2
INDEX PART 1 ENCYCLOPEDIA
Presentation encyclopedia 10
Vision, objective and realization, where around
Look differently, react differently 63
How a child experiences a situation or event will largely
determine his reaction.
Assertiveness youth theme 72
Assertiveness is the degree of self-confidence and
strength in your dealings with your environment. It is
something you have to a certain extent and that you can
develop further.
How to keep the balance positive ? 94
You can count on some things. Not on others. How does
the parent tilt the balance favorably?
Proactive development support 101
Parenting is more than rewarding or punishing. As a pa-
rent, you can proactively offer something to which your
child can react favorably.
Limiters - who or what stops me ? youth theme 109
As a young person you can stand for the task of slowing
down and limiting yourself.
3
From control to influence culture 119
What remains of the context in which I was raised? In
what context do I place the education that I give my
child?
Working together with the broad environment. Impor-
tance of social network 124
Parenting isn’t something you do on your own.
Reward and punishment. About development guidance
131
You reward to encourage behavior. How do you actually
do this in practice?
In your reach! youth theme 142
You often feel powerless as a young person. Is this al-
ways the case?
Development of meaning 149
There is a lot to learn to discover meanings and to gives
meanings for yourself as a child. Even harder is it to get
to know meanings that count for others.
Buffers as protection 160
Buffers ensure safety. They allow us to notice insecurity
on time. How to sensitize children for this?
4
Preventing burnout as a parent 168
How as a parent prevent to go under? Which signals can
you notice in time? How do you respond?
Out of the center 180
What if a child no longer identifies himself with the fa-
mily group?
Circular influence 188
What you say or do can be a reaction to your child. Your
reaction can then again be the starting point for the child
to which it in turn reacts.
Claim behavior, demanding a lot of attention 210
Every child needs attention. How to deal with it ?
What can coaching do for me ? youth theme 225
As a young person, much is still a dream to realize. With
discovering how to make this happen, via which roads
and with the help of what and who, you can be very
much at ease and help yourself.
Cognitions in parenting 230
Cognitions - as what you make of something - determine
your responding as a parent. This is also the case for the
child - what it makes of what you say and do - determines
his reaction.
5
Cognitive schemas and parenting 242
The development of the child coincides with the deve-
lopment of cognitive schemas. In the upbringing, the
child can be helped with the construction and filling of
cognitive schemas.
Communicative approach 268
How do you openly communicate with your child in an
open way as part of your upbringing ?
Communicative development child 272
In parenting, much attention is given to language and be-
havior development of the child. Less attention is given
to how communication develops in the child.
For a clear communication 288
Talking to your child is not always easy. A clear commu-
nication can offer more opportunities.
Phase-specific communication 300
Communication that accompanies someone's doing in
reality requires prior, during and afterwards conversa-
tion, in accordance with the different communication
phases.
A good contact with my child 310
Every parent wants a good contact with his child. What
does this mean a good contact?
6
Containment and holding in parenting 323
Children may need someone who knows how to cover
their emotions and can provide the necessary support
and protection.
From co-regulation to self-regulation 332
Adults play through the interactive process of co-regula-
tion an essential role in shaping and supporting self-re-
gulatory development of the child. Self-regulation as the
skill to get grip on emotions, needs and behavior and to
guide them.
Deconstruction & construction in parenting 346
Deconstruction is separating in our thoughts what
should better be not together. Construction is bringing
together in mind what helps and offers opportunities.
Partial grouping 361
Subgroups can arise in a group. This offers opportunities,
but at the same time involves risks.
Appeal which parts and sides ? 370
Each of us has parts that can become active and sides
that can be addressed to. How do these parts and sides
come into play ?
Thinking on 381
A thinking can be on or off. If it is on, a major influence
of this will be on the child's behavior and experiences.
7
Knowledge and thinking development 395
The development of know-how and thinking helps the
child to respond to questions and challenges.
Thinking about your parenting 404
Does thinking about your parenting confuse you, or does
it offer added value ?
By thinking 423
Take a moment to consider every day parenting, maybe
it brings you new ideas. Space to stop for a moment in
your upbringing can be to free yourself for new inspira-
tion.
Activation dialog 428
You want the other to perceive something like that and
react accordingly. The other does or does not respond to
this.
Direct and indirect approach 439
Want to focus your parenting directly on your child's be-
havior or indirectly focus on what surrounds it?
Keep distance and go on 446
Sometimes thoughts, feelings, memories and percep-
tions of yourself or of your environment bother you.
How to keep a distance and continue anyway?
8
Capacity & burden of the family 456
Also the family has a certain carrying capacity and has a
certain load capacity. These fluctuate over time.
Drug use child 473
It is not easy today as a parent to prevent your child from
having contact with drugs. What can you do preventively
and how can you respond? How to talk to your child, ac-
tivate his own forces and offer support with regard to
drug use ?
From pressure to attraction 488
What alternatives are there for pressure?
The child under pressure 505
Every child experiences pressure. Pressure is a signal that
asks for attention from parent and child.
External and internal pressure 513
A child adds internal pressure to external pressure. How
to avoid the pressure from becoming too high?
Dealing with pressure from your child 523
A child easily exerts pressure for what it wants or does
not want. How to deal with this as a parent?
9
For a favorable dynamic 541
An unfavorable dynamic can really get in the way of your
child. A favorable dynamic can help your child on his way.
Eating problems in children 550
The feeding of the child does not always go smoothly.
Where do you think about and how to react as a parent?
Referential guidance 559
Something that is going to turn around something gets
attention, so that something more favorable can hap-
pen: what about?
10
Presentation
encyclopedia
Vision, objective and realization
The encyclopedia (P)referential parenting and guidance
from A to Zprovides supportive information for family
and school. This is done in the form of a thematic inter-
active methodical approach. She focuses on educators
(parents, child care workers, teachers, pupil counselors,
educator-counselors, social workers) ánd young people.
The encyclopedia tries to translate scientific psycho-ped-
agogical insights and methodologies based on the very
latest (neuro)scientific research findings into concrete
This encyclopedia provides supportive parenting in-
formation for family and school.
The discussed parenting themes can also be found
on : https://www.opvoeding.be. These are freely ac-
cessible.
11
family and school contexts in a modular way. It is an ini-
tiative of the psychcom-research vzw training and re-
search center in Hove (Antwerp): info@opvoeding.be.
The focus in the encyclopedia is on parenting of the child
and on guidance in its dual sense. Guidance, on the one
hand for children with less need for explicit upbringing,
such as very young children, who require more develop-
mental stimulation; or older children, who require more
coaching. Guidance, on the other hand, in the form of
parental guidance, with particular attention to parents
as a person and their experiencing of being a parent. In
the encyclopedia there is so attention for child upbring-
ing, young child guidance, youth or adolescent guidance
and parent guidance.
At present there are already 600 specific alphabetically
ordered themes on development, parenting and guid-
ance available, each on itself. This corresponds to ap-
proximately 6,000 pages of information in book format.
The theme items are included in an alphabetically or-
dered database that forms the encyclopedia. All theme
items have also been developed for Internet, CD-ROM
and USB and can be found at www.opvoeding.be.
The encyclopedia follows an independent course and the
only objective is to make valuable scientific insights and
methods available for a broad audience, especially for
parents, teachers ánd young people. It can be concluded
12
that only part of these insights and methods can be
found in educational practice. In many cases, the same
approaches are used. This encyclopaedia wants to try to
fill this gap.
In the thematic components, a competence-enhancing
approach is chosen. This applies both to educators and
to children and young people. Attention is given to the
way of thinking, to the way of structuring and organizing,
and to the way of acting. This applies to both the parent,
the teacher, the child and the young person. The aim is
to add new ways of thinking, organizing and dealing in
education and development. In this way, more possibili-
ties can be made available and perhaps more specific sit-
uations in education and development can be played
out. The emphasis here is not so much on how to solve
problems, but on how to prevent problems through own
competences from acquired own and shared power and
strength. In other words, there is not so much a focus on
how to overcome weaknesses, but how to acquire
strengths. So an increased self-management and -regu-
lation as an individual and as a (family) group may be-
come possible within a larger whole. For example, an
attempt is made to prevent a great deal in ordinary up-
bringing in the ordinary environment, something that is
also referred to as 'normalising'. For example, an at-
tempt is made to prevent a great deal in ordinary up-
bringing in the ordinary environment, something that is
also referred to as 'normalising'. In this way an attempt
13
is made to prevent a great deal in ordinary upbringing in
the ordinary environment, something that is also re-
ferred to as 'normalising'. Ultimately, it wants to in-
crease parenting comfort for both parent and child, so
that mutual interaction runs more smoothly and more
and easier results are achieved in the desired direction.
So there should not be more, but just less.
Quality is set for each of the developed theme compo-
nents. To this end, a number of quality criteria are used
that each component must meet. These quality criteria
are:
* informative
* thematic
* process-oriented
* action-oriented
* context-oriented
* power oriented
* meta (contact) oriented
* user-centered
* inclusive
* overview focused
* situating
* methodically
* authentic
* experiential
* understandable language
* broad target audience
* minimal prior knowledge required
* illustrative
* innovative
14
* coherent
* increasing competency
* easily accessible
* gender inclusive language
* podcast friendly
The content has been kept as accessible as possible, yet
it is special. The quality criteria must guarantee this.
In this way, an attempt is made to make information im-
mediately available without a threshold and without ha-
ving to come forward with one’s own situation. But on
the contrary with respect for one's own situation and
own vulnerability and in a non-committal manner. He-
reby avoiding to create a feeling of inadequacy or com-
promising existing trust.
Providing information plays a key role. It should allow to
become more aware of one's own behavior and possible
reaction to it. The idea is that by looking more consciou-
sly or differently to an upbringing situation, a more cons-
cious or appropriate upbringing reaction becomes pos-
sible. Through the included interactive element in each
component, an attempt is made to link up with the pa-
rent or teacher and with one's own experience. So these
try to allow them to start a new experience that can in-
volve a certain evolution. Here there is not always a fo-
cus on what a parent can do, but also or first of all a focus
on what the child needs to develop. For example, to in-
15
vite parents to think and not to emphasize their own pa-
renting behavior, but to assume the situation for the pa-
rent. In order to be able to come up with solutions more
easily as a parent, without getting stuck in repetitive pa-
renting patterns that complicate being a parent. In this
way, not to perceive parent acting as determined only by
one's own upbringing, but as a result of a complex inter-
play of situation and parent. Here it is important for the
parent to start from their own situation and actions,
their own story and experience, and their own strength,
and to give them a place and also a space. Such as a fee-
ling of being able, which sometimes turns into po-
werlessness. Or feelings of joy and affection, which go
hand in hand with feelings of sadness and distance. Or
attention and care for oneself as a starting point to be
able to give attention and care to the child. Or not to
claim knowing the how as a parent, but looking for the
how together with the child.
Fundamental psychological and pedagogical research is
now making such a progression that it is obliged to re-
write a number of educational insights and approaches.
In this encyclopaedia, parents and teachers are trying to
do this for a number of themes.
As a parent or teacher you expect a lot from the environ-
ment as support in your task as an educator. You easily
feel like you want to count on others. You expect the
necessary help from the environment and society. That
16
contribution is however lacking easily, or at least you
have this feeling. In the theme sections, you will exa-
mine what you can do yourself to not experience these
consequences of standing to much alone. Often as a pa-
rent or teacher you will determine that it is for your ac-
count and that what you do can make the difference. In
the theme sections you try to offer help and support.
As a parent and teacher you can occasionally, often more
than you expect, come into behavior embarrassment.
This is easily accompanied by a feeling of powerlessness.
You have no influence on the child, while he has to deal
with the same problems over and over again. A don't
know anymore, as if blocked. Nothing gets done in any
way. Your knowledge and skills as parents and teachers
threaten to fall short. Usually you expect something
from the child that does not work. The danger then
exists of putting the child under pressure, with even
more risk of not succeeding. If you leave it that way, you
will fear that something will never change, at the same
time the child will be given a powerful tool that may in-
crease in frequency and the child might eventually take
over from you. You can easily fall back on your own
upbringing, or you appeal to your immediate environ-
ment, relatives or friends. But even then it is easy to see
that you do not get useful instructions.
In the theme components, the aim is to provide insight-
17
enhancing, action-oriented and contextually linked in-
formation. Information that mainly explains how some-
thing could happen. Which processes are present and
how they could respond to them. Attention is given to
sharing of each and of what is present, and what the in-
put of each and of what is present, could be. Today pa-
rents realize more than before that they do not always
know and do not always see it. In the media they tell you
about it, without hesitation. This means that there is re-
cognition for not being the ideal parent and to be able to
be searching. At the same time, it turns out that parents
are now more inclined to lean towards something more
strict in order not to go into action. Perhaps the higher
pace of life is something behind this. Patient search and
encouragement requires more time. Possibly also it is
related to the imbalance, according to some people, of
too little directive, sometimes too over-crowding and
leaving too much room for the child when they do not
know.
Many parents intend to have fun from and with their
child. This soon turns out to be less easy than expected.
As a parent you can easily show behavior insecurity.
Whether something is possible, whether you can best
handle something. In the encyclopedia, an attempt is
made to reduce this uncertainty from the perspective of
the opportunities and risks of own actions. Also in indi-
cating which actions in a concrete patenting situation of-
fers more opportunities with fewer risks. In this way,
18
one's own actions are confirmed or optimized, or useful
alternatives for their own actions are provided. Starting
from your own actions it is indicated how it can become
even more optimal. Rather than questioning one's own
parent- or teacher-dealing, one can try to find a way to
add value. It takes into account the rapidly evolving time
with new possibilities and challenges, making parenting
an increasingly complex task. The encyclopedia wants to
help parents and children gain strength in this increasin-
gly complex reality by looking for contemporary ans-
wers. So that both can find what suits them and gives
them more opportunities, so that they do not give up or
get them in overdrive. The intention is therefore cer-
tainly not to make parents insecure and weak, but rather
to let them gain and strengthen their confidence on the
basis of scientific input. As a parent, for example, you
may develop negative thoughts and feelings towards
your child, which can easily make you stiff and stuck. By
looking for how you can deal with these thoughts and
feelings differently and how to activate other thoughts
or feelings, it will allow more flexibility, something will be
is less in the way and there will be room for change and
a different reaction. This way you can transfer from
where you want to go away to where you want to go the
way. So you can give full attention to your growth op-
portunities.
In this encyclopaedia, the young person is also consi-
19
dered a full-fledged party or steakholder in the educati-
onal process. After all, it is him or her who is in the cen-
ter of the education process. He or she is considered as
an active 'agent' who colors the upbringing event and in-
dicates content and form as 'agency' or influence. This
implies attention to freedom of choice, behavioral space
and personally colored right to exist. This is apparent
from the age- and gender-specific approach in upbrin-
ging. There are, for example, theme elements that spe-
cifically address the young person and offer informative
help in his development. They were given the name
youth theme.
In the upbringing it is also the young person who in his
actions asks for specific parenting needs in perspective
to his development. Parenting needs where the upbrin-
ging of the environment can best be connected to as well
as possible. Thus both, young one and adult, are invol-
ved at the same time. This is based on the individuality
of each child and each young person. Individuality that
requires its own parenting approach for each.
This can also open the perspective for the adult to be-
come more aware of what parenting and development
processes mean for the child and the young person.
What they mean to them, how something is experienced
by them and how they react to it and try to exert influ-
ence.
20
This approach from child and young person contribute
to a child's reflex in the adult, of what his actions and the
present situation imply for the child. Something that asks
for feelers of how something is and appears to the child
or young person of the given and experienced parenting.
In this way, the safety and well-being of the child can be
prevented and, if desired, they can be restored with the
necessary support. This is discussed in, among other
things: parenting stress in the child, when it no longer
works between yourself and your child and my mom or
dad easily lose their temper. Something that can raise
such concerns as parents where they wants to work on.
This brings the child into the picture and makes it clear
where to pay attention to.
In this work, therefore, much attention is paid to the vul-
nerability of the child. A child is often unable to assess
the quality of the care and upbringing received. It often
tries to adapt to the care and upbringing situation and
circumstances and to learn from it in order to function
and develop as optimally as possible in that environ-
ment. Not only the child, but often also the parent is in-
sufficiently aware of the possible lack of quality. If the
care and upbringing received is problematic, the child is
often consciously unable to interpret this, but it does
show emotional and behavioral reactions that point to
possible chronic stress present in a context that is not
very suitable for the child and its development. The work
21
pays attention to this child's stress and possible emotio-
nal and behavioral reactions in order to prevent this if
possible, so that better functioning and development
opportunities can arise for the child. More specifically, it
tries to do something about it by providing a more opti-
mal living and development environment with more ap-
propriate guidance and upbringing. It provides informa-
tion and a framework for it. In this way, it may be possi-
ble to avoid a great deal of powerlessness being expe-
rienced on the part of the parent(s) and the child, resul-
ting in inappropriate mutual reactions. The information
provided must allow each to be situated in what is hap-
pening, what each is doing and what is possible. Hence
informative parenting support.
As a parent you consciously or unconsciously work to-
wards self-regulation of your child. For what the child
can not yet do, as a parent you take care of by co-regu-
lation. Co-regulation that helps the child and supports it
to develop more and more self-regulation. Especially the
way in which something can or does succeed will be
given attention in co-regulation, in order to help the
child find the way to self-regulation. It is particular this
method of regulation that will receive attention in this
encyclopaedia. The younger the child, the more co-regu-
lation will be needed, the older the child the more self-
regulation becomes possible. The younger the child, the
more important the co-regulation, in order to avoid that
the child is missing a step or facet in his development
22
with consequences for later. Co-regulation appears to
work in two ways. One, in which the parent helps the
child to find his own way. Two, where the child helps the
parent find the way to him or her. As the child grows
older the more self-regulation can be worked on. Such
as how to deal itself with experienced emotions, how to
keep communicating, how to stay itself in a group, how
to deal with expectations and realities, how to arm itself
against risk situations and how to meet encountered
problems and how to solve them.
From the perspective of the broad living environment,
the child is approached in an emancipatory, empowering
and participatory manner, so that it comes to its own as
an authentic person with individual meaning and active
contribution, who occupies a full place in his living envi-
ronment. A broad living environment that offers the ne-
cessary resources and protection for this.
This two-sided approach is fairly new because usually
only the adult perspective is taken in raising, as if only it
determines the upbringing. By thinking in terms of up-
bringing processes, this perspective changes to both pa-
renting actors, young one and adult and their mutual in-
teraction and relation. For example, each parenting
event is unique due to the share and interaction of adults
and young people. Most of the theme components are
therefore aimed at both as full partners in the upbringing
event.
23
Parenting is in this sense double layered. On the one
hand there is the encounter of parent and child as two
equal beings who share their lives together, interact with
each other in an equal manner, are involved with each
other and grow together. With an eye for meeting with
the wider environment of the family. This forms the ethi-
cal dimension and requires respectful and solidarity-ba-
sed interaction. On the other hand, there is the guidance
of the parent in the development of the child. To this
end, the parent offers the child care and support and
creates space and time to grow. This constitutes the pe-
dagogical dimension and requires a helpful approach.
Parents today invest more time and energy in their child
and his development. The child means a lot to the pa-
rent, especially emotionally. It also determines the iden-
tity of the parent. Parenthood partly determines who
they are, alongside all other partial entities. Parents are
increasingly demanding of themselves and want to offer
quality. They want to give their child every opportunity
and a happy childhood. This requires a lot of effort. They
account for an increasing share of this. At the same time,
they allow their child more input and a larger share. The
parent means so much to the child. The parent-child in-
teraction is more intense today than before. For parents
this means a more involved and intensive way of paren-
ting.
In some cases, the deep feelings towards each other in
24
the family may be somewhat underborn by troubles in
daily life. This often happens because people do not al-
ways know how to deal with each other. The needs of
each other as the need of other members of the fami-
ly - may also have been lost and are little or no longer
addressed by the daily tensions and conflicts. By indica-
ting possibilities and ways to reduce and overcome ob-
stacles, tensions and conflicts, so that the unfavorable
reality and discussions can be lifted, room for these deep
feelings and needs towards each other can come in
place. Small successive successes can then gradually ini-
tiate a change process and provide the energy for further
steps towards each other. By bringing these feelings and
needs back to each other, they can also immediately of-
fer a basis for moving towards each other.
Finally, there are theme items that specifically target
adults. This specifically concerns parenting, as what
means the upbringing for the adult. This parent dimen-
sion is placed in the theme components next to the pa-
renting dimension.
In the scientific encyclopaedia, for example, there is
plenty of attention for parenting and guidance for child-
ren and young people. But in addition, a lot of attention
is also paid to parenthood, in the form of parenthood-
oriented information and guidance. Where in parenting
and guidance the child and the younger are central, pa-
rents are central in parenthood. Parenthood is seen as
25
broader than parenting. The offered upbringing can
end, the parenthood is not. Moreover, parents are not
only parent, but also partners, members of one or more
communities and a person on its own. For example, at-
tention is paid to the broader social context of parents,
by which someone gains meaning and comes into its
right as a person. How can favorable relationships be
built and positive relationships developed, so that a so-
cial network is created, which can be counted on if ne-
cessary and which indirectly benefits the parenting and
the upbringing and development of the child. Pa-
renthood is thus also seen as encompassing the upbrin-
ging. In the parent-child relationship there is not only
your upbringing, but also the cohabitation relationship
with your child, the emotional bond and commitment to
your child, your new parental identity, your sociocultural
background, your continuing social relationships and
your time perspective (parenting history and future per-
spective). In the encyclopedia, therefore, support is of-
fered in parenting, but also in parenthood. Not only are
the well-being and the development of the child and the
younger, the well-being and the development of the pa-
rent as a person also receive full attention. In addition
to the child perspective and dealing with the child, there
is attention to the parent perspective and dealing with
oneself as a parent. The parent is put in the centre here.
How could you do that being a parent, what does it en-
tail, where and when are you a parent, why or for what
26
purpose? How do you deal with the parent you someti-
mes are, but don't really want or cant be ? Paying at-
tention not give a number of additional conditions for
being parent or to put forward a number of qualities that
must imply power and strength for the parent.
For example, parental feelings and stress - up to burnout
- are discussed. The stages of life of parents as a couple
are discussed as well as the development phases of the
child. Furthermore, the thinking development and set-
ting of the parent as a person and how this reflects on
the parenting offered. This means attention to the pa-
rent's interest next to the interests of the child. Like, for
example, how as a parent to pay attention to yourself,
yourself as well as a human being, and so on. This in-
cludes attention to questions, thoughts, feelings, needs
and concerns for the parent and as a person. As a parent,
you may know well how to parent, but there can be
something in yourself that is bothering you. Something
that you have little insight into, and about which more
information can be helpful in understanding and dealing
appropriately with the child.
Separate attention is paid to being a parent in relation to
the child. What does the child evoke in you as a parent ?
What is activated in you as a parent in contact with your
child ? What thoughts, feelings, needs and reaction ten-
dencies do you experience as a parent in dealing with
27
your child ? In what situation do you feel placed as a pa-
rent interacting with your child ? How much does the
child ask of you as a parent ? How much attention, time
and energy does the child demand from you as a parent?
Does what the child asks for, correspond to what you
want to offer as a parent ?
So it is proposed to start questions about parenthood
with questions about parenting. How to feel like a pa-
rent? How to grow in the role of parent ? What evolu-
tion to have gone through ? How to experience paren-
thood ? What it demands from you ? What it makes
difficult ? Whether it matches your presentation of
being parent ? Whether it meets your initial needs to be
a parent ? This is based on the assumption that a parent
who feels good about himself has it easier to raise a
child. Attention to being a parent in this work is aimed
at getting to know oneself better, taking oneself into ac-
count better, dealing with oneself better and being more
oneselves.
Today, there is a lot of attention for the relationship bet-
ween parent and child and its quality and sustainability.
A good and open parent-child relationship often forms a
solid basis for upbringing and development. In this work,
the nature of this relationship and its aspects and dimen-
sions are discussed in detail. In this way parent and child
can grow together and it can lead to a joint education
and development. Where people used to think in terms
28
of the child that needs to be raised and the parent that
needs to raise, people are now thinking in terms of the
relationship between parent and child and how this can
contribute to the shared challenge of developing and
education together. Together they are then responsible
for development and education. This goes beyond a in-
teractional or transactional proces. It is more about a
joint project and proces. For example are discussed :
connected parenting, partner and parent-child rela-
tionship, favorable parent-child relationship and parent-
child relationship as a basis.
More in general the context, as an important actor, re-
ceives plenty of attention. Both the real context as a
whole of small-scale and large-scale cohabitation, as the
ideal context as the whole of beliefs, values and norms
with which someone has to deal. Much is only expressed,
or is only relevant in a certain context. How is thought or
felt, how is acted or reacted and what something or so-
meone is like in reality, often requires triggers of what is
present in a specific situation as a trigger or activator.
For example, parenting questions or problems can be
linked to a certain situation or phase in someone's deve-
lopment and not so much to someone's person, beha-
vior or parenting history. For example, it is known that
certain difficulties only arise in unfavorable cir-
cumstances. By doing or changing something about that
situation, the difficulty can disappear or diminish, so that
29
it can be resolved or become more manageable to re-
solve. Any situation problem less is than a step in the
right direction. A term like growing up that stands for
becoming older, refers to the context in which this hap-
pens, both external and internal context. Both of these
contexts influence the existing and possible develop-
ments and the formation of identity and the opportuni-
ties or risks in this regard. Living in (disadvantaged) po-
verty or being ill, disabled, addicted or having a disorder,
often means that less development is possible or at a lo-
wer level. The living environment can be very decisive for
the development of personality and identity of the child,
such as living in a warm, familiar and stable environment,
or rather in a distant, unstable and critical environment,
an environment in which expected and desired or just
not, and so on. Attention is not only paid to the parent-
child relationship, but also to the family-child rela-
tionship and for the development of one's own network
as a surrounding context. The broader external context
such as society, culture and current times, such as virtual
online, also have a major influence on growing up. For
example, in addition to striving to strengthen one's own
strength, there is plenty of attention here for activating
surrounding social networks. The support of these net-
works mainly aims to work preventively and to increase
one's own strengths.
The attention for the child, the parent as educator and
the educational context are not approached here only in
30
isolation, but especially in connection with each other.
Thus, according to the transactional parenting model,
the child, the educator and the educational context are
the three actors in the dynamic circular process of pa-
renting, in which there is a mutual influence between
these three. The context often forms a condition for
something to be expressed or offered. At the same time,
child, educator and their mutual interaction help shape
the educational environment. In this way, it may be pos-
sible to join forces in parenting and jointly figuring out
and agreeing how it best can be done, as a joint quest
that offers opportunities for better ideas and dealing
with more well-being.
The encyclopedia also spends plenty of attention to the
time dimension, both on an individual and social level.
Individual attention is paid to the child from conception
to adulthood and to the parent from young parent to
grandparent. Social attention is paid to parenting and
parenthood in the past, in the present and also in the
future, with attention to the future of parenting and to
parenting for the future.
The information provided is therefore situated in the
current, constantly changing social framework of the so-
ciety. After all, the challenges parents and children face
today are constantly increasing in number and size.
Think of the increasing diversity, the disappearance of
the big stories, such as a religion that offered something
31
to hold on to, the globalization, the internet and social
media and networks, the inverse pyramid of authority,
the endless possibilities and at the same time limitations,
the blurring of categories and at the same time the in-
crease, the pervasive computerization, scientificization
and professionalization and the difficulties to control
pandemics.
Keeping in mind the context that you as a parent or child
can do something about and that is within your reach
and the context that is a given for you and which is
beyond your reach. In both cases this can have an effect
on the upbringing and thinking about it. In the first case
you can play and take your own responsibility, in the se-
cond case you can't. Bearing in mind the risk that the so-
cial situation and responsibility are passed on to the per-
sonal situation and responsibility, without paying atten-
tion to its coherence.
Nobody can predict the future anymore, not in the short
and long term. Every reason to gain in resilience and to
let it develop. So to prevent vulnerability, or to see it as
an opportunity for development. One can speak of a con-
tinuous transition of the society in which old patterns are
no longer useful and new patterns are not yet present or
not sufficiently flexible. How to deal with this and how to
respond to this as a family group is discussed below. The
increasing complexity of society can best be seen as a
given that you can trust and you are used to, and from
32
which you can start, without being overwhelmed by it or
losing control.
Attention to the time dimension also means attention to
change. Such as making parents and children aware of
and let them recognize that change and growth are pos-
sible and that they are in fact continuously present. Thus
in this way increasing empowerment. This can be done,
among other things, by discovering new coping me-
chanisms, how to use previous personal experience, to
realize that the brain has the capacity to change, taking
advantage of opportunities to grow, how to step outside
the comfort zone, how goal setting works together with
motivation and how to achieve goals.
In this encyclopedia, space has therefore been made for
a number of additional developmental aspects and areas
that are easily overlooked in education. Not only do pa-
rents often fail to pay sufficient attention to certain as-
pects and areas when dealing with their child, certain as-
pects and areas are also largely neglected in works on
upbringing and development. Attention to these deve-
lopmental aspects and areas should allow you as a pa-
rent to let the child develop skills in those areas. This at-
tention to this can mainly have a preventive effect be-
cause it often concerns less developed competences in
the child, which, however, if present, can increase self-
regulation and resilience. Supplement means an comple-
ment and addition. Complement of what was still little
33
or not offered attention or was not central in the deve-
lopment of the child and the upbringing offered by
adults. Also an addition of what has received little or no
attention or has been central in thinking and theory and
methodical education to date. This encyclopedia deals
with, among other things: development of favorable dy-
namics, emotional competence, development of cogni-
tive schemas and knowledge schema exploration, com-
municative development as a supplement for language
development, development of prosocial behavior and
social integration, development of one's own strength,
moral development, personal developmental plan, dea-
ling with changes, equilibration, self-regulation and self-
efficacy and development of the search, influence and
selection function of the child.
In our current complex society with its high degree of
instability and change, there is an increasing need for the
child to develop its own strengths. By pointing out these
own strengths of the child, it is also possible to respond
more specifically to them in the upbringing. In this way
preventive possibilities can be developed to deal with
the countless situations and challenges that children and
young people face today, or even to play a central role in
dealing or solution-oriented response. In this way, both
parents and children can increasingly develop a powerful
feeling and have less of a feeling that things are escaping
them, things over which they seem to have no influence
or control. This work aims to additionally highlight some
34
of these developmental aspects and areas, without in-
creasing the pressure on parents. Not even more, but
better less. Rather, perhaps partly different, which may
make it less demanding in the long run. This is because
solid foundations are laid in the development, on which
you can count on and build on. Memory and cognition
schemes play a central role in this story. It concerns pro-
cessed own experience stored in the memory and infor-
mation obtained from the experience of others. In this
way, in contemporary scientific thinking with attention
to information and neuroscientific processing, the ac-
tions of a child or young person are increasingly seen as
memory-determined and centered.
The parental approach in the past easily created dis-
tance, misunderstanding, hierarchy and immutability.
Think, for example, of an authoritarian upbringing or of
punishment and reward as a method. The current ap-
proach offers opportunities for proximity, understan-
ding, equality, changeability and is committed to this.
Think, for example, of authoritative parenting or bonding
parenting. Where previously communication was diffi-
cult due to the requirements or expectations, there is
now more optimal communication due to a listening at-
titude or supportive approach. Where previously the re-
lationship was regarded as less or of little importance,
now the relationship and its quality are paramount.
Where previously the parent was central and was the
starting point and the measure, now the child is central
35
and forms the starting point and the measure. Being a
parent used to consist of holding on and staying in one's
role, in being a parent there is now room for being able
to let go (for a while) and knowing how to step out of his
role, the parent is thus more than just being a parent.
Parenting thus depends on many actors as well as on
existing factors and processes that influence the child
and its development. In this way, forces specific to actors
can be activated or addressed in parenting, some factors
can be influenced in favor and existing processes can be
optimized and activated in a targeted manner.
Education is fundamental to one's life and development.
It lays a foundation for one's functioning and influences
one's later thinking and experience and one's behavior
and dealings. It provides both forms and contents that
help guide someone’s life and direction. It characterizes
someone for his further life and development. Education
is very unique, so is its influence and impact. It is at the
root of difference. Education can be more or less impli-
cit, but it is never neutral.
So much scientific research has already been done, that
this requires order and systematization. This systema-
tization allows to get an overview of the various
(researched) parental situations and opportunities. In
this way it allows you to situate yourself as a parent or
young person and to discover and oversee the available
36
possibilities. This way, an informed choice and selection
can be made of what fits best with you and the situation
and this can be added. For example, it allows you to si-
tuate yourself as a parent or young person in what you
do and is possible.
This encyclopedia is not so much about how to get con-
trol of your child's upbringing as an adult. Rather, it is
about how to influence your child's upbringing with res-
pect for your child as a person. The first finds its origin
mainly in science, the second in philosophy and ethics
around it. The first is hierarchical, the second egal and
solidary. Science is one, how you deal with its findings is
two. After all, it is up to you to find out how you can deal
with the various scientific findings and what they can
mean for you. Freedom of choice and space for this, ta-
king into account your own actions and your concrete si-
tuation, are crucial. You can read more about this in
'Deontology in parenting aid' (Franck, 1989) and in the
theme section 'From control culture to influence culture'
of this encyclopedia.
This differs from parenting information that is often pre-
sented as parenting advice in a or-or form. In this case,
the proposed form of parenting is presented as prefe-
rable, or as the mode of parenting. Other types of paren-
ting are then often presented as less desirable, or
avoided for a number of reasons listed. In this encyclo-
paedia, it has been decided to place valuable methods of
37
parenting side by side, with attention for their possibili-
ties and for how they are working process-wise. This is
more about an and-and story with attention to what
each of these modes of parenting can be used in which
specific situations. This without wanting to pretend or
claim anything, but rather to contribute in a modest and
appropriate way.
Consequently, this work does not pursue a reductionist
or prescribing perspective. But there is rather taken an
expansive and informative perspective. There is no con-
verging punctual direction, but a divergent all-encom-
passing representation is sought. Education and paren-
ting are not reduced to something, but what is present
and what can be added is sought. It is also not attempted
to convince, but to stimulate one's own thinking.
For example, when attention is paid to the neuroscienti-
fic contribution to parenting, no reduction is intended
from child or parent to their brain and its development,
but the brain is seen as involved in childhood and paren-
thood and the development of it. The aim is not to make
a point, but an attempt is made to cover all points and to
give them their place. Nothing is magnified for one's own
story, but rather everything is nuanced for the multitude
of stories. Not one presentation is central, but space is
offered for several presentations. Also, not too far-
reaching distractions are made with regard to parenting
practice, but an attempt is made to stick to the research
38
facts. Informing, not advising is the order of the day. Des-
cribing, not confirming or indicating preference is the
orientation.
In the encyclopaedia, the emphasis is on development
and parental processes, interactions and contexts. Not
so much the development and parental factors or cha-
racteristics. Factors and characteristics lead (too) easily
to labels and categories that are difficult to get rid of and
that focus unilaterally on something as if nothing else is
out there. Processes, interactions and contexts rather
offer a description that forms a basis for acting and dea-
ling with it. They are rather diffuse and leave room for
something outside. The emphasis is therefore not so
much on what and who. The emphasis is more on how
and which. Which processes and influences are no-
ticeable for both parents and children and how these
processes and influences could be anticipated to opti-
mize them for development and upbringing. In this way,
parenting is conceived as a development and learning
process in which you can grow. This is done without si-
tuating the origin of the less fluent education with you,
and not you as only responsible to succeed. Similarly,
this work helps to understand how potentially unfavo-
rable processes, such as polarization and radicalization
processes, arise and work, by means of the central con-
cept of cognitive or character. It then shows you how
you can work on depolarization and deradicalisation
39
from this insight. Finally, it also indicates how these pro-
cesses may link up with existing failures and disruptions.
In this sense, the encyclopedia is psycho- and socio-edu-
cational. With psycho- and socio-education is meant to
give more insight, more vigor and more control by ex-
plaining exactly what is going on, showing which pro-
cesses (psycho) and interactions occur in specific con-
texts (socio), and letting experience what mechanisms
there are to exert influence in favor and which me-
chanisms go away from what is unfavorable. By giving
visibility, by articulating and by making it experienceable
and workable, further skill can grow o act with more in-
sight and more impact.
The encyclopaedia aims to provide a certain level of
meta in concrete thinking and acting as a parent and tea-
cher in daily educational situations. So there is not only
what you think and do, but also a certain awareness.
This way, an insight and consideration moment can al-
ways be built-in. In this way, you can also incorporate a
moment of choice into your reaction, so that a reaction
with added value becomes possible. Because of this
greater awareness, you can better tailor your interaction
and better situate yourself between other possible reac-
tions. Your reflection creates more room to better at-
tune your actions to perceived needs for guidance with
40
your child. By keeping a mental view, by following, thin-
king ahead, guiding and reflecting, you get a better grip
on your actions.
By being able to situate yourself better, you also get to
know yourself better. Like what is typical of your way of
thinking and acting and who you are. Which, moreover,
this specifically goes back and at when somewhere be-
fore. This way you discover how what is specific to you
may be a resource, or a stand in the way, and how you
can change this.
Rather than questioning parent- and teacher-dealing, it
wants to offer a basis for this action. Parents and tea-
chers can experience support through this substantia-
tion. It also makes it clear to them how they can evolve
in their actions and offers the necessary support to know
these steps.
Rather than indicate anything from the outside about
the what and how of parenting and teacher-behavior.
From the inside the starting point is the what and how of
parent and teacher-dealing with respect for their own
context. What and how something is for the parent or
teacher. This should allow not to seek answers, but to
come to formulate their own answers. Rather than at-
tempt to provide answers, parents and teachers are sup-
ported to come up with their own answers and so gain own
power and strength.
41
Parents are rather presented as experienced and com-
petent. Parenting is not approached too quickly as if it is
beyond their possibilities and power. Parenting is also
not taken for granted. Nor is it taken for more, rather for
otherwise. Parenting is quite a challenge and difficulties
are considered to be associated with it. These difficulties
are often tied to the development phase of the child. By
informing parents, an attempt is made to increase their
options for action and to allow them to gain their own
and shared strength, so that they can cope with their ac-
tual challenges. However, if the problems encountered
threaten to exceed their own possibilities and forces,
outside help is recommended. This may be due to the
increase in problems, their timeliness, their intensity, du-
ration or recurrence. Even then parents can be sup-
ported from their vulnerability to have an increasing
share in the solution together with the child.
In a school context, there is a clear question of how to
stimulate social behavior so that young people develop
to deal responsibly with their environment and so that
roughness of behavior can be prevented. The develop-
ment of healthy behavior and learning and work strate-
gies also require attention. As well as learning to control
someone own behavior and dealing with stress and ten-
sion. In many countries, therefore, understanding expe-
riences and behavior is central in a school context. This
to acquire competences that help development and
learning.
42
In the encyclopedia the development of the child is put
central. To make this possible, parenting can make a
contribution. In the encyclopaedia this development-
supporting meaning and function of upbringing is ad-
dressed.
To give space to the own character of the child and the
adult and let them come to their right, is a central star-
ting point. Rather than disturbing present processes and
interactions, trying to them gain quality. Attempts are
made to make what is and happens visible and to offer
possibilities to improve the quality of the interaction.
The whole was developed from a supportive perspec-
tive, for both parent and child, in which polarization is
prevented. This happened by not thinking in terms of
(unfavorable) judgments: such as spoiledor 'ungrateful
children, 'unrespectful', 'unreasonable', ‘boundless’ or
'egocentricyoung people, or overprotective' or 'pam-
pering parents, or 'mutually opposed’ or uncertain ma-
king' pedagogical experts. In other words, there is atten-
tion, not for what goes wrong and who is wrong, but
there is attention to how together from everyone's
strength the quality can be improved. So that it does not
turn out to be who is faced with whom, but it is a search
for what to support together. In this way not choosing
the track of more panic with negative representation of
children, young people, parents and pedagogical ex-
perts. Such as, for example, the child as a risk or problem
43
child, the upbringing shifted to school education, experts
as depriving spontaneity and intuition and alienating.
Support is not provided here for the sake of not being
able to handle it alone, which might support suggest. It
is based on their own autonomy and independence. Nor
is it an attempt to make parents professionals, but more
competent and with more options and possibilities, ba-
sed on their own autonomy. No attempt is made to strive
for or achieve professionalism for parents while maste-
ring all possibilities. But it is precisely to allow parents to
explore useful new possibilities based on their own act-
ions, situation and strength. This without feeling obliged
to choose with so much freedom and possibilities.
Parenting support therefore does not have the connota-
tion that parents can no longer or are not allowed to do
it alone. On the contrary, it tries to respect and streng-
then their independence, without imposing anything on
them, but making alternatives available. So that they can
still gain in self-assurance and self-confidence. For
example, the quality of upbringing can be further enhan-
ced by making information available if it is desired.
In this encyclopedia it was decided not to do this in a
language for professionals or experts, but to opt for a
universal design when providing insights and behavior.
Preference is given to the language of parents or tea-
chers. Even more, where possible, preference was given
44
to the language of the child or the young person to
whom it ultimately goes. Not what professionals say, but
what can something mean to me as an adult, or how can
it be useful for the child or the young person in develop-
ment.
Rather than winning the reader for something in the en-
cyclopedia, an attempt is made to bring together multi-
ple insights and to possibly build bridges. Attempts are
being made to broaden the horizon so that a better lo-
cation of one's own upbringing situation and action, and
a more specific choice and response become possible.
Sometimes focusing on parental competence is called
demanding and disruptive, as this would result in paren-
tal insecurity and confusion. It is meant that a scientific
approach would have insufficient eye and respect for its
own complex educational reality and would require pro-
fessionalism.
In other words, use is made here of a distinction bet-
ween an empirical scientific perspective with diagnoses
and advice and a philosophical framework and meta-ap-
proach that allows for more personality and more speci-
fically the individuality of the parent, the child and their
context. The first is then indicted and the second then
acts as prosecutor.
45
However, this latter philosophical insight may still re-
quire more competence than to conform to empirical
findings. In this encyclopedia both dimensions are
treated as competences for this purpose, the first empi-
rically-scientifically substantiated with emphasis on in-
forming and not advising, the second as philosophical-
scientific and ethical with emphasis on own experience
and thinking. These two dimensions or layers are ap-
proached in encounter with each other and in what they
can mean for each other.
As scientific knowledge increases, some scientists
become worried about the use of this knowledge. They
fear that scientific diagnoses and advice make parents
insecure. They suggest that parents better follow their
own compass and gut feeling and ignore scientific in-
sights and findings. At most they can exchange ideas
with each other as experience experts. With a risk today
of 'sharenting', where via the social media too much con-
tent about or outgoing from own children is shared,
therefore also called 'oversharenting'. In this sharing
with each other, more and more organization is pursued,
in accordance with the trend towards the socialization of
care as no longer just a matter for the government. Pa-
rents, citizens, volunteers and professionals work toge-
ther around everything related to education, from the
motto upbringing, you don’t do it as a parent alone. So
locally organized volunteer work is linked to informal
educational help, also known as educational civil society.
46
With the risk, however, of an unequal distribution of
upbringing support through initiative from below. In this
context, social meeting spaces with a range of games
and meeting options are provided, without specific di-
rection or preconceived purpose. Parents and children
can meet each other and exchange experiences and
ideas that can be enriching. Parents find recognition and
social and emotional support there, can learn from each
other and, through the diversity encountered, better si-
tuate and measure themselves and their actions. In this
way they can gain self-confidence and a sense of self-
worth. The importance of support from one's own social
network is also pointed out. Research by the Social Cul-
tural Planning Office in the Netherlands shows in parti-
cular that support from one's own social network often
has positive effects and advantages for parents. Howe-
ver, it can sometimes also bring uncertainty, as it turns
out. It also appears that being able to fall back on a social
network is less often possible for parents in a vulnerable
position. There appeared to be limits to the support
sought for privacy reasons and out of shame, parents do
not always want to share their situation and problems.
Another fear is that parents would blindly follow scienti-
fic developments closely and become afraid of making
mistakes by deviating from them in their thinking and ac-
tions. That instead of more options, only one way and
manner would remain. This out of concern for parents to
47
disadvantage their child or even cause harm. This con-
cern is stronger in Anglo-Saxon countries. More specifi-
cally, the numerous recent neuroscientific findings
would oblige parents to follow a neurodiscourse in pa-
renting that focuses primarily on the brain development
of their child. As if their child and its development could
be reduced to this. There is then talk of one-sided neu-
roparenting that would limit both the parent and the
child in their freedom. But here too it appears that it is
not entirely possible to eliminate parenting insecurity,
that a nuanced, faithful and appropriate translation of
research is necessary if it is to be useful and that it is dan-
gerous to reduce the child to its brain and parenting to
development of its brain.
Because we start from the independence and autonomy
of parents and young people and we only want to streng-
then and support parents and young people, rather than
confuse and weaken them, we chose to inform parents
and young people about the various available knowledge
and the range of also new possibilities. In this way we
want to leave the initiative to parents and young people
to inform themselves and make or strengthen their own
choices. This all is not based on a weakness or gap that
must be eliminated, on the contrary, parents and young
people are recognized and validated in their strengths
and forces. The optics are therefore rather bidirectional,
what can each learn from each other, rather seeking ba-
lance and dosed, which possible contribution each can
48
have and not reducing or persistent, but just opening up
and expanding with the necessary nuances. Perhaps to
join forces here too and find out together and agree on
how it best can be done, as a joint quest that offers op-
portunities for better ideas and dealing with more well-
being.
We outline the various options, so that this information
is available if required, without including the expert role
of diagnostician or consultant. Leaving users all (paren-
tal) freedom. Our point of view here is not to withhold
parents or young people from scientific information or
to put them in perspective. In this way we hope to allow
them to inform themselves about what they are doing
and what is possible in addition.
So this work is not about telling parents what to do. It's
more about pointing out options. No formulations as ad-
vice to be followed, but offering a possibility and oppor-
tunity to think for themselves and make their own choi-
ces. Taking into account available information, one's
own situation and one's own strength.
The encyclopaedia is primarily focused on a preventive
educational approach. This does not alter the fact that
a lot of information can be used in a more problematic
educational framework.
49
For each theme section at the back, a number of questi-
ons are provided for inspiration. They can help concre-
tize and apply the insights and methods provided.
What is addressed in education in a micro environment,
such as the family, can have a certain relevance for the
interaction in a macro environment, such as the society.
Similar stresses as a result of communication and in-
fluencing methods can, for example, be recognized. At
the same time, solution methods linked to more harmo-
nious communication and influence methods in a family
context can be meaningful in a broader social and cultu-
ral context. The how has many parallels, even if the who
is something different.
Often the challenge is even greater in the family, given
the close and continuous life of relatively few people,
while in the society there is more distance, temporality
and a larger and wider whole. In the family the conse-
quences and repercussions are immediate, in society the
consequences and repercussions require a little more
time, although they may be far-reaching.
From now on you can also listen to the alphabetically ar-
ranged parenting themes as a podcast. This can be done
by opening the part of the encyclopedia in which your
chosen theme can be found and then downloading it
with the download symbol at the top. You can then open
50
this downloaded file from Word. In Word, choose Re-
view and then Read Aloud. You can then go to the desi-
red parenting theme and listen to the fragment as a pod-
cast with the play arrow. Enjoy listening! If necessary,
convert PDF to Word and save a copy. Once you've figu-
red out how it works, it's very user-friendly. Playing a
dash of quiet or classical music in the background in a
split screen view can complete the picture.
All information in the encyclopaedia has been collected
and compiled with great care. However, no responsibi-
lity can be taken for the content and use thereof. Con-
sultation and use are entirely under your own responsi-
bility.
The content of the encyclopedia can be quoted with re-
ference of the source.
Where around
In the encyclopaedia, special attention is given to the re-
ferential thinking & working model. In English referential
model. This referential thinking & working model is gra-
dually making its appearance in the care and healthcare
sector and integrates many of the existing thinking and
working models by taking a step further. It does this by
systematizing the existing models and incorporating
them into a larger sustainable whole with its own con-
ceptual framework. Particularly insight into the often
51
problematic processes present and making a switch to
more favorable processes is one of its assets. To this end,
the referential model is simultaneously process-oriented
(neural and mental), action-oriented & context-
oriented. She relates these different orientations to
each other and visualizes their mutual links.
More specifically, attention is given to what parenting
and guidance models refer to, the where around, to give
them a place opposite each other and to make visible
what can still be added, the where to, in order to arrive
at a total picture. In particular, it wants to provide more
insight into the often problematic processes present in
someone's development, the where around, in order to
make a switch to more favorable development proces-
ses, the where to. On an individual level, it thus wants to
help to gain insight into what it is all about for someone,
the where around, to get from here to what it could be
about for someone, the where to.
The model shows affinities with the emerging schema
thinking & working model, the current identity question
and the evolving evidence-based information processing
theory with neuroscientific roots. It expands the con-
textual model further.
Referential represents what something is about. What is
in the center and is the essence. By being aware of this
in its various forms, what revolves around what is in the
52
center and forms the essence, can be changed. The re-
ferential approach wants to create space to make visible
what plays a central role in a person's functioning and
functioning together, but is difficult to make visible
because we are so close to it. It wants to make resources
available from visibly made processes to optimize what
is so central, so that a better personal and cooperative
functioning can ensue. From the referential it is just a
step towards the (p)referential.
In this approach, attention is given to the cognitive, the
virtual and the cultural in individuals and groups of indi-
viduals. This as inner core elements, also called cognitive
and cultural schemes, around which it can turn with so-
meone or a group. These mental elements are brought
together to describe and predict the influence and direc-
tion of individual and group behavior. It shows how each
participates in his own understanding, behavioral, and
contextual filling of his inner schemas and how this has
an orientation, steering and limiting effect on his own
expression and his own actions. In addition to the collec-
tive linguistic filling of used concepts, there is a personal
psychological filling of these concepts that determine
what something is or should be for each, how you do or
should do something, and where and when to achieve
something.
The referential model allows to visualize what is linked
53
and what refers to each other in its coherence and con-
gregation, to put it in its proper context and to help on
the way to from a new perspective. This way connections
can be made visible and what makes reference to some-
thing else made aware. This way the larger picture can
be mapped. As a result, possible obstacles can be de-
tected and forces released. This way difficulties can be
given a place and problems solved. Like, for example,
how negative experiences can stand in the way, or how
someone remains excessively stuck to unusable beliefs,
or how certain emotions and desires stand between so-
meone and his environment, or how someone threatens
to fall victim to unrealistic plans or unattainable dreams,
and more.
Schemes can help explain why we do not so easily
change opinions or feelings. First, there is a tendency to
retain an already developed cognitive or emotional
schema. As a result, we will only or preferably note what
fits within our schemes. This is how we protect our per-
sonal truth. Secondly, there is a tendency to defend our
schemes. We evoke thoughts and arguments ourselves
in accordance with our already developed schemes or
beliefs. Thirdly, if we want or need to change or change
our schemes, we do this only step by step or by little
bits. We only shift a little each time.
Thinking in terms of schemes around which something
54
turns or is about and which are disturbed is already com-
mon to researchers and professionals. This includes,
among others, identity questions, agression, schema
therapy, diagnosis and treatment of anorexia, trauma
treatment, suicidal and attachment problems. Schemes
often play a mediating role between what used to be in
the less favorable development and what is expressed at
a later stage.
In this work this is supplemented with schemes with un-
disturbed development in a favorable framework. For
example, schemas can be dimensionally situated on a
continuum of a non-disturbed with an average develop-
ment to a disturbed in a problematic development. Dif-
ferent degrees can then be recognized.
This approach deals extensively with seeing what we ex-
pect to see: such as our own anxieties and fears, desires
and wishes, ideas and benefits. This is possible without
the fact that something in reality corresponds with this
as present, or as is so, or as corresponds with to those
expectations.
But also that, as a rule, we do not notice what is not ex-
pected, because it is not feared, is not demanded or is
not proposed. Even though it is present or present in re-
ality, but not in expectation.
This is also sometimes described, if too pronounced,
distorted and/or too one-sided, as living in a world of its
55
own or a bubble of its own. Here the reality is replaced
by personal memories, ideas, expectations, dreams and
fears without a real link to reality. What lives inside is so-
metimes described as facts that can take the form of 'fa-
ke' or 'alternative' facts and do not correspond with rea-
lity.
The referential thinking & working model is substantia-
ted with scientific findings from recent research and thus
translates research into practice. It forms a scientific up-
date of existing insights. So she added to these insights
the contextual, the cognitive, the neuroscientific, the
cultural and the virtual dimension. Psychology is thus not
only in function of behavior and psychic behavioral pro-
cesses, but also in function of behavioral conditions. In
other words, the referential model is not a theory, but
forms a framework in which scientific research find his
place. It arose from a fragmentation of insights and me-
thods in the field of pedagogy and guidance that had no
binding agent.
(P)referential in the title of the encyclopedia has a dual
meaning. When talking about parenting, there is often a
preferential undertone : 'You can best do that.' However,
this encyclopedia uses an informative point of view -
hence the p in brackets. It wants to clarify what it refers
to in the various types of parenting. As where it revolves
around, so that this or that direction is not unconsciously
taken. What is parenting about and where thus it goes
56
to, together, where to go to or is referential. In addition,
there is a second reason for using (p)referential. Perhaps
or possibly the conscious own choice for certain and
multiple references in parenting is preferred and is pre-
ferential.
In summary, the initial p is stripped of the initial prefe-
rential, in order to become aware of what is central in
different ways of parenting. Later, after clarification of
several references to where parenting refers, it is possi-
ble to make a consciously and own choice for multiple
references as what is perhaps or possibly preferential -
in this way referential gets its initial p back.
On this scientific encyclopedia is worked for years. This
encyclopaedia wants to be an available precipitation of
this innovative work. Hopefully it finds its way to inte-
rested parties and end users.
A total of 12 volumes are available with alphabetically
ordered (p)referential parenting and guidance compo-
nents. Each of these theme items is self-contained and
can be used separately. At the same time, themes are
integrated into the larger whole that forms the encyclo-
paedia.
Even though the scientific encyclopaedia is arranged alp-
habetically, some emphases can be indicated of what is
dealt with in the individual parts:
57
In part one and two it is mainly about attention, care and
well-being for reality. For example, communica-
tion and dynamics are central to Part 1 and Section 2
describes behavior and well-being.
In part three and four it is mainly about attention, care
and well-being for yourself. For example, in part 3 inte-
raction and image formation is central and in part 4 mo-
dels and learning.
In part five and six it is mainly about attention, care and
well-being for the other person. For example, in section
5 guidance and development is central and in section
6 parenthood and parenting.
In part seven and eight it is mainly about attention, care
and well-being for the relationship. For example, in sec-
tion 7 the reactive and (problem) solution is central and
in part 8 relational and referential.
Part 9 and 10 focus primarily on attention, care and well-
being for the environment and context. For example, in
section 9 social interaction and schema development
is central and in part 10 language and change.
In parts eleven and twelve, it is mainly about attention,
care and well-being for the whole of the mind. For
example, in section 11, connection and valuation
are central and in section 12 world- and self-orientation.
58
The attention, care and well-being offered in each of
these areas can lead to a more optimal handling, rela-
tionship and connection in each of these areas. In the
contact-oriented, relationship-oriented and connecting
parenting, there is increasing interest in this. Attention
stands for mental in mind, care stands for behavior
around and well-being stands for the desired experi-
enced reality. All this can best be achieved from devel-
oping competence.
In each of the scientific parts the emphasis is always on
two complementary facets or processes of parenting
and counseling. One facet is for the share of parent(s)
and supervisor(s). The complementary facet is for the
child's share in development. One process takes place
with parent(s) and supervisor(s), the complementary
with the child. Both complementary facets or processe
anticipate and influence each other. No matter how dif-
ferent, they always form a whole. These complementary
facets are thematically broader across the parts.
These complementary facets are successively:
communication and own dynamics (part 1),
behavior and well-being (part 2),
interaction and image formation (part 3),
models and learning (part 4),
guidance and development (part 5),
parenthood and parenting (part 6),
59
the reactive and (problem) solution (part 7),
relational and referential (part 8),
social interaction and schema development (part 9),
language and change (part 10),
connection and valuation (part 11),
world- and self-orientation (part 12 & 12bis).
This broadening of the demands of parents can also be
found in the top 5 in the Netherlands of questions about
parenting, obtained on the basis of national and provin-
cial research reports. This has also been taken into ac-
count in the classification.
This top 5 of parenting questions is:
1: General development of children, health and child di-
seases, can be found in
communication and own dynamics (part 1) and
behavioral behavior and well-being (part 2),
2: Behavior of children, especially difficult and 'disobe-
dient' behavior, can be found in
interaction and imaging (part 3) and
models and learning (part 4),
3: Setting limits, listening and 'obeying', correcting and
punishing, reflected in
counseling and development (part 5),
parenthood and upbringing (part 6) and
the reactive and (problem) solution (part 7),
60
4: Socio-emotional development, self-confidence, uncer-
tainty and (failure) anxiety, reflected in
relational and referential (part 8) and
social interaction and schema development (part 9),
5: General educational questions and skills, to be found
in
language and change (part 10),
connection and valuation (part 11) and
world and self-orientation (part 12 & 12bis).
Today, the referential model is unintentionally more cur-
rent than ever. Today, more and more tendencies can be
observed in society to break through and abolish the tra-
ditional gender, ethnic and class categories and divi-
sions. This sometimes leads to new and other more va-
ried categories and dividing lines with a larger assort-
ment. Sometimes all divisions and distinctions are lifted.
Everyone can then fill in everything themselves and ac-
cording to their own preference and dosage, so that col-
lective labels and associated valuation are no longer
useful. This is often linked to accepting and appreciating
everything and everyone, called woke. The referential
model describes the underlying processes, including
how to bring about change.
61
If you prefer a first acquaintance, the basic work in Dutch
Referential schema thinking and acting for the educatio-
nal practice. Scientific insights updated ' is an interesting
option.
62
Some short visual illustrations of possible application of
referential thinking and working
animation presentation
I would like to laugh,
but I feel sad!
We try to solve upcoming problems,
while we do not pay attention to
what there is, what works and what
is feasible!
I am always excluded and then I feel unsafe.
I would love to belong to the group and count
as someone, so I could feel safe.
I prefer other parents as experi-
ential experts to share things.
I choose to exchange thoughts
and experiences as parents and
to form myself as thus.
I prefer experts to help
me with this.
I choose to learn and increase
my competence as a parent.
Can you be realistic
and child friendly!
I am friendly and
warm!
I am principled!
63
Look differently,
react differently
How a child experiences a social situation or event, will
strongly determine his reaction. This reaction can be a
favorable starting point for children with whom it is con-
cerned. This reaction can also form an unfavorable star-
ting point for the reaction of the other children. The re-
action of the first child is determined by the way it per-
ceives the situation or the event, how it experiences and
interprets it. The child can change little about the situa-
tion or the event. The child can also change little how
the children will respond to his reaction. It may, howe-
ver, try to change its unfavorable perception into a more
favorable one. In this way it can react differently, so that
it gives the other children the chance to react more fa-
vorably and differently.
How a child experiences a situation or event, will
greatly determine its response.
64
In summary :
How a child looks, not only determines his reaction, but
largely also the reaction of the other children.
If we want to influence the reaction of the other children,
we will have to change the way of looking of the child.
Below are three situations, find out for yourself how the
child can turn his reaction, but also that of the other
child, by a more favorable experience. In order not to get
stuck in the 'unfavorable situation' and the unfavorable
reaction of the other child, it can try to change its per-
ception so that it can react differently. As a result, the
child can develop the sense of having a grip on a difficult
situation and not being dependent on it, or having to un-
dergo the helplessness.
1.
Situation:
looks at me
To experience :
Thinks I am weird
My reaction :
look away and do not dare to do anything
say or do
Consequence:
The other child is really staring at me now
65
2.
Situation:
laughs at me
To experience :
laughs with me
My reaction :
sting out tongue
Consequence:
The other child laughs even harder
3.
Situation:
sticks tongue out
To experience :
hate me
My reaction :
turn my eyes down
and walk away
Consequence:
the other child starts to laugh laughter
Children with less favorable reactions are easily inclined
to stick to a first emotionally colored unfavorable per-
ception of a situation. From previous less pleasant expe-
riences in similar situations and a possibly less favorable
self-image and low sense of self-esteem, a new confron-
tation quickly evokes tensions that distort the expe-
rience. On the basis of this tense distorted experience is
then easily reflexively reacted against the other or
66
against themselves. This immediately implies an unfavo-
rable starting point for the reaction of other children,
who may feel misunderstood in some way or who per-
ceive that they are faced with someone who is a model
for self-discernment.
Children with such less favorable perceptions can be hel-
ped by helping them in addition to their first spontane-
ous unfavorable experience to find a second experience
that is more favorable. Not from a painful past but from
a hopeful self-challengers future. To take the height of a
less tense factual reality that is more nuanced. On the
basis of this image, which is closer to reality, one can opt
for a reaction towards the other. This immediately im-
plies a more favorable starting point for the reaction of
the other person, who feels addressed and experiences
someone who is open and approach-able.
Since the first emotional reflex has often become an au-
tomatism, the child will always have to go beyond this
automatism in order to arrive at a second more realistic
experience, closer to the other and themselves. A diffi-
culty here is that the emotional reflex is always faster
than the reality-based reaction. The child will have to
make every effort, until the new experience has gradu-
ally become an automatism. In this way the child can
come from a defensive or protective attitude to a more
involved and cooperative attitude.
67
red is unfavorable perception, green is favorable perception
Below are three situations, find out for yourself how the child can turn its reaction,
but also that of the other child, by a more favorable experience. In order not to get
stuck in the 'unfavorable situation' and the unfavorable reaction of the other child,
it can try to change its perception so that it can react differently. As a result, the
child can develop the sense of having a grip on a difficult situation and not being
dependent on it, or having to undergo the helplessness.
Situation:
looks at me
To experience :
Thinks I am weird
My reaction :
look away and do not dare to
do anything
say or do
Consequence:
The other child is really staring
at me now
Situation:
sticks tongue out
To experience :
hate me
My reaction :
turn my eyes down
and walk away
Consequence:
the other child starts to laugh
laughter
Situation:
laughs at me
To experience :
laughs with me
My reaction :
sting out tongue
Consequence:
The other child laughs even har-
der
Situation:
looks at me
To experience :
shows interest in me
My reaction :
stands still, watch back en
asks what happens
Consequence:
winks at me as recognition
Situation:
sticks tongue out
To experience :
does funny to me
My reaction :
run to him
Consequence:
make himself a joke about
tongue
Situation:
laughs at me
To experience :
likes me
My reaction :
teases with his tongue
Consequence:
is running to me
68
In summary :
The first old experiencing, feeling, thinking, imagining the
other and themselves and reacting in a situation will gra-
dually consciously be replaced by sustained effort by a
second new experiencing, feeling, thinking, imagining the
other and themselves and reacting.
In this way the child can gradually start from leaving be-
hind the situation and children with which to make, and
come to an on the way to the situation and the children
with whom it wants to deal.
Because of emotional automatism, the environment and
the child will have to pay sufficient attention to the actual
realism.
The situation and the children that are dealt with will
have to be stripped of their own less favorable associati-
ons and thus provide space for more favorable helping
connections. Deconstruction can thus provide space for
new construction.
This is not an easy task for the child, which obviously has
his feelings of insecurity, less trust in other children and
self-doubt. For these feelings, the necessary space must
certainly also be offered relational.
However, if the child does not want to become even
more victim of these feelings, with the risk that they still
69
increase in size and intensity, then it needs positive so-
cial confirmation. The child can increase the chances of
this by believing that the perceived insecurity and the
less trust in others and themselves are only temporary
and that certainty and trust for him or her and in other
children must also be possible by finding opportunities
for this.
In addition, it can often be even more difficult for the
child if it encounters real unfavorable feelings and a truly
repulsive attitude with other children, which may be trig-
gered by their own reaction. Even then, when the child
encounters unfavorable feelings, thoughts and inten-
tions with other children, it is necessary not to continue
this and to offer no longer any further opportunities for
it. But to make an attempt to reverse this yourself. The
grip on this situation and the reaction of the other child-
ren will otherwise be minimal in such a situation. Only by
taking steps to reverse the negative spiral by a second
more favorable perception of where to want to go in the
future, despite the perceived lack of openness and coo-
peration, can eventually be found to be connected to
other children and to awaken step-by-step a different
feeling, thinking, meaning and reaction to them.
How parents can help ? Recent research at Utrecht Uni-
versity shows that explanations parents give to child be-
havior helps young children to view the behavior of their
peers with less hostility. Young children are more easily
70
hostile or agressive when they think other children want
to hurt them. This is so when they interprets it as provo-
cation. Most children interpret ambiguous contempts as
accidental, some find them hostile. By framing social si-
tuations in a positive way, parents can let their child ex-
perience less hostility in their social world. This way they
can reduce the chance of agressive behavior. Young
children rely primarily on their parents to help them un-
derstand their social world. Very often they talk to their
parents about dealing with their peers.
Recent research from the University of Illinois shows that
the quality of friendships in children can be influenced
by the benign or hostile finding of the intentions of peers
and by how they experience and express their own emo-
tions. The emotions present do not stand alone, but go
together with the activated cognitions in a social context
when a child communicates with peers. Both interact
with each other. Here it is the emotion and its intensity
that motivates or stimulates the reaction and the cogni-
tion that gives direction to the reaction, friendly or hos-
tile. Children can respond more quickly when their hos-
tile judgment or bias is fed by stronger emotions. They
attack other children or ignore other children. On the
other hand, children can show a more positive behavior
towards friends if their friendly representation is combi-
ned with stronger emotions. Their friendship and inter-
action with each other is growing then.
71
A challenge for adults here is to help children who exhibit
negative cognitions to model more positive views on in-
teractions when the situation justifies this. For example,
the child does not want to hurt you, but cannot express
himself appropriately.
Or as a parent you can ask about thoughts and emotions
in the child during interactions. Certainly when adoles-
cence is reached, the child can increasingly reflect on his
own cognitions and, if necessary, adjust them more fa-
vorably. Deep positive emotions can then reinforce
friendships with peers.
72
Assertivity
A learning school for assertiveness
Assertiveness is not a given. It is something that can be
learned, or can be given in education. It is not some-
thing that you do or do not have. You have it to a certain
extent.
Assertiveness is not an easy-to-handle skill. If you use
too little of it, then you are subassertive and you achieve
little. If you use too much of it, then you are easily
agressive and you also achieve little.
In the first case you risk that others take over from you
because you are subassertive. In the second case you
Assertiveness is the degree of self-confidence and
strength in your dealing with your environment.
It is something you have to a certain extent and that
you can develop further.
YOUTH THEME
Actually
I mean no …
I say no.
No !!!!!!!!!
ASSERTIVITY
73
easily collide with resistance and resistance from others
because you yourself are agressive and offensive or
come across.
It is nice that assertiveness gives you the necessary
energy and strength to take the defense of your-
self. Preferably on time. In particular, it can be esta-
blished that whoever waits and, above all, waits, gets it
hard to stand up for himself, or to stand up enough. You
have already made too much space, or you are forced in
an ungrateful role to still save something.
Actually
I mean no
I say no.
No !!!!!!!!!
A S S E R T I V I T Y
74
How to promote assertiveness and resilience develop-
ment
Communication assertiveness is an aspect of communi-
cation positioning. It is the degree of self-confidence
and strength with which you conduct a conversation and
move in your interaction with your environment, so that
possible influence or tenacity is the result of what is ex-
pressed and not of the perceived uncertainty and weak-
ness.
Attention can be paid to the belief in yourself, in your
own views and in your skills as a (conversation) partner.
Attention can be given to expressing assertiveness in
what and how something is expressed through both
speaking and body language.
You can pay attention to your own base, the personal
support and the self-contained responsibility for your ex-
pressions.
You can pay attention to how to resist or prevent pres-
sure from the other person.
You can also pay attention to how to create space for a
vulnerable attitude of yourself within a safe and trustful
relationship or environment.
75
Communication assertiveness is characterized by:
I know how to express my views, attitudes, feelings and
desires.
I clearly say what I think is important, desirable or neces-
sary for me.
I can easily make clear what I expect from the other per-
son.
I easily express my opinion in such a way that it is taken
into consideration.
I consider it my responsibility to express my feelings, my
experience, my needs and desires.
It's okay to ask what you want without feeling guilty and
without experiencing it as if the other person will judge
you.
In conversation, be attentive to his own (and possibly dif-
ferent) vision, opinion, preference or desire to have, to
recognize, to admit and to accept.
Let go of the idea not to have to listen to yourself what
your feelings, thoughts and needs are, because you can
not take them into account anyway and it only produces
disappointment and inner conflict.
76
Not from the idea of not having to listen to yourself, let-
ting others decide what to feel, think and want.
I dare to say and ask what I want.
To be able to convert my feeling and desire into an ex-
pression (yes, no, not yet, this non-, if not, will, will-not-
,-that-way, under-that-condition,. ..- feel).
I know how to express myself originally in a direct and
spontaneous way, not saved or restrained.
I feel comfortable with my personal experience, which I
believe to be right, so that I can express it in an open,
non-offensive way.
I know how to speak to the other person for myself and
for my expectations without contact-restraint.
In conversation, I know to ask for attention and to ask for
an 'account-with-'.
What you have to say, you express with conviction.
I dare to ask attention for myself and talk about myself
in conversation.
Connect and maintain in conversation with yourself and
with the other person.
77
Do not show too much restraint in conversation about
yourself and your feelings.
To talk to the other person with a positive and good
sense of self.
Consider whether you want to make your own views,
feelings, needs, plans or expectations dependent on or
subordinate to the other person, or want to come into
your own right with the other person.
For the satisfaction of your needs, make you lesser de-
pendent on the other person, by getting to know them
better in (conversation) interaction and choosing to
stand up for it yourself.
Getting to know yourself better and the reality around
you, to come to an optimal choice for you with more
(self)confidence.
I can speak enough in the 'I' form.
I know to (re)act in a timely, specific and focused way, to
prevent resistance and to use less power.
You know to express your appreciation or annoyance
about the other person.
Show your appealing or appealing-restraint attitude and
feelings towards the other person.
78
Do not let yourself be bothered or disturbed in conver-
sation by self-summoned and maintained physical
(unrest, sweating, ...), psychic (self-doubt, fear, ...) and
social tensions (acceptance, inferiority, ...), by not fixa-
ting you, not to seek confirmation, not to declare taboo
for yourself and not to want to suppress it.
You follow your own feelings, ideas, thoughts, me-
mories, desires and actions with your attention and use
those that help you achieve something.
The way you talk and interact with yourself, what you
think of yourself and what you feel for yourself, radiate
outwards.
So approaching yourself positively and treating you that
it reflects on the other person.
In conversation experience yourself and the other per-
son as very special, personal and unusual.
In conversation, assume that it is not only what you give
to the other person or get from the other person (for at-
tention) that makes you valuable.
Letting go of the unbalanced idea that you only mean so-
mething to the extent that you make the other(s) happy.
Not saying the opposite of what I mean from self-doubt
or to be accepted or positive.
79
In wanting to give attention to yourself, not being stuck
in non-helping ways of expression, but chosing for more
effective expressions: (from being kind is always
agreeing, to indicating how to what extent something
can be; from being helpful as forgetting yourself to how
you want to help; from expressing criticism as what is
negative, to what you would like differently; ...).
Do not choose negative thoughts that generate negative
feelings (fear, insecurity, anger, ...), resulting in weak or
collapsing behavior.
Leave a feeling or a characteristic in yourself or enable
another that can be helpful or offer protection.
I do not compare myself in a negative way with the other
person (more, better, faster, ...).
From the eyes of the other person I do not negatively
compare myself with the other person (less, worse, slo-
wer, ...).
To find a sense of security in yourself.
I stand on my own, which means for me a sufficient de-
gree of independence, individuality, support, respect,
appreciation and future objective.
Feeling responsible for yourself.
Motivate yourself to organize your life yourself.
80
To assign yourself a place in the relation to the other(s)
(equal, partner, friend, ... fascinating, appealing, inte-
resting, ...).
Not being so concerned with the negative reaction of the
other or with the other that you dare not to say what you
think, feel and want.
Check whether you are inconvenienced by an excess of
fear (to lose) or a lack of courage (win).
In conversation I give attention not to let me too easy,
too much or too often do, influence or convince myself.
Doing attempts to persuade the other person and not
give up in advance or too quickly.
Making connection with neglected or hidden parts of
yourself and bring them out.
Leaving behind inaccurate ideas about yourself that you
have spoken to yourself as an apology to avoid un-
pleasant and difficult situations.
Leaving behind inaccurate ideas about yourself that
others gave you to stimulate you or reduce your re-
silience.
Creating a mental space for yourself and your actions
(knowing, being able, daring, allowing, willing, being,
81
... something and not having to know, being able, daring,
allowing, willing, being, ...everything).
Not imagining or experiencing too much distance bet-
ween yourself and the other person in order to be able
to clarify in conversation, convince the other person, not
surrender yourself too much and be able to maintain the
desired safe distance, and give yourself a valid chance to
at least to come to self-expression, a certain understan-
ding or a rapprochement.
If I have changed my mind, I can tell the other person.
What you know, want, feel, can and do letting follow the
same step.
I dedicate my expressive expression to what I want to
achieve with it.
Not expressing your compliance, indulgence, docility,
submissiveness, passiveness (subassertivity) in advance.
Knowing your own domain and helping the other person
to recognize it.
Finding to know your own domain and letting the other
accept it and take it into account.
I discuss the other person's expectations with me in a
sharply way.
82
I focus my willingness towards the other person in con-
versation.
I clearly and expressively indicate my limits to the other
person.
I expressively indicate the way in which I wish the others
deal with me.
I can resist the other in a conversation.
If the other person asks me something, I know, if I wish,
to ask for an explanation to determine my answer.
Choose for yourself what you want to bring to the fore-
ground and what you want to bring to the background in
yourself and in your (conversation) interaction.
Take into account that you do not be more against your-
self (know, can, may, dare, do not want) than against the
other person.
Rather than running after yourself with consistently
disappointing ratings, prefer to lead the way with posi-
tive expectations.
I know how to take the initiative to express myself rather
than to adopt a passive or wait-and-see attitude.
83
Allow yourself space to enjoy the (conversation) situa-
tion and to think how and what you can contribute to a
pleasant interaction.
I ask the other person what he/she likes to talk about or
do and in what way, I then choose something that I also
like and put the other vividly and concretely for what to
do together and ask the other person finally to partici-
pate.
I can express complaints in a conversation and engage in
a confrontation with the other person.
I don't let myself get out of my lead during a conversa-
tion.
I transfer something of myself to the other person.
I do not suggest, but react and react in time.
In a conversation I remain very confident.
As preferable leave it to the other to be emotional (an-
xious, excited, annoyed, bored, angry, ...).
In conversation, I don’t abandon myself or turn against
myself.
Having sufficient self-esteem to always be able to fall
back on yourself in difficult (conversation) cir-
cumstances.
84
If your perception, experience, thinking, feeling, needs,
imagination, bodyfeeling go in the same direction
(keeping safety, expressing yourself, being aware of
yourself, defending yourself, ...), then this will also be au-
dible, visible and tangible to the other.
With confidence, I occupy my body fully and express my-
self easily and clearly.
With my body expression I confirm and support what I
express with words.
In conversation you are not only occupied with yourself
and how you come across to the other person, but also
have enough attention to focus on the other person and
how it comes to you.
Do not only listen to the other person in conversation
and do not only talk to the other person and listen too
little to yourself and talk too little to yourself.
So preferable you move your own attention and thinking
focus from yourself to your action, or to the action of the
other person, or to the other person without having to
compare.
In a conversation I look at the other person and let my-
self be looked to.
85
So preferably deliberately and slowly express you au-
dible in order to let your voice give shine on you.
So helpful keep your insecurity, doubt, fear, excitement
inside and come out with self-assured calmness.
By my trustful, crystal-clear expression, I invite the other
person to the same expression.
The way I position myself in space reflects my place that
I know to take in relation to my surroundings.
To experience it positively for you and to find yourself
valuable enough, you bring the other person into
something that spontaneously he did not consider or
choose on its own.
To ask questions should not be tied to who you are and
what your relationship is, but to whom you want to be
and what relationship you want.
I dare to come out with enough power.
In how you make yourself heard, seen or felt there is no
exaggerated expressing of uncertainty, hesitation, weak-
ness, shutting down, hiding, numbness, lack of meaning,
stopping needlessness.
Be careful that a too extreme presentation in one way or
another can reduce the hidden power, quality and indi-
viduality.
86
I express myself concisely in the matter.
Pretending to say and act where you still have to grow
up to, as with respect for the other person and yourself
expressing something and standing up for something.
In expressing myself and standing up for myself, I prefer
not to keep me from communicating, if the other person
does not want to listen, is hostile to me, criticizes me,
finds me unreasonable or ridiculous, constantly discou-
rages me or interrupts me, gets annoyed or out of ba-
lance.
I clearly indicate the obstacles and interruptions that the
other person brings about during a (conversation) inte-
raction.
I reconfirm my relationship to the other person in a po-
sitive way and then share with which concrete I have
which specific problem.
If I do not want to comment on something in a conver-
sation at the moment, I indicate this.
Showing sufficient self-confidence by daring to express
and formulate remarkable insecurity, doubt, fear, excite-
ment.
87
What you express does not represent a form of weak-
ness, but a way to become stronger (I know, dare, can,
... not, but I want or would like to know, dare, can ...).
Be aware that fear of saying or doing fades away by say-
ing or doing it.
Before, during or immediately after a conversation I do
not feel nauseous or sick.
I dare to leave my territory in conversation.
Through the content of the communication I can ques-
tion and change my actions without doubting my-
self.
Talking or reacting is not equal to losses for me.
To me, talking or reacting is equal to winning.
I know how to give and receive positive appreciation in
(conversation) interaction.
I do not adjust my message to the reaction I expect from
the other person.
I do not deny or do not simply cancel what I just expres-
sed.
I show that I mean it.
88
I can go against and with the other person's concerns
and criticisms.
In a conversation I can admit unevenly on the basis of
realities.
In a conversation I do not feel like I'm losing.
If it threatens to conflict, I will not shy away from this.
In a (conversation) interaction I only admit what I will ac-
tually be able to fulfill.
If the other person appeals to me in a way that does not
lie with me, I respond to this.
If I feel attacked or hurt, I can tell the other person.
When I want to convince the other person in a conver-
sation, I put enough power behind what I say.
I don't give up immediately or give in on some resistance.
In a conversation I don’t admit because of pressure.
I don’t give in to the unreasonableness of the other per-
son.
I enter into a (conversation) interaction with a lot of con-
fidence.
89
Feeling good, safe and dignified in (conversation) con-
tact helps me to come out for myself.
In (conversation) contact I strive for greater self-awa-
reness and self-reliance.
I don't equate standing up with wanting to dominate.
I can set myself open and be vulnerable in a confidential
situation.
I can immediately indicate a refusal of a request in a di-
rect and simple way with a short 'no' initial answer.
I can recognize that my fear of saying no comes mainly
from unjustified catastrophic thoughts and images (hurt
and repulse the other, make myself unsympathetic and
isolate myself, ...).
If I don't want to respond to something or refuse some-
thing, I say 'no' immediately after the other person has
formulated his question or proposal, while I shorten my
acknowledgment or appreciation and gratitude for the
proposal (no, thank you! no, that's great about the pro-
posal!
I can regard my negative reaction as an informative
event in which the position of the other person and his
question and the position of myself and my answer are
clearly clarified (I know that you think or feel this and
90
that you would like to, I feel and think differently and
can't or won't go into what you want, ...).
If desired, I can motivate a refusal with valid reasons or
as my own choice, without further explanation; I avoid
using weak reasons or excuses that provoke counter-ar-
gumentation and refutation.
I prefer to indicate that I do not want something rather
than that I cannot do something, in order to prevent at-
tempts to convince myself of my ability or the possibility
of it.
I indicate a short no-answer at the behavioral level, star-
ting with 'no, I ...' and the verb used in the question (no,
I am not going; no, I am not buying; ...) and with further
questions. I supplement this with 'because I ...' and the
same verb (because I don't go, ...).
If I don't want to respond to a question or comment from
the other person, I just listen without answering or reac-
ting.
If a refusal can come across as very antisocial or is diffi-
cult within my friendly relationship (not helping, not pay-
ing attention to, not taking into account, not responding
to, not using my possibilities, no effort for, hurtful to, ...)
I press my regret not being able to help in the requested
manner this time. If necessary, I indicate that I want to
help in a different way or make a better proposal that
91
suits me more and if necessary I ask how the other per-
son thinks I can help differently, and I ask about the con-
crete reason, circumstances, context or background of
his request what I can help for (practical, advice,...) or I
look together who could help and whether there is no
other solution.
If I'm afraid by refusing to hurt the other, I separate my
refusal from the intention to hurt the other (I don't want
to offend you at all, not harm you at all, not ignore you
at all, there's nothing personally, ...; you must not take it
as, do not think that you, ...; I can fully understand you, I
follow you without question, I believe you completely,
...; would you mind, can you accept it (from me), won't
you blame me, ...).
If I am afraid to refuse, I use the description of my per-
sonal situation as an explanation so that the other per-
son does not look for the origin in himself or your rela-
tionship (it does not suit me, it asks too much of me, I
have no experience with it, I'm afraid of it, I'm not going
to start it, I'm not able, I can't do it now, I can't do it, I
see no possibility, I can't combine it, ...) and I show my
willingness should my situation look different (willing if it
suits me, I would if it doesn't ask too much of me, if I
would have experience, if I wouldn't be afraid of it, if I
could , if it was possible for me, I would succeed, I can
combine it, ...).
92
If I am afraid to refuse to create a negative impression
about myself and to hurt myself, I indicate my attitude
and commitment to the general, the what as a principle
and rule, and I indicate my refusal to the particular, the
how as proposal and exception (normally yes, not now;
otherwise yes, if not; I want to belong, once I have to re-
nounce; ...).
If I am afraid to refuse due to the consequences for my
further relationship (being rejected, loss of the other,
tensions, distance, being less liked, ...) I express my fear
of this, and I indicate hoping this wouldn't happen, while
expressing my relationship desire, I indicate that I will
take the risk anyway and indicate the importance of
speaking out or (re)acting in order to keep my relations-
hip clear and pure.
If I can't respond to something, I give the feeling for the
other person, and the difficulty for me and I give my pro-
posal for the other (what a pity or bad for you, I can't or
don't know now, shall we at another time.. .).
I try to avoid having to refuse something by sensing the
evolution of a situation in time and being ahead of the
other: I tell my willingness, my attitude, my availability,
my reaction, ... in advance, or I will not respond to some-
thing and change the subject if possible, or I will distance
myself from the situation or leave it in time.
93
If I have to say something bad or negative, I make it clear
right away and help express and process the disappoint-
ment.
94
How to keep
the balans positive?
Something can go wrong, something can go along, some-
thing can contribute. It can be realized or is already rea-
lized, it can already be learned and acquired. It can offer
firmness. It can form a buffer. It can hold a reserve. It
can offer protection.
Something can disappoint, something can counteract,
something can not bear. It may be absent or not yet
okay, it can not yet be learned and acquired. It can in-
volve weakness. It can pose a danger. It can form a
gap. It can involve risk.
You can count on some things. Not on others.
How does the parent tilt the balance favorably?
WHAT LIVES :
MENTALITY
WHAT IS :
REALITY
WHAT HAPPENS :
ACTUALITY
RISK
RISK
PROTECTION
PROTECTION
95
The more protection can be offered or found, the more
solidity, reserve and the larger the buffer.
The less risk can be taken or encountered, the less weak-
ness, danger and the smaller the gap.
You do not have much control. It's just like that. You do
have a lot of control. It is how you think and how you
want something. It is how you arrange and organize so-
mething. It is how you do something and deal with so-
mething.
The basic rule can be used here : whatever escapes you,
you can try to take care of what you do have, so that the
balance remains positive. That the risks that are there
remain relatively smaller than the protection you are
looking for and can find.
In this way, sufficient strength, reserve can remain or can
be found and a buffer can be provided.
Especially in times and in situations where there are fe-
wer problems, work can be done to provide more secu-
rity. There is more time and space for this and people
usually are more interested. What is possibly missing,
however, is to grasp the importance and meaning of this.
There is yet no immediate need for it.
96
Because of the positive spiral in which you end up, there
is more chance and opportunity to develop more
strength, for more growth, for more strength. This can
be expressed in the physical field, mentally and so-
cially. You and your child can have a better physical con-
dition, greater mental well-being and better social inte-
gration in a larger circle.
At times and in situations where things go less well, the
risk increases. There is less time and less space for buil-
ding up and the desire is largely missing. At such a mo-
ment, the necessity and usefulness of more safety is felt
most strongly. There is then most immediate need.
Because of the negative spiral in which you end up, there
is more chance and opportunity for the loss of more po-
wer, for relapse, for more weakness. This can manifest
itself physically, mentally and socially. Yourself and your
child will then easily suffer under a less favorable physi-
cal condition, under a reduced mental well-being and a
more limited social integration and in a smaller circle.
By coming to a situation with a positive spiral for a longer
period of time, a longer time can be avoided with a ne-
gative spiral. The positive spiral avoids ending up in a
tense situation. The absence of a negative spiral allows
for more lasting relaxation.
97
Within a positive spiral there are experiences of confir-
mation, of self-esteem, of a positive self-image, of self-
confidence that bring greater resilience.
Within a negative spiral, there are experiences of discou-
ragement, a low sense of self-esteem, a negative self-
image, a lack of self-confidence that show a greater vul-
nerability.
The presence of what offers protection reduces the in-
fluence of what constitutes risk. It can also change the
way of a response to what involves risk. The resilience is
greater.
In concrete terms, it is possible to eliminate or reduce
risk, or what constitutes risk to form its protective coun-
terpart, or add some protection and prevent what cons-
titutes protection is transformed into its risky counter-
part.
This way an experienced injustice can be removed, or re-
duced as much as possible, and instead of the injustice,
it is possible to allow as much right as possible, to streng-
then the right and to avoid being slipped to injustice.
Removing or deconstructing an element and inserting
another element in its place and letting it come into its
own strength can act as a lever or catalyst to also reduce
98
other risks and increase protective measures. This is pos-
sible for someone, this can also be done for each in a re-
lation or a group.
Searching for what offers protection and what entails
risk can occur at the moment when there are difficulties
and problems are experienced.
However, it can also be done on a regular basis to see
what (even) offers protection and what (still) risk. In this
way pro-activity rather than re-activity can work on more
robustness and a larger buffer and more reserve. In this
way, risks are less likely and someone can approach
them better and in a less risky way.
Some practice:
There are two problems. Assignment 1 is located in the
left column. Assignment 2 can be found in the right-hand
column.
99
WHAT LIVES :
MENTALITY
WHAT IS :
REALITY
WHAT HAPPENS :
ACTUALITY
RISK
PROTECTION
PROTECTION
RISK
Place each of the elements below in one of the six provided boxes.
There are three risk elements, also called risk factors.
There are three protective elements, also called protective factors.
We’ll make it right again.
Seeing violence in the environment.
Few alternatives for using violence.
Talk in time.
Hate violence.
You can talk to us.
We can’t stand injustice.
We don’t help you.
I have few options.
We find you too busy.
No aversion of violence.
Violence in environment exceptional.
100
WHAT LIVES :
MENTALITY
WHAT IS :
REALITY
WHAT HAPPENS :
ACTUALITY
WHAT LIVES :
MENTALITY
WHAT HAPPENS :
ACTUALITY
WHAT IS :
REALITY
RISK
RISK
RISK
RISK
PROTECTION
PROTECTION
PROTECTION
PROTECTION
Violence in environment exceptional.
No aversion of violence.
We find you too busy.
We don’t help you.
I have few options.
We can’t stand injustice.
You can talk to us.
We’ll make it right again.
Hate violence.
Few alternatives for using violence.
Talk in time.
Seeing violence in the environment.
101
Pro-active
development guidance
As a parent, you are often inclined to respond to your
child in an encouraging or discouraging way. You want to
encourage certain behaviors, so that your child could use
them easier or more frequent. Or you want to discou-
rage certain behavior, so that they would occur less ea-
sily or less frequently and that they finally no longer oc-
cur at the end.
In a lot of educational work, upbringing is often largely
reduced to this. Rewards and punishments are called
the pedagogical tools par excellence for the parents. Al-
though both can be very useful in education, they both
belong to the reactive type of development guidance.
Parenting is more than rewarding or punishing.
You can also proactively offer something as a parent
to which your child can respond favorably.
102
It is good to know that they are not the only tools for
parents. That there are a whole range of other pedago-
gical approaches in dealing with your child. Approaches
that belong to the proactive type. These tools offer the
advantage that your actions as a parent do not follow
what your child does or says first. So that the chance is
smaller that you have to adjust something. As a parent
you first do or say something, something that the child
responds to. The intention is that through your actions
or expression you create a favorable situation for the
child on which it can respond favorably. A situation that
is also adapted to the child. The chance that you will be
faced with a surprise to which you have to respond in a
decisive way will be reduced. Your input will increase the
chances of your child responding appropriately so that
you can respond to it in an encouraging way. By acting
proactively, you increase the chances of a rewarding and
affirmative re-active act. This is nicely included. This way
your child can react more positively to you and the child
will appear more positively. You too can remain in a po-
sitive role, so that you can also act more favorably. Be-
cause of the positive atmosphere in which you end up,
this can also have a positive effect on your mutual rela-
tionship, so that it also appears more favorable : there
is a better bond and it is more satisfying. Because of your
pro-activity, your child isnt yet come to reactivity, such
as closing himself of, resistance or struglle, and is still re-
ceptive to your approach. If reactivity is already noti-
ceable in your child, your proactive action can bring the
103
child to more receptivity. In a proactive approach, the
relational comes first and it gets more opportunities, so
that less control is required and there is less controver-
sion.
Here a number of these proactive approaches for you as
a parent are named and briefly visualized. In each case,
typical parental acting is indicated. In each case, situa-
tions are indicated in which the approach is especially
useful. A separate theme part of this encyclopaedia was
devoted to some approaches.
O r i e n t a t i o n c e n t e r e d
Functional approach
Intentional approach
Direct approach
Indirect approach
P e r s o n c e n t e r e d
Childfriendly approach
Listening approach
Parentfriendly approach
Collaborative approach
E x p r e s s i o n c e n t e r e d
Informative approach
Advising approach
Directive approach
Communicative approach
104
I n t e r a c t i o n c e n t e r e d
Behavior interactive approach
Acting approach
Experience-giving approach
Experience-limiting approach
E n v i r o n m e n t c e n t e r e d
Authority-dosed approach
Supporting approach
Situation approach
Structural approach
T o o l c e n t e r e d
Reality approach
Motivational approach
Behavioral approach
Resource approach
C o n t e x t c e n t e r e d
Personal approach
Territorium approach
Referential approach
Contact approach
N e e d c e n t e r e d
Life safety approach
Attachment approach
Behavioral realization approach
Person realization approach
105
F o c u s c e n t e r e d
Optimization approach
Responsive approach
Monitoring approach
Reflective approach
106
O v e r v i e w proactive approaches
O r i e n t a t i o n c e n t e r e d
Functional approach
E x p r e s s i o n c e n t e r e d
P e r s o n c e n t e r e d
Informative approach
Collaborative approach
Parentfriendly approach
Listening approach
Childfriendly approach
Indirect approach
Direct approach
Intentional approach
Advising approach
Directive approach
Communicative approach
107
T o o l c e n t e r e d
E n v i r o n m e n t c e n t e r e d
I n t e r a c t i o n c e n t e r e d
Authority-dosed
approach
Experience-limiting
approach
Experience-giving
approach
Acting approach
Behavior interactive
approach
Resource approach
Behavioral approach
Reality approach
Structural approach
Situation approach
Supporting approach
Motivational approach
108
N e e d c e n t e r e d
C o n t e x t c e n t e r e d
F o c u s c e n t e r e d
Personal approach
Territorium approach
Referential approach
Contact approach
Life safety approach
Attachment approach
Behavioral realization
approach
Person realization
approach
Optimization approach
Responsive approach
Monitoring approach
Reflective approach
109
Limiters
Who or what
stops me ?
As a young person, you can be put for the difficult task
how to stop yourself. It requires a sufficient dyna-
mic. The ability to have a sufficient power that comes
from one or other power source. What can that power
be and who the power source?
You do not always want to stop yourself, but want the
environment to stop you. It is then the environment that
is looking for a sufficient force from a power source that
can stop you or stop you doing something. That power
and power source must then be acceptable to you. This
can be particularly difficult, because you are looking for
something and want to start something that the environ-
ment wants you to stop early with.
As a young person you can stand for the task of slo-
wing down and limiting yourself.
YOUTH THEME
P O W E R S O U R C E
110
But you can not blindly explore. Even then you place
stops or stops can be placed that you know to limit.
To know who and what stops you, you can pay attention
to your own actions lately and see who and what limits
this. Write down below three examples of situations
where boundaries have appeared. Indicate for each who
defined and what made it possible.
situation who as a limiter what as a limiter
1.
2.
3.
What do you perceive ?
Did you put adults and government in front? Do you no-
tice that you slow yourself down or not? Do you think
that adults and authority figures should take care of that
and think about it? Are you going through with
something until adults tell you that you can not and you
have to stop? Do you think you should not think about
something yourself? Is there no room here for your fee-
ling? Have you never learned it? Have you possibly
canceled it because it did not count how you thought
about something and what you felt about it?
111
What did you discover about yourself?
You placed yourself and your thinking in front. Do you
experience that you easily and often slow down? Do
you think that you yourself and how you think about
something should be responsible for that? You do not
just go ahead, but only after you have set the green light
yourself and stop as soon as you have turned the light to
red yourself ? Do you think you should consider for
yourself how you think about something and what you
feel about something? Or have you previously thought
about things based on your developed feeling? So that
you can bring what you do into agreement with that thin-
king and feeling. Have you ever learned it and continue
to grow because it offers you a directional beacon for
what, how and what not to do for you?
Where do you find your friends and the reality?
You put your friends and the reality in front. Do you ex-
perience that you slow down your pace when the reality
and friends as belonging to that reality move you? Do
you think that only the (social) reality can stop you? If
you can not do otherwise and your peers expect it from
you. Do you think you should only look at whether some-
thing can and should not pay so much attention to what
is imposed on you or what you expect from your-
self? Do you need this less? Were you only taught to
pay attention to the actual situation and not to expecta-
tions and opinions?
112
Michiel (16): "I can sometimes have a hard time when
adults tell me what to do and especially what I should not
do. They then have such a sense of what they all know
better, they talk from experience. You, you have not
thought about it yet and you do not know what you're
talking about, I used to think: just tell me, then I do not
have to think about it myself. But today it's a little diffe-
rent. I think myself about what I want and find myself
okay, but they certainly do not encourage me, so they
serve me all as certainties, so I never learn to have my
own opinion. My friends sometimes tell me that I do not
have to think about anything, just do what they expect
P O W E R S O U R C E
REALITY
MYSELF
ADULTS
FRIENDS
AUTHORITY
MY THOUGHTS
Place the power sources in order in which theY limit you. Place what you
most limited in front.
113
from you, so that's the least you suffer, apparently they
are not encouraged to think about anything either."
Sofie (17): "At a party I can keep on dancing until I drop,
there is no one who tells me anything and you want to
join in. I sometimes get stitches and suffer from shortness
of breath. I just try not to pay attention to it. If I dare to
say something about it to my mother, she warns me that
if I am not paying attention I might get serious problems.
Fortunately in my circle of friends there is someone who
gets it also sometimes on her breath. I can talk to her
about this, she is the only one who understands me "
Jenne (15): "If something has to be done, then it must
also of myself, I can sometimes be really principled to-
wards myself, sometimes I pay too much attention to my
diet, but I am like that. I make no exception for myself.
Good is not good enough for me. My mum sometimes
says that I am perfectionist. I sometimes tell her that I
have learned it from her. My friends sometimes try to se-
duce me to something. I just tell them that I do not parti-
cipate in this, even though this is not always easy. Other-
wise I would feel very tense and uncomfortable. Someti-
mes I would want to be a bit milder for myself, but then
those principles will come back to me. I just can not stand
it, it is so and not different, even if I want something
else.”
114
Indicate the most used power source in the oval below.
Then enter in each of the four boxes what the power
source can be to your best to influence and limit you:
. what
. what not
. how
. how not
Put a = sign in front of your statements if this already
happens
Put a + sign in front of your statements if you think that
priority can be given to this.
WHAT :
WHAT NOT :
HOW :
HOW NOT :
POWER
115
Young people have automatically learned to take into ac-
count what adults expect from them. Adults have lear-
ned that young people often can not limit themselves
and adults have to impose structure and limits on
them. They want that young people should do like other
young people and they then impose the same expectati-
ons and norms on all young people. How the reality is,
then counts less. It is the formulated principles and rules
that must be met. A personal feeling and opinion is less
useful in that context, because it is expected to depend
on what adults expect and expect from them.
The more young people then abandon from looking at
reality themselves and what is possible and what is not
and the more young people neglect to feel for themsel-
ves how something is possible and to think whether it is
possible or not, the more adults experience that they
have to use structure and rules. Adults often try to im-
press their principles and norms on young people. The
hope then is that young people will remember them at
the right moment in a concrete situation.
Perhaps, in order to give young people more possibilities
to control and limit their behavior themselves, they
should gradually be taught to perceive situations them-
selves, to feel for themselves, to think for themselves, to
choose for themselves. So they can not only rely on their
memories and the model of peers. It is then not so much
116
something from the outside that limits them, but some-
thing that is driven from within.
Perhaps there is still a whole task here, now that the out-
side world is experiencing loss of authority. Teach young
people how to acquire authority over themselves. Tea-
ching young people to experience for themselves how
their environment experiences their actions, now that
the environment has to reduce the power of its laws and
does not know how to convey their experience expressi-
vely. The assignment is not so much to use rules from
outside to exercise external control, but to convey stan-
dards that young people want to keep themselves in, so
that internal control becomes possible. As an adult you
can then hold up a mirror to them, to what extent they
already meet their own standards. You can thus indicate
their progression and indicate the direction to continue
evolving. As an adult you point out for them at what they
want to keep themselves.
You can further teach young people to make their own
choices, young people who are increasingly guided by
peers through the reduction of authority. The peers to
whom they mirror themselves and who they want to re-
semble, form the norm to be like them, which also opens
up perspective for them and assurance not to be exclu-
ded.
117
In this way, young people can be taught to focus more
on their own needs, on what they are at a certain mo-
ment and not to get carried away by group members or
to limit themselves only when adults know how to im-
pose this. Young people can then learn how to deal with
those needs more from their own thinking and fee-
ling. Without making themselves a victim of compelling
thinking, of threatening feelings or of their needs. Adults
can be a model for this and help young people to find out
for themselves what opportunities they offer and is use-
ful and helpful for them.
Young people can also discover that it is easier to stick to
something if it is agreed together, so that they can think,
choose and decide together what to do or not. This
sense of being listened to and participation can have a
very stimulating effect on how to deal with something.
This way a joint commitment can arise. This from their
own choice who or what they want to follow as a young
person. In their own thinking they are behind that indivi-
dual and joint choice and decision.
Tom (14): "My friends try to drag me with them, I don’t
know a lot about what I want, I pay little attention to it, I
do not have a look at it, I'm more interested in the other
guys, what they want, that's what me too, especially ol-
der young people are attracting to us, we simply follow
them, even though I sometimes feel uncomfortable with
118
them. It's all new and strange. The only thing I fear is
that my parents or a teacher will come after it"
Freya (15): "Sometimes I'm afraid of what I do not know,
I sometimes think it's better not to join in. But then they
just laugh at you, you better not feel anything and do not
think at all, just get involved and wanting not too much
standing out with what you think and you feel, let alone
with what you will. Yet something in me protests, but I
dare not go into it too much, unless others support me.
Maybe I should show something more of myself than I do
not have to do things that I do not feel like."
Lisa (16): "I'm just away from home, making time to en-
joy things, if you're in the mood. No excess, only getting
the hang of it." Together with others if its possible. I just
don’t let myself be put under pressure, I do not like that
at all: doing what I feel good about and what I want, is
really in me - I think I have this from home. I do not put
pressure on other people, on the contrary, I find it easy to
resist when someone is put under pressure. Everyone
must be given the space to follow their own opinions, fee-
lings and choices. And not just having to run after
friends."
119
From control cul-
ture to influencing
culture
Parents are increasingly experiencing tensions in their
task as educators. The upbringing they received them-
selves is no longer useful in the contemporary context
and within the contemporary culture of interaction. At
the same time, they experience that their child asks for
an appropriate contribution and a share from their side
as a parent. How to make this happen in the current con-
text is their question.
It can help to clarify this context and at the same time
indicate which behavioral culture fits in and provides re-
sults.
What remains of the context in which I was raised?
In what context do I place the education that I give
my child?
120
Parents intuitively feel that a compelling and demanding
attitude is not the right way, even though an obligatory
response will occasionally prove to be the exception. A
more positive and constructive attitude - away from the
escalation of resistance and flight of the child - should
offer more prospects for cooperation and proximity. If
not, there is a risk of mutually compelling, opposing and
disposing, with the threat of violence and its develop-
ment in the longer term.
If in this way parents do not always immediately get what
they want from their child, it can be established that this
will allow favorable developments in due course.
Through a different way of exercising authority and in-
teraction with their child, chances are offered for deve-
lopment, which are only possible in this context.
Have influence and give influence
Increasingly, society is asking the question how to in-
fluence each other. One finds that the other is less wil-
ling to listen just like that, let alone just go into it or to
take into account what is being proposed or expected.
From that perceived powerlessness is then sought for
means to yet still have influence, or to acquire them
back. Often one seeks refuge in old recipes that are re-
called, in tightening the existing approach, or looking for
alternatives. For example, by engaging others, prefera-
bly others that are hoped to help in some way.
121
It is then assumed that something is lost and that this has
to be recovered. Possibly the other person has taken
over something that you want back. It is then presented
as if only someone can always have it, Initially you are
the other person, and therefore it comes down to regai-
ning its part. The origin of this problem, sometimes out
of despair, is explained to the other person and, as it
were, is expected to be solved by that side. It is then so-
metimes expected that he would give back the influence
of its own will and would encourage group members to
do so.
Influence, however, is not something that exists in a cer-
tain amount, that you can equate with having a say and
that you can win by appropriating it. Influence is some-
thing that expresses itself in quality, that you can equate
with the giving and that you can win by leasing it. One of
the things that can be thought of here is the distinction
between power and leadership.
Create conditions for self-regulation
Each of us has an inexhaustible source of energy, dyna-
mism, aptitude, approachability, growth and creati-
vity. Everyone wants to be big and strong. Nobody wants
a feeling of helplessness, uselessness or futility. To know
how to speak to this source and to stimulate that you
acquire influence. This by giving influence and providing
the necessary support and help so that the acquisition of
122
influence on itself and its environment continues to in-
crease. And not to remove any influence and motivation
already spontaneously present.
Research shows that where influence is given an opening
is created to shared consultation, shared understanding,
shared objectives, shared agreements and shared res-
ponsibility. Often one is even prepared to pledge a part
of his influence from growing trust or present
need. With good contact we come to a good co (n) act
or vice versa. In this way, one ultimately comes to a sha-
red influence.
Influence is not only about the influence of young people
towards adults or vice versa, but also about the influence
of young people towards themselves and influence to-
wards each other or towards the group, or even of the
group towards group members or towards adults. The
more, lateral influence of one person towards another,
the more influence there is, rather than less.
To have development requires something to add. Ad-
ding information, skills, experience, chances, opportuni-
ties, possiblities, power, strength. Something is often ta-
ken away out of uncertainty or fear. So there is no dan-
ger, so everything stays the old, so everything remains
clear, so the relationship remains intact, so you stay
on. For example, it is unfortunately not possible to prac-
tice with what one does not have and has not received.
123
In addition, it turns out that, unfortunately, your fear
comes true: the other person does not get enough in-
fluence over himself and his environment.
124
Working together with
the broad environment
Importance of social network
. Research shows that young people need informative
support, emotionally supported appreciative support
and concrete practical help from meaningful adults who
feel something for them. In particular, the emotional at-
mosphere in which help is provided is perceived by
young people as very valuable. As a person, they are con-
sidered worthwhile. Someone shows genuine interest
and concern for who they are.
. The number of people for whom a young person means
something and who can offer him or her informative
help, emotional help or practical help can be limited or
more extensive.
Do they help the young person who has to know some-
thing about which he is not sure ? Do they help the
Parenting isn’t something you do on your own.
125
young person who needs to talk about his feelings ? Do
they give the things the young person needs or wants, or
do they help him or her ? Do they offer the young per-
son anything on a mental-informative level, socio-emo-
tionally, on a real-practical level ? Do they offer support
in real life or online? What is the ratio of real life versus
online ?
. Also the regularity with which the informative, emotio-
nal and practical help is available, so young people want
to use it, and the quality of this help are important to feel
good and feel socially absorbed. Being able to use a so-
cial network can be an important support to be able to
It can be checked whether the youngster can, for ex-
ample, count on his or her mother, father, step- or
plusparent, brother, sister, grandmother, grandfa-
ther, aunt, uncle, cousin, niece, other children, neigh-
bor, neighbor friend, neighbor girlfriend, club friend,
club girlfriend, shopkeeper, cleaning man or lady,
class teacher, teacher, school friend, school girlfriend,
classmate, friend, grilfriend, buddy, partner, leading
person, youth service or organization, service or or-
ganization head, older-person, younger-person,
stranger, companion, confidant, online contacts and
friends, chat opportunities, ...
126
cope with life and everything that the youngster
faces. Tensions and problems can be handled better,
because one can count on others and one has the feeling
not to stand for it alone and one knows people who be-
lieve in him or her. People who love the younger person
and care about him or her. In short, letting the youngster
notice not to stand for it alone and not to stand al-
one. Others are around the younger. Especially the per-
sonal and the small distance are very meaningful
here. They hold more chances than the impersonal and
the greater distance from organized aid.
. On an emotionally supported informative level, a young
person may need help with thinking about something,
when solving a problem or conflict, when talking about
feelings and clarifying them, when sharing pleasant or
unpleasant feelings, when exploring something new,
when trying to tackle something differently or better,
when releasing something, when in doubt and insecure,
when looking for answers, when understanding and ex-
plaining something, when planning and looking ahead,
when to come to perspective and rest.
. On an emotionally substantiated appreciating level, a
young person may need help with getting over some-
thing when he is confronted with problems and possible
failure and loss, when he feels valued, when he or she
needs support and someone who defends him or her, to
say nice things about the younger ones, to be happy for
127
him or her, to show interest, to pay attention, to listen,
to being there for the young person who has a hard time,
when to process something, to be able to share some-
thing with him or her, to be able to trust the youngster,
to what you mean to him or her, to give the feeling of
belonging, to show how the youngster is perceived and
liked by others.
. On a concrete practical level, a young person may, for
example, need help with certain tasks and assignments
for which it has been asked, to take part in the responsi-
bility for something for which the young person himself
or herself is not only able to temporarily take care of so-
mething.
. Especially the opposite that no help is offered, or that
others are against the youngster or offer opposition and
counter-work, can come hard and isolate a youngster.
Others do not care about him or her, so the youngster
can not go to them. The young person is far away from
128
them, they can not accept him or her, they do not lis-
ten. The young person can not talk to them or ask for
advice, he or she can not be open with them or take
them into trust. They laugh at him or her or bother him
or her, they have no attention and no time, they do not
take the youngster into account and exclude him or
her. They do nothing for the younger person and give
him or her a bad feeling, the younger one can not count
on them. As a result, he or she risks missing a number of
development opportunities.
. Especially if a young person discovers not being able to
go to one group, he will take refuge with another
group. The group closest to life in the younger state will
usually give the easiest access. However, it is often the
group that can offer something emotionally, but that is
informally and practically less equipped to offer this
help. It is then a missed opportunity for those other
groups. The cause will then often be not being suffi-
ciently accessible and being experienced to much as an
opponent and a threat. One is too little inclined to res-
pond to the needs of the young person and wants too
much because of the help offered to meet his own needs
or to confirm himself. In the end one does something too
much for himself, the perspective of himself then stands
in the foreground and prevents the perspective of the
youngster.
129
. A young person who finally determines that he can not
go anywhere can feel bad and develop a negative self-
image. There is a risk that someone will actively iso-
late himself or herself in order to avoid feeling rejected
and so will in vain resort to resources and a response, as
a hold and shelter, which must reduce the pain of loss
and what missing and fill a large gap.
. A young person who feels isolated or excluded, also be-
lieves to have less influence and not be able to expect
help and support from people around him or her. From
this helpless feeling there is more and more the call for
powerful means and solutions of groups and principles
from outside. Those who do not feel isolated or exclu-
ded, believe that they have influence and that they can
expect help and support from people around them.
From this hopeful and confident feeling, more reserve is
created as opposed to interference and disruption from
outside.
. We can check and follow up to what extent who offers
what support to the youngster. And so certain help is
lacking and no one in a positive way is at present able to
do so, you can try to arrange this or letting arrange it,
by referral, so that certain persons will give the neces-
sary help that is lacking or inadequate.
. If this help can not be offered in the young person's na-
tural environment, it can be sought or made accessible,
130
by referring, how an organized facility (day center, re-
ception service, ...) can still offer this shelter and sup-
port, or of course the natural environment in the long
term.
. A movement has been active lately, called 'educational
civil society'. It concerns joint activities of citizens around
the young person with a view to raising and growing up.
This from the philosophy that raising and growing up is
not just a matter for parents alone anymore. As citizens,
they share a common responsibility with the parents.
The strength lies in social relations, formal and informal
networks, shared norms, the degree of mutual familia-
rity with each other and the common interest.
. ...
131
Reward and pu-
nishment
About develop-
ment guidance
Parenting as well as guiding the development of a child
is perhaps more difficult today than ever. Many certain-
ties from the past disappear and the future is difficult to
predict.
Moreover, parents and educators have become more
aware of their educational task. They certainly do not
want to make mistakes and perhaps provide better edu-
cation than they themselves had.
Parenting is often equated with rewarding and punis-
hing, in other words encouraging favorable behavior and
discouraging unfavorable behavior among children in
development.
You reward to encourage behavior.
How do you actually do this in practice?
132
As a parent or educator you try through your reaction to
learn a child something by rewarding it or to unlearn so-
mething by punishing it and not the other way around.
You let the child first try something and you react enthu-
siastically so that it would be repeated more often or
more easily.
Or you react disappointed so that the behavior would be
repeated less frequently and less easily and would disap-
pear as quick as possible.
However, it can be taken into account that there are also
many opportunities in a proactive, rather than reactive
act.
Proactive parenting means then, for example, creating
development-friendly situations for your child, talking to
your child in advance, making arrangements, setting a
model for your child, stimulating skills, developing one's
own strength, working in a connecting way, and so on.
You can read more about this in the theme section 'Pro-
active development support' of this encyclopedia.
Parenting by means of rewarding and punishing is there-
fore becoming less and less evident. There are so many
other parenting ways available that are more supportive
and power-oriented.
133
But even if you choose a different parenting relationship,
your reward and punishment will continue to play un-
consciously. You will, for example, be happy with what
you want or prefer from your child. You will not express
happiness for what you do not want or do not prefer.
Perhaps it is better then if you consciously deal with re-
warding and punishing.
However, not every reward method that is effective is
also desirable. The necessary conditions are that it is ac-
companied by respect and recognition of the child in de-
velopment, that it takes place in dialogue with the child,
that the effect is sustainable and that it promotes the in-
dependence and self-direction of the child.
If you want to reward and punish, it is important to build
a good relationship with your child and create a develop-
mentally friendly and child-friendly climate. This begins
in the first years of life by giving the child the opportunity
to attach safely.
If the distance between yourself and the child is too
great, it will be difficult for you to identify with what is
going on with your child and the willingness of your child
to invollow may be slight. Educating is simply a two-way
process. Your contact with your child will also be less
good, so that he or she experiences less safety. This is
especially true with long-term or frequent problems,
tensions and stress, which make it easier to become
134
angry, impatient or at risk of giving up and letting it run
its course. After all, parenting is a two-way process.
The better you can notice the needs and feelings of a
child, the better you can respond to it.
Every child needs well-being and feeling physically well,
safety and security, attention and love, appreciation and
individuality, growth space and a dose of autonomy. It is
important not to forget this when it comes to rewarding
and punishing.
It is useful to know that a child still has to learn just about
everything : getting to know himself or herself and the
immediate and wider world. This requires exercise
chances and stimulation and not in the first place limita-
tion and deceleration.
Now and then the child gets excited or out of control and
is then difficult to reach and approachable. Allowing time
to catch some breath and regain control over itself can
prevent you from reacting excessively. This is also so for
your own excitement. Maybe because you are missing
something and you do not know it anymore.
It is important to be able to work with rewards and to
make the most of the opportunities for this, rather than
waiting until it goes wrong and then having to intervene
in a punishing manner.
135
To pay attention to children when they get along well is
preferable, then intervene limiting when they go wrong.
It may be thought that rewarding is not only material,
such as spending money, a drink or something tasty.
Children often find social reinforcements very pleasant :
an admiring glance, smiling, attention, an encouraging
word and a hug can do wonders.
The reward of a possible joint activity is also very popular
with children.
Do not wait too long with your reward, the faster, the
more influence and then it is clear to the child what is
rewarded.
Do not, however, purchase your child's behavior by offe-
ring a reward in prospect, your child may only do some-
thing on condition that it knows what it will be.
A punishment is essentially something unpleasant. For
example, the absence of a reaction or result can be ex-
perienced as punitive, it is then spoken of ignoring if you
do not respond.
Spanking and even a tap can better belong to the past,
you also set the better tone and you will not let the child
want to do violence. That way you can be sure that you
136
has not given rise to violence. Violence that mainly pro-
vokes resistance and resistance, violates someone's phy-
sical integrity and is not the way to a sustainable solu-
tion.
For example, in countries where spanking or tapping a
child by anyone is legally prohibited, violence among
young people declines markedly. In countries where only
parents are allowed to tap their child as a pedagogical
tick, only aggression is reduced among girls. Recent
large-scale statistical research has also shown that child-
ren who were beaten at the age of 5 showed an increase
in behavioral problems at the age of 6 and also at the age
of 8 compared with children who were never beaten.
Hitting a child was linked to an increase in behavioral
problems. It was not effective and made the behavior of
children worse. This was also evident in families where
parents were otherwise loving and warm in dealing with
their child.
A child responds to hitting with a greater response in
areas of the brain related to self-esteem and confidence,
The greater response is related to signals of threat from
the environment. This increases the chance of develo-
ping anxiety, depression, behavioral problems and other
psychological problems. Spanking appeared to affect
how the brain develops, similar to what happens with
more pronounced forms of violence. Also a tap turned
137
out to have a greater impact than expected on the brain
development of the child.
Pausing the child, denying it something, putting it out of
the situation, having the child rebuild and temporarily
imposing a limitation are perhaps better choices.
Try to process something meaningful in your sentence
and have something done as it should.
Beware of humiliating punishments and remarks, such as
laughing at. They can have far-reaching side effects.
Your child can become anxious and insecure by regular
use and develop a negative self-image. Your child can
then respond anxiously from fear of punishment or from
disapproval.
But the child may also become or be insensitive to pu-
nishment, because it dislikes outcomes that arouse its
aversion or reluctance and predictors of these aversive
outcomes, such as punishment. It then clings to the re-
presentation it prefers or desires. It reacts negatively or
indifferently to punishment or the prospect of punish-
ment, so that it does not learn from it. This according to
a recent Australian study.
138
Tell your child I like you, but I do not like you to do or
don’t do this or that. Your attitude is then positive to-
wards the child and adjusting to the action.
It is better not to assume as usual negative or undesira-
ble behavior on the part of your child. Unfavorable be-
havior that you can counteract and unlearn with reward
if it is not there. Or that you can counter with punish-
ment if this behavior continues. Rather, you can let it re-
volve around a generally positive or desired behavior of
your child as a starting point, which you confirm with re-
warding if it remains present and can punish if it disap-
pears.
Respond in a timely manner and do not just let your act-
ions depend on your child who is disappointing or does
disappointing things.
Do not forget that every situation brings with it an expe-
rience that can be rewarding or punitive in itself. Some-
thing works and the child is happy with it or something
fails and the child is unhappy about it.
Avoid disturbing this naturally disturbed experience
through your intervention. The child is no longer
unhappy by your intervention - if possible unjustly expe-
rienced - or is thereby distracted from his original expe-
rience.
139
Also pay attention to how a child experiences something,
how does a child feel about it.
Keep in mind that an internal stimulator and motivator
from your child is preferable to an external stimulator
and motivator from outside of you as a parent. This way
the child can control itself and is not dependent on its
environment.
If your child finds an activity intrinsically satisfying, such
as with play activity, it is better to omit an extrinsic sti-
mulus. If not, the child threatens to do something only
for the sake of your external reward and the inner stimu-
lation disappears even if your reward is no longer recei-
ved afterwards. This is due to the overjustification effect.
Many educators assume that only they reward and pu-
nish. However, parents can often find that their child re-
wards them when they overlook something and, conver-
sely, punishes them or ignores them when they ask for
something.
Do not let yourself be rewarded for not holding on so-
mething or punishing for your holding on some-
thing. Make this clear immediately. You can, of course,
reward your child for something you can hold.
Parents are sometimes inclined to establish their autho-
rity through reward and punishment. It is good to be
140
aware then that you do this more for yourself than for
your child.
Every child has multiple sides. On the way you deal with
your child depends much which side develops. Especially
young children are still very flexible in their attitude and
actions, in their personality development.
Children do not change and grow suddenly, but step by
step. Every rewarding experience can be a step in a de-
velopment-friendly direction.
Every punishing experience, especially if it happens to
them personally, can lead to a defensive and repulsive
response. You then come out with your child to what you
just wanted to avoid, distant and self-centered.
It is important to be patient with the child, even if it does
not work out completely. Especially to prevent you from
discouraging and discouragingly react to your child that
does not meet your (high) expectations.
You can also pay attention to stay in balance yourself as
much as possible, by taking time and caring for yourself.
If not, there is a risk that you will reach to punishment
more quickly.
Every child wants to become big and strong, just like his
parents to whom it mirrors. By showing yourself how it
141
should be done and giving the child the chance to feel
big and strong and become independent, you can see
the child evolve favorably.
Your child becomes a communicative, interactive, lively
and cheerful person, full of confidence, just as you show
it to your child and radiate.
If you attract and stimulate your child to develop, your
child will attract you and you will have more opportuni-
ties to guide your child in his development.
142
In your reach !
As a young person you often meet situations where you
can do little, at least that is how these situations occur.
You discover that something can be up to you, but that
you can not do anything about it. For example, others do
not understand you, or they constantly misunderstand
you. You did not mean it like that, it's up to the language
you speak, learned at home. It's up to me, to my langu-
age, but I can not help it. It are the others who do not
understand it, or constantly misunderstand it.
You often feel powerless as a young person.
Is this always the case?
YOUTH THEME
143
Or you discover that it is not up to you at all. You can not
do anything about it then. For example, others do not
like someone who is not sporty. Even though I could do
something about it, which is not so certain, it depends
on the preference and interest of the environment. Just
bad luck!
Even though something is not up to you and even though
you can not do anything about it, you can try to perceive
it for yourself as within your sphere of influence. Even
though you are not responsible for the origin, even if you
are not responsible for the consequences, you can ima-
gine it to yourself as if not to undergo it. Not powerless
to face.
The least you can do is protect you from possible conse-
quences. It is better to formulate actively and find out
how you can deal with it, so that some effect becomes
possible.
This way you can search for how to avoid becoming a
victim of something that is not up to you or that you can
not change anything about. Searching for how you can
deal constructively with something that is not up to you
and that can not be changed in itself.
Find out what you can do about the consequences. How
you can avoid the negative consequences and be a victim
through your perception and your dealings.
144
That language of yours, for example, that you received
from home and that nobody really understands. Even if
you can not change it in itself, you can try to avoid the
consequences by dealing with it to others. This way you
could check with others, or in doubtful cases, whether
they have understood you completely. This way you can
immediately correct misunderstandings and avoid that
you would later be confronted with negative consequen-
ces.
That being not sporty of you. You can not really help that
you are not an athlete. Still, you might want to develop
It’s up to me
Can do so-
mething
It’s up to me
Can’t to anything
about
It’s not up to me
Can do something
about
It’s not up to me
Can’t do anything
about
145
some sporting activity. If you can not do this, you can al-
ways talk about sports and you can show some inte-
rest. Or at least do not allow any subdued disgust.
Look for an example of something that is up to you and
that you can not do anything about.
Then find out what you could do to reduce or eliminate
the consequences for you.
Doesnt it work. For example, imagine that you are afraid
of something that has frightened you before and of
which you will no longer be redeemed. You could tell
your surroundings about your fear, and immediately ask
them to take this into account. Tell them that they could
help you a lot. Because of their understanding or support
you would be very helped and you could do something
about your situation.
Try it yourself.
Look for an example of something that is not up to you
and that you can do something about.
Then find out what you could do to reduce the conse-
quences for you, or make them disappear.
Doesnt it work. For example, imagine that someone is
constantly making you angry, because he always tries to
146
make you wise something, or sometimes even acts diffe-
rently than agreed. You can then make it clear to him or
her that you do not want to be made wise something, or
do not wish to experience that something is different
than agreed. As soon as you notice something, you can
also remind the other person of what you do not want.
Try it yourself.
Look for an example of something that is not up to you
and that you can not do anything about.
Then find out what you could do to reduce the conse-
quences for you, or make them disappear.
Doesn’t it work. For example, imagine someone hurting
you. He or she makes you clear to no longer feels
something for you. You can have a very difficult time
with this. You can then talk about this with whom you
did this grief, or with someone you can trust. You can
also try to learn from this yourself : that not everyone
loves you and that you learn to live with this, that you
figure out why someone no longer cares about you and
what you can learn from this to avoid or reduce repeti-
tion.
Try it yourself.
147
Often we are inclined in what we do to react to what
happened to us : something scared us, someone made
us angry, or sad. We will respond to this. Something or
someone formed the cause, our response is then the lo-
gical consequence. The encountered cause is the star-
ting point of our actions.
We can also make the starting point of our actions from
a self-intended goal. Our actions then form the means to
achieve our preconceived goal. We then respond to a
self chosen goal. Finding safety, staying calm, knowing
how to deal with loss is then our starting point for our
response.
Through the chosen goals, we experience more in-
fluence and have a grip on the situation and the
course. It revolves around something we want, and not
around something that the environment wants or does
not want for us.
That way we are less vulnerable. In this way we remain
or become more resilient. It does not matter from what
we want to go away, or what we want to avoid, but
where do we want to go or what do we want to
reach. For example, we are looking for resources and
means for what can help us, who or what can support us
to figure out what we have chosen ourselves.
148
This way we can experience ourselves less as victims of
what happened to us, but more as responsible for what
we want. This way we shift the responsibility of the other
to ourselves.
Thus we can move from the limits of permissible, easier,
to switch to the conditions for the desirable.
For example, we do not have to go negative to the other
person to give a 'brake' signal, but we can do something
positive to the other person to give a 'pull' signal.
149
Development of
meaning
Common and additional meanings
Simply put, we could say that in our head we deal with
duplicates of the surrounding realities. Call it copies, alt-
hough this word is not so well chosen. Only one side of
the double refers directly to reality, this is the common
side. For example, consider the term 'younger' that re-
fers to a person of small age. This is the common mea-
ning or reference value of the double.
The other sides of the double refer to what is called in
our heads when we deal with this double, these are the
individual sides. These are the for each of us our own
There is a lot to learn to discover meanings and to
gives meanings for yourself as a child.
Even harder is it to get to know meanings that count
for others.
150
connotations that spring up automatically and are often
different for each of us. Think of associations of 'youn-
ger' with being playful, with being dependent, being
overconfident, and so on. These associations refer to in-
formation that is stored in our heads, often arising from
previous contacts and experiences. They only refer indi-
rectly to surrounding realities.
This means that when communicating alongside the
common side of the double which is easy to communi-
cate, a great deal of time must be spent on the commu-
nication of the individual sides of the double, if one
wants to get exactly the same wavelength. The lack of
this often leads to a different or wrong understan-
ding. Having common experiences can provide a basis
for building up multiple common sides of the doubles
that are used in a communicative way.
Cognitions and cognitive schema’s as linking
Such a meaning can be called a cognition. Because mea-
nings usually occur together, think of common and indi-
vidual meanings, one speaks of a cognitive sche-
ma. Where cognition is a unit of knowledge, a cognitive
schema is a knowledge package. Once the child has mas-
tered the language, cognition is associated with a name
that has often been taken over from the environment. A
concept is linked to a collection of cognitions as soon as
the child's memory and thinking ability allow it.
151
Cognitions and cognitive schemas allow to attribute
meaning to the child in the environment. What the child
perceives activates in the child certain cognitions and
cognitive schemas that allow it to be identified as this or
that as a common meaning. Or what the child perceives
can cause the child to be awakened to that or that which
gives it that individual meaning to something. If the per-
son who meets the child is small in shape, the child will
activate the child or younger schema. If the person who
meets it is smaller than the child, then the schema baby
may be activated, to which he looks somewhat down.
Meanings mean that there are links between something
in the outside world and something in the inner world or
between something in the inner world and something
else in the inner world. For example, the link between
the child in the outside world and the image that the
child has of a child or a younger, or the link between the
image of a child and being weak as a picture.
Semantic memory as a storage medium
It is the semantic memory that stores the defining cha-
racteristics and the characteristic features in the course
of the development of the child. It is also the semantic
memory that makes the defining and characteristic fea-
tures available. The determining factor for identifying
what is happening in the outside world. The typical mar-
king and characterizing of what is going on, this is sur-
152
rounded with feelings, judgments, anticipation or aver-
sion, and so on. The moment the child forms a meaning,
it does this on the basis of stimuli from one or more sen-
ses. It may also be that the child is involved in interaction
with that something from the outside world. Specific
sensory and behavioral experience are then linked to the
encountered reality and stored in the semantic memory
as characteristic.
Researchers from the Universities of Glasgow and Bir-
mingham were able to show that memories become less
vivid and detailed over time, so that ultimately only the
central core is preserved. This blurring of details of our
memory in favor of the essence was amplified with regu-
lar recall of recently stored experiences. Remembering is
seen as a highly reconstructive process and not as an
exact representation, where memories can change every
time they are thought of.
Memories thus appear to be primarily focused on mea-
ningful contents, which is also reflected in brain signals.
That memories change with time and use is a good and
adaptive thing. Memories preserve the information that
is likely to come in handy in similar situations in the fu-
ture. This preference for semantic memory content ap-
pears to be significantly stronger with the passage of
time and with repeated recall. In this way, meaningful
information for later, remains longer.
153
After a few characteristics are met in daily reality, the
whole of stored characteristics is activated in the seman-
tic memory. In this way something is quickly recognized
in reality and a rapid image and subsequent reaction is
possible. What is noticed is seen as a sign of and for (sig-
ning) a certain perception and reaction.
In semantic memory the encountered reality can be sto-
red as an image as a representation of that reality. This
is especially so in children up to about four years. Gradu-
ally, symbols are also formed that represent often more
complex realities. The scarf that symbolizes the connec-
tion with mommy who gave him to me. In the develop-
ment of the language, concepts are available to store
characteristics. Finally, rules are available to link con-
cepts to each other, where one term means a link for
another concept. A child that is small and young.
The development of the language allows the rever-
se : where the child tries to capture reality in images, it
now tries to evoke reality through the meaning of the
language concepts. For example, the semantic develop-
ment of language is seen as a second step in language
development. This after the phonological development
that concerns the making of sounds and the syntactic
development that concerns the making of sentences and
the morphological development that is about the use of
the right word form. This way it comes to understanding
154
what stands for what and thus listening for active use
and thus speaking.
Function of meaning development
Development of meaning can be seen as a system for
classification, organizing and structuring of the environ-
mental reality. The way this happens is very individual
and culturally determined. These are the child's own ex-
periences that are at the basis of the self-formed links. It
is the information obtained from the environment or the
shared experiences that form the basis of the jointly for-
med links. Who the parents are for the child will be very
colored by his personal experiences with his pa-
rents. What his parents are is heared from his environ-
ment and is determined culturally and historically.
A clear trend that is evident here is that the provision of
meaning today is more individually determined then be-
fore. Previously, the child was more likely to abandon his
own experience or let it precede by what the environ-
ment imposed and expected. Not who are my parents
for me from concrete experiences with them or from ex-
periences with needs in contact with them, but what do
my parents want in contact with them as interpretation
that in general can be expected in the society from child-
ren.
In addition to organizing reality, the development of
meaning also leads to that reality. How can the concept
155
allow a better response to and dealing with the environ-
mental reality.
Origin of own meaning development
From phenomenological research we know that the es-
sence of many realities can not be found in the core of
the realities themselves, but in ourselves in dealing with
those realities, in the meaning we give ourselves to these
realities, how much these realities in itself also displays
a certain meaning. For a child, a stack of books can have
the meaning of a sofa, however clearly the meaning of
the books may be to us.
Especially what the child is looking for in a reality and the
contact it has with it, is very decisive for his significance
assignment. So your mobile phone can be a nice toy for
the child. In the evolution of what the child looks for in a
reality and in the changing relationship with it, each time
different meanings are assigned. The strange child of the
neighbors becomes a playmate, later a friend, later the
sweetheart and yes perhaps the chosen life partner.
Development of meaningful constructions
Gradually the child develops besides doubles that refer
to realities outside of itself, also doubles that refer to
constructions in its head about realities. These doubles
also have a side that refers directly to the construction,
next to sides that refer to what is called with the double.
Think of 'young' as referring to the common meaning of
156
small age, in addition to individual associations of 'young'
with being active, with being-in, with new, with attracti-
veness, and so on.
For these abstract doubles even more differences in
meaning arise because the common side can also show
individual differences in nuance. Where, for example,
does young ends. As a parent you only have indirect in-
fluence on this.
Meaning to themselves and to others
Children first develop the ability to recognize meaning
and attribute it to what they meet. In this way they get
to know themselves what something means to them. In
this way they also learn to discover what is important to
them, what they seek and need in their own sense of
meaning. My mommy means everything to me, so I am
still very dependent. My mom goes before everything, I
seek and constantly needs her safety.
From the age of three, children develop the ability to
also discover the meaning that others recognize and at-
tribute to something. Children try to understand other
children and to understand their intentions. Which idea
other children make of something and what other child-
ren are looking for based on their knowledge, desires,
questions and expectations. In other words, the child is
able to attribute meaning to perceived behavior. My
mum takes good care of me, I mean a lot to my mom. My
157
mom constantly urges me to do what she expects, she
wants me to be sweet.
Where four to five-year-olds in the meanings allocation
mainly rely on the concrete situation and the concrete
actions of themselves and others, eight or nine-year-olds
also rely on the knowledge they have acquired about
themselves and others. I cry because I have lost
something or I cry because I am sensitive. He is angry
because he can not participate, he is angry because he is
light-hearted. Gradually these two knowledge contents
mix, these about the concrete situation and reaction and
the one about who someone is. She is excited because
she is not the first to turn and because she always wants
to win from others.
Encouraging the development of meaning
As a parent you can stimulate the development of the
meaning of the child by using images of realities in the
child's world. Images that accentuate certain characte-
ristics of these realities, for example, by simplifying
them. The smaller shape of the child is magnified against
that of an adult. The love of the mother for her child is
over-accentuated with hearts. Picture books and chil-
dren's videos can be helpful.
Regularly talking to, with and in the vicinity of the child
can make the child familiar with language sounds, from
158
your tonality a foundation can be laid for meanings. Re-
search shows that the richer your language use is in the
form of a variety of words and more complex sentence
constructions, the faster the vocabulary development of
the child (Hoff & Naigles, 2002).
It can help to give definitions of what the child meets, by
indicating its characteristics. If the child deals with a ball,
you can draw attention to the round, opposite the angu-
lar of a block. Around you can illustrate with roles, an-
gular with non-movable and sliding. Especially for what
is not immediately perceptible, you can indicate what it
typifies or typifies the child. For example, if the child
weeps you can link to a feeling of grief because it has lost
something.
Especially giving concrete examples of what something
is and what not, what belongs to something and what
does not, how something is and how something does
not, when something is and when it is not, make the
meanings very differentiated and at the same time more
extensive. What is all small, what is all great, for
example. What is not small, what is not great.
As a parent, you can give feedback to the child when it
gives an incorrect meaning to something. Not smaller
but less, no more but bigger.
159
Let the child tell a lot as soon as it can talk, let the child
read a lot as soon as possible. In his talk the meaning of
something becomes sharper and more frequent. In rea-
ding, the child meets meanings that others offer.
A child of two knows about two hundred to three
hundred words and their meaning, a child of three al-
ready nine hundred and a child of five nearly two thou-
sand words and their meaning. Personal use of language
can only stimulate this.
160
Buffers
as protection
What accompanies me as a youngster?
I've been there before I get anywhere. In my thoughts
and in my imagining I have already formed an idea and I
can feel and experience this in a physical way. Do I feel
tense, do I suffer from nerves?
The more often I experienced something, the more de-
tailed the image could be, but at the same time the more
volatile this happening, for the sake of predictability and
routine.
The newer a happening, the deeper and more detailed
this happening for me, even if I notice that it is still vague
or unknown and needs to be assessed and comple-
ted. Much remains in the question form. This ensures
Buffers ensure safety.
They allow us to notice insecurity on time.
How to sensitize children for this?
YES !
NO !
161
more prudence and a slower progress. First (knowing)
to know and feel and then only doing.
Multiple buffers
For example, we notice that several buffers surround us
who ensure safety and avoid too great risks with serious
consequences.
In this way we have the already mentioned mental buf-
fer of estimating and feeling.
Closely connected to this is the signal buffer. Signals that
point in a particular direction can be more direct or indi-
rectly read from what is being said, from what the per-
son shows and from what the person let feel.
Also related is the incoherence buffer. What someone
says, does not correspond with reality or with what so-
meone does.
Towards yourself there is the comfort (zone) buffer. You
notice that the situation or the other person takes you
out of your comfort zone and you don't feel comfortable,
like you feel bad about something, you don't recognize
something or you don't trust something, you risk falling
outside your limits, etc.
In addition, there is the social buffer, the others on which
162
we can count, who accompany us or on which we can
appeal. They provide a large dose of safety and security.
Furthermore, there is the communicative buffer. We can
address, agree, inform, warn, and more.
Not to mention is the behavioral barrier, such as proxi-
mity or distance-winning, respecting habits and rituals,
etc.
Finally, in emergency situations, there is the reference
buffer, such as apparently cooperating; say yes, doing
no; pretend; create a different impression; point to sur-
veillance; point to be met; someone on the way; set con-
ditions; delay; make appointments; 'promise'; keep tal-
king; gain time; distract; put on the wrong track; believe
in a way out and a happy ending; and so on.
This means that we are not immediately surrendered to
something, but that we often can see or feel something
in advance, that we can invoke the help of others in time
and act in a communicative or behavioral way. These
buffers surround us and make access to something pos-
sible or allow us to prevent access.
What to allow yourself?
For optimal use of these buffers, much will depend on
how you let yourself deal with a situation or event.
163
What you let go before, whether you want to go into so-
mething, go on with it, or want to go on. Whether you
want to go ahead, go along or go together. Whether you
want to check something or start from it. Whether you
want to go to something, or want to stop or go away or
go sideways or backwards. Whether you want to go
ahead or want to let something go down, get out of the
way, let breakdown or get lost. Whether you let go or
insist that something goes well and is possible. Whether
it goes this way before you go out. Or you allow yourself
to let go or get stuck. It will be a matter of determining
for yourself how far you want to go and not just going
through with something.
Give buffers opportunities
Adults can teach young people how to use buffers. They
can explain what to do and can show how to do this. This
offers young people a basis to optimize their own expe-
rience for themselves and their own situation.
Adults often neglect this development or refute the na-
tural and intuitive buffers by substituting their buffers
and acting as a buffer themselves. But what if the adults
are not there or are not available.
Buffers in what you undertake
Where the previous is useful for what the other person
says and does to you and how you respond to this or not
and whether or not you allows this, is the following
164
useful in your own or requested engagement, in what
you undertake and how you already does or does not
act.
With what you yourself do and undertake, on your own
initiative or at the request of someone, you can use an
emotional, rational and behavioral buffer.
Emotional buffer : You can use what and how you feel
about what and how you think and do.
Rational buffer : Or can you use what and how you think
about what and how you feel and do.
Behavioral buffer: Or you can still use what and how you
do from what and how you think and feel.
An example :
Someone wants something from you and asks for your
cooperation, but fears a no-answer if you knew the un-
derlying reason for his request.
You try to empathize with his proposal, but notice that
many questions remain open. Especially the why of his
question remains very unclear. Also why the question is
asked to you remains obscure. Especially the exclusive
and wanting to exclude the others can not be inter-
preted. You do not feel comfortable with your requested
engagement. Also, not wanting to talk openly about the
165
direction the other person wants to go, does not feel
right.
The mental image that remains vague, the feelings that
are unfavorable and that you can not appeal to others
about your commitment should encourage you to talk
more about what the other person wants from you. And
if this does not work, you can try to distance yourself or
actively take action not to go further with the other per-
son.
If you would go to the request of the other person, you
can consider how you would think about yourself and
how you would feel when you gave in to the other person.
Okay in all areas
Finally, you can check whether something is okay in the
three different territories with which you have to do :
Is it something I like or something I want, in the mental
territory ?
Are others in the social territory informed and agree with
what I do ?
Can I call on someone or something in the real territory
if necessary ?
166
Three questions on which three times yes
Before I want to respond to something attractive or to
an invitation, ask yourself beforehand :
. I feel for it and I agree with it ? (mental territory)
. others know where I am and they agree ? (social ter-
ritory)
. can I find help or way out in the
environment and support from others?
(real territory)
For example, if your answer is 'no' to one of the three
questions, express your no, inform others if necessary,
and seek help and support.
167
A practical situation as exercise
YES !
NO !
answer
At home they
think that’s okay.
The others are al-
ready gone.
I love a
party.
Other friends
are going
too.
It’s already
late.
Nobody else is
there.
NO !
YES !
168
Preventing
burnout
as a parent
Burnout as a parent?
Perhaps the topic will somewhat surprise : the occur-
rence of burnout as a parent. Is burnout not associated
with a 'burned-out' in a work situation ? Indeed, but un-
der a work situation can more in general be understood,
a task that has been given or an own assignment that ge-
nerally depletes someone so that he or she goes un-
der. Whether this is a work situation, a learning situation
(burnout at students) or a living situation (burnout at pa-
rents) is rather secondary. It always involves the con-
frontation with a task or assignment - here a parenting
task - that requires too much of a person (bearing load)
so that he no longer perseveres with his available possi-
How as a parent prevent to go under?
Which signals can you notice in time?
How do you respond?
[emotional exhaustation]
[decreasing competence feeling]
[depersonalisation]
169
bilities (capacity). Because the possibilities are ex-
hausted by the continuous, repetitive and prolonged
load, so that it can not be regained again. It is not so
much the balance of carrying capacity and bearing load
that is disturbed, but the balance of giving and building
up. The result is a long-term energy deficit and a perma-
nent feeling of exhaustion. If in time the reconstruction
of forces could be done, then burnout would not oc-
cur. However, a progressive reduction of forces takes
place, which in the long term gives burnout more oppor-
tunities. Reducing this reduction of forces and offering
opportunities to rebuild them is one of the main points
of attention for preventing burnout as a parent.
(Mia - 33 years) I experienced that I was very unhappy
with my child. No matter how much I tried, it did not
want to click between us. It was also difficult: I constantly
made comments about what it did or did not want to do
what I wanted. Sometimes I completely lost my patience
and demanded in vain that it would sit still and be silent. I
just could not have anything from my child at certain ti-
mes. The best moments were when it was away from
home. But even then I was very disappointed that it
would come home again and everything would start
again.
(Diane - 36 years old) I started to experience myself more
and more as an unfriendly, upbringing and hard-working
parent who could no longer handle it and knew it with his
170
child to whom she was less and less attached. Who did
the opposite of what she wanted herself, but who no lon-
ger had a grip on the child, on her own actions and on
herself.
The development of a burnout
Parenting can ask a whole effort of you as a parent. Es-
pecially if it is not easy when dealing with your child, you
may feel that you have a difficult assignment. It is then
easy to create a tense atmosphere that gradually turns
into a tense relationship with your child. This tense at-
mosphere and relationship can then easily create new
tensions and evoke stress both with you as a parent as
with the child. This way you as a parent and child easily
end up in a long-lasting and recurring stress situa-
tion. This requires a lot from the child, but also from the
parent who gradually feels that he can no longer easily
cope with his task as a parent.
As a parent you are inclined to make extra efforts to still
succeed in your parental task. Efforts to which the child
does not always react positively. This can generate a lot
of emotions, such as excitement, disappointment, anger
and fear that make you gradually become very irritable
and easily react emotionally. The feeling then gradually
arises with your little impact-providing commitment that
this can not continue endlessly, especially because the
child's positive response to your extra effort is lacking.
171
... or how emotional exhaustion occurs.
There is a danger that you will gradually question your
parental skills and your parental competence, that you
will gradually lose your self-confidence in this area, be-
cause you are increasingly confronted with not knowing
how to manege it as parent. You do not know how to
deal with the situation of your child and your child self,
so that additional tensions would arise. Especially the
decrease or lack of a clear vision on parenting makes so-
meone more vulnerable.
... or how decreasing competence feeling appears.
An additional danger is that your attitude towards your
child and your task as a parent becomes increasingly ne-
gative and you start to believe less and less in your child
and your task. This way you can gradually slide down to
Recently, Leuven researchers developed a new defi-
nition of burnout, with five core symptoms that can
be seen as characteristics of (emotional) exhaus-
tion. They are physical and psychological exhaus-
tion; cognitive loss of control, such as concentration
and memory problems; emotional loss of control, ex-
pressing itself in pronounced emotional reac-
tions; depressive symptoms, which is similar to de-
pression; and mental distance, expressing itself as a
mental distance from the present assignment.
172
a more cynical view of your child and your stated paren-
tal assignment. It does not yield much or anything with
your child who is disappointing.
... or how depersonalisation occurs.
Emotional exhaustion, a decreasing sense of compe-
tence and depersonalization are generally seen as the
three related core characteristics of burnout.
Risks
It will be clear that a developing burnout does not only
entail a risk for yourself as a parent, but also for your ac-
tions towards your child and for your child.
1. risk to yourself
. general feeling of powerlessness
. permanent feeling of tension and pressure
. doubt of own possibilities as a parent
. much as a burden and difficult to experience
. disinterested and isolated (want to be left
alone, ...)
. not be able to distance, nothing can be relative
or let away
2. risk for your actions to your child
. easily act emotionally charged towards your
child: disappointed, excited, angry, ...
. act impatiently with your child
. slight tolerance towards the child
173
. mood fluctuations and volatility
in your dealings with child
. increased pressure on your child
. lack of energy, interest and sense of
interaction with child
. show escape behavior or neglect behavior
. easily conflictual interaction
. in the background risk of abusing your child
(hitting, heavy punishment, ...)
3. risk for your child
. show your disappointing image of
child (child as a nuisance, ...)
. the development of negative self-image in your
child because of your reactions
. to develop a low self-esteem feeling
because of the lack of confirmation
. in the background risk for emotional neglect
(disinterest, rejection, …)
In summary, there is a risk that your actions will show
signs of overcompensation, giving up or escaping
Consequences of burnout
When the daily stress of being a parent continues,
it can lead to a burnout. This is an intense exhaus-
tion that leads parents to feel detached from their
174
child and become insecure about their parenting
skills. In today's society and cultural context, there
is a lot of pressure on parents. However, it is not
possible to be a perfect parent. Trying to do so can
lead to exhaustion, with the risk of achieving just the
opposite as intended. This according to recent re-
search at the French-speaking University of Leuven.
The research showed that burnout can have serious
consequences for both parent and child. For parents
emotional exhaustion, emotional detachment and
parental feelings of inefficiency. For children, ne-
glect of physical, educational and emotional needs,
confrontation with a parent's thinking to abandon
them and a propensity of their parents to verbal,
physical or psychological abuse.
Parental burnout and parental neglect also showed
a circular relationship: parental burnout led to more
parental neglect, which in turn led to more burnout,
and so on.
The study indicates that parents should know that
self-care is good for themselves and their child and
that when they feel severely exhausted, they should
seek help. Anything that allows parents to recharge
their batteries to prevent exhaustion is therefore
also beneficial for their child. It is best for parents to
avoid putting too much pressure on themselves,
such as expecting too much of themselves and wan-
175
How to prevent burnout
. Identifying signs of evolving bur-
nout in a timely manner, in
yourself, in dealing with child-
ren, in children themselves as a
reaction to your dealings. No-
ticing changes that occur pro-
gressively, such as no longer re-
cognizing themselves at certain
points.
. Perceiving causes in yourself
(loss of control), in your
dealings with child (conflict, dis-
tance, misunderstanding, ...)
and in child (insecurity, uncer-
tainty, ...).
. Reduce causes and, if possible,
eliminate them.
. Add protective factors (partner,
friends, family members, self-
care, ...).
Emma Mansour, psy-
chologist and psycho-
therapist, proposes to
prevent burnout, to pay
attention to yourself.
According to her, a
glass jar with marbles
can be helpful. Every
marble that you add re-
presents a moment or
an action of self-
care. Like, for example,
taking a break or just
moving. Every marble
you take away corres-
ponds to, for example,
skipping a moment of
rest or not moving. Ac-
cording to her, it is then
essential to keep as
many marbles as possi-
ble in the cup and in
this way be reminded in
time of the need for
self-care.
too much expectations of themselves and wanting
to do too much. So exhaustion can be avoided and
also the harmful consequences associated with it.
176
. Reduce risk factors (stressful work situation, deman-
dingness, perfectionism, ...).
. Increase carrying capacity (parent skills, expand used
parenting methods and responses, ...).
. Reduce load (help, share parenting task, ...).
. Call on social network for conversation or to relieve you
practically. For example, participating in parent groups
or chatting online.
. Break through continuity in load (temporary relief, op-
portunity to gain strength, ...).
. Pay attention to available energy: keep reserve, charge
batteries in time, take breaks in time, spread out, di-
vide, ...
. Focusing on and recognizing the positive: focus on
whatworks and is okay, being happy with small succes-
ses and going step by step.
. Don't pursue perfectionism.
Parents who worry and who lack a vision are sometimes
presented as more vulnerable to burnout. However, this
177
is a circular process. The gradually increasing vulnerabi-
lity undermines self-confidence, makes people insecure,
increases worry, and doubts the existing vision.
You can also take into account that what you just want
to avoid (such as not being able to cope, losing control,
getting exhausted, ...) is likely to occur due to your incre-
ased effort.
Apology
It can be a good idea for an experienced increasing fai-
lure in dealing with your child, to :
not just accusing your child, as if your child is a
big problem. But to recognize that from an evol-
ving burnout everything is presented more nega-
tively, more magnified and less nuanced than it
is, so that no possibilities for rearing are seen and
tried out,
not just blame yourself, as if you were not able or
willing to raise your child. But to recognize that
from a developing burnout your ways of dealing
with your child are presented as more negative,
problematic and less nuanced, so that no action
possibilities are seen and tried.
Stress and burnout
Every parent experiences sometimes to get out of ba-
lance and out of selfcontrol, yet he quickly regains con-
trol over himself and the situation. This is typical for
178
stress. Many children know these stress reactions from
their parents, without this really giving them problems.
Some parents are constantly experiencing loss of self-
control and can no longer find their balance, so that for
a long time the feeling arises that they no longer have
any control over themselves and the situation. This is ty-
pical for burnout. For children, burnout consequences
can best be avoided, it causes more than transient pro-
blems for them.
Children respond very differently to a parental burnout
Many children have noticed or felt for some time that
the relationship with the parent is becoming increasingly
tense and difficult. They also come under tension, which
can evolve to a more permanent state of tension.
Even though children sometimes do their utmost not to
increase the tension (being good, being quiet, not com-
plaining, keeping a distance, keeping quiet, sensing how
the mood is of parent, being careful in response, not da-
ring to react, ... ), yet the experienced tension causes fee-
lings of tension, such as agitation, irritability, fear, inse-
curity, guilt, disappointment and lethargy. The child can
respond to this with restless behavior, irritable behavior,
with uncertain behavior, with passive behavior and with
physical reactions.
179
These can strengthen the tension and the exhaustion
feeling in the parent. So that a negative spiral starts of
burnout symptoms that feed the behavioral problems of
the child, which in turn increase the burnout symptoms.
180
Out of the center
If we look at a group, we see group members who be-
long more to the center of the group. We also see group
members who belong less to the center. Sometimes we
see group members who are on the edge of the group or
even over the edge. Physically they are still part of the
group, but mentally they have distanced themselves
from it or they were socially excluded. Sometimes se-
veral group members can be in this situation at the same
time. It will be clear that they find each other easily.
The more someone is at the center of the group, the
more someone will be inclined to refer in his or her act-
ions to what lives and guides in the group. The more so-
meone is out of the center, the less someone will be in-
clined to refer to what lives in the group and is direc-
tive. The chance is then great that someone in his doing
What if a child no longer identifies himself with the
family group?
181
will refer to himself or to the subgroup who is also out of
the center.
The reasons why someone is out of the center can be
very diverse. On the one hand, they can relate to the less
favorable attitude of the group towards the group mem-
ber, or they may have to deal with group members
themselves that for some reason do not fit or find con-
nection or want to find with the group, or also they can
have to deal with less favorable experiences with each
other as a result of being incompatible with each other
or not being able or willing to become compatible.
Those who are more in the center have more reasons to
comply with the group. Such a person gets more bene-
fits from the group through his conformation. Those
who are more out of the center have fewer reasons to
comply with the group. Such a person may derive more
benefits from the distance to the center of the group due
to less conformation. It are the advantages of turning
with the group that makes someone move to the center
of the group. Once those benefits are lost, there is a risk
that someone will distance himself more from the
group. In this way one easily ends up in a negative circu-
larity, which progressively pushes someone from the
core.
Primarily, on the one hand, there is a bridge between pa-
rents and children, and on the other hand a bridge bet-
182
ween child and the wider environment, say society. So-
metimes parents end up in a struggle with their child, so
that the child will be more out of the center of the fa-
mily. This can make it particularly difficult for the child to
bridge the family group, so that the child could be in the
center of the family group. Sometimes you may notice
that parents are struggling with society and moving
more from the center of society and their environment.
This can make it particularly difficult to create a bridge
for the child to society, so that the child could be at the
center of the environment and society.
Sometimes parents can determine to their despair that
their child apparently does not respond as they should
expect as a minimum. The child does not conform to the
customs that are customary in the family or are expec-
ted. Apparently the child sails a different course, res-
ponds to something else, something that is strange to
the parents. The child apparently does not refer to the
family group in his expression and reaction. The child ap-
parently refers to himself or another group, with which
it is more related or connected or feels. In dealing with
this, this easily gives rise to stress and conflict situations
that can cause a lot of stress in the child but also in the
parents. On this stress the child can react with excite-
ment and agression because of the collision, but also
with pronounced grief and uncertainty because of the
perceived distance. Parents then clash with this excite-
ment, these outbursts of rage, or this stagnation, this
183
inability and grief. The child does not give itself to the
group that offers insufficient safety, space and recog-
nisability for it. The child prefers the safety and familia-
rity of itself or another group that allows more stability
and less risk. In other words, there is an attachment pro-
blem that expresses itself with the child in an attachment
disorder.
Parents can have a hard time with this situation, which
often also gets a habit and possibly leads to increasingly
serious problems. Parents often also take as standard
that the child refers to what applies in the family. They
can hardly accept that the child is out of the center and
even beyond the boundary of the family group.
Starting from this reality, that their child is self- or alter-
native referential, and if they can accept this reality, this
can lead to steps towards each other, without thre-
atening. Parents need not feel threatened and
misunderstood as a family group, the child does not have
to feel threatened and pressured. This mutual security
can provide a favorable basis for getting closer toge-
ther. You can maintain your own core and space, and
steps can be taken to another core and space without
this risk or loss.
From a dreamed we-feeling, over an actual I-feeling, to
get gradually away from being together next to each
other, in order to arrive at a desired together-with-each-
184
other, with guarantee for sufficient autonomy and main-
taining its own integrity at the same time.
S ometimes parents can distant themselves in some
way or another through less favorable experiences in
contact with society or authorities within society. They
then develop their own culture away from the center of
the society, or they already received that non-cultural
culture from home, a home that did not feel as socially
happy either.
Instead of trust in society, trust came in their own con-
victions and strategies. This own way of dealing with the
environment is often passed on to the child. It is often
about alternative or inverted values and norms that ap-
ply as a way of thinking and behavior. For example,
where a well-thought-out action is considered desirable
in society, an impulsive reaction as habitual behavior is
put in place instead. Where in society taking into ac-
count environmental expectations is preferable, prefe-
rence is given to stubbornly adhering to own momentary
desires. Where in society there are attempts to avoid
confrontation as much as possible, direct confrontation
is chosen. Where in a confrontation - if not to exclude -
the boundary is laid in a word dispute, it is easily threa-
tened with physical confrontation to show its own po-
wer. Where healthy trust prevails in society, a cautious
distrust is assumed.
185
Many of these own references, as a foundation, want to
protect themselves from becoming victims of the envi-
ronment. What is assumed is considered to be of in-
fluence, by acting in this way one experiences effect for
themselves. On the edge of the group, what society is
suggesting is insufficient to work and produce an ef-
fect. By postponing something and striving for effect in
the longer term, as often pushed forward in society, such
a person does not gain opportunities, but experiences
them to lose and to miss out on his chances. What is
indeed possible, if one can no longer count on others.
From the center of the group - family or community
group - there is a risk of ending up in a negative spiral
that moves someone further and further from the center
to or over the edge. The unpleasant contacts with the
group lead to negative reactions or a lack of res-
ponse. Such reactions in turn lead to even more un-
pleasant interactions by the group. Gradually, incom-
prehension, hostility and rejection, or an increased risk,
develop along one or both sides. This misunderstanding,
this hostility and that rejection give reasons for pushing
someone out of the center and withdrawing from the
center. Because of this double action, this process can
proceed quickly and take an extreme form. In this way
each tries to protect himself - the group and who is iso-
lated. Due to this interaction method, the need and ne-
cessity to protect themselves is also becoming increasin-
186
gly apparent. Every agreement, every band, every com-
munity threatens to be lost more and more for a longer
period of time.
All reasons to prevent pushing someone out of the cen-
ter or withdrawing himself. This can be done by preven-
ting negative spiral formation. Specifically, this can be
done by, among other things, recognizing the various re-
ference forms. By avoiding a battle between different re-
ference centers because of the contradiction or the dis-
tance. By bringing together multiple references and see-
ing what the similarities are, what the additions are,
what multiple interests entail and ask for attention and
seek attention. By proposing alternative references with
opportunities to open up to this without having to hold
back a threat. By creating a new reference group for an
increasing part or the whole for the future where every-
one can feel safe. By avoiding that anyone who already
has the tendency to withdraw from the center get fur-
ther away.
Imagine that you are in a weak position in a group.
Imagine that you are all alone in a group.
Imagine you do not notice it.
Imagine that others do not accept you as you are.
Imagine that others are against you.
Imagine that doing your best to belong to the group
makes little difference.
187
Imagine to perceive you do not seem to be and do like
others.
How would you experience this?
How would you feel?
How would you react?
How would you protect yourself?
How would you try to avoid repetition?
What effect could this have on you in time (self-esteem,
self-confidence, isolation, taking initiative, ...)?
How would you act as an educator towards someone
who experiences this?
P erhaps is often too little understood the importance
of belonging to the center of a group. Perhaps too little
is seen the reality that many, individuals or subgroups
are located out of the center. This reality is also often not
accepted. This often causes pressure on those who are
out of the center. Too little is perhaps seen the signifi-
cance of being able to make a contribution and to be
able to continue to strive continuously to let belong as
many individuals and subgroups as possible to the
group. Perhaps it is possible to use this difference not as
an element of exclusion but as a referential for belon-
ging. So you can to a certain extent be yourself and be-
long to the group.
Use the figure above for your child to mark the place in
or out of the center of the family and cohabitation group.
188
Circular
influence
Provoke
A child has a whole register of perceptions, feelings, de-
sires, thoughts, memories, fantasies, body sensations,
expressions and reactions of which some are awakened
under certain circumstances, in certain situations and
contexts, or which the child evokes for himself in func-
tion of what it wants to achieve, maintain or avoid.
As a parent or educator you also have a whole register
of perceptions, feelings, desires, thoughts, memories,
fantasies, body sensations, expressions and reactions,
some of which are awakened under certain cir-
cumstances, in certain situations and contexts, or which
What you say or do
can be a reaction to your child.
Your reaction can then again be the starting point for
the child to which it in turn reacts.
189
you yourself call forth in yourself in function of what you
want to achieve, maintain or avoid.
Mutual influence
When we respond or act as parents or educators, we
may lure a reaction or action with the child in connection
with the activated perceptions, feelings, desires,
thoughts, memories, fantasies, body sensations.
This can be a reaction or action that we choose or
want. However, it can also be the opposite reaction or
action that we do not prefer and just do not want. This
action or reaction of your child can in turn provoke a cer-
tain action or reaction that is not desirable for the child
or the child himself does not want. As a parent or child
you can be aware of this circular process of mutual in-
fluence in the form of provocation or not. A mutual in-
fluence that takes the form of circular triggering pro-
cesses. Parenting is rightly described as a complemen-
tary and circular process, in which both parent and child
are involved and successively active.
. With our impatience, we often try to encourage our
child to start, continue or stop something. The impa-
tience can, however, provoke resistance and possibly
provoke a blockage in the child. Just what we did not
want at all. However, we just wanted the opposite, some
more flexibility and mobility. The resistance and the
blocking and the lack of flexibility and mobility of the
190
child can arouse displeasure and cause even more impa-
tience. Just the opposite of what the child needs and de-
sires. This can then generate more resistance in the
child. Because of their own performance each of them
leads to the opposite of what to choose. The resulting
reaction of each provokes the opposite of what together
and what also each wants for themselves. With impa-
tience and resistance as a result, while each preferred
patience and cooperation.
If this occurs repeatedly, or permanently, or still very
pronounced, then the chances of provoking each other's
behavior increase more, each of which wanted to coun-
teract its own actions. Everyone's reaction increases the
chance of repetition, no longer ceasing or at a pronoun-
ced intensity, as a result of which each still wanted to
adjust the other person. The other person, who, howe-
ver, by your own performance, is less and less activa-
table for what you wanted, but on the contrary streng-
thens flight into what you endeavor to achieve with rigi-
dity and more extreme action.
. If you easily take the lead in avoiding indecision, this
can just provoke indecision, because the other can not
practice making his own choice and because your deci-
sion definitely accentuates the lesser decision as weaker,
what is also perceived as thus by the other. The weak de-
termination of the child then triggers your decision and
191
initiative, which is the larger as the child is more indeci-
vise. By triggering the opposite together the origin of
each other's problem is strengthened and the situation
evolves in a negative and more pronounced sense.
There is a high risk that everyone gradually resigns to the
development- and change-adverse situation and there-
fore requires each other to continue in the unfavorable
reaction.
. As a parent you do not expect any decision and initia-
tive from your child anymore and you endure his indeci-
siveness and passivity. As a child, you do not expect to
be able to make more efforts to be more self-determi-
ned and to take the initiative, and in this way you can
sustain the superiority of the parent. In this way you
keep provoking each other, which prevents everyone
from allowing change and development.
Unfavorable mutual influence
As a parent you run the risk of negatively influencing the
behavior of the child through this mutual provocation
process with your own behavior. You run the risk of hol-
ding each other in a mutually unconverted expression
and behavioral pattern that is re-activated each time by
its own expression and behavioral pattern. An additional
risk is that you permanently reinforce each other in this
pattern. So that you feel at a certain moment that it can
not go on like this. You do not want your child to evolve
192
further in that direction. By possibly feeling that you
have too few expectations and demands on your child
and being too accommodating and too weak, you risk in-
creasing your actions, with a more pronounced un-
wanted behavior of your child, something against which
you just came up.
. Your dominance that provokes dependence on your
child, which in turn triggers your dominance.
. Your talk that triggers the silence of your child, which in
turn triggers your talk.
. Your attack that provokes defense with your child,
which in turn triggers your attack.
. Your control which evokes hiding in your child, which in
turn triggers your control.
. Your criticism that provokes passivity in your child,
which in turn triggers your criticism.
. Your agression that provokes rebellion in your child,
which in turn triggers your agression.
. Your compete that provokes withdrawal from your
child, which in turn triggers rivalry.
. Your doubt that provokes uncertainty in your child,
which in turn triggers your doubt.
. Your superiority that provokes submissiveness in your
child, which in turn triggers your superiority.
. Your know-all that provokes know-nothing with your
child, which in turn triggers know-all with you.
193
. Your compliance and following that provokes doing is
own thing in your child, which in turn triggers your
compliance and following.
. Your constantly limitation of your child that elicits
boundlessness from your child, which in turn triggers
your defining of boundaries.
. Your constantly commanding and adjusting that pro-
vokes carelessness in your child, which in turn triggers
your commands and adjustments.
The toddler's stubbornness, for example, can lead to a
range of dysfunctional responses from the parent inclu-
ding limiting the child's autonomous desires, giving ex-
cessive directions, or disrupting his chances of develo-
ping independent skills to regulate his behavior. This can
lead to even more resistance from the child to maintain
himself. The parent's intent in being overdirective is to
manage and control the child's behavior.
However, when parents know how to deal with this in a
calm, confident way, responding with more autonomy
support and less disruptive and controlling behavior, the
child will come out less powerful and more benevolent.
It experiences a certain space and it experiences gaining
influence. The negative spiral is then reversed.
Research by New York University showed, by way of illu-
stration, that negative parenting in early childhood has
194
consequences for later. Negative parenting was reflec-
ted in negative emotions towards the child and rough
treatment of the child that escalated over time during
conflict. This led to pronounced negative emotions and
violent reactions of the child, which in turn fueled the
hostility of the parent. Negative parenting and not so
much the temperament of the child appeared to pave
the way for hostility and negative emotions in parent and
child during the toddler years, with the worst in every
one coming up. This resulted later in more behavioral
problems at school for the child.
Favorable mutual influence
While these circular triggering processes entail the risk
of both coming out where you do not want to and hol-
ding each other. They on the other hand have the
chance to trigger the positive behavior themselves by
adjusting their own expression and their own actions in
such a way that allows behavioral change at both sides
and that can activate it. It is not always possible to
change your child directly, but by changing your own in-
put you create opportunities to activate change in your
child. Because of the positive reaction that you provokes
with your child, it can in turn activate a further positive
relationship with your child. In this way you elicit a posi-
tive expression and behavior pattern, you keep each
other in this and you create opportunities for another in-
crease.
195
. Your positivity that provokes openness with your child,
which in turn triggers your positivity.
. Your willingness to help that provokes cooperation with
your child, which in turn triggers your willingness.
. Your discretion that provokes confidence in your child,
which in turn triggers your discretion.
. Your respect that provokes respect with your child,
which in turn triggers your respect.
. Your calm that provokes peace with your child, which
in turn triggers your calm.
. Your sense of perspective that deactivates panic in your
child, which in turn triggers your relativity.
. Giving responsibility to your child that activates your
child's responsibility, which in turn triggers your giving
of responsibility.
Where you as a parent do not succeed in direct influen-
cing your child, you can always use the indirect by chan-
ging your own expression and behavior, and thus chan-
ging the expression and behavior of your child.
. For example, if you want your child to become calm and
your insistence does not help, you can always try to set
a calm tone yourself or you can let a difficulty rest for a
while or you can try to avoid escalation and provoke rest
with your child.
196
Parents can sometimes see that, for example, one posi-
tivity is not the other, the first does not result in open-
ness, the other does. It is then important to be positive
in the right way, so that it can activate the openness and
de-activate the closedness. Possibly there was insuffi-
cient attention to de-activate the child's closedness, so
that the activated openness did not in itself receive suf-
ficient chances.
Multiple triggering patterns
What provokes each with the other can be very diffe-
rent. We already indicated that there can be a positive
influence, but also a negative one. It may be that you
hold each other in the opposite pole and that you are
reinforced in this opposition. It may also be that you
maintain an action and reaction, where no one wants
any concessions or changes. This way you both trigger
each other to exhibit a kind of mirror behavior. My di-
sagreement with you provokes an unconfirmed res-
ponse. The opposite is also possible that you can each
respond to each other and you let each respond to each
other. Your noticed confidence provokes me to be con-
fident. Your adult approach lures me an adult reac-
tion. Thus, in addition to a complementary triggering
process, a symmetrical or similar triggering process can
occur. How you approach each other will determine
which interaction process is triggered.
197
With a complementary and a symmetrical lure pattern,
each of you tries to avoid or prevent something that you
are afraid of or have resistance to. Especially your per-
ception of each other and of each other's expected reac-
tion elicits your own expression and actions. Wanting to
move forward with your child in a certain direction can
cause your child to slow down or steer in a different di-
rection. Getting you along as a parent for something the
child wants, can make you as a parent responds indeci-
sive or responds to something else.
With a similar triggering pattern you try to make every
effort to achieve something together or to retain what
you prefer and where you want to go. Your acceptable
approach to your child can cause your child to refrain
from any reproach. Not blaming each other and not
wanting to punish each other, can make you stand toge-
ther on the trail of commitment and to support each
other.
Known by parents ... and child
Parents are sometimes aware of this mutual inducement
process in one way or another. They say to their child
because you do not listen, I have to deny you this privi-
lege. I would like to give you this privilege, this is only
possible if you promise to listen. Children sometimes
also indicate this. I'm angry with you because you forbid
me this. They also immediately indicate how the parent
198
can take away their anger. Something that is not always
obvious to the parent.
Parents also sometimes use this provocation process as
a condition to adjust their child's behavior. I'll listen if
you do not yell. They then make it clear that yelling of
the child does not activate their listening and that it can
not de-activate not listening. Children do this too. I will
do this if you are no longer angry.
In certain cases each can be difficult, to use as a means
to get from each other that he originally or spontane-
ously did not want. In those cases it is best to handle it
carefully. It could lead to something circular by your in-
dulgence to provoke something that you do not want at
all and so to strengthen it. Your child always yells to in-
duce you to listen indirectly, so that it can reward you
with quiet talking. You are always bad tempered to indi-
rectly induce your child to do what you want so that you
can reward it with your calm.
More or less mutual influence
Possibly multiple circular triggering processes are mixed
together. Multiple between the same people. But also
with various other relevant people. For example, as a pa-
rent you may sometimes notice that if you try to reach
change in your child by changing your own expression
and behavior, this does not have the expected re-
sult. Your child may then be stuck in other dependencies
199
with you or with other persons relevant to your child
from his environment. Your child wants to listen because
you also listen to your child, but your reproach to your
child prevents your child from being very open. Or your
child may feel obliged by his bond with his sister to do
very superficially on certain topics. Other elements that
elicit other behavior prevent you from achieving the de-
sired behavioral change in your child through your beha-
vioral change.
Sometimes as a parent you may notice that your own
change does not bring about the desired change in your
child. There is a change in your child, but the content and
the form do not match what you prefer.
. By intervening less constantly, you child become more
autonomous. However, the autonomy that you deter-
mine is not what you prefer. You want your child to be
less helpless, but you did not immediately want your
child to make his own choices.
Sometimes you can also notice that your change has no
influence at all on your child, without the afore men-
tioned inhibiting factors playing. The reaction pattern
that your child showed might have little to do with mu-
tual influence, but had arisen earlier or in a different con-
text. At most, you can try to create a different reaction
pattern through your interaction with the child.
200
. Your child easily uses power words that it may have
picked up outside. No matter how calm you act as a pa-
rent, the child grabs if you limit it to these terms of ex-
pression. As a parent, you can try to get the child to ex-
press his feelings more directly, and to activate this reac-
tion scheme rather than the force word use
schema. Damn it, not back again' as 'If I do not like it then
I feel anger coming'.
Victim-offender mutual influence
With your actions you can easily victimize the other per-
son. Whoever is a victim can then easily feel entitled to
victimize the other in turn, because of the damage and
the shortages you experienced yourself and because of
the absence of recognition. Given the possible circula-
rity, each can victimize the other, making it only worse.
. You have repeatedly asked your child to help. You al-
ways assume that you have everything to do alone. You
also feel little willing to respond to a question from your
child. It does not matter that you would make an effort
for him or her. Only when your child is willing to apolo-
gize and to recognize how it does you wrong will you be
prepared to do something for him or her.
. Your child has already repeatedly indicated that he
finds it very bad to be laughed at whenever he indicates
that he can not do something alone. He still feels little
willing to answer questions from you, partly because of
201
fear of receiving comments again. In his eyes you do not
deserve that he would do something that you could pos-
sibly reproach him for too little independent. Only when
you promise not to laugh at him or her anymore and you
admit that this was unjustified, you can hope for some
compliance.
By having an eye on how to rightly repair injustice and to
undo or limit damage, you may be able to break through
the negative spiral and can generate willingness and
compensation together. This can be enhanced by recog-
nizing everyone's merit and acknowledging each other.
Yourself as standing in the way
As a parent, you can be aware of the fact that you may
be in the way with circular influencing by your own act-
ions, so that you may not be able to activate what you
want with your child.
Your distance to your child who possibly activates the
proximity search of your child, but at the same time en-
sures that more distance can not succeed. Your distance
blocks a possible distance from your child. Conversely, it
also applies that the proximity search of your child is a
stand in the way for more distance as a parent and en-
sures that more distance can not succeed. The proximity
of the child blocks a possible distance from you towards
your child.
202
Your talking that activates the silence of your child, but
at the same time makes sure that more of your child's
talking is not possible. Your talking blocks a possible talk
from your child. Conversely, the silence of your child is a
stand in the way of not talking to you. The silence of your
child blocks a possible silence from you.
Who comes first, what comes later
In mutual influence, you notice that you exert mutual in-
fluence on each other in the negative, so that a negative
and escalating spiral arises, or in the positive, so that a
positive and strengthening spiral can arise.
In this spiral you follow each other and you react to each
other. Your child flees you, so you go after it. It's just the
same for your child. You go after your child, so the child
flees you.
To break this spiral, you can choose not to follow each
other, but take the lead yourself and you can also choose
not to respond to each other, but prefer to choose an
'acting' or initiative. Your behavior starts with yourself,
with something that you choose. My child always runs
away from me, so I always walk behind it. I choose to
walk in front and I do not go after my child to come back.
My child will increasingly be tempted to walk away from
their own experience, to stay and follow more and more.
Your child reacts, you act. Your child follows, you take
the lead. In circular triggering processes, it is therefore
203
important to recognize who can be provoked and reac-
ted and who provokes and acts.
In the past, attention has not always been paid to who in
the first place provokes and who is provoked. Whoever
provokes colors immediately where it comes to turn. For
example, dominance and dependence, such as self-con-
fidence and uncertainty. Who finally set the tone? If it
is the dependency and insecurity of the child, then there
is a great risk of domination and self-confidence of pa-
rents. However, if the parents set the tone by their do-
minance and self-assurance and occupy the correspon-
ding place for the child, they may force their child into
complementary dependency and uncertainty. However,
if they leave room for their child, this can easily result in
a symmetrical dominance and self-confidence in the
child.
Whoever takes the lead or acts has more choice, for him
or her it is more wanted. Who follows or reacts has less
freedom of choice, for him or her it is made more so. For
example, anyone who compels and is not inclined to lis-
ten will possibly have to deal with someone who shows
increasing resistance and resistance even if the latter
does not want it at all. However, his or her response will
promptly provide for justice and instigation of more
coercion with less listening. From the second, his nega-
tive sides can then increasingly be addressed, while it
204
would never have come about in itself or in another con-
text. But this is provoked by the initial stubborn compul-
sion of the former.
Those who cant do something will ask for help from
those who can do something. The help offered can make
that something is never learned. The weaknesses are
maintained by the strengths of the other. The weakest
takes the lead and makes the strongest respond.
Determining who takes dominant initiative for the na-
ture of the circularity can also immediately explain why
undergoing violence or abuse of the child can not be
seen as provocative, but its the parent, and the child
does not have a share in this event.
Whereas in the first place everyone's reaction was a con-
sequence of what preceded as a cause, everyone's
action can therefore become a means for what is aimed
at as a goal. In this case, both can also take the lead and
responsibility together for what you want together. This
prevents both of them from falling victim to what both
do not want together.
Unfavorable unwanted (schema) activations
Someone lures it out or obliges you to activate a certain
schema that is undesirable for yourself. A schema as a
way to record, observe and respond. In a relationship
this often happens mutual and escalating towards each
205
other. To an increasing degree, the intensity or the num-
ber of schemes for recording, perception and reaction
are often unconsciously increased.
For example, in a parent-child relationship, a child goes
into attack and tries to dominate, so that the parent
wants to defend himself and tries to restore the balance
of power in order to protect himself and keep the whole
thing going. This may provoke more attack and domi-
nance in the child. The parent may try to distance or re-
fuse to respond to reduce the impact and destructive-
ness, potentially allowing the child to try to hold and
claim the parent more. Through the child, schemas, such
as sides and parts, are activated in the parent in such a
way that the parent himself does not wish at all and
spontaneously never would. The parent, however, must
follow the schema dance started by the child and stepped
up. It does this to keep it livable and working and not to
make it worse. Both will easily have the impression that
the other person started and is the basis of the com-
pulsory schema dance.
Another example, a child easily disposes of everything.
This obliges the parent to follow and keep everything in
order. Because the parent takes over and keeps an eye
on everything, the child makes it even easier, after all can
be counted on the parent. Two processes may occur here:
the child is incapable of independence or not yet capable
of doing so, and the activated schemes with the parent
206
do not promote autonomy in any way and may prevent
it. If serious problems are to be prevented and to remain
fully functional, the parent will have to keep the schemas
that have been provoked at his own will.
Possibly a combination of dominance and dependence
occurs. This is, for example, when a child demands that
the parent does everything. This creates a very difficult
situation for the parent. The parents will have to defend
themselves if they do not want to go down completely,
at the same time they will have to take great care. If it is
possible to defend itself by not automatically taking on
everything, the child may be unwilling to notice this,
which may lead to more demands and expectations to-
wards the parent. The parent has to activate his defense
and give continuous caring, which he does not really
want at all. Sometimes this is reinforced if the child de-
velops hostile feelings in response to what it thinks it is
experiencing. As a parent you will unwittingly end up in
the hostile camp from an activated divide : companion
or opponent, friend or foe. The child then tries to isolate
the parent by choosing party for others against the pa-
rent.
If this hostility adds to the foregoing, an even more com-
plex and contradictory situation arises: as an unwanted
opponent (due to hostility) the parent must then defend
himself (as a result of perceived dominance) in a situa-
tion of care (as a result of experienced self-reliance). .
207
The crazy thing is that just being the opponent as a pa-
rent who defends himself but still gives care, provokes,
strengthens and holds dominance, dependence and hos-
tility in the child. Just all are ways that unfavorably af-
fect the child and its development.
208
Indicate the circular influence that applies to you and in-
dicate which one you want:
dominance
to talk
attack
check
criticism
aggression
competition
doubt
superiority
know-all
compliant
limit
command
impatience
more
more
less
less
triggers
triggers
dependency
keep silent
defense
hide
passivity
rebellion
withdrawal
uncertainty
submissive
know-nothing
to follow
boundlessness
inconsiderate
to block
209
decisiveness
initiative
to watch
do nothing more
keep distance
run after
positivity
helping
discretion
respect
tranquility
relativity
give responsibility
...
indecisive
passivity
do not dare
not participating
approaching
do your own thing
openness
collaboration
trust
respect
peace
panic
feel responsible
...
210
Claim behavior,
demanding a lot of
attention
- "Mom, mom ! Look !'
- "Dad, may I?"
- "Mommy, what is this?
- "Daddy, come and help!"
- "Mom, mom, mom, is this right?"
- "Dad, do I get a piece too?"
- "Mom, I can not join."
- "Daddy, she teases me."
- "Mom, when are we going to grandmother?"
- "Mum, Dad, I'm hungry."
Every parent thinks it's okay to be there for his child.
Every parent thinks it's okay that his child calls on him or
her. Every parent thinks it's okay to give the child suffi-
cient attention.
Every child needs attention.
How to deal with it ?
211
This is no problem for parents. The problem arises when
you, as a parent, have to be too much for your child, if it
appeals too much to you, demands too much attention.
This too much is very subjective. As a parent you can
quickly find something too much. Or, at times yourself,
may already be heavily burdened, and so find something
easier too much.
For an important part, the feeling of asking a lot of atten-
tion has to do with yourself as a parent and not with your
child in the first place. It feels as not pleasant for you, it
overloads you.
As soon as you feel overwhelmed, you will see if you can
not slow this down and how you could actually do this.
You will see if you can slow this down without neglecting
the needs of the child.
You want to know exactly which needs of the child are
the basis of his attention questions and claims. And
whether these are justified.
You also want to know which reaction, go into or against
your child and helps your child the most. In the long
term, help your child to get ahead by going into it, or help
your child by going against it or by not responding to it.
212
You can always take this into account in your response:
1. What does it mean for your child in the short term
now;
2. What does it mean for your child in the long term
later?
You can also always consider yourself in your response:
1. What means the situation of asking attention for you
now, can you handle it?
2. What means the situation of asking attention for you
in the long term, can you always respond in this way.
Make sure you take sufficient notice what your child
learns from your reaction of what it can repeat in the
future.
Responding to what your child says or asks in a positive
way increases the chance or frequency of repetition of
your child's asking for attention. If you respond negati-
vely or not, you reduce the chance or frequency of repe-
tition of your child's attention claims.
This way you contribute to the habitual formation of
more or fewer attention claims.
Do not react at first and eventually when your child con-
tinues to whine or makes trouble or threatens to make
213
fur, well, you risk to learn your child that it has to
persevere or must insist to get a desired response from
you.
If you first react positively and afterwards no longer or
negatively, then you risk that your child will repeatedly
look for attention with short interruptions because it
tries to get what he can now get before you change your
mind.
If you are changing in your reaction, then your child's at-
tention will easily be drawn to this. His sense of it makes
sense or it does not, works lesser then. By following up
and thinking about the situation, he wants to find out
what he can or can not expect.
He will then easily match his attention-seeking behavior
to what he expects. What he expects will also depend
on what you expect. If you would like your child to claim
your attention, this can also be picked up by the child.
Your child who is also responsible for the atmosphere
and comfort of daily life.
Today, a child takes an important place in the social
event for his parents. A lot often comes to turn around
the child. The child receives a lot of attention at the ta-
ble. Parents talk with the child and what the child does
is often followed with attention.
214
Children can feel which place they occupy and what
is expected of them. They often enjoy the attention they
receive and the role they play in company.
What they say and do is often given full attention. There
is also very often positive talk about the child. This hap-
pens in terms of how it surprises its parents and what
effort they are willing to make to ensure the child's well-
being.
The child does not easily get the feeling that when he
reacts positive to this, it would be disruptive for his envi-
ronment.
Because of lots of attention that parents give to the
child, they are also a model for lots of attention that a
child gives to the parents. As a child you can easily talk
with your parents because the parents talk a lot to you.
By giving a lot of attention as a parent, you indirectly pass
on the message that the child isn't standing alone, that
he can always turn to someone and that independence
is not something you expect immediately.
The child can deal with this implicit imaging that you
provide. And if he has a question or if he encounters a
difficulty, he immediately can turn to the environment
for an answer or for help.
215
Because you want to be there as a parent for your child,
you do not easily say no. This means that your child will
also easily claim you because you usually go to your child
and agree.
You do not want to come over as the forbidding parent
who is strict and does not allow anything. Or that autho-
ritarian conducts the child. You prefer to listen to your
child and you want to respond to him and if possible
agree.
So you can count on the love of your child, you hope, and
do not have to deal with his hatred. Love that now tran-
slates into joy with you and hatred that can be avoided
by not arousing the anger of your child here and now.
By being somewhat or very insecure as a parent about
being loved by your child, you can also easily arouse
some uncertainty in your child. For example, whether
it is still loved by you as a child. Your child can then ask
for attention by repeatedly asking for confirmation.
The child wants to know if everything is still in order, and
whether what is there now also has your approval.
As a parent you can notice that at certain moments and
times the claiming behavior of the child is stronger and
more frequent.
216
There may be differences that, in addition to the influ-
ence of the upbringing as described here, go back to the
temperament of the child. So one child requires more
attention or is more demanding than the other child.
If the attention-seeking and claiming behavior is tempo-
rary, it may be related to the development phase in
which the child is present. For example, the one and a
half year old child can want to manifest and seek confir-
mation for him. Likewise, the child may want to distance
himself more from adolescence and want to stand up
more and try to enforce this position if necessar.
If the size of the nuclear family is small, such as a child
alone, and if the social network is limited, because there
is little contact and interaction with the environment,
then the pressure of the child mainly comes to the few
members of the family and the small network. So the
child comes very quickly over as a lot and very questi-
oning person.
The restrictive attitude from the small immediate en-
vironment is then hardly compensated by a broader en-
vironment that allows more room for maneuver. The
restraining attitude then very quickly triggers a rebuttal
in the child who is characterized by fighting indepen-
dency. With the awakened attitude not to stop until this
is achieved.
217
If you come too quickly as a parent to comfort or reas-
sure the child, the child also expects your intervention.
He will then make little effort to do so himself if it ends
up in that situation.
As a parent, you can best pay attention to your child and
respond when the child starts to settle down or reassure
himself. Wait until the child is calmer than before and
reassures himself before you react. Knowing how to
posphone satisfaction and calm and comfort oneself are
important skills that reduce attention demands.
If you constantly go against your child because it does
something that you do not want, the child can gradually
become accustomed to this negative attention from
you. At your limitation, at your judgment, to your re-
mark, to your reproach.
The child may unwittingly provoke the same reaction
from you at other times. This is because at those times
it feels like something is missing so often, namely your
comments and your reaction.
By expressing your displeasure at what your child says
and does, there is a chance that your dissatisfaction also
arouses displeasure in your child. You are then on a ne-
gative track. You want to slow down your child by ex-
pressing your displeasure, and your child is trying to do
218
the same thing to you. Namely slow you down in your
displeasure by annoying you.
The result, however, is easily a mutually increasing and
escalating displeasure. What is activated in you acti-
vates something similar in your child. As if you turn on
each other. With your emotional expression you infect
your child unwillingly.
A child who gets a lot of attention can keep this attention
going, out of fear that an end would come on it.
He wants to know if he can still count on your attention,
and constantly tries to assure himself by demanding
your attention and seeing if nothing has changed yet.
In the past, the child may have gained the experience
that he did not receive attention and was left to himself.
He does not want to experience it again. Hence a cons-
tant check to see if he can count on your attention.
As a parent you do not like the claiming behavior of your
child. You actually want to go against this and take your
child the lead or his over-share. The child easily feels
that you are not favorable to his claiming behavior.
For that reason, it is possible through his constant atten-
tion seeking to ascertain himself whether he still has the
say and you have not taken it over from him or her.
219
Similarly, the birth of a brother or a sister can mean that
he looses a part of the attention of his parents.
The child can then become insecure about his or her
position and by looking for attention seeking trying to
know where it stands. It may possibly have to try to cut
back or undo attention parts.
By providing the child with clarity and certainty that it
will be able to receive sufficient attention, it can be pre-
vented that the child has to found out or has to try to
reduce the shared attention.
Often, claiming will become worse at the time the child
fears being confronted with loss. He wants to get some-
thing or does not want to do something and notices that
this will not work out. By putting more strength, he still
hopes to achieve its right or advantage.
As a parent you can try to inform your child in time
about what is going to happen, so that it can take this
into account and can already adjust to it or get used to
it. You can then appeal to your child to go into this and
you can then make appointments. "You can be strong!"
"How great you are that you can it alone !' "If you listen,
you may tomorrow." And so on.
It may be possible that you have adjusted your child or
banned something, that your child's attention seeking
220
mean so much as an attempt to undo this or to discou-
rage you from repeating this again.
His nagging attention seeking is the price you have to
pay if you deny something or ask for something.
It may not be about attention seeking, but rather about
giving attention. It may possible not be about unlear-
ning you something. On the contrary, attention seeking
may have to do with an attempt to abandon your expec-
tation.
You can be deduced by the attention you get. The
kindness of your child, wants to do away your reaction
or your requirement. If I am so kind to you, you can not
refuse me anything.
A child tends to use a more extreme way when as a pa-
rent you do not want something or just want something.
As a parent, you can make clear what you accept or re-
ject of how a child respond or react. What you want to
pay attention to and to what not, without what you
agree. "If you calm down, I want to listen, without auto-
matically agreeing." "If you stop cursing, we can take a
look at what makes it so difficult for you." "I notice that
you're having a hard time, maybe it can help if we try to
figure out which feelings are going on in you."
221
Afterwards or in advance if your child is calm and re-
laxed, you can raise a difficulty and make clear what is
possible and what is not possible, what you expect in this
context and what you do not want.
Because your child is more relaxed and not immediately
confronted with the difficulty, there will be less resis-
tance and it will be easier to develop willingness and mo-
tivation to accept your proposal.
As a parent, you can not always immediately enforce be-
havioral change. Usually this happens step by step,
over a certain amount of time. Small changes are usually
more acceptable for your child.
By setting up your own step-by-step approach and reac-
ting differently, you can progressively take small steps in
the more desired direction. A power struggle often ac-
companied by escalation on both sides can thus be
avoided.
As a parent you can make sure that you are not the only
one who can give attention to your child, but that other
adults and also other children can do this for your child.
If a child has a playmate or has another child to talk to,
giving attention and responding to your child is more di-
vided.
222
At certain times in certain situations they can give pre-
ference to others than yourself. This can make you
temporarily relieved.
Some children are busier, they are more sensitive to sti-
muli from their environment and respond faster and
more, sometimes quite impulsively.
Other children need more stimuli and a need to be ac-
tive.
As a parent you can take this into account, that this be-
longs to their nature and has little to do with unwilling-
ness and being not susceptible.
As a parent you can pay attention that not everything
has to go through you. If others are available or if the
child can already do something independently, you can
make it clear to your child how he can do without you.
In this way you run less risk of being overloaded. Instead
of focusing his attention on you, the child will focus his
attention on the situation and on who else can possibly
help.
As a parent you can pay attention to circular proces-
ses : the more you give attention and help, the more the
child may need attention and help. The more your child
223
needs attention and help, the more inclined you will be
to respond to this.
By dosing your attention a bit more, the child can get
used to less attention. Because he can be more in him-
self, you can dose the attention you give yourself.
Give your child an alternative for his attention seeking
to you. What could he do instead of your input.
Could he, for example, just try or do it? Would some-
one else have time to explain or help ? And who then?
Make sure that this alternative is valuable and feasible.
As a parent, you can provide sufficient time for pre-
ventive attention in the context of 'quality time' toge-
ther. Here you can pay attention to each child indivi-
dually, but you can also set yourself up so that you pay
attention to the group of children, so that each one ex-
periences it as if addressed.
Indicate your own needs as a parent. Make it clear to
your child that as you also give some attention to his
needs, you also want room for your needs. "Our mum
has no time now." "Dad, takes a break."
224
Also indicate the needs of others as just as legitimate
as your child's. "There must be something for every-
one." 'Everybody has to have their turn, later on it will
be your turn again.'
Consider your own experiences as a child. Did you get
a lot of attention, or just very little. Do you want to offer
your child the same, or do you want to make it possible
for your child what you missed? Do you respond from
yourself or from what your child needs?
What can I What can I What can I
do more ? do less? do it differently?
225
I walk behind,
I walk ahead.
What can coaching
do for me ?
As a young person, being with peers is an important
thing for you. It is also quite a challenge at the same
time. As a youngster you can be more at the front of the
peloton of peers and it costs you less effort. As a young
person, you may also feel that you are more in the
back. This can be very stressful. Especially because more
and more support centers are disappearing. Confirma-
tion and valuations are then easily missing. Sympathetic
expressions or jealous glances of peers can not be no-
ticed. Instead, comes worried looks or impatience from
alarmed adults.
As a young person, much is still a dream to realize.
With discovering how to make this happen, via
which roads and with the help of what and who, you
can help yourself.
YOUTH THEME
226
The risk then is that you tend to flee or crawl away, or
that you get stuck and do not progress or want to stop,
that you do not want to face your future and possibly dis-
tance yourself, and you do something unrealistic that
has no opportunities. Or that you do not get any more
opportunities, and no one can find anyone who still be-
lieves in you and wants to invest in you.
There is a risk that you will easily merge everything, so
that little movement is possible. And there is gradually a
negative image forming, on both sides: because they no
longer believe in you, you do not believe in yourself any-
more and no longer in them.
However, it can be a good idea to look at what you are
in, or even in advance, and what you are not in or even
in reverse with. And for which someone will still give cre-
dit for you, or you still want to offer the other credit.
Through this more nuanced and focused approach, at-
tention and work points can be recognized. Can gaps be
established for which bridges can be sought and thus
overcome barriers. Can strong points be found that can
be further developed, or that can be used. At the same
time, you can try to recognize existing opportunities and
learn to use them better and you can identify and avoid
pitfalls and stumbling blocks.
227
Especially as a young person, it is always important to
take a next step in your development. Starting from
where you are, entering the zone of proximal develop-
ment, reaching for something on a level one step higher
than you are on. Without being pressurized or putting
yourself under pressure. Without coming into great ten-
sion by having to or want to skip a step.
To make this optimally possible, longer-term follow-up is
desirable. Young people can be taught to take part in this
follow-up and to draw up and fill in their own life plan,
or young people can be taught to call on others where
necessary. Others who are willing and (perhaps better)
able to see the strengths and weaknesses of a young per-
son, not to judge them, but to find ways to acquire
skills. And especially in order to develop further what the
young person is good at. To this end, the young person
helps to discern and utilize existing opportunities, and to
help create desirable opportunities for this in the envi-
ronment.
For you as a young person much is still virtual and reali-
zable. It is worth discovering how to make this realistic,
by means of which roads and how to take care of this
yourself if possible and to follow this up.
If you are unable to do this yourself as a young person,
the use of a supervisor or coach who can offer a follow-
up in the longer term can contribute to this in a favorable
228
way. This coach can be found as a young person in your
environment. One or both parents may be able to in-
clude this. But also others, professionals may be invol-
ved here as a learning path counselor. Without, howe-
ver, posing a threat or exerting pressure, but to see op-
portunities that are there and to make optimal use of
them, so that you can better come to your right in your
environment and come more to yourself.
As a young person, you are very willing to train a lot and
practice for your future later. You want thoroughly pre-
pare yourself to succeed in reality and then to be suffi-
ciently armed and to have gained sufficient expe-
rience. Question may not be so much how you as a
young person motivate you to do this, but to examine
how you as a young person may have lost this motiva-
tion.
By taking the step yourself and indicating how a confi-
dential counselor can help you, a patronizing and forced
intervention can be avoided. As a young person you
want to be able to choose and take steps, or at least ex-
plore and learn. This does not alter the fact that an adult
could be helpful and would support you, so that your
self-initiative and autonomy are sufficiently res-
pected. An adult where you can feel safe and you feel
that it really is all about you. It helps you to see yourself
and your surroundings better and to speak to and to pick
sides in you and to help you take consecutive steps.
229
Do you think with me about my strengths:
Do you think with me about my weaknesses:
Do you think with me about the opportunities that are
there for me:
Do you think with me about the risks that are there for
me:
Do you think with me about successive objectives for me:
Do you think with me about successive steps for me:
Do you think with me about resources for me:
230
Cognitions
in parenting
Successively, for you as a parent cognitions about your
child are discussed that determine your reaction, first for
yourself as a parent, then for your parner. Subsequently,
your child forms cognitions about yourself and your part-
ner as a parent who will determine his reaction. These
cognitions form mental representations of the reality.
Behavior is then determined by these mental repre-
sentations or perceptions of the reality.
First a practical example is given each time, then this is
Cognitions - as what you make of something - deter-
mine your reaction as a parent.
This is also the case for the child - what makes it of
what you say and do - determines his reaction.
231
explained theoretically. The parenting situation for the
practical examples is always the same elaborate eating
situation, both for you and your partner as parent, and
for your child.
In this way you learn about what cognitions are as a men-
tal unit and how you can use them when raising your
child. In this way you also gain insight into the place of
cognition in the behavioral cycle or course as a unit of
parent-child interaction.
1. Practice
YOU AS A PARENT
This is happening
Iris constantly walks away from the table during the
meal.
We do not respond directly to what occurs.
For us, these are the original behavioral conditions.
What is and happens are behavioral conditions.
This is what you do (as perception behavior)
You try to find out what is going on by watching and lis-
tening.
We first try to know how we interpret what is occurring.
We respond to behavioral conditions with input or input
behavior.
What you do is your behavior.
232
This is what you make of it
Iris is as busy as ever for you. She is a busy child.
We want to know with what recognizable what occurs.
Our recording behavior activates appropriate cognitions
for imaging.
What you make of it are behavioral processes.
This is what you do (as reaction behavior)
You ask Iris to be more calm and to stay at the table.
We do not respond to what happens, but to the cogni-
tion of it with accompanying feelings and beliefs.
Our cognitions direct the executive or output behavior
for reaction formation.
This is happening
Iris wobbles back and forth on her chair in her attempt
to remain seated.
Our response causes changed behavioral conditions.
YOUR PARTNER AS A PARENT
This is happening
Iris constantly walks away from the table during the
meal.
This is what your partner does (as perception behavior)
Your partner wonders if she will start again.
This is what your partner makes of it
233
Iris can not listen to your partner as usual. She is
headstrong.
This is what your partner does (as reaction behavior)
Your partner says she should not have a dessert if she
can not listen.
This is happening
Iris is crying on her chair. She did her best and did not
understand the consequences.
BEHAVIOR PROCESSES
BEHAVIORAL CONDITIONS
BEHAVIOR
schemas
reality
perception
behavior
doing
reaction
behavior
BEHAVIORAL CYCLE
this is what you make of it
this is what you do
this is happening
234
2. Theory
In our example, we notice Iris wobbling quietly and Iris
wailing aloud after she left the table earlier: THE BEHA-
VIOR CONDITIONS
The difference between wobbling and weeping is for-
med by seeing Iris as busy or seeing Iris as headstrong. As
a parent or educator you can usually not directly change
the child and his behavior. You can change the image
you form of the child and his behavior: THE BEHAVIOR
PROCESSES
By activating another cognition about the child and what
it does, you can activate another reaction yourself. This
reaction (encouraging or punishing) is controlled by your
cognition (busy or self-centered). This reaction gives the
child the opportunity to respond differently: THE BEHA-
VIOR
A cognition is what you know, as you know it. In other
words, it is very personal.
Cognitions are stored in the form of cognitive schemes,
as ready-to-use knowledge and doing packages.
Cognitive schemes contain not only an informative
knowledge. They also contain a feeling and a view. They
also indicate direction and interaction.
The creation of an appropriate cognitive schema is based
on triggers that are present in the behavioral condi-
235
tions. These observed data from the behavioral condi-
tions ensure that the most appropriate cognitive schema
in you is activated.
For you this was the being busy of the child, based on the
many distractions.
For your partner it was not listening, based on his pre-
vious comments.
Being busy involves very different feelings, a different
opinion and a different reaction than non-listening.
You can also create a cognitive schema yourself based
on what you know or found out.
For example, it may be useful to know that the child is,
for example, of nature busy. It does not mean not to lis-
ten, but easily gives too little attention.
3. Practice
YOUR CHILD
This is happening
You ask to be calm and to stay at the table in a quiet way.
A child does not respond directly to what you say or do.
For the child, these are the original behavioral condi-
tions.
This is what your child does (as perception behavior)
The child tries to find out what is expected.
A child first tries to find out the meaning and the pur-
pose.
The child responds to further information about beha-
vioral circumstances.
236
This is what your child makes of it
If something is said quietly, it allows attention and arou-
ses this willingness.
Something is awakened in the child.
This information matches the child with an existing co-
gnition.
This is what your child does (as reaction behavior)
The child tries to remain seated and to slow down.
On the basis of what is awakened in the child, is respon-
ded.
The activated cognition conducts its response.
This is happening
As a parent, you show satisfaction.
The child does not react to what is said, but to what this
awakens in the child.
His reaction works out for you and forms the changed
behavioral condition.
YOUR CHILD AND YOUR PARTNER
This is happening
You ask yourself in a busy way, incredibly, whether
change is possible.
This is what your child does (as perception behavior)
The child wonders what you mean by this and why you
say something like that.
237
This is what your child makes of it
The child's insecurity is awakened as well as his feeling
of inability.
This is what your child does (as reaction behavior)
From his excited inability the child gives up and bursts
into tears.
This is happening
As a parent you show disappointment with this repeti-
tion of unwillingness.
4. Theory
What you say or do as a parent or educator (your ques-
tion or judgment) can make the behavioral condition for
the child, sometimes more than the situation for which
it is placed (stay in place): THE BEHAVIOR CONDITIONS
Experiencing yourself as being addressed or failing is the
cognition to which the child responds, rather of what
you say or do directly.The child generates this cognition
based on what you say or do: THE BEHAVIOR PROCESSES
By allowing the child to activate another cognition, it can
react differently, also emotionally. This reaction (exer-
ting or giving up) is driven by its cognition (prepared or
powerless). This reaction gives you as a parent or educa-
tor the opportunity to react differently: THE BEHAVIOR
238
If you follow the successive steps in the behavioral cycle,
you can expect more and more concrete which will be
the next step. If you look back at how the successive
steps went, you can become aware and make it transpa-
rent for yourself as a parent or educator, or for the child
what made what followed successively.
Here cognitions were introduced as a concept. In the
following section cognitive schemes are discussed.
239
A COGNITION = SMALLEST KNOWLEDGE UNIT
= SOMETHING I KNOW -> information
LIKE I KNOW IT (ON MY MANNER)
-> feelings + thoughts
for example : cognition CHILD (vulnerable, cute, dependent)
COGNITIVE SCHEMA
= KNOWLEDGE PACKAGE
= COLLECTION OF ASSOCIATED COGNITIONS
(OR UNITS OF KNOWLEDGE)
for example : knowledge package CHILD
a child is young
is in development
is not independent
is playful
is distractible
is influencable
is part of a communion
is part of the future
SCHEMAS = KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURE
OR KNOWLEDGE NETWORK
= MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO ORGANIZE
AND INTERPRET INFORMATION
Helps to cope in a fast way with lots of information from
the environment.
They are and function as shortcuts.
They make use of part-whole relations : parts refers to the
whole, and vice-versa a whole refers to its parts.
for example : young and playful refers to CHILD
CHILD refers to young and playful
240
Read more :
A basis for all this can be found in the perceptual cycle
model of Neisser, founder of cognitive psychology. It also
distinguishes between reality (object with its available
information, the schema (with its stored information)
and movement and action (with its exploration). Reality
modifies the schema, the schema directs movement and
action (directs) and this allows us to experience reality
concretely (samples).
241
He described it here for perception as both perceptual
and reactive behavior (see inner zone graphic represen-
tation). The model depicts how cognition influences per-
ceptual exploration, but is in turn modified by real-world
experience, creating a cycle of cognition, attention, per-
ception, and the real world in which each influences
each other.
However, as can be seen graphically, the model can be
extended and applied to any behavior in which percep-
tion and response are integrated (see out-of-zone
graphical representation).
The model was recently amended by Plant and Stanton
for use in an artificial intelligence context.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and
implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W.H.
Freeman.
242
Cognitive schemas
and parenting
1. Development of cognitive schemas that are very
meaningful
Parents do not think about how their child develops cog-
nitive schemas based on their existing aptitude, their up-
bringing and their own experience, which are very mea-
ningful for how it perceives something and for how it re-
acts to something and deals with something. Parents do
not think about how much their child has to fill cognitive
schemas to know and understand what things in their
environment look like and how they can react emotio-
nally and judiciously and can deal with them behavi-
orally. Parents do not think about how children use
The development of the child is accompanied by the
development of cognitive schemas.
In the upbringing, the child can be helped with the
construction and filling of cognitive schemas.
243
these cognitive schemas constantly to know and esti-
mate things and to determine how to react emotionally
and judgmentally themselves and to interact with them
in a behavioral way. Parents do not realize how impor-
tant it is for their child to be able to read each other or a
situation. To learn which knowledge schemes to activate
with whom or in which situation. Like with whom can I
feel safe, when is a situation unsafe. Can I read if some-
one or a situation comes across as safe or unsafe? What
am I supposed to understand about what someone says
or does? What meaning should I give to a situation. But
also being able to read what has been activated in the
other person or has been activated in a situation. Pa-
rents do not think about how their child can be disabled
so certain cognitive schemas are lacking or little deve-
loped, or distorted, inappropriate or unusable, or very
dominant or rigidly present.
Recent research at Northwestern University shows that
a three-month-old child can already distinguish what is
equal from what is different. Something crucial for the
development of cognitive schemas. If first paired things
shown are the same, it will continue to look longer when
it is suddenly shown something unequal. Or vice versa, if
the succession of unequal being followed by what is
equal, it will continue to look on for longer. In other
words, even before the development of the understan-
ding of language, the relationship can be recognized as
244
equal and unequal and thus the child can make a distinc-
tion between what belongs or goes together and what
does not.
Parents can indirectly understand the meaning of these
cognitive schemas for their child when they notice how
very curious and active their child can be to get to know
everything, not only in what it is, but also in what it
means to the child and how it can be handled. Parents
can indirectly see the meaning of these schemas when
they determine how unrealistic their child may be and
against any reality or healthy judgment in do things that
in this situation here and now and at this age are not at
all suitable or useful for their child.
Parents often do not notice how much they are doing to
fill the content of their child's cognitive schemas. How
they do that by being a model in what is right for them,
in what something means to them emotionally and ra-
tionally and in what their association means. How they
do that in their reaction to what is right for their child, in
what something means to their child emotionally and ra-
tionally and in what it means for their child. How they do
this in informing and instructing their child about what
something could or should be for him, what something
could or should mean for him and what the child's way
of being could or should be.
245
According to research from Northwestern University, for
babies who learn their first words, the way in which so-
mething is mentioned determines the method of coding,
representation and memory. The designation can repre-
sent a category, for example a dog, or it can indicate so-
mething unique, such as this is Max. If the same name is
consistently used for a series of observation objects,
then mainly common characteristics, for example, pet
and bark, are stored, rather than what distinguishes the
observation objects. When a unique name is used, the
unique characteristics are stored, for example, scar and
collar with dog's name. Naming a series of different indi-
vidual objects with the same noun invites babies to form
object categories based on what is in common, without
regard to differences. It invites the child to focus on what
is similar and less on what is unique about an object of
observation.
When the same name is consistently applied to a range
of objects, babies mainly encode their common charac-
teristics. In contrast, when a unique name is given to
each observation object, babies encode the unique cha-
racteristics of each object. The method of encoding ob-
jects of observation in memory and retrieving them later
is fundamental to human cognition and arises in child-
hood.
The manner of naming objects, even if only once, can
have a lasting impact on how babies encode an object,
246
remember it, and reproduce it from memory. Thus, na-
ming a series of different individual observation objects
with the same noun invites babies to form an object ca-
tegory.
2. The what of cognitive schemas
What are cognitive schemas then? They form the way
in which the environmental reality is stored in our
minds. Both reality as we know them, as reality as we
sense and estimate them, as our dealings with the
known, sensed and perceived reality. These knowledge
components are stored in knowledge packages that we
have about the most diverse realities. These knowledge
packages form the cognitive or inner schemas.
The learning of categories as knowledge packages, such
as colors, shapes and objects, happens initially pre-ver-
bal with the infant without words. This pre-verbal visual
category knowledge is then used to discover word mea-
nings, such as names for colors, shapes and objects. This
was recently found by researchers at Birkbeck University
of London and Central European University. Differences
between young children in the development of visual ca-
tegory learning help to understand the difference in
speed of language acquisition. For example, difficult ca-
tegory learning in children with autism can help explain
the slower vocabulary development.
247
The cognitive schemes are constantly supplemented and
modified on the basis of information obtained and of ac-
quired experience.These cognitive schemes are con-
stantly used to know, to feel, to estimate and to deal
with just about everything that we have to deal with.You
could say that about half of our behavior is at the service
of cognitive schema building and the other half for cog-
nitive schema use.Cognitive schemes form the best pos-
sible representation of the realities for us based on what
we record. From the multitude of realities we try to de-
duce a somewhat stable concept of understanding that
this variety clearly carries within itself, without being
confused by it. To this end, cognitive schemes will make
use of either the named realities themselves in simpli-
city, but also their symbolized representations by indi-
rectness, to regularities and rules at great complexity.
An example, a child wants to know exactly who his pa-
rents are. Thus it will try to deduce from the multitude of
behaviors of the parents how they are. In the cognitive
scheme of your child, you will thus find whether you are
sweet or impatient, or there is regularity in it, usually
sweet, exceptionally impatient. The child may also stop
rules in his schema : what is my mommy or daddy, what
is my mum or daddy not, how is mommy or daddy, how
is mommy or daddy not ? If you are like that, you are the
sweet mum or dad, if you are different, you are the im-
patient mommy or daddy for your child.
248
Cognitive schemas also provide the best possible res-
ponse and interaction with the proposed realities based
on information and experience. From the multitude of
possible reactions we try to derive a somewhat stable
behavioral fulfillment that implies the best possible reac-
tion intuitively and judiciously for ourselves and involves
the best possible interaction with the environment.
An example, a child will react emotionally and judgmen-
tally in a completely different way to the sweet mother
or dad and will deal with it very differently than with the
impatient mom or dad. The child is happy and relaxed
when it meets his preference. It is inclined to cooperate
and respond to what the parents expect. A child who is
confronted with the activated cognitive schema of the
impatient mum or dad will be rather angry and tensed at
his aversion. It will be more inclined to counteract and, in
this way, not want to show off the parental expectations,
unless the parents switch to their dear way of being and
allow him to activate an appropriate cognitive schema.
Cognitive schemas form so implicit syntheses that are
continuously used to know and deal with encountered
realities : the conceptualization or concept filling as the
best possible representation, the behavioral filling as the
best possible emotional and judgmental reaction for
oneself and the best possible interactive interac-
tion. Realities are constantly compared with already
249
developed cognitive schemas and thus known and reco-
gnized. At the same time these schemes are constantly
being supplemented or adjusted. From the cognitive
schemas reality is then approached, so that someone
can react emotionally and rationally and can deal with it.
These reactions are also supplemented and adjusted on
the basis of experiences.
For example, a child will easily recognize familiar adults
on the basis of the comparison and found agreement
with his already developed facial schemas. The activated
schemes can be supplemented and adjusted so that small
changes can occur. My mother, that is brown hair, but
also red hair. My dad, that is without, but also with pier-
cing. For example, a child will respond differently in the
presence of unfamiliar adults and come to other inter-
actions. The child may be scared and inconvenienced, it
keeps distance. After all, the new adults do not fit into an
already developed cognitive facial schema, but fit into
the cognitive scheme stranger that is activated with res-
tlessness and distance as a result.
3. Building cognitive schemas
Children and also we needs cognitive schemas very
much to deal with the surrounding realities with more
precision and more ease. To this end, it is necessary for
the child to build up and fill in his cognitive schemes,
both in terms of what, the concept filling, the way in
250
which, the behavior filling and the where and when, the
context filling.
For example, babies discover very early that mouth and
food goes together and hard objects, such as glasses or
smartphone goes with the senses, such as eyes and ears.
Thus a movement or action forms the basis for the beha-
vioral concept and the evolving schema behavioral filling.
This was ascertained because the child continues to look
longer when, unexpected, food was not brought to the
mouth and glasses were brought to the ear or the
smartphone to the eyes.
Completion of the concept arises on the basis of noticed
patterns. Behavioral infill is created on the basis of disco-
vered rules. Context completion finally goes back to es-
tablished regularities. These progressively observed pat-
terns, rules and regularities together form developing
schemes.
For example, from the adult visual cortex is known to
contain two regions that work together to process per-
ceived faces and two more regions that work together to
process places. Research at Emory University now found
that already in infants, the two areas of the visual cortex
associated with facial processing, and the two networks
associated with sites, fired synchronously. These infant
patterns were similar to those in adults, although not as
strongly. The visual and site networks of the brain were
251
connected within a few days of birth and talked to each
other. This finding suggests that there is room for these
networks from an early age to tune in better and better.
Babies' brains seem wired for specialized tasks such as
seeing faces and seeing places so that specific patterns
of brain activity are possible. The baby brain then essen-
tially waits for the relevant information for its progres-
sive processing. This may explain why a baby's gaze is fo-
cused on faces right from birth.
Another example, recent research by the University of
Washington shows that toddlers from 17 months are
able to recognize social dominance (what). They know
where to see who in a group is dominant (where and
when) and know how to commit to receiving more re-
wards (how).
In the development of a knowledge scheme as
knowledge structure, it can be established that first
mainly declarative knowledge is developed (the concept
interpretation: what something is and what to do), then
especially the procedural knowledge (the interpretation
of behaviour: how something is and how to do some-
thing) and finally especially conditional or conditional
knowledge (the context interpretation: where and when
something is and where and when something is to be
done). When a child, for example, becomes acquainted
with a game, he successively discovers what is there,
how something happens and where and when. At the
252
same time, it successively discovers what it should do,
how in what way, where and when as the best choice or
option. You could say that each time the form and con-
tent of the knowledge already present is converted into
a different form and content. The what is then converted
into the how and then into the where and when.
The child spontaneously puts a lot of effort into building
cognitive schemas: his outspoken curiosity, being conti-
nuously involved in a playful exploration, asking questi-
ons and asking why. These are ways of realizing this con-
ceptual and behavioral filling of cognitive schemas that
is necessary for the child.
Recent research from Ohio University shows that child-
ren four to five years old would rather explore than re-
ceive rewards. They explore a major driving force during
early childhood, of more importance than immediate re-
wards. They seem motivated in the first place by the in-
formation obtained from research. It helps them make
the world work.
It's not just running around aimlessly, opening drawers
and cupboards, and picking up random objects, as adults
easily think. Their exploration and investigation are not
random at all, but are done systematically to make sure
not to miss anything. The seemingly unpredictable beha-
vior of children at this age strongly resembles an urge to
store information.
253
Children apparently go through a stage where systema-
tic exploration is one of their primary goals rather than
being motivated by rewards.
The child also is using his developing sense of probability
in building cognitive schemas. The presence of a sense
of probability is necessary for the development of cogni-
tive schemes. Recent research at the Max Planck Insti-
tute shows that six month old babies are already able to
make generalizations based on limited information. The
brain does this by using probable information to direct
its own actions based on established regularities in the
environment. The brain records which situations and
events are more likely to occur than others and are the-
refore more likely. This may concern their coherence or
their succession. This is to estimate their occurrence to-
gether or sequentially.
Infants who, early in their development, even from the
age of 6 months, have the ability to process new infor-
mation and make associations with other information
and expand their knowledge this way, achieve a higher
degree of development, according to recent research at
the Case Western Reserve University.
The young child has a built-in learning strategy. Babies
don't randomly explore the world around them, but stra-
254
tegically. They select and focus on information that ena-
ble them to learn faster and more efficiently, and they
prefer to focus on that. Instead, what they see as what
doesn't help them learn, they ignore. They therefore fo-
cus on what learns them the most. Babies are thus pro-
bably the best learners imaginable. This all was recently
shown in a study by the Donders Institute for Brain, Cog-
nition and Behavior, by means of eye tracking.
Cognitive schemas can refer to situations, but also to
events. In the first case it is what is, in the second case it
is a course. The cognitive schema then refers to the co-
herence between what is: it indicates a causal relations-
hip, the second as a result of the first, or it indicates an
instrumental connection, the first that results in the se-
cond.
Also for this dynamic coherence included in cognitive
schemas, the child makes a lot of effort to get to know
them better. It questions how something has arisen. For
example, what made my mum impatient. It also goes for
itself how it can create something itself. For example,
how do I make my mum sweet. These cognitive schemes
will also regularly be used by the child to influence his
environment or bring about change.
Cognitive schemas can also refer to people. Himself or
herself, meaningful persons from the world and the re-
lationship between themselves and others. Who they
255
are and how to respond and deal with. How both relate
to each other and what causal or instrumental connec-
tion there is.
For example, newborns have a preference for orienting
themselves toward faces in their natural visual environ-
ment. This indicates that the mechanisms underlying
orienting and moving faces with direct gaze also facili-
tate activation of relevant cortical regions in young in-
fants, providing an important foundation for the emer-
ging social brain. There would be a rapid subcortical
pathway for face detection triggered by a face (or eye)
like phase contrast pattern within a bounded area. In this
way, the baby brain would absorb information about the
social world and process it into social cognition, which it
can then use in its social interaction.
Another example, who am I to myself, I love myself and I
value myself, how attentive and caring I am about my-
self. Who is my mother, what feelings does she raise and
how much does she mean for me, how do I deal with
her? What is the relationship between the two of us, how
does it feel and how important is it for me, what kind of
interaction does it take.
All this information is implicitly stored in the cognitive
schemas of the child and is used as a matter of course
and therefore often less consciously when assessing and
dealing with situations, events and people. They form
256
the best possible wholes as an undertone in what is the
predominant here and now. They provide a solid basis
for the concrete action of the child.
4. Perception and cognitive schemas
Every perception is carried by cognitive schemas as a
comparison of what the child hears, sees or feels with
what has already been acquired by schemes. The result
is that a scheme is applicable or applies in a new situa-
tion, something that is included in the scheme or assimi-
lated to the scheme so that it remains confirmed. The
result can also mean that something is not included in
the scheme, but is split off, or that the scheme is chan-
ged so that it is accommodated. In assimilation, the co-
gnitive schema applies more broadly, with accommoda-
tion the schema becomes more limited. For example,
research shows that children are looking at something
longer if something does not meet their expectations.
This information is used by researchers to gain more in-
sight into inner processes, for example in children who
do not yet master the language. In this way they acquire
insights into activated thoughts and feelings of these
children.
To illustrate, recent neuroscience research at Dresden
University of Technology suggests that someone hears
what he or she expects to hear. Previous research has al-
ready shown that the cerebral cortex continuously makes
predictions about what will happen, and that neurons
257
responsible for sensory processing code differences bet-
ween predictions made and actual reality. It now appears
that not only the cerebral cortex, but also the entire au-
ditory path represents sounds according to previous ex-
pectations. This fits with the more general theory of sen-
sory processing that describes perception as a process of
hypothesis testing. Predictive coding assumes that the
brain is constantly activating predictions about what the
surrounding world will look like, sound, feel, and smell,
and that neurons only process the differences between
these predictions and the actual physical world. The pre-
viously established subjective beliefs about the surroun-
ding reality thus appear to play a decisive role in how the
perceived reality is processed and understood.
Every feeling- and judgment-response is carried by co-
gnitive schemas. The activated schema evokes asso-
ciated feelings and stored judgments.
Every interactive dealing is supported by cognitive
schemes. The activated scheme calls up associated be-
havior.
An example, a child will deal with a stuffed animal very
differently than with a living animal. A child may start his
dealings with a living animal from his association with his
cuddly toy. However, it will quickly experience that both
can be best distinguished and that both raise different
258
feelings and preferences and necessitate a different ap-
proach, for example itself more active towards reactive
in the living animal.
Not only their own interactive dealing but also those of
others in the environment is supported by their own co-
gnitive schemes in development. Cognitive schemes al-
low predicting the behavior of others. This is necessary
for smooth social interaction. For example, according to
Bekkering of Radboud University Nijmegen, we are able
to estimate what the other person is doing, how he will
do this and in what context, such as with what intention.
For example, if your child is walking around with his plush
pet, then it will play with it when it is fit. However, if it is
tired, it will reach its favorite animal to nurture it and
press it against itself.
In the brain, there would be a memory area in the tem-
poral cortex at the brain side that would help to form
these expectation models.
The child himself gradually finds out how other children
deal with their pet animal, also from their own experien-
ces with pet animals. Playing in the wake-up time, che-
rish around the sleep time. The more they exhibit this be-
havior themselves, the better they can assess it with
other children.
Research shows that the brain sends stored predictions
259
to the brain area that is responsible for observation. For
seeing the visual area in the back of the brain. Signals of
low-frequency brain waves stand for this. If the observa-
tion does not match the predictions, signals from high-
frequency waves are sent to the memory area with pre-
viously built-up predictions. Possibly the prediction can
still be saved, because it is not applicable and can so be
saved. It was not the stuffed animal, for example.
However, the forecast may have to be adjusted. In the
example, not only when the child is tired, the hug is che-
rished, also if the child feels unsafe, playing with the hug
stops and the hug is pressed against him. In predicting
and estimating this, the child should first pay attention
to the context, then to the course and finally to what it
represents. That's how it goes from general and vague
to concrete and specific.
According to some scientists, we perceive from the out-
side in and from the global to the detail. For example, we
would first perceive and label larger wholes such as
areas of color, then perceive shapes through edges and
then focus within them on from larger to smaller local
details, which would lead to a precise identification. For
example, such as discovering body and facial profiles
first, it is a man or woman, a child or an adult, then per-
ceiving that it is someone with blond or gray hair, white,
brown or black skin and finally based on perceiving smal-
ler details that it is, for example, your child, your neigh-
260
bor or your grandmother. This would also be neurologi-
cally substantiated. For example, rods are mainly res-
ponsible for peripheral vision and cones for central vi-
sion. The principle outlined here is gratefully used in ar-
tificial intelligence.
5. Cognitive schemas and parents
Even though parents are not consciously busy with the
filling of cognitive schemas of their child, parents have a
big influence on these schemas. Significant for this cog-
nitive development of the child are the cognitive sche-
mas that parents themselves possess and use in their ex-
pression and dealings. Children are very influenceable
for what is for their parents, what they know in their own
way. Also for how they react for themselves and their
environment to what is right for them, for what feelings,
judgment and association they connect to some-
thing. This way we can talk about social cognitive sche-
mas that apply to the whole family or the whole environ-
ment and that also assimilates.
261
An example, what respect is for a child is strongly deter-
mined by what respect is in the immediate environment
of the child, such as not attacking, not laughing or not
denying. How the child responds to respect often shows
a lot of resemblance with the reaction to this in the envi-
ronment, whether it experiences well-being or indiffe-
rence, whether it experiences appreciation or misunder-
standing, whether it is responsive in respect and non-res-
ponsive in the absence of respect.
262
If the interaction between the parent and child is unfa-
vourable, and if there is long-term stress due to financial,
relationship, parenting, addiction, violence, (too much)
focus or diversity problems, the child can develop deve-
lopmentally unfavorable minus schemes in addition to
developmentally favorable plus schemes, resulting in in-
security.
Parents sometimes take this more consciously and then
make an effort to teach the child values and norms. To
contribute what is valuable and to contribute what and
how something is possible, and what and how something
can not. Even though parents do not do this explicitly,
their implicit use of their cognitive schemas will implicitly
affect children, especially at a younger age, when child-
ren easily assimilate what is implicit in their environ-
ment. What is expressed as an undertone in the expres-
sion and actions of the parents.
New European research shows that the tendency to form
a first impression about someone based on the ap-
pearance of a person's face arises early in development.
Parents, among other things, reinforce their child's for-
mation of impressions in interaction with them. About
thirteen percent of the parent-child conversations in the
study had to do with perceived characteristics of people.
Parents actively reinforced their children's facial attribu-
263
tes. Moreover, they often agreed on their mutually ex-
pressed opinions. Parents thus encouraged the mapping
of facial features to infer who someone is on the basis of
perceived physical appearance. Specifically, babies as
young as seven months old prefer already to look at faces
whose features resemble a subtle smile rather than a
subtle frown.
Parents who consciously take care of the concept and
behavior formation of their child can see that as the child
grows older this is not always as easy and runs not always
as smoothly as before. This is because their child usually
already has a certain developed cognitive schema with
personal concepts and own behavioral filling. What pa-
rents offer is included, as confirmation, as a supplement
or as a change to which the child does not always want
to pass. It disturbs the inner cognitive stability and
housekeeping. It may end up in the cognitive schema not
as own, but as what and how parents know something.
In recent research, children who accepted the habit of
imitating their parents naturally seem to be more open
to influences later on. A mindset or scheme is thus deve-
loped to supplement (assimilation) and change (accom-
modation) their schemes under development. This can
be of significance so later on openness is important.
264
John Dewey, an important educator of the last century,
already described the educational process as a conti-
nuous reconstruction of experience. For him it meant a
continuous learning process without end, not even in
adulthood. For example, he preferred the term growth
to that of development. Each new experience builds on
previous experiences and helps determine the quality of
future experiences. The upbringing process must be un-
derstood from the point of view of the child's activity.
The more intensive the interaction, the more interrela-
tions are made. So the more meaning is given to
something, individually but also collectively.
6. Operation guiding and control
Research shows that children around the age of about
three years evolve from being incapable of action con-
trol and are dependent on the outside world to the use
of strategies that allow a certain action guiding and con-
trol without leaving it to the outside world. The develop-
ment of this guidance and control appears to be in paral-
lel with biological, cognitive and social development pro-
cesses. They then gradually become aware of whether
something corresponds to what they apparently use as a
scheme or standard. If this is not the case, then this may
seem strange to even frightening, or crazy or even laug-
hable. Likewise, they gradually become aware of
whether something is going on, such as what or how, for
what they apparently use a stored scheme or rule. If this
is not the case, then this can be perceived to them as
265
non-okay, which makes them refuse, or just as okay and
as their priority. The development of this course of
action and control is progressing step by step, with more
and more schemes being used as behavioral orienting
and with increasing use of multiple schemes as behavi-
oral forms
Before a child is able to act internally based on cognitive
schemas, a whole period of externally information-dri-
ven action from the parents and environment precedes
it. This external information that the child must help with
his behavioral control consists partly of product informa-
tion and partly of process information.Product informa-
tion relates to a certain (social) situation or event and
forms a whole set of data and characteristics that is in-
dicated as an image.Process information includes an in a
certain (social) situation or event associated dealing and
(inter)action progress that is indicated as a model, the
how. By means of product information that is more
spontaneously derivable or more expressly provided by
the environment, the what, and process information, the
how, the child is able to orient and direct his beha-
vior. Initially with the necessary practical help and ad-
justment. On the basis of this information made availa-
ble and supplemented with own experience, the neces-
sary cognitive schemas gradually develop.
For the development of the child, this external informa-
266
tion, its degree, its quality and its availability are vi-
tal. Adults can be very intermediaries here in the transi-
tion to internal information. The lack of this or shortages
in it lead to less developed or unilateral schemes.
For example, the thinking scheme of a young person can
remain very elementary. Thinking is then possible : to
take over and repeat what others think and ex-
press. Thinking is done by passively relying on others and
their help, or impulsively taking over what others hold.
Thinking then is not able to produce as much new infor-
mation as possible with as little information as possible. I
do not think by actively exploring a situation or problem,
by expressing the information present and relating it, by
deriving possible explanations and solutions, by coordi-
nating purpose and means, before, during and af-
terwards. Thinking. If I did this well, that would require a
very different, more developed, thinking plan.
Parents and educators can contribute by helping the
child build rich schemes in the long-term memory. Sche-
mes in which facts, concepts, principles, methods, situa-
tions, contexts are mutually functionally linked and are
easily accessible for use in the various situations that
have to be processed in the working memory, such as
the solution of a specific problem, or the approach to a
task or assignment.
267
7. Cognitive schemes applied
Enter a cognitive schema :
Fill in after each dot for your child :
... is for your child :
.
is your child doing so/is your child so dealing with :
.
can you wake up like this:
.
can you extinguish like this:
.
can activate your child like this:
.
can deactivate your child like this :
.
268
Communicative
approach
The communicative approach means talking back and
forth with your child in an open way in an open climate.
Experiences, feelings, thoughts, intentions and expecta-
tions are preferably conveyed precisely, completely and
clearly in word language on both sides. This event is ac-
cepted, stimulated and kept positive. It is avoided that
communication could only be done indirectly through at-
titudes, behavior or others.
The parent-child communication is functional when the
messages are complete, the concrete content aspect of
the message is important and there is a congruence bet-
ween the content aspect (what is communicated) and
How to talk back and forth with your child in an
open way in an open climate as part of your upbrin-
ging?
WORDS
WORDS
269
the relation (how it should be understood) and rela-
tionship aspect (which relationship between communi-
cators).
The parent-child communication is dysfunctional if it is
characterized by incomplete messages, a content aspect
of the message that loses its unambiguous meaning and
becomes irrelevant and unimportant and a relationship
aspect that becomes overpowering and leads to misun-
derstandings, blockages and disorders.
Typical is:
Talk to your child in an open way.
Make clear agreements so that your child knows exactly
what can and can not and how something is possible.
Discuss a difficulty in advance and look for solutions to-
gether.
There are development oriented different ap-
proaches possible as educator.
They each contribute in their own way to a
development beneficial environment.
The communicative approach is one of these
development-favorable approaches.
270
The final responsibility for setting rules is with you as an
parent with the participation of your child.
Planning together in difficult behavior situations.
Creating an open climate with open communication.
Talking with your child when drawing up rules of conduct.
Build a positive relationship with your child.
Keep the underlying tone positive when communicating.
Being a sounding board for your child.
Report failures so that they can be better prevented in
the future.
. you may have your own opinion,
I do not attack it,
I place my opinion next to yours,
I may also have my opinion
. you may have your own feeling ,
I do not attack it,
I place my feeling besides this of you,
I may also have my feeling
. you may have your own desire,
I do not attack it,
I give my desire alongside yours,
I may also have my desire
. We explain our opinions, feelings and
desires together and take care of them
so that there is respect for them and if possible
they come into their own.
271
your opinions
my opinions
your feelings
my feelings
your desires
my desires
272
Communicative
development
1. Attention requested
In parenting of a child, a lot of attention is given to lan-
guage development and interactive development. Pa-
rents want their child to be able to get in touch with chil-
dren and adults from his or her surroundings as quickly
and as well as possible and to be able to deal with it as
well as possible. They pay a lot of care to learning to
speak and learning to get along with who it is dealing
with. Attention is given to language and interaction as
tools.
In parenting there is a lot of attention for language
and behavioral development of the child.
Less attention is given to how communication deve-
lops in the child.
273
There is less attention for the communicative element in
the use of these tools. What is expressed and exchanged
with language and interaction. How is language and in-
teraction expressed and exchanged? When it comes to
what and how something is expressed, it involves com-
munication of content in a certain way. Both the content
and the form will then determine what is exchanged.
2. Your contribution as an educator or parent
The communicative development of the child starts with
you. How you deal with the child and how you talk to it
allows the child to a greater or lesser extent convey so-
mething of himself: of what it experiences, of how it
feels, what needs it has.
A child can discover in this way how he can do something
within his possibilities. Whether it can and is useful to
convey something? Does it help to make something
clear, how loud, bad or long does it have to weep to get
your attention and get a reaction? Is it sufficient to give
a signal that something is going on and do you further
inform yourself how you can cater to the child? Are you
responsive in other words? Being responsive means
that you can notice the present (need) signals in the
child's expressions and respond appropriately to them,
without always giving the child his desire.
Do you encourage the child through your attention and
274
reaction to express what it experiences ? Do you en-
courage the child to express his experience appro-
priately ? Do you help your child to become more ex-
pressive, as by informing the environment about
yourself in a way that invites them to pay attention to
this and respond appropriately ?
As a parent, it is preferable not to resort too much to
questioning when encouraging communication. After all,
the child may not always know how to answer, or it may
experience too much pressure. You can better use des-
criptive statements about something to encourage con-
versation. For example, you can describe what happens,
or describe what someone does. For example, instead of
'Are you dressed yet ?' you can say 'You're still wearing
your pajamas.' Instead of 'Did you enjoy today ?' you may
prefer 'I see a big smile on your face.' Instead of 'Did you
play well together?' you may encourage to reply with "I
see you've made something beautiful together." That
way you already start a story.
3. Yourself as a model
Do you stimulate the child to take notice of what you ex-
press as an environment ? Do you give signals that the
child can understand or do you ask the child to derive
from your reaction what you want to express? As long
as the child does not speak a word language, are you
using a sign language, a voice language, a body language
or do you resort to a behavioral or middle language. Let
275
you yourself be heard through your voice, or see yourself
through gestures or your body what you mean ? Or are
you going to let feel by what you do or do not do, or
through which means you use, such as punish-
ment? For example : withdrawing or denying some-
thing ?
It is important that you help the child to take a higher
level and respond to what it hears and what it sees and
do not let it come to the point where you child only feels
it what you want. This way you can orientate the child to
your verbal language through your voice language to
take account of what you want to express. Likewise, you
can help to orientate your child on what you say and ex-
press, rather than on how you say something or express
something. In this way, it can also help you to not always
be obliged to hide your message in how you say or ex-
press something. For example : friendly or unfriendly, in-
viting or compelling. By not taking this yourself to ex-
pressing yourself through how, but preferring to express
yourself through what, you can lay the foundation for
the child.
By being self-respectful and not expressing your displea-
sure against the child but against the situation and what
the child does or does not do, you avoid affecting the
self-image and the self-esteem of the child. At the same
time you set the tone and stand model for a respectful
communication, in which you come to the point for what
276
you want differently and at the same time appeals the
child to its contribution. You can then focus on how
something is possible.
4. Discover communication channels and languages
A baby initially communicates very much with his
body. Reflexively in pain for example : it pulls away, or it
gets the hiccups in abdominal cramps. A baby communi-
cates also with a purpose : it ceases to suck, or it
squeezes the lips when it no longer wants the baby
bottle.
Very quickly the child also communicates with his mimi-
cry. His face is calm, neutral, relaxed, or his face shows
restlessness, displeasure or discomfort and is
tense. From his face can quickly read feelings present
with him or her.
Very soon it also communicates with its voice, even
though it can not talk at all. Its schreitone points very
quickly to a certain displeasure or a certain appeal. Its
vocalizing around 3 months, as with soft elongated
sounds 'uh, uh' indicates a certain pleasure and satisfac-
tion. Its babbling around 6 months becomes a social
babble a few months later, in which sounds can be found
of the native language. It invites you as a parent to talk
back, or is a response to your talk and is stimulated by
it. In addition to the game and exercise element, it can
277
have the meaning of answering, approaching, expressing
impatience, and so on.
Spontaneously or possibly in response to yourself, the
child begins to make gestures that match certain realities
or events by the end of the first year of life. Like opening
its mouth to get something, or pointing to draw atten-
tion to something. As a parent you have a tendency to
make a number of gestures. For example, sway when so-
meone leaves, or shrug your shoulder to indicate that
you do not know something. Especially when the child
tries to say the first words, it may be tempting if this does
not quite succeed in supporting this with certain gestu-
res. Like 'caa' for cat and a caressing gesture. As a parent
you can consciously try to become aware of these baby
gestures and try to support and stimulate them. As an
intermediary step for language acquisition, they can help
to experience communicative success. It also helps to
make the transition from not being able to talk to wan-
ting to talk but not yet succeeding, or not yet completely
successful. Gradually, as soon as the child can talk bet-
ter, these gestures disappear, even though they can still
occur together for a certain time. Think of saying no and
shaking the head at the same time. Research would indi-
cate the beneficial effect of gestures on language acqui-
sition.
As soon as the child learns to understand and learn to
278
use the language, a new world opens up communicati-
vely. It now finally understands what those adults have
been saying all the time. Moreover, it can give the ans-
wer, or elicit an answer by first saying something. This
language communication has two consequences: the
child is better informed and can better inform the envi-
ronment about itself, on the other hand more and more
influence can be exerted on the child, but on the other
hand it can also try to influence the environment. This
makes the exchange more intensive.
In the second year of life, the child discovers that if it
does not want to respond to something, it can do this
with its behavioral reaction. It does not want to be at the
table, it does not want to go inside or go to sleep. It also
discovers that if it has to do something mandatory, for
example, letting his sister ride his bike, it can do some-
thing to make his sister's life miserable. It constantly
forms an obstacle for his sister with materials. Or it sti-
mulates a play friend to tease his sister. In this way, the
child discovers the behavioral language (not at the table,
not inside) and the middle language (materials such as
obstacle, involvement of a friend). This way it can make
you and his sister feel something and make it clear.
In this way the child discovers the different communica-
tion channels: his body, his mimicry, his voice, his gestu-
res, his language, his behavior, means and others. In this
way, the various communication languages associated
279
with these channels also develop to a greater or lesser
extent : body language, mimic language, voice language,
sign language, word language, behavioral language and
medium language.
5. Which signals?
When using the various communication channels and as-
sociated languages, the child gradually discovers from
the reactions of the environment what is possible and
what is not possible. This is done on the basis of the per-
ceived appreciation and positive reaction and the expe-
rienced disapproval and negative reaction. In this way, it
quickly becomes clear that calling, or hitting, or making
something broken can not be done at all. This is how it
feels that respectful talking, ignoring or mediation can
be done. In this way his communication is increasingly
becoming a social (accepted) communication.
During use, the child gradually discovers in the various
specific groups of which it is part, such as the family, the
nursery, afterwards the school, the circle of friends, the
neighborhood, etc., which is the preferred language
that attracts attention and provokes the desired res-
ponse, or is most likely to offer it. This way it can discover
that it is best to ask everything in kindergarten, but that
it does not work out very well at home towards its bro-
ther(s) or sister(s) and that it only has influence by letting
feel it. This way it can be determined that each group
uses a signal language, language on which they often
280
have little insight. A language that is responded to with
attention and reaction. If a different language is used
then no attention is given or no or little reaction occurs.
To ask your sister or brother to participate makes little
impression, sharing a piece of your cake does offer the
desired response. A child of three to four years is able to
adapt his language to who it talks with. It can take into
account age, situation and demand for informa-
tion. Communication is often used to come to an agree-
ment and to work together, often in a game context.
6. Communication in itself
Between the age of five and seven years, oral communi-
cation skills are increasing. Communicating is becoming
increasingly disconnected from concrete (game) situa-
tions and specific behavior. The talking comes standing
at its own, becomes longer, is coherent and forms a
whole. Talking remotely with each other is more popular
because it works better, everything can be better ex-
pressed, even if nothing can be shown or seen. From
eight years onwards thoughts can be exchanged and
more (goal-oriented) dealed with the language. For
example, arguments can be formulated to obtain some-
thing. In what is communicated, the prior knowledge of
the interlocutor is gradually taken into account. It is also
possible to communicate more and more in a nuanced
and efficient manner, such as exchanging main issues
and staying with the preconceived main line.
281
The communication circle is gradually expanding from
the familiar environment to new contacts and more and
more functional communication is coming forward
here. Our own communication is becoming more and
more conscious and can therefore be better tuned.
7. Social communication
Social communication development is very important for
dealing with other children and young people in game
and group contexts. The child must be able to give sig-
nals to the others and receive timely and accurate sig-
nals. The child must be able to understand what the
others say and respond appropriately to the other child
and itself. The child must keep in touch with social con-
tact and know how to find a way out of conflict in a com-
municative way.
Parents can offer the necessary training opportunities in
dealing with their child. For example, helping their child
to notice what exactly you say as a parent, teach the
child to take into account what you say, how to express
yourself without making you angry, how to come to an
agreement, how to express what it feels and needs, how
to indicate in time when something brings the child in
trouble, and so on.
8. Consequences of development delay
Failure to timely or sufficiently develop communicative
skills could result in the child continuing to express itself
282
in a more elementary way. It shouts easily, throws things
or beats others. It can also result in it being left on the
sidelines, it is silent or is passively alone. Parents easily
experience their child as more difficult to handle, little
attentive or not social attentive, more active and little
capable of positive emotional exchange. Possibly this
also depends on being less able to take and understand
what is expressed by the environment.
Being able to express less of what it feels and needs in-
creases the risk of disappointment and isolation because
it does not meet its needs. This is certainly the case
when the child starts to go to school.
Problem behavior would be more at risk with less favo-
rable communicative development and there could be a
correlation with less favorable socio-emotional and be-
havioral competence development. For example, lan-
guage can help the child to slow down socially less va-
lued behavior and to opt for what is socially preferable.
9. Feelings and communication
Even though children manage to quickly understand the
environment and make themselves understood, it
should not be assumed too quickly that the child can im-
mediately be very accurate. A child often experiences si-
tuations easily, but therefore does not just succeed in gi-
ving this feeling, sometimes also physically, accurately
and completely in words. What you say as a parent easily
283
arouses feelings in the child, but these cheerful feelings
are not just a faithful representation of what you com-
municate and mean.
A child may feel very tense or uncomfortable in a new
situation, but will experience this possibly expressed in
stress complaints, such as withdrawing or feeling un-
well. As a parent you mean to make a comment about
something that you want to see changed in the behavior
of the child, the child can easily interpret this as an attack
or rejection.
As a parent, you can help the child by identifying exactly
what something is about and with which something is
connected. It is something unfamiliar and hence you ex-
perience some tension. It is not about criticism, but it is
about what can be a more favorable alternative to what
you do now or is happening now. Especially to make it
clear to the child how to do this and to practice exerci-
sing feelings and to express them and to distinguish
them from situations or events with which they relate.
10. Conscious communication
Communication is a matter of course. In fact, every inte-
raction between parent and child involves communica-
tion, even if you do not mean it at all. Not communica-
ting is simply not possible. It is precisely because it is so
spontaneous and self-evident that it receives little atten-
tion, also in the development. This also appears in works
and research on the development of the child.
284
Nevertheless, it can be experienced that many interac-
tion problems are partly related to less favorable com-
munication. Every reason therefore to pay attention to
this in the development of the child. This can be done by
becoming more aware of the communication of and with
the child as a parent. In this way you get a better view of
it, also on growth and evolution and you can better res-
pond to it. This way more opportunities can be created
and more can be practiced. The upbringing situation can
provide the safe basis for this.
11. Affectable
This way you can also pay attention to the link between
the presentation for the child and its communication. In
this way you can notice that the child, based on what it
receives, forms a representation that is very colored with
what lives in the child itself and that is not always exactly
related to what was actually expressed.
On the other hand, you can sometimes notice, because
the child has no or no precise representation yet, that
this can be very influenced by what it receives in com-
munication.
The younger the child, the more influenceable it is by
what is going on in him or herself and by what the envi-
ronment provides.
285
According to a recent study by the University of Utrecht
as soon as a child has a presentation his brain is in sync
with who it is talking. This is in case something of what it
will hear is predictable. The type of brain activity is more
such as to who it talks, this is in case it can predict what
will be said. The brains of both speakers and listeners
take particular account of the predictability of the langu-
age. This results in more similar patterns of brain activity
in both, even before a sentence is heard or spoken.
The brain of both parent and child appear here as a pre-
dictive tool, it continuously anticipate on the outside
world. So their can be a quick and accurate response.
This allows the brain to predict sounds and words based
on the context. For example, your child's shouting stands
for fun, even though your child has not yet said finding
something pleasant. The brain sends a signal to the au-
ditory cortex that it can expect sound patterns that are
similar to predicted words. In communication, therefore,
top-down processes play a role : this means that it can
be anticipated as to what is to come. Here what will be
said, for example, by you as a parent. The brain plays in
this an important role as a predictive force.
In the same line are findings from research at Radboud
University in Nijmegen. This research shows that talking
to each other is more than the exchange of words and
phrases, but that together a reality is evoked or created
within a small bubble, here parent and child, in which
messages are understood. In order to understand what
286
is being said, the shared context must also be grasped
here. For example, how can in what each say taken into
account what the listener already knows or expects. In
conversation an imaginary space is created together,
which evolves as the conversation progresses. This can
make the created context more aligned, as something
you can build on. The changing representations can be
larger or more limited.
In conversation, everything must come together in a
lightning-fast manner: communicative signals, know-
ledge of the world and knowledge of your interlocutor in
an imaginary collective context. For this purpose, the
brain constantly keeps all knowledge and expectations
ready, so that can be built on very flexibly, during con-
versation. Research shows that the same areas of the
brain are active in conversation partners. They respond
simultaneously and this is more active as mutual under-
standing increases. Activation represents the process of
jointly negotiating and updating that shared space. If
both conversation partners already have the same con-
text information, the synchronous activity will stop. If au-
tism is involved, this synchronous activity seems more
difficult because the shared communicative space is less
successful, with as consequence less understanding each
other.
287
12. Classification and attention
Indicate whit a cross what is typical for the communica-
tion of the child.
Indicate with a dot what you would like to pay attention
to in the communicative development of the child:
Body language
Mimic language
Voice language
Sign language
Word language
Behavioral language
Medium language
Social language
Signal language
Communication in connection with activity
Communication in itself
Social communication
Emotional communication
Development-delayed communication
Conscious communication
Very influenceable communication
288
For a clear
communication
Nothing is more difficult than talking to someone. We al-
ways find it difficult to communicate what we mean to
say. The other person does not always understand us. Or
the other person understands us wrong. Or the other
does not want to understand us. It becomes really diffi-
cult if we want to get something done from the other
person. Or whether we want the other to change. It is
even more difficult to stand up for yourself and put the
other in place.
In almost all situations we feel that it is good to talk. Pre-
ferably to talk and to discuss in advance. Even when we
do something together, keeping each other informed, is
important in order to avoid misunderstandings and
mistakes. After a successful or unsuccessful execution,
Talking to your child is not always easy.
Clear communication can offer more opportunities.
289
talking helps to learn from what we did. Sometimes it is
necessary to talk things out, for what we can not accept
at all.
I come to you across my borders,
but you are so closed within yourself.
I'm going on,
I am busy myself.
If only I could get your attention?
Even if it was for a moment,
you could look outside
and get over your own limits
and do not feel lost.
I will help you,
if you let me.
If you touch me,
we both are free.
This is certainly the case for you as a parent in relation to
your child. This talking together becomes more impor-
tant as your child grows up and develops and expresses
his own ideas, preferences and desires. The child asks
and expects you to take this into account. This then re-
quires a lot of consultation in order to allow everyone to
do their utmost in the care of your child.
Usually we live on friendly terms with our child. As a pa-
rent you are interested in your child and are very com-
mitted to it. And your child feels a lot for you. Such a
290
friendly relationship offers the most chances to under-
stand each other well and to influence each other. But
even then we notice that a very different way of talking
can be found in friendly conversations. After all, we have
each gained our own experiences from which we
talk. For example, your silence is for your child to agree,
for you it is an expression of disagreement. The things
we say can also have a different content. For example,
when I speak as a parent about 'difficult', I think of what
is complicated or delicate. Your child thinks about what
it should do alone, without help or support. The closer
we are to each other in experience and living environ-
ment, the easier we will be on the same wavelength.
Fortunately, this is usually so in the relationship with
your child.
It is difficult if we are at odds with our child. We did not
manage to find a rapprochement for anything, or we got
into conflict with our child and argued so that our
friendship or understanding cooled for a shorter or lon-
ger period of time. There is usually a certain power
struggle or inequality. Many daily frictions may then re-
turn to this resulting disagreement and distance. Even
though we are still struggling to make ourselves clear
and we are inviting our child, it wants to strengthen or
reinforce its position through refusal, contrarian or to do
difficult.
291
It becomes very difficult when we have to limit our child
or put it in its place, to reduce it in its field. Or have to
ensure that our child takes up his duties and responsibi-
lity for the agreed part. We are then easily pushed into a
very unsympathetic role as a parent. Your child thinks,
speaks, chooses, decides and acts in your place. Or your
child refuses to think, speak, choose, decide and act and
pushes this towards you. For example, your child is
struggling with your time and money spending. Or your
child leaves his chores and unpleasant messages to
you. Your child often expresses itself tactically to you. 'I
can do this better, you have no experience with it, I've
never had to do this before, you've been cut for it, it used
to be, now this is ridiculous, ...'
In many of these cases, it will be a matter of speaking
from and for yourself as a parent and standing up for his
experienced responsibility. Consideration should not be
given to being tempted to speak in the name of your
child, how much safer this may seem, from what is sup-
posedly only important to your child. It is indeed not
easy to speak about and for yourself as a parent. This re-
quires that you yourself have a vision, an opinion, a pre-
ference and have decided what you yourself want from
your self-declared task as a parent. So you know in ad-
vance what you want to say and you can concentrate on
how to say it. It often seems more social to talk about
and for the other person. For example, "if you pick it up
like that, if you ever acted like that, instead of I would
292
take it that way, I do not want to do it alone
anymore." However, it is good to know that by talking to
your child you are not in the loom and present it as if you
do not have to change. Your child then feels alone and
feels very personally addressed. It will therefore easily
go into defense and respond defensively. Moreover, it
will find its justification and justification for its opposition
to feeling attacked by you.
It is very important to come out very clearly from your
own point of view as a parent and to stand up for
yourself. Specify exactly what you yourself are and to in-
vite your child to take this into account and go into
it. Making it a joint issue and challenge. Not because you
want to attack your child and treat it as an enemy. On
the contrary, you prefer to respect your child as a person
and to maintain a friendly relationship with it. But this
does not mean to hold back and neglect yourself from
the idea of being only someone and meaning something
for what you give to your child or get spontaneously
from your child. For example, affection, attention, right.
Against this background you can try to be clear. This can
be done by ruling out everything that can lead to a
misunderstanding of what you say. This way you can en-
sure that everything is transferred to your child as preci-
sely, coherently, completely, directly and expressively as
possible. Only by being clear in what you want to ex-
press, you can achieve the desired positive result.
293
When I speak to my child, I can pay attention not to
exaggerate what I say and what I expect. By stating very
accurately, in detail, concretely, with nuances and speci-
fically what it is about and not staying vague or too ge-
neral and wanting to include too much, it remains clear
for your child. I share something and ask something. I do
not want to shake my child, it seems more reasonable
and acceptable. I also say specifically what concerns me
and my child. For example, 'if I do this, you can do that.'
When I share something, I can be careful not to contra-
dict myself. Often I say something, but I mean something
else. Often I do not dare to say what I mean, or I do not
want to show my purpose. I say 'yes, but ; or no,
yet ...; or so, though ... '. I often give in with words, but I
do very angry. Or say to refuse, but laugh away what I
say or do differently. This often creates confusion among
my child as an observer, so that in the end I have less
control over how it understands and responds to it. In
practice, you often try to make it friendly clear that it is
no for this difficulty, but that it remains yes for the rela-
tionship with the other person. An explanation of this
double message, no and yet friendly, will often be desi-
rable if your child is not familiar with it.
Sometimes I only express myself half-way, instead of be-
ing complete. Possibly because I suppose my child
knows what it is about and understands what I
mean. Possibly also because I show some hesitation for
any resistance and reaction from my child. I also do not
294
have to show where I stand for. In case of refusal I avoid
to go off in the situation. In case of disappointing results,
I can also deny having said or asked anything. I am just
suggesting something. Your child will then be obliged to
guess and to estimate what it is about and what is expec-
ted of it.
Sometimes I also just express myself indirectly. I then
use detours or deviate from the subject, instead of spea-
king to my child in my presence in a clear, affirmative
way. Indirectness often originates in wanting to spare
your child, yourself or your relationship. Certainly
something negative or bad must be communicated, this
can best be made immediately clear. Your child can then
be helped in expressing and processing its disappoint-
ment. The tendency to express yourself indirectly is
mainly expressed when you seek refuge in your body lan-
guage, such as grimacing or excitement. This tendency is
even more pronounced in limiting yourself to behavioral
language, such as avoiding each other, or bullying each
other, or telling someone else.
In order to teach your child something, time, energy, ef-
fort and other means are often needed to inform it
exactly. Making something clear and lively increases the
chance of being followed. Starting and explaining in
good time too can make the child able to get used to it.
295
It will be necessary to avoid to do violence to reali-
ties due to incorrect and unjustified additions such as as-
sumptions, generalizations, expectations, interpreta-
tions, growing suspicion, emotional reactions, indeci-
sion, rigidity, hardening, position, principle realization ,
precedent definition, and symptomation. It is better to
try to solve the existing basic problem (unblocking), or to
raise awareness of the irrational framework (remove
swelling). It should not be forgotten that we at any mo-
ment make a double of what is happening in reality. We
would then be better able to make a constructive, usable
and workable double that helps us move forward instead
of a defensive, hindering and immobilising model that
separates us more and more as a parent and child.
By talking about reality, a model arises in everyone's
head. It is a model of how reality works and how to con-
ceive things, and how to deal with this in what con-
text. This model then communicates to the reality. In
this way reality becomes a communicated reality in
which the resulting model plays a leading role. This
creates a social model through communication. Commu-
nication often has the purpose to influence each other's
model in everyone's mind and, if possible, to harmonize
with each other. However, clear communication allows
to make the own model known to the other person,
while the other person is prepared to take notice of this
without immediately wanting to influence it. This often
makes a more explicit communication possible. Clear
296
communication then allows to add something to
everyone's model rather than wanting to change it and
make it so richer and more nuanced.
Attempts will also have to be made not to disturb the
conversation with, among other things, your unrest,
fear, tension, uncertainty, confusion, blockage, loss of
control, powerlessness, disappointment, grief, regret,
misunderstanding, isolation, excitement, surprise, irrita-
tion, anger, disgust, aversion, bitterness, distrust, envy,
impatience, struggle, threat. This can be done by expres-
sing your emotions in a positive-lasting conversation at-
mosphere for your child. This way it can be taken into
account and can be used for further orientation. It can
also be taken into account that you yourself attribute im-
portant emotional significance to what is being discus-
sed.
All of this must lead to precise and real giving and taking
of information of each other and each other's sensitivi-
ties and expectations in a mutually respecting and space
providing atmosphere. In this way you acquire authority
on the basis of respect and not so much on the basis of
your authority. Thus, from the actual distance to each
other, feasible opportunities for growth can be sought
and tested. Possibilities that each can accept and sup-
port and where no use is made of preponderance, pres-
sure, manipulation or violence. By being myself and be-
ing for myself and coming out for it, I invite my child to
297
be itself and to be for itself and to come out for it. This is
how we notice differences that come across as wealth
and personality. This way we can rely on it without any
misunderstanding of this diversity and we can build on
each other in addition.
In any case, it is important to continue to cherish positive
feelings and expectations in conversation, even though
there are currently few reasons for this. Nevertheless, it
should be taken into account that negative feelings and
expectations that we would begin to have, can have a
very big influence on one's own way of speaking. Nega-
tive feelings and expectations, such as 'my child does not
want to listen anyway, my child can not convince me, it
will never change, ...' It could lead to no longer tal-
king. Or things can not really be explained anymore. Or
you use the talk to accuse your child and express your
disappointment. So you close every door yourself that
could lead to some change. In the end, I'd rather stay for
a conversation, just as I stay for our relationship'. From
what we want to say, find out how to say this. Like from
what we want to do in our parent-child relationship, look
for how to do this.
As a parent you can work on two goals in order to ar-
rive at a clear communication. These are :
1. Becoming aware of your own way of communication
298
This is to recognize and situate your own usual way of
speaking and listening between possible communication
forms. You can pay particular attention to your own
place and space that you occupy when talking. Can I be
and remain myself ? Will I come to my right ? Do I
reach my intended goal ? Do I communicate from my
childs expectations to me ? Do I communicate from
what I personally feel, think or want ? Am I violating my-
self ? Will I stay in the cold ? Which structure and limits
offer help or hinder ? Can I be open and direct ? Do I
have to be on my guard ? For whom or what ? Can I
stand up for myself ? Am I sufficiently resistant ? Do I
have to protect myself for my child ? Am I afraid to lis-
ten because my child is pressing me ? Can I stay nearby
or should I keep a distance ? Am I aware of what is dif-
ficult for me in communication ? What and when will a
conversation be disturbed for me ? What happens then
to me ? Does my child understand me or not ? Do you
want to or can’t you ?
2. Optimize your own way of communication
How can I supplement and adjust my usual way of spea-
king and listening so that communication gives me more
satisfaction and opportunities and there is less disap-
pointment and risk for me ? How can I find myself bet-
ter and speak better through talking and listening? How
can I achieve more skill to achieve more with less effort
and less failure in conversation ? How can I solve pro-
blems and conflicts in conversation in a functional way,
299
where each one wins ? How can I get closer to myself
by talking together with my child ? How can I also get
closer to my child ? How can I keep a friendly conversa-
tion with my child and still stand up for myself ? How
can I come to a change in my life, relationship and beha-
vioral situation by talking together ? How can I reach a
redistribution and reorganization of tasks, actions, atten-
tion, influence, agreements through consulta-
tion ? How can I avoid tensions that put me out of ba-
lance in a conversation with my child ? How can I avoid
feelings that disturb my listening and speaking ? How
can I avoid error ? How can I avoid giving an impression
so that I unintentionally commit to something and then
have to fulfill this ? How can I maintain openness in my
child ? How can I influence my child ? How can I ex-
press myself more clearly ? How can I better identify
realities ? How can I deal with feelings and emotions in
favor of the conversation ?
300
Phase-specific
communication
Where, when, with whom?
Nina (40 years) We often forgot to talk to our child
beforehand, or avoided talking in advance, to avoid po-
tential hassle. Afterwards we had to say that we did not
agree and did not want a repeat. Our daughter then rep-
licated that she did not know that this was not allowed.
She felt attacked and criticized, although she thought
she was doing well.
Ben (30 years old) Once something was agreed, we as-
sumed that our child did what we asked for and what we
expected. Only later did we sometimes notice that
something else had expired. We just left it, because it
was just like that.
Communication that accompanies someone's doing
in reality requires prior, during and afterwards con-
versation, in accordance with the different commu-
nication phases.
301
Louise (15) If I asked my parents something, their an-
swer was invariably that they should think about it. So I
gradually left it to ask something. I then tried to do some-
thing, outside of them. I sometimes did crazy or even
dangerous things. I certainly couldn't talk to them about
it, even if it risked to go wrong.
Mathis (18 years old) There was not much talking be-
tween us. We should have already serious problems be-
fore addressing one of our parents. Questions with
which we were confronted we also rarely talked about
them with our parents. We preferred to consult with
friends. Even when something risked to go wrong, we
kept our lips together. There was no openness to each
other. Because of this silence, the mutual distance in-
creased. Occasionally this led to misunderstandings. We
were then blamed about it and made guilty. But even
then we did not try to explain or justify it. Everyone
chose to lock themselves in with his personal right. Also
afraid of the reaction of each other.
Finn (16 years old) My parents were divorced. That
made them each very busy. I learned early to do my own
things, without thinking much about the things I did.
Usually I just started something. When my mom found
out, she easily commented because she was worried
about me and my future. My dad, for his part, tried to
steer me constantly, especially if it did not coincide with
what he chose or had in mind for me. They both said that
302
they loved me very much, but we would not sit together
in advance, consult and find out what was good for me.
No, because they didn't want to hurt me. But afterwards
they also avoided talking about something if it had not
been successful. Again not to hurt me. That way all the
pressure came on me. I could not experience real sup-
port, even though they often pretended.
Marie (29 years old) As young parents, we intended to
do things differently, both in the relationship to each
other and in the relationship with our child. We espe-
cially wanted openness towards each other. We hoped
to achieve this by regularly talking to each other. Prefer-
ably as much as possible in advance. We also did not
want to avoid difficult conversations. But wanted to talk
precisely in case of difficulties. We also wanted to talk
afterwards to process things and learn from them.
Joran (31 years old) As parents, we quickly realized
how important it was to act as a team towards our child.
So everything would be unambiguous for our child. The
message was to talk as parents with one voice. Some-
times we each wanted to approach something in a dif-
ferent way. In order not to cause confusion, we worked
out how to get to the same wavelength. Also within our
relationship as partners, we quickly realized the im-
portance of openness and consultation. Especially con-
303
sultation on time, but also when implementing some-
thing and afterwards to look back. That way there was
no division between us.
What ?
Talking in advance, during and afterwards or communi-
cating phase-own is what can offer many benefits for
each. In this way you come to a better understanding
and relationship with each other. It prevents problems
or their repetition. In this way you can also ensure that
problems are situated at conversation level and not at
reality level.
Phase-specific communication is the extent to which
communication is brought into conformity with the ap-
peal in the present phase of the interaction.
The phase-fitting communication has three phases, each
with its own appeal forms: one, informing, orienting and
directing what is to come; two, guiding, supporting and
adjusting what is going on; three, evaluating, following
up and concluding what is over. They correspond to the
three distinct communication phases.
You can pay attention to phase-specific communication
coordination. You can pay attention to the difference,
meaning and importance of the distinct communication
304
phases and the enclosed appeal. You can work on opti-
mizing your communication by integrating the phase
perspective with the enclosed appeal forms. You can pay
attention to the three-phase perspective for each of the
possible stages of a (conversation) relationship. You can
pay attention to come into conversation from the taken
up individual or shared responsibility to planning, organ-
ization, arrangements, follow-up and control.
How ?
What typifies phase-specific communication is:
Prior to
I inform others in advance of my needs and plans.
In conversation matching in advance the picture that
each of us has of what is coming.
Discuss with each other beforehand where we want to
come out and how to find and adjust usable ways for
this.
Together we indicate in advance what we hope to
achieve for each and the relationship through conversa-
tion (equal, more, better, less, ...).
From the certainty that you will meet with each other,
prepare for changes as well as possible, adjust to them
and try to integrate them positively into your life.
If I do not agree with something, I will say this clearly and
explicitly in advance.
305
Through conversation try to get in touch with and keep
in touch with what lives with each one and what each
does.
Continuously incorporate as much information as possi-
ble about each other's qualities and concerns into your
experience to be able to take this into account when for-
mulating proposals.
Before we do anything together, we consult with each
other and examine whether and how we can succeed.
In conversation we pay attention to what leads us to
want to do here and now and what this can result to or
has as consequence.
Involve own and joint experience reflections in choices
in conversation.
In case of foreseeable difficulties and tensions, talk in ad-
vance.
Trying to prevent, resolve or successfully manage a con-
flict through conversation.
In conversation so preferable give attention beforehand
to 'what, if', 'suppose, what', 'if-not, what', 'as if, how'
situations.
Use talking and informing as a powerful preventive tool
to prevent something from going wrong.
Make appointments in time and remind them in time.
I make the things I do in conversation sufficiently visible
and audible for the other person and myself.
I make the things I experience in conversation suffi-
ciently visible and audible for the other person and my-
self.
306
While
My speaking accompanies my doing.
I tell about what I am doing.
Surround what you undertake with good information
provision and support through it.
While I do something with others, I talk to them about
this.
We ensure that communication is underway - it supports
processes and changes and does not hinders them.
If something disappoints me, you can tell from my atti-
tude.
If others disturb me, I tell them this.
So necessarily I give my vision on the actions of others.
I prefer to talk to each other pre-actively and pro-actively
rather than re-and contra-actively.
So you notice that there is a problem, stop, put the prob-
lem into words and think together how to get out and
take the next steps.
Speaking over and over at intervals of where to come,
where to be now and where to go further.
Taking everyone's experiences, feelings and desires into
account by regularly looking back and checking what is
okay and what is not or less and doing the desired ad-
justments.
Afterwards
I talk about past joint experiences.
We talk about an event afterwards.
307
Reflecting in conversation about own and joint experi-
ences.
We discuss about experiences so we gain to learn from
them for the future.
If something went wrong, we discuss the event after-
wards, not to highlight failure, but to see how it can be
better for the future.
In conversation we use knowledge and experience infor-
mation to learn from them if possible before we or after
we do something (whether or not wrong).
Afterwards we do the discussion of an unfulfilled ap-
pointment.
Going together through a happening in a calm frame at
a later time and 'commemorating' from a more remote
perspective in order to come to terms with things, to
think differently and to regain trust in ourselves.
Afterwards we discuss the expressions through which we
had which effects on each other, in order to be able to
respond to each other more optimally and with more fa-
vourable influence.
Orienting a conversation afterwards as a conversation
beforehand to prevent a repeat of what went wrong.
Recognize the consequences of not talking and avoid
them through dialogue.
If we cannot find a solution by talking, seeing or trying,
with subsequent adjustment evaluations, we look what
another person can experience and look at this.
308
General
Ask each other useful questions during preparation, ex-
ecution and finishing.
Communicative duplication of the interaction reality and
phases.
Discussing the joint reality of interaction in conversation,
offering a focus on what is to come, intensifying the ex-
perience that is going on and enjoying or repeating look-
ing back on what is over.
If desired, respond more invitingly than in a timely man-
ner without taking initiative at the level of how to plan
something than at the level of implementation or later.
Follow up the results of previous conversations in later
conversations.
Indicate in I-terms before, during and afterwards how
you see things and want or choose for yourself, together
with clarification and explanation for the other.
What for?
Phase-specific communication is a permanent task with
several cycles that run simultaneously. Every time some-
thing requires communication, before, during and after.
Making space and time to tackle these issues continu-
ously and in parallel, can help them to achieve them.
There are two trajectories: one, this in reality and the ac-
tion in it and two, these in the fore, weather and reflec-
tion of it in communication. Sometimes the phase-spe-
cific communication will be focused on reality or dealing
309
with it, then again it will be focused on the representa-
tion of what is in reality or the handling of this represen-
tation.
Each communication phase therefore requires its own
joint attention. This joint attention that is dealt with in
communication optimizes something in reality that is
meaningful and valuable for everyone.
Where do you situate your own talk in the course of
events?
What do you think you can change in this?
310
What is it ? A good
contact with my child
What is this ? A good contact with my child
Tanja (34 yrs) A good contact with my
child means that I can get along well with
my child. That is that quarrels
and discussions do not get in the way of a
good relationship with my child. That is
trying to get out of disputes it in such a way
that no destruc- tions are made.
Marissa (29 yrs) - I had as a child a bad relationship with
my mother. We could not talk to each other. I could ne-
ver go to my mother with anything, there was never time
to talk. I suffered a lot from that and I missed a lot. I have
planned for my children not to let it come to a repetition.
Every parent wants a good contact with his child.
What does this mean a good contact?
In which story
do you recog-
nize yourself the
most ?
build up, not
breaking down
311
We have made it a habit from the beginning to get a
good contact. We have a good and
close relationship. It can have some
troubles. We do not want to lose that
band. In this way we try to be as open
as possible to each other, so that great
tensions do not get chances and we
can stand close to each other. We are
really attached to each other, we just
can not miss each other. We also try not to have to miss
each other.
Nele (26 yrs) - For me a good contact asks simply respect
and recognition of each other. If this is there, then there
is just a good contact. That is respect
for your child and what goes on in your
child, and give your child recognition.
This has also brought your child to
know that it has respect for you and
what goes on inside you. If your child
does not accept this proposal for
respect, then you must insist that this is done as a mini-
mum. Without respect and recognition on both sides, it
just does not succeed to come to an exchange of views.
This does not mean simply agreeing, it means what so-
meone thinks, feels and wants to approach with re-
verence and give each other recognition. This also
means paying attention to what you think, feel and want
without being criticized or ignored.
close bond,
avoidance of
being on
oneself
mutual res-
pect, and re-
cognition
312
Iris (37 yrs) - We always try to do a number of things to-
gether. This way we get to know each other better, we
make time for each other and we
come closer together. Because
we are in the same situation, we can
only by working together make it us
more pleasant and easier. In this way we
are less easily separated and isola-
ted. We are used to each other and play
better in on each other. Neither my child nor myself
want to skip those moments together.
Marlies (40 yrs) - We are still trying to create a warm
nest for our children. Letting them feel that you love
them, that they are allowed to be themselves, express
your feelings for them, show your
affection and provide safety for them.
Really provide a place where they can
feel safe and can relax. Where they
can relax without not always expecting
every- thing. Rather, we try to
give a lot of information from the
meaning and value they have for us. Apparently they feel
what we offer them without any condition. In this way
we also experience a lot of affection and warmth from
them. If we address them to something, we also notice a
willingness not to disregard this just like that. They usu-
ally want to talk about how to accommodate, or make it
together-
moments
and doing
things toge-
ther
warm affec-
tion
313
clear to us that they do not want to give up solida-
rity. They tell us what makes it difficult for them, or to
which they can not answer. As long as we notice that
they do not take advantage of this, we do not drive it too
far.
Nathalie (35 yrs) - We are constantly arguing, I think. We
rarely get up to the same wavelength. Yet I notice that
my child needs a lot of support and someone who is
there for it. Just someone to tell and exchange ideas. So-
meone who helps it over the bridge
or limits it. That provides that extra
dynamic to get it in action, or to stop it, or
to protect something. No matter
how often we quibble, we try to do it
with respect for each other. I do not
bombard it with feelings of disappointment, excitement
or annoyance. I also do not accept that it blames or ac-
cuses me. By being more rational and stimulating and
not overly emotional, we usually come out. A few good
arguments and a few serious incentives, without beco-
ming emotional usually succeeds.
Sarah (42 yrs) - I remember as a child
how difficult it was at home to talk to each
other. Our mum always tried to avoid
having an open discussion or quar-
rel. We would hardly have dared to do
this
rational and
stimulating
avoid indi-
rectness
314
either. We feared that once a fight, it would no longer
come in order anymore. We had the habit of indirectly
letting each other feel everything. We were silent and
with an angry face. We escaped each other or did every-
thing in an irritating way. We pretended that the other
person did not exist or was air. We were aggravating this
harsh atmosphere until we gave each other his plea-
sure. That way we could continue to have the impression
of having good contact with each other, because every-
thing was enforced and imposed indirectly.
Julie (47 yrs) - Our children are gradually becoming older
and more independent. They are often with their friends
and talk a lot with them. Yet we notice that they often
still need to talk to us. Sometimes to share their joy and
pride. Sometimes also to be able to express their disap-
pointment and failure. Without to say so explicitly, they
sometimes want to hear from us how to respond to
something and how to deal with some-
thing. Sometimes they want confir-
mation for what they do themselves,
or support if they stand more isolated
with their friends. So you still notice
that you really need to be there.
Sometimes they doubt very much and
want a 'second opinion', or someone who finally puts
them out of a questionable choice option. Even though
you express your feelings and opinions clearly they do
point of con-
tact for child
315
not always take them into account directly, yet you no-
tice that they are still looking for you at times.
Tina (36 yrs) - Good contact is not given. It is something
that has to grow. It is important that your child feels
that what you say and do is what your child needs at a
certain moment in his or her development.
That what you offer your child, responds to
its demand for growth. Sometimes
that is more guidance if your
child does not get out of it. Sometimes
it is more space and consultation, so
that your child can find out and
learn something itself. Sometimes that is giving support
if your child does not become active or does not come
out. This way you can provide care for your child and his
or her development. The greater this success, the better
the contact with your child, we experience.
Pascal (32 yrs) - Above all, I think you need good contact
with your child to know what is going on in your child and
to have the chance to influence your
child. A good contact therefore re-
quires openness from your
child. It also means that you are also open
to your child. And that you accept both
this openness. That you do not
immediately suppress that openness. That you want to
development-
oriented
safe open-
ness
316
listen to your child who feels safe to tell you some-
thing. That you also feel free to say what you feel, think
and what you want. That you feel that your child takes
this into account. That your child does not close itself in
advance and you cause this with your overreaction.
Sven (27 yrs) - Together with my partner we always have
tried to make it clear to our children that a friendly rela-
tional arrangement is one, and our expectations are
two. We do not put the one on the slope for the
other. We do not deliver on our
expectations to secure our relation-
ship with the children. We do not
put our accepting relationship on the
slope to meet our expectations. We
feel a lot for our children, start from
who they are and are prepared to
respond to them. At the same time, we feel responsible
for their development and we want to stimulate them on
the one hand and, on the other, limit them if necessary.
Kim (29 yrs) - I try to be a modern parent. The smaller
the distance to my child, the better the contact is, I no-
tice. I do not try to prepare myself in
advance as the adult who knows it
all, and can everything and dares
everything. I try to avoid to treat my child
in a childlike manner as someone
who knows, can and dares little. This
childfriendly
relationship
proximity
through vali-
dation
317
does not mean that in order to reduce the distance, I
want to imitate my child. On the contrary, I want to raise
my child and get it closer to me. I try to involve my child
in many matters. I give answers that it needs and let my
child take care of itself as much as possible, or take care
of what it can handle. This automatically creates good
contact because the child feels addressed.
Steven (39 yrs) - From the beginning I have paid atten-
tion to creating a bond based on trust. I made my child
clear that it can always confidential
talk to me about anything. I have
made the habit of always wanting to
listen and to show always that I want to
help and support my child. That is not to
say that I admitted everything. It means
that I would never have attacked my
child, or denied. I always tried to speak to my child and
to bring something that I could not do anymore. I made
it clear to my child why it was not possible for me, and
why I also thought it was not possible for it. I talked to it
about a situation or about a behavior that was not pos-
sible and together we were looking for a change.
listening to
help
318
Gert (41 yrs) - I have a job where I have it to say. People
come for explanation and advice. I am convinced myself
that sometimes I am in danger of doing the same thing
to my children. In my work, however, I know that liste-
ning well and accurately already contains part of the ans-
wer. I try to apply this at home. Do not
immediately start responding or just ask
what you want in what way. But first
take sufficient time not only to listen to
the story but also to the story behind the
story. What it means to them, how
they see it themselves, where
they want to go, what it's all about. Only then in their
meaning and on their size exactly saying what is in front
of you and how you perceive it. This way you can be clear
at the same time without having to come out of the cor-
ner. To follow them for what it can, adjust them for what
is needed. I then ask them what to do about this them-
selves and to look for ways to change. I then try to be
careful not to take over too many of them and fill it for
them. If not, a unilateral relationship arises.
Pieter (36 yrs) - What we have tried to make a habit of is
that there are no things between us and no things that
remains stuck between us, so that we
don’t have still trouble meeting each
other. This is how we try to clarify and
talk out as many things as possible. That
way our relationship can stay
to involve
clear up obs-
tacles
319
good. Our relationship is too important to put it at risk
for something that comes between us. This way our child
can really go in against us. We then want to know at a
more quiet moment afterwards what went wrong, what
the reason was, whether the child would continue to do
so. We also want to talk about our disappointment and
our anger with the experienced refusal, so that these
feelings can fade away after we have been able to talk
with words. Recently we had a discussion point where
we still have not a resolution for. We agreed to let it rest
for a while because it was too sensitive on both sides.
Neither wanted to meet the other. By building a brea-
ther and let it rest for a while, it can allow us to talk again
and to get along well again.
Vincent (28 yrs) - I have always found that
you can only rely on realities and build
on them. Likewise, I find this in
contact with my child. As soon as you do
not have an eye for the reality of your
child: who your child is, what your child
does, what your child expresses of what
goes on in it and lifes, you create distance. Distance to
your child and distance in talking together. This also ap-
plies to your own reality: who you are, how you react to
your child and what you experience with your child and
his actions. Also having to keep this reality nearby in you
talking together. Sometimes this can be hard, but at the
true-to-life
communica-
tion
320
same time it creates clarity and gives a grip. In your con-
tact you are close to reality and this provides security for
your further contact. You do not let your child fantasize
endlessly to react negatively to this. You yourself do not
cherish irrealistic ideas and expectations to confront
your child in your contact with your disappointments
and reproach. You talk together and reality goes hand in
hand.
What about good parent-child contact?
For this you will find a number of testimonials from pa-
rents that indicate what is good contact for them and
how they try to achieve and maintain this.
The testimonies show that they usually put something
central. Good contact implies this or that. This or that is
a sign or proof of good contact. If this is missing, there is
no good contact, or no longer a good contact.
In the testimonies it can also be found that the parents
indicate in which way a good contact can be made, or
how it can be sought to keep it. Along this road or that
way you reach or maintain good contact. If this route or
approach is not followed, then no good contact is
created, or it is no longer possible.
Good contact is thus equated with this and in this way.
In achieving good contact, parents also try to involve
their children. They try in one way or another to make
321
clear to their child what good contact specifically
means. They also try to activate their child to choose and
use this way and manner to make this good contact pos-
sible. If you do this, we will come to a good contact,
which means this.
Parents do this by model, by encouragement, by their
explanation and directions, by discouraging the other, by
support, sometimes by imposing and enforcing it. The
way in which they approach this can then be a sign of
how good contact is obtained for them.
Of course, for parents a good contact can involve several
elements at the same time, with multiple ways to reach
it. This makes the contact qualitatively richer.
Parents attach great importance to good contact. It must
allow more and positive influence on their child and on
each other. It must also guarantee its continuity. If good
contact disappears, or if it is absent, much is immediately
not possible. Distance creates a lot of problems,
proximity can solve them. What that proximity then
looks like, every parent tries it his own way, taking into
account his child and himself.
What can be central, among other things, is:
close bond, avoidance of being on oneself
warm affection
322
mutual respect, and recognition
together-moments and doing things together
safe openness
proximity through validation
build up, not breaking down
listening to help
to involve
clear up obstacles
rational and stimulating
avoid indirectness
true-to-life communication
childfriendly relationship
development-oriented
point of contact for child
Name it key concepts around which the parent and child
come into contact. Sometimes the parent is more aware
of this and may name these key concepts as keywords.
Most of the time, however, they are implicit and are ea-
sier for others to draw their attention to.
In which story do you recognize yourself best ?
Tell your own story below if you would like :
Which implicit key concepts or explicit keywords are cen-
tral in this?
323
Containment
and holding
in parenting
Containment and holding are concepts that belong to
care in a therapeutic environment. In an ordinary educa-
tional environment, preference is given to terms such as
sensitivity and responsiveness in order to indicate how
parents can deal with their child, especially during the
first years of development.
Sensitivity means to perceive the feelings and need sig-
nals of a child in a timely manner and to interpret them
correctly, in such a way that you are responsive or, in
other words, the child can be responded appro-
priately. This does not always mean giving in to your
child, but by taking a good level of what is going on in
your child and expressing it, responding better to your
Children may need someone who knows their emoti-
ons and can provide the necessary support and pro-
tection.
324
child. For example, your child wants you to take some-
thing over because it is too difficult, or too much. Or your
child wants you to encourage it, or just help it for a while.
Especially sensitive children or children who are con-
fronted with pronounced or long-term stress often need
a supportive environment. An environment that not
only identifies the feelings and need signals present in
such an environment but is also willing and able to offer
this comprehensive (containment) and supportive (hol-
ding) environment. An incomprehension, ignoring or re-
jecting surrounding of the present feelings and needs
and attendant thoughts can only make it worse for the
child, because the sensitivity and the tension then incre-
ase. The child experiences only to stand alone for some-
thing that it can not do alone. Containment can then be
seen as a special form of emotional attunement. Emo-
tional attunement that every child asks for, but some
children or in some circumstances more. Holding is clo-
sely linked to containment and can be seen primarily as
support, making itself available and reassuringly present,
so that can be returned within protective boundaries.
It is important for the child that a parent manifests him-
self as a safe attachment figure. As someone who offers
safety by absorbing tension and transforming it into pro-
cessable parts and responding adequately to the signals
from the child. And the child is not overwhelmed and
325
burdened with own feelings from his own needs. By of-
fering containment and holding the child can develop a
positive sense of self and start seeing the world as a safe
and reliable place. This lays the foundation for an attach-
ment relationship because children start to attach them-
selves to the source of this safety and to those who pay
attention to their needs.
Specifically, a parent who for children who are confron-
ted with intense feelings, knows how to reach out to the
child without being confused, who recognizes and un-
derstands the child in his feelings, and thus learns the
child how to deal with them. In this way the parent
knows how to offer a way that the child can learn step
by step. This way the child can develop an internal wor-
king model on this basis in order to deal with himself and
his environment. Validation by the environment of the
child's feelings is necessary in order to develop trust in
the attachment figures and also to develop trust in
oneself. The attachment figure appears as someone who
is capable of emotional containment. The model of this
attachment figure allows the child to develop an identity
that is capable of emotion containment.
Providing security can exist in watching as a parent with
the child to what has happened and what it has genera-
ted in feelings, thoughts and needs in the child. Knowing
these feelings, thoughts and needs makes it possible to
influence and regulate them. What has happened is
326
fixed, how it is dealt with can be changed. As a parent
you can present an affective experience of the child to
him or her in a bearable and processable form.
It is also important to be able to see the child and his
feelings in isolation from his own emotions as parent. So
that the child does not appear as threatening or dis-
ruptive. This way the image of the child and his feelings
can be accurately represented, as well as what is mea-
ningful and relevant for the child. If, as a parent, you do
not want to notice certain feelings and dismiss them as
nagging or attention seeking because they appear to be
threatening to you, you may well miss out on justified
signals and needs. Or if, as a parent, you pay excessive
attention to feelings because you have become uncer-
tain, justified signals and needs are needless reinforced.
If the child follows the parent in this, it will set away his
feelings as a grumbling and not relevant, or the child will
strengthen his feelings as a threat and will not know how
to take these away. The own past as a parent to suppress
feelings or to be overwhelmed by them continues to play
a role in this. The personal attachment safety that was
experienced or lacked as a child may be at the basis here.
To summarize : Containment means to respond calmly
and confidently to the child's existing tension, anger, ex-
citement and fear, without becoming tense, angry, exci-
ted or anxious. As a parent, you act as a container or 'co-
327
holder' who opens up to the feelings, thoughts and needs
of the child, without judging them, but presents them as
processable pieces so that they can be better tolerated
and understood. In this way you offer a comprehensive
and enveloping environment and you ensure an environ-
ment that provides a secure environment. A 'holding en-
vironment' or protective environment according to Win-
nicotthat who devised this concept, characterized by ac-
ceptance, understanding, support, tolerance and con-
trol. According to Bion, who invented the concept of con-
tainment, every development takes place in the interplay
of something that is included with something that en-
compasses it. Both undergo hereby a change.
As a parent you can sometimes also feel the need for so-
meone who knows how to contain feelings of unrest, an-
ger, excitement or fear (containment) and can offer you
the experience of being seen and heard, understood and
supported (holding). This can make it better to be able
to offer a containment and holding environment for the
own child. You can not expect this understanding and
support from your child which should not be appropri-
ate. Your partner, or another adult, possibly a care pro-
vider, may be able to help with this. In doing so, they can
ask and look for a healthy balance between support and
autonomy. From experienced understanding and sup-
port, parents can then use existing and found powers in
themselves. In a holding environment, parents try to
keep emotions that are activated in themselves under
328
control, emotions such as excitement, anger, fear, impa-
tience and disappointment. They try to offer a reliable
supply of trust and confirmation in a stable, affective cli-
mate.
As a child you may need containment as a result of the
pronounced and difficult to bear emotional con-
tent. Specifically, this can take the form of a need for so-
meone who knows how to emotionally tune in to the
child and his/her experience, who tries to understand
what goes on in the child and tries to bring this back into
the child's own language, so that contact and communi-
cation becomes possible, as well as mental awareness
and verbalization. The holding that is offered here, holds
a grip, which means predictability, reliability and stead-
fastness.
In this way babies and very young children can be
overwhelmed by powerful feelings of frustration, dis-
pleasure, despair, anger and fear. Because of their limi-
ted development, these feelings can overwhelm them
and are incomprehensible to them. Containment then
asks for competence as a parent to absorb and regulate
these powerful feelings so that the child can safely
discharge them. Holding asks for competence as a pa-
rent to know the position of the child and to keep uncer-
tainties and powerful feelings in the hand, so that the
child can feel that someone will be there when neces-
sary, both physically and emotionally. The emotional
329
availability of the parent allows the child to discover the
present needs behind his experienced and expressed
emotions. His anger is then a need for help for expe-
rienced difficulties. His excitement then proves a need to
get change going, without knowing how. His fear then
means a need for more security and support, or wanting
to take a distance. The protective care of the parent
guarantees the child the safety it needs. The physical
touches communicate to the child the present affec-
tion. Being emotionally present gives the child comfort
when in fear or in tension and let knows how to temper
the feelings.
Once the child is familiar with language, parents can con-
cretely help to identify the feelings, thoughts and needs
the child has to deal with, so that they can get a name
and the child can learn to talk and think about them and
thus achieve more understanding and order in what is
initially unclear and confusing. Parents can also help the
child to name their reaction tendencies and reactions so
that the child can gain more sight and insight into how
things are handled. From here it can eventually discover
and try out other possibilities with the help of pa-
rents. Thus, when the child is panicked, or furious, or
helpless, with help by naming what is happening within
itself, the child can gain more insight into what is happe-
ning and with help by means of knowing how to deal
with this, looking for alternatives.
330
Containment and a holding environment must thus en-
sure safety, stability and protection for the child. A con-
text in which can be taken note from one's own expe-
rience and reaction, which must allow reflection and
promote growth. A context that also allows the child to
temporarily fold back and, if necessary, fall back without
being rejected or criticized. The comprehensive support
can help to get faster and better over something.
All children may need containment and holding when
confronted with emotions. Some children and in some
circumstances children will need this more. It is then im-
portant to be able to meet this.
Sensitive parents will then notice the need for contain-
ment of their child. If they are also responsive, they will
give an answer to the current need for holding of their
child. This without provoking or perpetuating these
needs.
Noted need for containment of my child:
Meeting need for holding of my child:
Read more :
Bion , WR (1961). Experiences in groups.London:
Tavistock.
331
Winnicot , DW (1984). The child, the family and the out-
side world. Middlesex : Pinguin Books.
332
From co-regulation
to self-regulation
The what and why of co-regulation
A child can not do anything at birth without the help of
an adult. A child at birth knows nothing at all about how
to deal with something. At the same time, the child has
to deal with many needs from birth, such as body tem-
perature, food, sleep, safety and predictability. These
needs arise when looking for an optimum, not too cold
or too hot, not hungry or thirsty, but also no over-satu-
ration, no stress and insecurity, but also no apathy or
flight. This optimum is often a balance between too little
and too much. No panicking, but also no absence or bloc-
king, in case of stress for example.
Adults play through the interactive process of co-re-
gulation an essential role in shaping and supporting
self-regulatory development of the child.
Self-regulation as the skill to get grip on emotions,
needs and behavior and to guide them.
333
Even if the child grows up, it will face new tasks and chal-
lenges, where the child can not handle it alone and does
not know how to deal with it or cope with it. Even then,
adults will be needed to help the child and show the way
to meet the needs or expectations that are present. How
to finally reach an optimum or balance. The concept of
adjustment refers to an optimal or balanced regulation.
The concept also involves adjustment with others who
are responsible for an optimal or balanced regulation.
For what the child does not know how to regulate, adults
will be required to regulate it together with the child for
the part that the child can not yet manage. Where self-
regulation is not yet possible, there is a need for co-re-
gulation. This co-regulation is then a step or condition
for self-regulation. Read more about self-regulation in
the theme sections 'Self-regulation. The development of
more self' and 'Emotion- and self-regulation' of this en-
cyclopedia.
Also the child is not unconcerned in co-regulation. It tries
with its expression and reaction to indicate exactly what
it needs on the part of adults. It not only makes clear his
needs, but also his expectations how to meet them.
334
The importance of the cognitive in co-regulation
In co-regulation, the adults use their own developed cha-
racteristic cognitive schemes. On the basis of this, they
offer the child experiences that should lead to the deve-
lopment of his own cognitive schemes. The parents, for
example, will themselves notice the signs of hunger in
their child, they will interpret these signs as hunger or a
shortage of nutrients and they will feed the child as a
way to respond to hunger and to satisfy it. Gradually,
the child can discover for himself which signals indicate
hunger, state the body condition as hunger and look for
what can satisfy the hunger, as previously the adults did
for him or her. In this way the child comes from co-regu-
lation to self-regulation, which concerns hunger and fee-
ding. So regulation is also described as managing
thoughts and feelings to enable targeted actions.
All this indicates that the quality of parent-child interac-
tion contributes to the development of self-regulation
ánd cognitive development. Within a secure bond, the
way is open for a positive sense of self.
Adjustment of co-regulation
The graph below shows the decreasing proportion of co-
regulation and the increasing share of self-regulation
throughout the different stages of development, from
birth to adulthood:
335
During the development of the child, there are two peri-
ods in which self-regulation makes great progress, espe-
cially in early childhood and in adolescence. This is ac-
companied by maturation and development of networks
in the brain.
Therefore, although all children, young people and
young adults need support for co-regulation, there are
differences between individuals in self-regulating capa-
city and need for co-regulation support. They can be ba-
sed on internal factors such as aptitude and tempera-
ment. They can also be related to environmental factors,
such as experiences with stress and adversity.
Children, adolescents and young adults with self-regula-
tion problems due to internal or environmental factors
may exhibit more sensitive neurological responses to in-
terpersonal and environmental stimuli and may require
336
greater support, skills and coaching. They can be more
easily overwhelmed by physical sensations such as
sound, touch, sight and emotions, and probably also
have strong reactions to this. There is then a need for
effective co-regulation, including the presence of a sup-
portive care provider in a quiet environment that creates
space in which can start learning self-regulating skills.
You can read more about this in the theme section 'Brain
functioning and relational injuries' of this encyclopedia.
According to recent American research, strengthening of
self-regulation in childhood can improve resilience in la-
ter life. The strengthening of the research focused on
building skills in youth, improving parental emotional
support, encouraging communication between parents
and children and helping children set future goals. This
resulted in stronger connections in the form of more in-
teractions between the hippocampus and prefrontal
cortex, areas involved in memory and decision making. It
also meant fewer behavioral problems, from agression
to temperament. This research showed that strengthe-
ning the self-regulation skills of children and supporting
parenting have a positive effect on resilience in later life.
The well-known concept of scaffolding from Vygotsky
comes close to co-regulation. In this context there is a
zone of near development, within which the scaffolding
or declining support and counseling aid takes place. This
zone is located between the developed zone and the
337
zone that can not yet be developed. In the developed
zone there is what the child already can do and there is
self-regulation, in the zone of near development there is
what the child can do with decreasing help and there is
co-regulation, finally in the not yet for development ac-
cesible zone, there is what the child can not do with help,
and in the logic used here is a other- regulation or full co-
regulation. You can read more about this in the theme
section 'Scaffolding, activating help' of this encyclopedia.
Four modes of co-regulation
There are four ways in which parents or other caregivers
can provide support that can help the child develop self-
regulatory skills and meet more complex regulatory
needs as self-regulation increases.
1. Ensure a warm, responsive relationship by offering
care and affection; by recognizing and responding to sig-
nals that indicate needs and wishes; and by providing ca-
ring support in moments of stress.
Research by the University of Amsterdam shows that pa-
rents who constantly put themselves in their child's
shoes contribute strongly to his emotion regulation.
Mind-minded parents always think about which autono-
mous feelings, thoughts, wishes and preferences of their
baby can explain his behavior. As a result, they are more
able to respond sensitively to the signals of their baby.
338
Their words better translate their baby's inner state so
that they fit in well with his behavior. For example, pa-
rents can help to co-regulate the baby's internal expe-
riences so that the baby learns not to experience emoti-
ons as overwhelming and overwhelming, but rather as
manageable. This co-regulation of parent and baby can
slowly develop into self-regulation.
Through communication, word and deed, interest in the
world of the child, respect for the child and an uncondi-
tional positive appreciation, a strong relationship can be
built up.
2. Structuring the environment in order to make self-re-
gulation accessible and provide a buffer against environ-
mental stressors. A physically and emotionally safe envi-
ronment that allows exploring and learning at his or her
level of development without risk to one's own well-be-
ing.
Promoting a sense of security through consistent and
predictable routines, including through clear goals for
behavioral regulation and definite logical consequences
for negative behavior.
3. Teaching and coaching self-regulation skills through
modeling, instruction, practice opportunities, high-
lighting skills and strengthening every step towards suc-
cessful use of skills.
339
Coaching first in learning skills and then provide the ne-
cessary support or scaffolding, for self-regulation at the
appropriate time.
4. As adults, focus on their own capacity for self-regula-
tion and optimization. Attention can be paid to feelings
and reactions during stressful interactions with the child.
This way attention can be paid to own thoughts and be-
liefs about child behavior. This way you can use strate-
gies to effectively relax and respond empathetically.
Such as deep breathing and self-talk, for example 'I do
not let myself get excited', 'I had worse times with it'. By
staying calm yourself you avoid escalation and can be a
model for your child. If necessary, family or friends can
help with support, exercise and coaching, to build your
own coping and calm down skills.
Co-regulation in different development phases
Co-regulation as a supporting process from parent to
child is different in each development phase as the
child's self-regulation increases.
Babies need adults who are responsible for their physical
needs from feeding to body temperature and the ma-
nagement of environmental stimuli. Infants react physi-
cally to stimuli around them, with little ability to change
their experience. They need adults who are sensitive to
their needs and who, due to their soothing presence,
340
meet their unease. For example, by comforting them or
removing environmental stressors.
Toddlers gradually acquire motor and language skills that
allow them to get a grip on their environment. However,
there are still distinct emotions and reactions that trans-
cend their developing skills. Caregivers can start with a
targeted model for skills, such as postponing satisfaction
and starting to teach them. They can teach them using
simple words to express needs. Adults are still responsi-
ble for a safe and manageable environment and for com-
fort and reassurance when they become stressed.
Preschoolers experience rapid growth in areas of the
brain linked with self-regulation. This development ma-
kes them much more willing to learn and use self-regu-
lation skills. This is the ideal time for caregivers to learn
such as emotional identification, problem solving, per-
spective and calming strategies. Children will need a sub-
stantial repetition, incentive and exercise to use these
new skills. Modeling these skills is also important,
because children have to look at how to behave and res-
pond. Co-regulation in this phase involves learning in a
powerful way and clearly communicating behavior and
natural and logical consequences. As in the previous de-
velopment traineeships, infants still need structured and
predictable environments and warm and responsive
care providers that provide a supportive context for
practicing new skills.
341
Learning requires the development of self-regulation
Self-regulation, in the form of a cognitive ability to regu-
late one's own thoughts and behavior by inhibiting or
controlling impulsive responses, remembering and pro-
cessing information, as well as being able to maintain
and shift attention focus. Self-regulation is necessary to
focus on and solve problems, as well as to plan and carry
out tasks. Self-regulation is also important for the deve-
lopment of social skills, such as when playing and inter-
acting with other children, as well as for developing
school skills such as learning to read, write and solve
math problems. A child needs self-regulation to maneu-
ver in a complex world and take advantage of the lear-
ning opportunities around it.
Children's home environments can enhance their ability
to regulate their own behavior. However, experiencing a
lack of structure, a chaotic or a stressful home situation
can hinder the development of self-regulation. The
school can then give children the opportunity to develop
self-regulation. All children have the potential for this.
Many studies have been conducted in the United States
showing a link between self-regulation and academic
skills. For example, a link was found between self-regu-
lation and literacy and between self-regulation and rea-
ding and math skills when children go to first grade. Self-
342
regulation is thus important in learning new skills and ac-
quiring new knowledge, especially when a learning task
is difficult. Once a skill has been automated, self-regula-
tion should then be applied less.
It turned out that children's vocabulary is predictive of
their self-regulation in the first year, but not the other
way around. The promotion of language is such an im-
portant tool to enable children to develop their self-re-
gulation. In this way they can regulate their behavior
through the use of their inner language.
In primary school age children gain more control over
their attention, emotions and behavior. They have a gro-
wing ability to control their impulses and slow down sa-
tisfaction, and they are aware of their thought proces-
ses, emotions and decision-making. It is a relatively sta-
ble period in their development that provides ample op-
portunity to instruct and guide them in the use of self-
regulatory skills. The provided co-regulation helps to im-
prove and refine their skills in the run-up to increasing
expectations in adolescence.
In adolescence, the brain is in full development which en-
tails both benefits and challenges for self-regulation. Ini-
tially, brain systems that process and seek rewards are
more developed than the cognitive control systems that
are responsible for good decision making and future
343
planning. This means that adolescents initially opt for
short-term incentives rather than long-term benefits,
and their emotions strongly influence their decisions. In
order to avoid negative consequences in the long term
the supportive input of adults remains necessary. Ado-
lescents take more distance during their development
and seek more independence, yet a warm and accepting
relationship with a caring adult remains important.
Adolescents need adults who can listen supportively
when dealing with strong emotions, providing space and
support to settle down in conflict, and coping skills
to handle stressful situations. Likewise, they need care-
givers to monitor their actions, protect them from dan-
gerous situations and offer support for responsible choi-
ces. For example, adolescents sometimes realize what is
harmful to them, but their self-regulating skills can not
always stop them. In doing so, they need experiences to
develop good self-regulation. Meaningful social inter-
actions and pleasant activities can so contribute to the
development of skills that are the basis of self-regula-
tion.
This means a pronounced acceleration in the increase of
self-regulating skills in adolescence. Yet self-regulation
skills are only fully developed in late adolescence or
young adulthood.
344
This is not always so straightforward and does not always
go in the desired way. Recent international research at
the University of Zurich, for example, has shown that
girls with problematic social behavior are characterized
by reduced brain activity in the prefrontal and temporal
brain regions that are responsible for cognitive control.
They also show weaker connectivity between brain re-
gions that are relevant to emotion regulation and cogni-
tive control. This study offers for the first time a neuro-
biological explanation for difficulties in managing emoti-
ons.
How further ?
Indicate for yourself the what and how of the co-regula-
tion.
Indicate for yourself how you can optimize the offered co-
regulation.
Indicate for your child the what and how of the self-regu-
lation.
345
Indicate for your child how you can optimize the present
self-regulation.
Read more :
Rosanbalm, K.D., & Murray, D.W. (2017). Caregiver Co-
regulation Across Development: A Practice Letter. OPRE
Letter # 2017-80. Washington, DC: Office of Planning,
Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children
and Families, US. Department of Health and Human Ser-
vices. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/co-regu-
lation-from-birth-through-young-adulthood-a-practice-
brief
346
Deconstruction and
construction in paren-
ting
Changes can occur by working on things that are con-
nected, in particular by changing these connections. This
way the connections can be loosened or other connec-
tions can be found. Or connections can be adjusted or
things can be added. Or another arrangement may still
be sought between the connections. Several of these
change processes can go hand in hand.
In order for these connections to change in reality or in
a person's behavior, it is first and foremost advisable to
change them on a mental level. What you think and how
you think about something.
Deconstruction is separating in our thoughts what
should better be not together.
Construction is bringing together in mind what
helps and offers opportunities.
347
Deconstruction means to seperate things that are con-
nected to each other, but which are not very helpful and
work restricting, so that a new combination becomes
possible.
Construction means to connect things that are not con-
nected to each other, whereby a possibly existing limita-
tion can be overcome and more helpful possibilities
could be tried out. It is not so much about what is right,
or who is right, but about what works, is usable and
creates opportunities.
an example :
expressing criticism does not automatically or necessarily
mean
.. scold ..
.. breaking down your child ..
.. make your child responsible ..
expressing criticism is possibly also
.. quietly formulate what it is about ..
.. show respect for your child and indicate with what you
did not agree ..
.. indicate with what you have difficulty yourself ..
By making connections different or making other con-
nections, you will achieve more optimal conversation
and behavioral interaction with your child. In this way
connections can also be made that better serve your set-
348
up and goals and help you, rather than limit and hinder
you.
an example :
I as a parent does not automatically or necessarily mean
.. I figure myself away ..
.. I do not want to hurt my child ..
.. I do not want to ruin the pleasant atmosphere ..
being a parent can also be like that
.. I will not let myself down ...
.. express your appreciation for your child's proposal
and indicate that you had formed a different vision ..
.. consultation can also be done in a pleasant way
not to bring tensions or shouts with it ..
The problematic conversation and behavioral interac-
tion can be exchanged for a healthy conversation and
behavioral interaction with your child.
another example :
friendly interaction with your child is not automatic or ne-
cessary
.. do everything together ..
.. the same thinking ..
.. have the same taste and preference ..
friendly association with your child is possibly also
349
... what you do better together do together, what better
off for every one does it alone ...
.. you may have your own thought, which is not critized ..
.. discover and exchange together in which your taste and
your preference is different ..
a final example:
succeeding as a parent does not mean self-evident
.. the acquisition of power ..
.. have the material equipment for saying ..
.. winning of your child ..
succeeding as a parent can also be done by
.. the acquisition of influence ..
.. making available material possibilities ..
.. winning the child for you ..
With the first connections you stand as a parent against
your child, with the second connections you are concer-
ned as parent with your child.
Causal connections
Things are often connected to each other that do not
really or not have much to do with each other. For
example, as a parent, you can help your child with fixed
opinions and lasting feeling by opening up causalities
and constructing new connections.
350
some examples :
being sympathetic can be for your child
.. being fashionable ..
.. being spontaneous ..
.. look cool ..
Being bullied can be according to your child
.. do not agree with others ..
.. not participating with others ..
.. don't look cool ...
being accepted can, according to your child, be associa-
ted with
.. lucky that others like you ..
.. always depend on others ..
.. you adapt to others ..
Causes are sometimes attributed to immutable things
and things outside themselves, so that you can not take
part in them yourself.
an example :
young people with social problems attribute this to fac-
tors other than those who succeed socially. Those who
experience social problems often attribute their failures
to their own unchangeable causes such as personality
(introvert, shy, ...) or low social skills (difficult to express,
do not know how to make friends, ...) en attributes their
351
successes mostly to non-changeable characteristics of
others (is sweet, is not hostile, ...) or luck or coincidence.
Those who do not have problems usually attribute suc-
cess to their own changeable elements, such as commit-
ment and approach. Making a different look at the ori-
gin, could therefore already make a big difference in
own initiative and give a chance in itself.
Things are also rightly or wrongly connected to each
other and thus reflect a causal chain effect and possibly
also a circular effect. Often, however, one does not
come that far.
an example of causal chain effect:
why did it fail? (it is ... a possible conversation, a task, a
discussion, a collaboration, ...)
it failed because I was nervous
why were you nervous?
I was nervous because I feared to fail
why did you fear to fail?
I feared to fail because I thought I could not
why did you think you could not?
I thought I could not because it failed the last time
why did you remember that it failed the last time?
I remembered my failure because I keep looking at
something from my experience
why did you watch from your experience?
because I observed myself
352
why did you observe yourself?
I observed myself because it threatened to fail
why did it threaten to fail?
it threatened to fail because I was nervous ...
an example of circular effect:
why do you annoy your friend?
I'm annoying my friend because he's annoying me
why does your friend annoy you?
my friend is annoying me because I'm annoying him
why do you annoy your friend? ...
Or still a consequence is interpreted as cause or a too
small fragment of the cause-effect chain is taken.
an example :
Why are you so alone here?
I am here so alone because they want to bully me and
because they are real bullies
The plague setting is described here as the cause for the
consequences of exclusion. Bullying can also be descri-
bed as a result of another cause, such as an underlying
territory, identity or social power struggle.
an example :
why are they bullying you?
they bully me because I can not just be excluded, I urge
myself, I do not let others talk, I demand that they follow
353
my proposals, I ask them about their plans, I want to
know everything about them.
My own actions are also involved in the development of
bullying behavior and I can do something more about
this.
Another and second causal thinking may lead to a diffe-
rent perspective that allows you to change your actions,
which is difficult if you do not change your idea. This
other thinking can be characterized by being more rea-
listic, more nuanced and more reasonable, allowing you
to see your share more accurately. Putting the origin
outside of yourself for things you now take for your own
account. Then once again placing the origin within your-
self, for things that you now place outside yourself. Then
once again placing the origin inside and outside yourself,
for things that you now only see outside or inside your-
self, so not feeding each other. To change the other per-
son is not possible or not easy, but you can change
yourself. Only you do not get easy through this emo-
tionally and you have to allow it yourself. You wonder
what your goal is, how you work towards it, what you
have to change or allow yourself to do.
an example :
currently just about everyone leaves me behind
So I intend to have a good contact with at least one per-
son at the end of a certain period. I radiate this desire and
354
work in my expression and act accordingly. What does
not work, I leave. I try out what helps me a step closer. I
try to learn from what goes a step backwards. I do not
allow my actions to be determined by the negativity of
the others to me. In this way I give access to myself and I
attract others by at least my constructive and not conti-
nuous defensive attitude.
another example :
I have always had a hard time finding a connection with
a group
I always do my best to be accepted and do not dare to do
anything that would endanger this, even though I have
to do things that I do not fully support. I feel very depen-
dent on others and would like to change this.
I imagine offering myself what I offer to others : such as
appreciating myself, following myself, accepting who I
am, resolving what does not help me and stopping me
from not taking it up for myself, keeping what I want as
individuality, paying attention to myself, letting myself
know, leading to myself, support and defend myself and
challenge what I do not agree with. In this way I hope to
express myself more clearly and to stand stronger and
not to suffer without defense and not to be someone who
I am not.
355
Another possibility is to challenge the obviousness of the
(causal) connections : do they have consequences or ef-
fects? also in the longer term? what side effects or other
consequences? commitment-result ratio? which mis-
match scores and exceptions? which alternatives lead to
the same result? Through a more realistic, nuanced and
fact-based view know how to relativate and get out of
rigid coupling and look for other possible more loose
connections with the same result.
A final option is to make cause and effect interchan-
geable via a larger circle.
an example :
agressive behavior is often seen as the cause of much
mischief, but rarely as a result of something that pre-
ceded and rarely seen as an expression of a state percei-
ved to be tense.
Very often then this agression is discussed as a cause,
but the agression is not seen as a result and expres-
sion. In the first case, the agressor must be tackled, and
in the second case that what caused the agression in the
agressor. By taking the circle larger the cause and effect
are interchangeable.
one last example:
those who bully are often spared by peers, but not always
liked. By adults, those who bully are usually dealt with,
356
and not at all liked. His bullying behavior is seen as the
cause for the suffering someone inflicted. The bully is
then labeled as perpetrator who victimizes someone. Re-
search shows that bullies are also often victims in their
wider environment. Their unpleasant behavior is often
the result of the harsh and unethical approach of their
environment and the problems they themselves expe-
rience. For example, a recent Finnish study shows that
girls in particular suffer from a poor self-esteem and
school fatigue and some show depressions and suicidal
tendencies. Feeling unwell in their living environment
that tries to keep prevalence and does not always under-
stand and help them sufficiently, can make themselves
feel victim, which is reflected in the biting off of peers and
the right to be equally hard for others like those others
are to them.
Here again, finally, cause and effect are interchangeable
by enlarging the image. Viewed from here, bullies have
the same right to and need for emotional and social help
as their victims. Help that is still given too little, from a
moral standpoint and not from a process-based attitude.
357
Hey,
As a parent you notice now and then or
more regularly, that your way of doing
towards your child has little or no re-
sult.
You may be easily disappointed, or
slightly angry, or excited, you may also
become frightened or somewhat inse-
cure.
358
You are not easily inclined to deal with
it differently, you may feel a tendency
to tighten. Stand on your point. Stay
with you.
Yet you can sometimes notice that
your feeling and your thinking are an
additional difficulty in something. A
stand in the way of change that is just
needed to get out of the impasse.
359
One thing has often become clear is that
you can not just change your son or
daughter, that you can not directly influ-
ence him or her.
It is worth trying to try out how discon-
necting your feelings and judgment in
something and looking for new connec-
tions can trigger change processes.
360
Not just a simple matter. To overcome
your feeling and value judgment. But
one that can offer new perspectives for
yourself and your son or daughter.
What you do have in control is to
change your own feeling and thinking
about something with your child, by let-
ting go of something and connecting
something else.
361
Subgroup formation
Wherever people live together, it can be established that
group relationships arise. These groupings provide stabi-
lity, security, safety, understanding, support, help, reco-
gnisability, recognition, appreciation, influence and so
much more. Few can do without this connection. It of-
fers prevention for instability, insecurity, isolation, in-
comprehension, vulnerability, helplessness, strange-
ness, misunderstanding, worthlessness, powerlessness
and so much more.
For some, the participating to a group is the core of their
existence and their lives. They have a lot to do with
this. They therefore wish to do a lot of labor and effort
Subgroups can arise in a group.
This offers opportunities,
but at the same time involves risks.
362
to belong to such a group. Sometimes one can be part of
such a group, sometimes one will want to create such a
group. However, if the found or established groups do
not sufficiently satisfy what one needs or expects, it is
easy to find or create a subgroup that is able to provide
this sufficient.
The advantage of a subgroup is that you can find or form
a powerful group in which you can fully identify yourself
and can come into its own easily. The disadvantage of a
subgroup is, however, that not everyone in the group is
included. On the contrary, who undermines or endan-
gers what one seeks in the subgroup is easily excluded
and pushed away. The subgroup is hereby called in to
disable who is not accepted. At the most, people who do
not belong to it are used as binders from the joint strug-
gle for those who do belong.
Group formation may not be avoided. What takes place
within the subgroup is experienced as more valuable and
emotionally more positive than what falls out-
side. However, it easily results in a closed group, it makes
it not easy for the person who falls outside, it victimizes
him, it expresses everything that is less valuable and
emotionally negative and gives him little or no chance, it
introduces the conflict within the group and gives rise to
struggle and resistance, it sharpens the opposition and
the distance, it increases the mutual unwillingness and
powerlessness, it lures out what one wants to avoid.
363
There is a high risk that those who are excluded from the
group by subgroup training will resort to another pos-
sible earlier subgroup and no longer simply want to join
the current group. This is precisely why the subgroup
formation is provoked. Someone excludes himself from
the group by holding on to another subgroup.
By ensuring that everyone can belong to the group or
join him, how own or different too, effort can be made
to extend what is better or more valuable, or what feels
better and does not generate negative feelings to what
lives with each and what each needs. By inviting each
with its individuality to be part of the larger and com-
plete group relationship, looking for something that is
better and valuable can be extended to the diversity
found, so can also be found out how pleasant and not
uncomfortable with the individuality of everyone it is,
and can what is at first strange made familiar.
That this usually does not happen automatically, will of-
ten require great efforts to be satisfied with what is hap-
pening within the whole group. It will, however, be so
that everyone will show a greater willingness and com-
mitment to make this happen. After all, everyone has
the benefit of being able to find in the large group what
everybody needs.
364
In a group, natural subgroups can sometimes be recogni-
zed. Subgroups that formed a group and expanded af-
terwards. Subgroups with a great affinity with each
other, for example with a common history. They are of-
ten subgroups with an openness to the larger whole of
the group and an involvement with it. These subgroups,
no matter how large the inner coherence, feel enrolled
in the larger whole. They use their strength for broader
participation and not for isolation of themselves or the
group environment. These subgroups can at most be dis-
tinguished.
The drama in organized subgroup formation is often that
everyone tries to find shelter within a subgroup because
one can not up against or is afraid of the observed or as-
sumed subgroups. For example, one subgroup provokes
the further formation of other subgroups. For example,
everyone is looking for support and strength in a sub-
group and it is gradually becoming necessary to secure
the buffer that it can offer. That group fragmentation
can easily form the breeding ground for conflicts and
struggle is then built into the group division. In order not
to be excluded one seeks to belong somewhere. This,
however, triggers the spiral of exclusion. Who belongs
to where and who does not is then precisely selected
and decided. Whoever falls outside should only count
on little attention and care. It is already difficult enough
to pay attention and care to those who are part of the
demanding subgroup.
365
Those who want to be part of a non-natural subgroup
are often subject to a number of conditions, require-
ments, expectations and obligations. These do not al-
ways match those who sought contact with the sub-
group, possibly because of age, advanced development,
skills and experience. For example, someone is some-
times used, or misused, and his own personality and
development are, to a greater or lesser extent, compro-
mised. Being part of the subgroup is then possible at the
expense of itself and its growth. In extreme cases this
can take the form of giving up his individuality to merge
with the subgroup. The own boundary then disappears
and coincides with the subgroup. From that unit the pre-
vious individual limits are ignored and exceeded. It can
range from pronounced interference to takeover.
If a family wants as a group a chance again for openness,
supporting and reinforcing each other, unity, friendship,
solidarity, closeness, familiarity, understanding, equa-
lity, individuality, feelings of relaxation and feelings of af-
fection, then work will have to be done of global group
formation with reduction of the closed subgroup forma-
tion. Contact, communication and interaction will have
to be found and found with everyone who is part of the
family group. Certainly initially not an easy task, which
can only progressively start a spiral of mutual rapproche-
ment and finding each other. A process of letting go per-
haps too safe subgroups with insecurity to the outside
and looking for a less secure group with less insecurity to
366
the outside, an outside that gradually disappears. A
group where each is valued less for its value in use, but
more for its value of being and its input.
These processes of subgroup formation can now also be
recognized in the family as a group. Besides the natural
subgroup formation of parents as partners with an open
orientation, and of brothers and sisters as children with
a reinforcing influence, subgroup formation with a clo-
sed character and a weakening effect externally can be
recognized. So can an adult or child be excluded from a
subgroup, or can an adult or child be attracted to a sub-
group. Disunity, hostility, isolation, distance, strange-
ness, unfamiliarity, incomprehension, inferiority, loss of
identity, feelings of tension and feelings of disgust are
lurking. What one actually wanted to avoid by resorting
to a subgroup, is precisely the breeding ground for
this. More and more the effect of this negative spiral is
being felt in contradictions and mutual conflict. The risk
is then real that who is excluded seeks refuge in an ear-
lier, for example familial, subgroup or forms a subdivi-
sion, for example a non-natural coalition, and no longer
wishes to participate or join the larger family group.
367
Indicate as a parent for your child(ren) the applicable
group classification :
open group
368
open subgroup
369
closed subgroup
370
Appeal which parts
and sides ?
Idea 1:
A child has all the qualities, feelings and reactions in
itself. It is only which ones are addressed and expres-
sed. What inner part of the child is addressed.
Example:
A child can potentially be both friendly and unfriendly, it
can develop feelings of trust but also of distrust, it can
cooperate and act against someone. A certain approach
from outside or a self-determined objective can make the
Each of us has parts that can become active and
sides that can be addressed.
How do these parts and sides come into play?
371
child friendly, confident and cooperative. A different ap-
proach or objective could have appealed to his unfrien-
dliness, distrust and opposition.
Idea 2:
Characteristics are not in the child, but between the child
and his environment. It is only which ones are activa-
ted. Which outer side of the child is awakened.
Example:
Friendliness, trust and cooperation or the contrary un-
kindness, distrust and opposition do not exist in themsel-
ves. They only come to life in the current interaction of
the child with the environment. These characteristics
may be activated from the outside or the child activates
them in his interaction with the environment.
It is assumed, as illustrated, that both the environment
and the child can address a part or activate a side. The
environment can do this directly through its actions, but
also indirectly by offering a situation or context.
Both ideas form part of the reference model in which
cognitive schemas are central. Cognitive schemas, on
the one hand, refer to what is picked up by the addres-
sed part. Cognitive schemas, on the other hand, can also
refer to how something is dealt with by the activated
side. What is picked up is the comprehension concept,
372
how something is approached forms the behavioral fil-
ling. Conceptual filling and behavioral filling are the two
components of a cognitive schema that is addressed or
activated.
In the referential model, this conceptual content and
this behavioral content are central, whereas in other mo-
dels, the thinking and behavior manner used to receive
a lot of attention. Thinking and behavior that were
mainly taught from the outside. This is in contrast to the
thinking content and behavioral content that is mainly
the result of externally processed information and inter-
nally personal experience.
The fact that the content is central makes it immediately
clear why each child picks up and deals with a situation
or event differently, even if the environment sometimes
has a uniform approach.
Example :
"If you promise to be calm, you can come along." I speak
to the schema calmly and ask to pick it up like that. I try
to activate the schema and ask for it to be addressed.
"If you stop screaming, we can talk about it." I try to de-
activate the screaming scheme and ask for a different ap-
proach. I try to appeal to the schema ‘talking’ and ask for
it to be picked up like this.
373
In this example, you can immediately find that schemas
as being calm can not only be awakened, but that you
can also try to extinguish schemas as screaming.
For example, it may be attempted to mute a part or side
by a deactivating approach (no attention or encourage-
ment for this part or that side), and to awake another
part or another side of the child by an activating ap-
proach (to appeal to or encourage this part or that side).
Example :
The irritable child scheme is discouraged in favor of the
stress-resistant child scheme that is encouraged in the
child. 'Fear is a bad counselor, cold-bloodedness can save
you'. We can also appeal to the stress-resistant child to
help deactivate the stressful child. 'You've already shown
that you can handle this if you manage to keep your ner-
ves under control.' Conversely, you can also appeal to
the stressful child not to jeopardize the chances for the
stress-resistant child. 'If you stay here, you miss the op-
portunity to prove yourself that it can also be done diffe-
rently and that you know how to find your resilience and
bring it in the foreground.
It may be a good idea however not to neglect the schema
that you place in the background or that is deactivated
by the environment and to pay attention to it at a diffe-
rent or later time. If it is stored away, what disturbs is
374
taken away, but on the other hand it can leave a void and
gap, so that there is no support or balance.
Example :
As a child you can expect from yourself not to give it up.
Just like what the parents try to address you. Neverthe-
less, it may be useful to pay some attention to your
doubts and hesitations in good time. They can help you
as a child to adjust in time your chosen direction, taking
into account your feelings and your needs.
As a young person you can easily be inclined to partici-
pate in what other young people expect. Your resistance
is then stored away. Nevertheless, it may be useful not
to neglect your resistance completely. She may indicate
that you and your needs do not get enough attention.
Yet it can generally be useful if necessary to activate suf-
ficiently your self-confident part and its strong side - I can
do something, I know something, ... -, rather than being
stuck in its overly insecure part and its weak side - I can
not do anything, I know nothing, ...
If this does happen, an attempt can be made to make a
switch to the more self-assured part or the strong side,
or it may be attempted to approach and assist the un-
certain part or the weak side from this part or side. "Are
you sure you can not or do not know anything. Nothing
at all, never at all, thinks everyone so, too ...? '
375
It is possible that young people only show their deman-
ding part or demanding side. With demands for themsel-
ves or for the environment. Young people can then be
helped by also offering their chances offering part or op-
portunity side. With opportunities for themselves or for
their environment.
Example:
Perhaps young people allow themselves to be easily in-
spired by adults for their demanding attitude. They can
be taught that there is a second track, with an opportu-
nity offering attitude. With opportunities to use and not
to be forgotten. 'It can, I can, you can, ...'
Risk
As an outside world, you can unintentionally activate too
many undesirable or less desirable schemes in young
people, for example, excitement or resistance, feeling of
powerlessness or uncertainty. The danger is that these
schemes will be easily activated again in new and other
situations, with even more unfavorable or undesirable
effects as a result. For example, a repressive environ-
ment can easily activate a self-protective attitude
among young people, or a classification of the environ-
ment in acceptable and objectionable. In this way,
young people risk coming into contact with new environ-
ments in the same way, resulting in a repulsive or con-
trary attitude, and with a division of what they accept
376
and what they ignore or reject. There is not much to be
noticed from an openly accommodating attitude.
Example:
Recent American research shows that when educators
and coaches make young people with delinquent and de-
structive behavior feel like they matter, this delinquent
and destructive behavior can be reduced. Adults outside
the family can contribute to reducing juvenile crime. If
they can feel themself useful and important to others, it
can help prevent at-risk adolescents from moving in the
direction of delinquency and dangerous behavior. Some-
thing that could jeopardize their future and possibly bring
them into contact with courts. Giving them the feeling
that they are being noticed, needed and socially accepted
by other adults than their parents can push them in the
right direction.
Opportunities
Research indicates that the wider the range of schemas
about themselves as a young person - as who, what and
how they are for themselves - the more opportunities
they have to handle different situations and events and
to respond appropriately and flexibly. It's not so much
about integrating these different sides and parts of
themselves, but rather allowing them to coexist so that
377
problems can be tackled from specific facets of themsel-
ves, without overpowering or completely drawing it
themselves. For example, the self-schema they appeal to
on one level in the face of a difficulty or a failure will not
necessarily disrupt another self-schema that can be used
on another level. In this way, a young person can also
continue to experience himself as valuable overall, even
if a part fails in a limited domain. Increasing relatively in-
dependent and distinct ways of experiencing oneself can
provide more stability, strength, resilience and appreci-
ation.
Example :
Due to repeated injuries, a youngster does not come into
his own as a player in his club. However, he can count on
his home, as a son and as a brother he feels good, even
as a friend between friends he feels safe and secure. His
weekend job as a helper also offers him a lot of satis-
faction and recognition. Finally, he can use his creative
talent in his hobby.
The young person can also be invited to look for different
parts, sides or facets of himself as diverse identities that
can entail multiple possibilities and strengths. To this
end, the young person can observe his own feelings,
thoughts and actions and try to become aware of under-
lying parts, sides or facets. The young person can also
observe relevant others in order to discover facets such
378
as diverse identities of themselves through their fee-
lings, thoughts and actions. In this way the youngster can
gradually find and build up his own identity(s) or identity
facets that can offer him optimal opportunities in various
situations and in which he can find himself. Due to the
diverse and changeable nature of current situations, this
requires a permanent task to constantly search for facets
of himself that suit him and the situation.
Tine can be both sweet and unfriendly, as
cheerful, as wild, as unacceptable, as angry, as
inaccessible, as playful, as serious, as despon-
dent, as enthusiastic, as open, as withdrawn.
Rino can be rough as well as brutal, as calm, as
opposed, as cooperative, as near, as
headstrong, as funny, as docile, as critical, as
expressive, als dominant, as caring.
How can we appeal to Tine or activate her, or how can
she do this herself ?
How can we appeal Rino to muffle his being like that,
or can we deactivate his behavior, or how can he let
go of this himself?
What we found
:
The question is:
379
What can you do for your child?
1. Check for yourself which schema in concrete you
want to appeal in your child or
activate:
2. Consider how you could address this schema or
activate it:
3. Check for yourself which schema
in concrete with your child would you want to mute or
de-activate :
4. Consider how you might mute this schema or
de-activate it :
What can the child do for himself?
1. Check for your child which schema your child
We can try to approach Rino in such a way that the bru-
tal and rough stops in him. We leave him alone for a
moment, hoping to appeal the calm down schema in
him and to deactivate the protest schema. Rino can also
address his self-management or schema in himself and
deactivate his anger. He can then exchange the schema
excitement for the schema being relaxed.
We can address Tine in such a way that it creates a
situation or context in which certain cognitive sche-
mas are activated. For example, we say: "Hey, Tine!
What great of you! " then there is a lot of chance to
see the sweet Tine. Tine can also appeal to the
cheerful girl or schema in herself. We then see a li-
vely and playful person.
Our answer is:
380
would really like to appeal to itself or
activate:
2. Consider how your child could encourage this schema
or activate it :
3. Check for your child which schema you
would want your child to muffle in concrete or
de-activate :
4. Consider how your child could mute this scheme
or de-activate it :
381
Thinking on
Nina her care
"Why don’t you say you're not coming?", her mother
wants to know. Nina keeps her lips together. She fights
the pain she has felt in her knee for a few days. She does
not want to drop out and hide behind a faint excuse in
the eyes of her peers. She also does not want to accept
this for herself, that she has pain in her knee again. Pain
that kept her home for a long time a time ago.
For Nina there is a lot going through her head at the
same time. The pain that plagues her again. The party
that she does not want to miss. The carefree teenager
she wants to be, just like everyone else. Her image of not
being faint and being reliable. She does not want her
A thinking can be on or off.
If it is on, then a major influence will be on behavior
and experience.
382
mother to remind her of her painful knee and disturb her
with her fear. Not everything that concerns her goes to-
gether. She prefers to be a careless teenager who is not
disturbed by her mother. But the pain and her mother
constantly awaken in her thoughts that she can not sim-
ply ignore. They threaten what she chooses to be occu-
pied with, the adolescent who is carefree and lively. Just
like her peers and someone who you can count on. Not
that she constantly thinks of all this at once. But in some
way she is working on it and it influences what she
thinks, what she feels, what she says, what she does and
how she reacts. As if never completely gone, or as if
quickly back there. As if actively present, or latently pre-
sent, more or less, but still influencing her.
Nicolas without care?
"You don’t think about nothing!", replies Nicolas Mom,
but Nicolas is not there with his thoughts. He came
home without a coat, without paying attention to the
time, his mum had been worried. And what about the
coat. He had come home because of the rain, did he
knew where his coat had gone, nor was it his care, To-
morrow they would know. For Nicolas, time and stuff
are not an issue. Not at his age, he is not busy with that.
That his mum does annoying, he has to face that, alt-
hough he thinks that she is exaggerating, so it is not yet
that late. Time is not something he keeps in mind, let
alone his clothes. Avoiding that his mum is annoying him
is the only thing that concerns him now. He hopes that
383
it will pass quickly by paying little attention to it, at most
to put it in perspective for his mommy, who must know
him anyway. For Nicolas is actively present in thoughts,
his mum and her exaggerate, and latently present, who
he is and that this should be familiar. Are not active or
latently present, his stuff and time. For Nicolas, little is
going through his mind at the same time, as if he wants
to keep his head free for important things, or things that
may have to come, or could come. Great things that he
sometimes dreams of, but which unfortunately never
become reality. He is then latent directed towards this.
Memory schemes
Nina and Nicolas are each dealing with very different
matters and are focused on completely different mat-
ters. What is latently present in the background is also
very different.
What someone is actively working on in his thoughts, or
what is latent for someone, will easily attract his atten-
tion if something in reality corresponds with it, or is con-
nected with it. For example, Nina will be very sensitive to
the attitude and reaction of other peers towards
her. This way, Nicolas will feel very touched if something
special happens in his immediate surroundings. As if so-
mething in their head is active or sensitive to what is hap-
pening in the outside world.
384
You can compare it with something that is familiar or
known and that something opens up a whole stored re-
ality very quickly and easily. This stored reality as a syn-
thesis of previous experiences takes the form of memory
schemes. For every reality there is such a schema in your
head that is activated in contact with reality. Once acti-
vated, it remains active or latently available, so that it
makes contact with reality easier. This quickly creates
image formation and can easily be responded to in the
appropriate situations and circumstances.
So we have a number of opened and already open sche-
mes. Here, one scheme can open the other or keep the
other open. Nina feels pretty helpless lately, she notices
that she is not so loved, other children are not so enthu-
siastic in her presence, it seems like she is cool, or at least
that happens. Her mama does not understand her either
and puts her under pressure, she does not feel so under-
stood and accommodated, as if nobody cares about her
and really cares for her. The knee again that makes it dif-
ficult for her as a game breaker. It makes her feel as if
she is a failure, it prevents her from being coquettish. Ra-
ther, she feels plump and awkward. This makes her feel
worthless, maybe stupid. This coincidence of emotional
thoughts makes her feel sad. Memory schemes like
helpless, unloved, cool, misunderstood, not-taken care
of, plump, awkward, worthless, stupid activate each
other easily and arouse in her increasingly the emotional
schema sadness. A part of one memory scheme can be
385
formed or linked with another memory scheme or part
thereof. Thus, helplessness can be unloved or wake up
stupidity. It will be the case otherwise I was not so
helpless. There is a risk that Nina will turn around in cir-
cles, she will stay in her sadness and will hold herself in
this. Only when other schemes could also be opened, a
different feeling could come to the foreground and help
to offer a way out.
We have a number of preference schemes and a number
of dislike schemes. Some schemes we prefer to be
opened and activated. I like my best friend in the neigh-
borhood, or I like to think about him or her. Or respecti-
vely we prefer that some schemes are not opened and
activated. I do not like my stubborn and dominant bro-
ther or sister in my neighborhood, he or she is the last
person I would like to think about. You want to go, hold,
repeat and restore the reality that one scheme stands
for. You want to leave, let go, avoid and prevent the re-
ality that the other schemes stand for.
Opening schemes
Schemes can be opened by reality and the concrete ele-
ments in it. This way the anxious child can be opened by
an emerging danger. They can also be opened by the
child himself. In this way the insecure child can be
opened by what the child thinks or fears. Also bystan-
ders, like you as a parent, can open certain schemes wi-
thin your child. This way the fragile child can be opened
386
by constantly taking over from your child. These sche-
mes can be in line with each other. Like the anxious child,
who is both insecure and fragile at the same time. They
can also contradict each other. Like the anxious and in-
secure child, who is reminded by you as a parent of his
resilience which he can show in other circumstances.
This way attention can be paid to the circumstances for
your child, in order to activate favorable schemas. Or
you can help the child to activate favorable schemes that
offer opportunities and chances. And as a parent you can
sad
helpless
cool
failure
clumsy
worthless
unkept
stupid
not-loved
misunder-
stood
387
try to activate schemas with your child that offer growth
opportunities and keep them active.
Influence schemes
Each scheme contains a set of contents that have to do
with the context of reality in which they can emerge,
with what that reality is and what is characteristic of it,
and with how to deal with it and respond to it. Its activa-
tion immediately brings this whole to life, or makes you
sensitive to it. Thus sadness, for example, fits in a con-
text of failure, of adversity and being weak. It is a nega-
tive feeling that takes away your zest for life and makes
you come to stand still. It allows you to build a rest break,
which allows you to (re)orient and not continue in the
same way. This way it helps you prevent a repetition of
this feeling and what motivates it.
As long as this scheme is open, it will color your doing,
your experience and your thoughts and give them con-
tent and shape. It becomes an element that is also rele-
vant and accompanies your strength or weakness, as
long as it is opened. Because multiple schemes can be
opened at the same time, they can give form and con-
tent to your doing and experiences. They can be found
in you and experienced. They form a characteristic or di-
mension of it. They can contribute and thus provide ad-
ded value for your actions and experiences. They can
also mean a brake or hindrance, and thus a loss of value
for your actions and experiences. Being sad is that you
388
can make less effort and that you experience colors less
favorable.
Once a schema has been opened, its content becomes
active. Linking it to other schemes allows preference and
rejection to become active and come to development. I
prefer, or rather not, to find this or that in reality. When
Nina or Nicolas think of mom, there is the sweet mother,
but also the difficult mom. Of course they prefer the
sweet mama and they have an aversion to the difficult
mom. It can encourage them to make efforts to recog-
nize the sweet mama and not the difficult one. The re-
cognition of the sweet mama awakens in them a
pleasant affirmative feeling. The recognition of the diffi-
cult mother the opposite feeling. They can try to act in
such a way that the sweet mommy is or remains activa-
ted. They can also put pressure on their mother to stay
the sweet mommy, for example, by saddling them other-
wise with feelings of guilt. In this way they can achieve
and maintain a pleasant feeling, because reality corres-
ponds with their preferred content of scheme.
Schemes and perception
Open or sensitive schemes - these are almost opened or
recently opened - can greatly determine the experience
and the reaction or color them. If Nina does not feel very
loved, any negligence of her peers to her will be easily
understood as confirmation of not being popular.
389
Unopened or non-sensitive schemes will cause
something not to be noticed as such. The time and his
coat are not a point of attention for Nicolas. He does not
notice that it is already dark, he does not notice that it is
raining. Or that these are at least indicators for time and
coat.
In this way, parents can quickly or sometimes not at all
notice certain problems with their child, because what is
a sign for this is very recognizable, or not at all. This de-
pends on whether or not they have a sensitive scheme
for this. For example, it may happen that they misjudge
staying at home as a sign of being isolated or isolating
themselves as children. And wrongly take staying home
as a sign of wanting to take it easy and not constantly
being bothered by friends.
Because you teach your child or yourself to approach si-
tuations from a different angle and question, taking into
account a different possibility and answer, you can per-
ceive something completely different from a different
perspective. What allows you to respond differently. For
example, not seeing what Nina or Nicolas does as weak-
ness or unwillingness, but look at them from a different
purpose or priority.
View on schemes
Often someone is little or not aware of an open or sensi-
tive scheme. Nicolas formulated once goals for himself
390
to make something special of his life, he does not think
about them at the moment. This does not alter the fact
that they can influence his interests and preferences.
Sometimes you feel certain things and feel certain things
that are coming, even if you are not completely aware of
them, or can not express them. They often have to deal
with an underlying scheme. Nina feels that she should
not stay away, she feels in some way that it would affect
her being loved. Nicolas foresees that if you want to ex-
perience something that needs to be in the broader
world and not at home, and then you do not have to deal
with details, but with essential things.
Schemes and influence on environment
Open or sensitive schemes not only ensure that you no-
tice or respond to certain things more easily, as a kind of
open register.
They also make, because you notice them and respond
to them, that your experience and your actions are
about to turn around them. Also with others from your
surroundings you can easily activate that side in them,
and situations in which you are placed are easily colou-
red by them. An interaction then arises that also keeps
the scheme open easily.
391
Nina is not very popular. By constantly asking her peers
for confirmation, it becomes an item in their mutual in-
teraction. In their talking and association the more or
less loved ones are discussed. Because some people
become more popular in the group, they find this
something they like as pleasant and what is susceptible
to repetition or preservation for them. Because others
become less or not loved by the group, this becomes a
concern for them where they want to get away from and
for which they make efforts to prevent repetition. In this
way, both their own and others' loved ones become an
activated and open scheme, so that their perception and
dealings are colored with it. In this way, they keep the
beloved schema open and active. In this way it be-
comes something they both think of or are involved with
in their communication and their interaction. Even if
they could not respond to this very much, if asked about
it, because they are not consciously involved with
this. Yet you could derive from their talking and doing
that this is in some way or other concerned.
Open and sensitive schemes
This way, situations or events that you deal with always
provide activated and open schemes. This way things
you are doing yourself in your thoughts or in your activity
go together with activated open schemes
Sensitive schemes are certainly related to things that are
very close to you and that are very important to
392
you. Your living situation, your health, your known
people, your performance, your self-image, your image,
your development and growth. They are all aspects that
are very important to you. Something related to this, you
will soon notice, to cherish and preserve, if necessary
guard. Or, if necessary, to escape if you are loaded or
chased by it. It keeps you then too busy in an undesira-
ble way.
Activate schemes or not
As a parent you can try to activate favorable schemes
with your child. Time awareness or organization, for
example, so your child can itself take this into account
and you are more likely that your child pays attention to
this and comes after with what is contained in it.
Your child can, however, make a lot of effort not to acti-
vate certain schemes and if they are already activated,
deactivate them. Your child wants to relax, for example,
with his friends. It does not want to be reminded of the
time, to do this and that, and this and certainly not
that. He will already prematurely repel what you want to
remember.
Because of this repulsive attitude of your child, you easily
have the tendency to exaggerate, in the hope that some-
thing will be carried out of your expectations and good
advice. By exaggerating, however, you can easily incre-
ase the resistance and the tendency to deactivate. By
393
letting your skepticism be noticed at the same time, you
simultaneously activate your child's doubts as to
whether you and your expectations will be taken into ac-
count. It is better then to express your trust that your
child is willing to cooperate and that you can count on
your child and activate this in your child.
On thinking or thinking, on
As a parent you can follow what the child thinks in his
experience and reaction, and which thinking is
lacking. You can stimulate your child to start a certain
way of thinking and to express a different way of thin-
king.
What the child experienced and stored earlier will re-
main available as a souvenir. If a similar situation occurs,
the child will use this memorial when it is desired, as a
source for grasping the situation and dealing with it.
By teaching your child to pay attention to what it is
thinking about, it can lead to a more conscious res-
ponse. It is then no longer unconsciously brought to a re-
action. He can then recognize what he keeps in mind,
without running away from it, or wanting to push it
away, or just accept it. He can choose for more favorable
schemes and set off on this, whereby the scheme can be
used as a means to achieve an established goal.
394
The child can then think of it, especially to make a thin-
king, which is on and focused on here and now, for which
he is open and from which he can move to the future.
Mark for your child what you recognise :
Formulate for your child what is useful :
395
Development of
knowledge and thin-
king
A child wants to find as accurate and complete answers
as possible from birth. This is the task it gives itself. Get-
ting answers to questions such as what, how, where,
when, who, why he and she poses of what they encoun-
ter in their environment. Just think of the endless series
of 'why-' and 'how come-that questions the child asks
when it can talk well. From the answers, the image on its
environment will depend and also its reaction towards
its environment. Where its image and its reaction are ini-
tially very limited, its development and thanks to its
The development of knowledge and thinking helps
the child to answer to questions and challenges
more and more.
396
constantly more evolving possibilities to answer these
questions will constantly increase in quality.
In order to develop these images and reactions, it will
use its own developing possibilities. In this respect, it will
also formulate more accurate, complete and qualitati-
vely rich answers to similar questions about what, how,
where, when, against whom and why, and their use.
These answers to enable adaptation are organized in
an orderly manner in the form of schemes that are of a
substantive nature and deal with what is present in the
environment, or that are formal in nature and are about
how to use as tools and instruments for themselves in
handling. Through this arrangement, the answers are
precisely maintained and continuously updated and ad-
justed, so that the most accurate, complete and best
answer is obtained. In this way the environment is get-
ting better and better represented and the child is get-
ting better and better opportunities to deal with it.
Who his mom is, what his pacifier is, comes in a
scheme. What is observing, what is paying attention
comes in a schema. The first type of schemes allow
knowledge to develop, the second type of schemes allow
thinking to develop. For example, Mommy is someone
who feeds you, smiles at you, holds you lo-
vingly. Mommy is someone who makes you feel safe,
397
who can let you know that you can express with weeping
that you are missing something or are experiencing dis-
comfort. So a pacifier is something that gives you com-
fort and is always delivered back wherever you leave it.
So is observing turning your head in the direction of the
sound. So is paying attention keeping your head in the
direction of the sound. These basic contents and forms
are constantly being supplemented and so develop. This
means that more can be done with it and better and
more powerful use is possible. Everything becomes clea-
rer and more accessible. Things can be realized thanks to
the more and better available own tools.
So, there are tools such as evolving deployable sche-
mes to get to know the environment better, such as per-
ception, memory and thinking. There are also tools to
get to know themselves and to follow themselves, such
as feelings, imagination and dynamics. These formal tool
schemas increase in complexity and possibilities during
the development of the child. In this way, the perception
scheme can evolve from looking or listening to what at-
tracts attention, about self-interest, to actively seeking
out what is and what is put together, to researching new
facets from a different question. In this way the emotio-
nal plan can evolve from being overwhelmed by emoti-
ons and warding them off, over noticing feelings in good
time and taking them into account, to actively prospec-
ting which feelings can bring something with them and
making choices in function of desired feelings. You can
398
read more about tool schemas in the theme section
Schema activation and development of this encyclope-
dia.
The substantive schemes can in turn be conscious sche-
mes, they can also be functional schemes. Conscious
schemes are used for imaging, functional schemes are
used in the context of an action. The action itself is often
not explicitly aware, it is usually aimed at conscious con-
tent formation. How a child perceives is not a concern
for the child, it is concerned with his mother or the paci-
fier that perceives it. The content of conscious schemes
is only partially aware, they are also primarily intended
for functional use. I smile at my mom, not at someone
unknown. I just want to know if someone is my mom so
that I can laugh. I must not be able to remember exactly
what is characteristic of my mother, let alone express
this. As soon as the child can talk it can be asked about
it, this turns out to be a not so easy job. Even as an adult,
you can still have a hard time giving a precise description
of someone from your head. You then have to look in
your scheme to see what you came up with. This scheme
is primarily intended for recognition and for functional
use. As soon as you want to express the content, you are
working on a higher level of a conscious meta-level.
If you want to help a child in his development, it can
be useful to show exactly and express what is so typical
of something. 'Here you have a photo of mama, your
399
brother and yourself. Tell me what you see here." You
always give an immediate answer, even before my ques-
tion is finished. Can you try to answer only after you've
heard the question? " In this way you can try to fill in
the child's schemas and adjust them so that they be-
come qualitatively better. You do this from a conscious
meta level and not from a spontaneous functional level
of experience and behavior.
Spontaneously, however, the child will initially be
busy on a functional level: how can I recognize some-
thing? how can I manipulate something so that I can
achieve a certain result? The child will gradually set
goals: find something or someone, explore something,
get something in its reach. For these purposes, the child
will look for resources and schemes to achieve this
goal. In what way can I find my mom who has disap-
peared from my field of vision. So resource-target
schemes with increasing complexity are created. As
soon as the child develops images more clearly, the
images are increasingly used to realize something. My
mom is not gone even though I do not see her in the li-
ving room at the moment, she will be in the kitchen and
I have to find her there. This makes the conscious level
increasingly important. The conscious level then supple-
ment the functional.
As soon as the child encounters a situation, it will
seek recognition and interaction with it. It will activate
400
the matching schemes for functional interaction. Howe-
ver, if the situation requires further attention, it will call
in its conscious level. In his working memory the activa-
ted schematic contents are then presented to merge
them with the observed reality data. For example, on the
basis of internally present and externally available data,
an attempt is made to arrive at a best performance that
can lead to an answer and reaction. The internal data are
the result of experiences and information from the past.
The reality data are what is available in the present. The
answer and the reaction are what must be realized for
the future. The quality and ability of this merging and
handling of mentally proposed information to arrive at
new information gradually increases. Where images
are initially used, then symbols such as words and num-
bers are used instead. Symbols whose meaning in-
creases progressively. This results in concepts that at the
same time become more concise and so abstract and re-
veal associations. This creates a thinking that makes use
of syntheses and rules, that is separate from time and
can go forward and back to predict something and ex-
plain something, in which more and more elements and
factors can be taken into account and that allow an ap-
proach from different angles, also separate from
themselves.
In this way, infants and toddlers bases themselves
very quickly on their own experiences and their explora-
401
tory activity, a bit like real researchers, to develop theo-
ries that organize their knowledge about characteristics
of things and living beings from their environment. Like
understanding that objects fall when you let them go and
realize that objects can not mix up but move each
other. This way you can watch young children watch for
a longer time when they notice something that does not
respond to their expected action. A balloon that flies and
does not fall when you release it. Even a year old already
knows that living beings can start moving on their own
and follow their own irregular road to reach a goal. In
this way they learn to use movement as a criterion for
noticing something as living or not.
In young children too, there is a growing knowledge
and understanding of one's own behavior and that of
others. For example, two-year-olds already understand
that they and others have desires and that desires can
lead to behavior. 'I want a biscuit' and 'I'm happy to have
his biscuit.' From the age of three, children start using
words such as thinking, believing, remembering and
forgetting, which indicates a start to becoming aware of
what is happening in them. From four years on, children
understand that their own behavior and that of others
originates in what they each believe about the given si-
tuations and events, even if this is incorrect.
However, children do not only learn from their
own exploratory experiences, they absorb much of the
402
experiences of others that are presented to them in the
form of self-evident expressions and situations. Unfavo-
rable experiences and situations, or of lesser quality or
strength, are then omitted. What promotes safety and
health, for example in the form of what is nutritious, is
then presented to them. Especially the way to collect
knowledge and to process it afterwards is transferred so-
cially and culturally. Is the reality itself offered to get to
know things, or are toys offered? Is emphasis placed on
independent thinking or thinking together to come to an
answer. Is emphasis placed on incorporating your own
feelings into what you notice and answer, or not to do
exactly that. How is available know-how in older child-
ren and adults valued and how is she optimally involved
in thinking and thinking development. When it is swit-
ched on, is account taken of the zone of proximal deve-
lopment where the child can do something with the help
of a more experienced person. Is taken into account the
degree and form of help that fits with what the child
needs. Is explanation and instruction given in such a way
that the child himself can take over this explanation and
instruction for himself, and by means of self-proclama-
tion can gradually instruct himself. Is this given so that
what the child already knows can be supplemented, so
that his own already developed schema can grow and
evolve.
As schemas are formed and filled in, more options for
the child become available. Especially because schemes
403
contain ready-made answers to what is and how to deal
with it when, where and why or what for. The acquired
schemes are functionally activated and thus free up the
working memory for new tasks and new strategies. The
schemes here offer an expanding database to be able to
respond quickly to these new challenges, because much
can be traced back to what is already familiar. In this
way, depending on the development of knowledge and
thinking, more powerful possibilities can arise within the
child. Existing processes go faster and new ones are bet-
ter supported by what the child has already acquired. In
this way the child succeeds better and becomes better
in carrying out specific activities, but also at the same
time taking on more than one activity. Like talking about
something else, while doing something.
404
Thinking about
your parenting
Think about your parenting
As a parent, you may occasionally have to deal with un-
certainty about your way of parenting. You can occasio-
nally be overwelmed by fear, with the question if you do
not do it wrong. You can start wondering whether your
dealings with your child guarantee enough opportunities
for your child to develop in a pleasant way. Especially
when the relation between yourself and your child isn't
good, questions arise easily.
Does thinking about your parenting confuse you?
Or does it offer added value?
405
Parenting is not an easy task. Your own upbringing did
not always work, or is no longer usable. Sometimes you
can only learn how it should not and how to do it other-
wise. Much information is available, but sometimes con-
tradicts each other. Not always is it usable for your own
situation with your child. Your own intuition then, but it
gets so quickly exhausted.
As a parent, you may occasionally need to stop and think
about your parenting. To see how it goes, how your gui-
dance work out on your child and its development. Your
child that evolves and grows time and time again. Just
look back, to see better ahead. Alone or with you
two. To see what was good, and what was weak. What
opportunities do you offer for the future, but also what
dangers it entails. Where you have to adjust, what you
have to add and what to omit, what to increase and what
to reduce, where you have to and can handle diffe-
rent. How you may have to look different, or react diffe-
rent. What you may think different. For what you may
have to offer a different environment.
Sometimes your child obliges you to think, sometimes its
environment. Sometimes your child shows that its deve-
lopment is less favorable. Your child then easily responds
physically, emotionally, expressively, or with behavior
and relational. The child does not feel well, reacts sensi-
tively, expresses his or her problems, does not partici-
pate or otherwise, does not feels well in the
406
group. Sometimes the environment let you know to
have difficulties with your childs. Your child is so often
absent or passive, or busy, or shows resistance, or is in-
secure and anxious. Dealing with your child is then diffi-
cult and stiff. There are many tensions and conflicts. You
do not always understand your child, or its reaction.
At such a moment you ask questions about your child,
but also about yourself and your way of parenting. With
thinking you try to get a view and find an answer. Often
this is a thinking and talking together : with your partner,
your parents, a friend, an acquaintance. Sometimes with
a professional : a teacher, a (family) doctor, a psycholo-
gist, a pedagogue, a counseling and guidance center. Al-
ways your way of dealing directly or indirectly with your
child will be discussed. Sometimes to see what went
wrong, sometimes how you could better guide your child
in its development. What is special about your
child. What your child specifically needs and how you
could respond to it. The child with his parenting ques-
tion, you with your parental offer.
Sometimes there is no specific reason to think about
your parenting. You then speak occasionally about pa-
renting in general within your family and with acquain-
tances. How this is going today, what is changing, how it
could be improved. What society expects from parents
and their children. Whether and how you want to go al-
ong as a parent and child. In this way you try to learn
407
from others, to find support with others. To build a cli-
mate of knowing and doing together, so that your act-
ions are not only carried by yourself, but also by your
meaningful others. That way you feel more certain, you
find together your direction, your content and your form
as a parent.
You can then experience an emergency, a need or an in-
terest to meet other parents to exchange thoughts and
experiences. This can then generate cognition and reco-
gnition and a feeling of support and solidarity. There is
then the feeling of having to do with equals that offer
you plus experiences, at the same time there is less a risk
of shortcomings or lesser experiences that occur more
easily when calling in experts.
If you as a parent look at your parenting, you can come
to the conclusion that you are good at it and can conti-
nue in the same direction with the same content and
form. You can also discover that you are confronted with
a number of questions, but do not immediately find
answers to them. That you have many questions about
your way of doing things and want to stop for a while
before continuing. This is to find out how to proceed
best. Finally, you can also discover that the answers you
find clearly make it possible to change direction, take a
different direction with a corresponding content and
form. If you wish to take a different direction, it will be
difficult to let go of the old, and you must make an effort
408
to let your new approach take effect, both for yourself
and for your child. Some sustained effort and the neces-
sary support, also from yourself, will then be more than
welcome.
Thinking about your parenting is not only about the ra-
tionally distant, also the emotional nearness can be in-
volved in this. Not only can you base your thinking on
what your judgment is about something, your thinking
can also start from what you feel and experience what
disturbs or what is missing. This way you can start loo-
king for how to think and how to feel, so that progress
becomes possible.
Thinking can help you get your parenting clear and clarify
what can change how to make it more optimal for your-
self and your child. Parenting is often intuitive, at least
for an important part, from an implicit thinking about pa-
renting. This is positive in itself and does not automati-
cally call for change. However, your thinking can take
this intuitive into words and translate the implicit into
worded insights. This way more insight can be gained
and, if necessary, more control. As a parent, you usually
do not immediately know how much your intuition and
the implicit is borne by a personal knowing that from
your own experiences has gradually arisen. This personal
knowing includes both what is fact, but also your own
feelings, opinions and beliefs, and needs and desires are
included.
409
By creating clarity, you are better able to oversee, moni-
tor and control. In your thoughts, for example, you are
able to get and understand what is going on in the reality
of the upbringing, of how you try to guide your child in
his development. On a mental level you therefore have
a double of what happens in the reality of the education
between yourself and your child. In this way, your
dealings with your child can be made more conscious
and more consciously followed up in parallel, and given
direction, content and form. So you have a double track:
the trace of the what and how in the parenting interac-
tion and the trace of this what and how in your head,
that you can follow and from here you can steer.
Thinking about your upbringing in order to achieve a
greater awareness of educational processes, has ano-
ther important advantage. Research shows that we can
only notice from a knowing. You will not easily notice so-
mething you do not know. Only from a knowing that you
can overdemand your child, you can notice that a child
gives difficulties because it can not meet your expecta-
tions. Only from a knowing that you can discourage your
child to change his boundaries, can you notice that a
child becomes passively awkward and spontaneously
does not take any initiatives. Only from a knowing that
a child sometimes fails to meet what you propose to
meet, you can see that a child is doing quite some effort.
But that it just does not work, and gives you the impres-
sion of unwillingness, of ignoring you or of opposing you.
410
If so no knowledge, it means easily not knowing to notice
and also not knowing to take it into account or respond
to it.
Think about your thinking about parenting
As a parent, you equate your parenting often to your ac-
tions to your child. How you deal with your child so that
it could grow. Less you equate your parenting with crea-
ting an environment for your child in which this growth
can proceed optimally. Still less do you think that upbrin-
ging often has to do with your thinking about your child,
about yourself, about your parental interaction, about
the parental context and the parental framework in
which this upbringing takes place. However, it can be es-
tablished that your parental behavior and the parental
environment that you offer are very determined by your
upbringing thinking. The upbringing environment and
your upbringing are the interpretation of your upbrin-
ging thinking. Suppose you assume that a child is not yet
capable of any independence, so you will create an envi-
ronment in which a lot is arranged for the child and you
will constantly help your child so that their is little of no
necessity for independance and the child is not encoura-
ged to do so.
Your thinking about upbringing is usually a very personal
way of thinking that has gradually grown on the basis of
your personal parenting experience and on the basis of
acquired and gathered information. It is not impersonal
411
knowledge about parenting, but a personal thinking in
which you are situated. Namely what means to educate
you, how to educate, when you are asked to raise and
when you approach your parenting. In this way, your
concrete upbringing is constantly colored and determi-
ned by this personal upbringing. It is surrounded by and
underpinned by it. At the same time it is legitimized and
limited by it. As a child, you have, for example, greatly
refrained from the many offenses you were part of. You
often have to deal with criticism, with accusations, with
disappointments of your environment in you. As a pa-
rent you may have learned from this that you can not be
raised in this way, taking into account the consequences
that you have had for years in your self-image and self-
esteem and still have their effect felt. In your own beliefs
about upbringing, you have also barred all forms of of-
fense. Every acknowledging response to your child is le-
gitimized by your thinking and a different response is li-
mited by it. Your child will never experience it being at-
tacked on his mind, his feelings and needs and for who
or what it is.
This personal thinking can be found in each of your reac-
tions and expressions to your child. It runs through it as
a red wire, a guideline. It forms the synthesis of all your
knowledge and your know-how about parenting. What it
is for you, how it is upbringing, where, when and to
whom when you are confronted with parenting, when
something in yourself is activating you. It is thinking that
412
is active when you are parenting, often implicitly, wit-
hout noticing it yourself. An parental situation or an pa-
rental interaction with your child will activate this thin-
king, so that it will give your reaction and expression con-
tent and form and at the same time indicate the boun-
daries of this: what is, what is not, how, how not, when,
when not, where, where not, to whom, to whom not,
why, why not, to what, to what not. For example, If your
child breaks something, you will not immediately res-
pond to this. But you will translate the situation as an up-
bringing event. Your child still has insufficient understan-
ding of what is fragile. You will encourage your child to
exercise caution by making clear how something goes
wrong. You will try to avoid repetition by putting away
what is too fragile for the child.
Becoming aware of what is implicit and is activated to
respond to an upbringing situation can be very help-
ful. Your own perceived reaction can help you to deduce
your implicit thinking from this.
Thinking about parenting
As a parent you can not only be interested in learning
more about your upbringing and your thinking about up-
bringing, you can also be curious about what in general
is the thinking about upbringing, especially in today's so-
ciety. What is central to parenting, how to work as an
parent, about what is parenting. Which way of thinking
is noticeable in society about upbringing. What appears
413
from scientific research. What do pedagogical experts
say.
Thus it appears that in the past parenting was often ap-
proached moralistically. It was about imparting values
and learning to deal with standards. Today we see a psy-
chological approach. It is about guiding the development
in different areas, it is about offering development and
growth opportunities. It must allow the child to discover
qualities and become familiar with them. Qualities that
can express it and incorporate it into its behavior and its
expression. The qualities it exhibits must allow an added
value for the child in growth and must be reflected in his
dealings. Not educating for what is good behavior, away
from what is bad. But educate people to act that adds
value, away from an action with a minus or less value. An
added value for themselves, for others, for the environ-
ment, for the future. A relationship with more quality
and more qualities. Together with this evolution, a tran-
sition can be observed from assessing the behavior of a
child in development to the accent on the appreciation
of behavior for what is already present in qualities and
quality. At the same time, there is room for appreciating
the child for the competences it has already developed
to make this quality action possible.
For a long time it turned in parenting around power, la-
ter translated into authority. It was about who was in
charge and who had to be docile. Or it was about who
414
was dependent and in need of authority. For example,
an authoritarian upbringing became an anti-authorita-
rian upbringing, but at the same time it kept running for
more or less power. In modern thought, however, power
can hardly be called quality, authority is slightly easier.
They rather seem to be resources and means. In con-
trast, responsibility, attention and care reflected in your
behavior seem to better withstand the test of quality and
qualities.
It was only recently that people saw that parenting could
also be about something else. For example, child-cente-
redness and support were central, but supplemented
with requirements and control. The support on relatio-
nal level, supplemented with the control of child beha-
vior, was called authoritative parenting.
Attention was given to a good relationship with the child,
and within this relationship the child could be held ac-
countable for his behavior. For the sake of com-
pleteness, this two-dimensional model can be supple-
mented with a third, a contextual dimension. A dimen-
sion that indicates that parenting revolves around deve-
lopment and its support, supported by an appropriate
conceptual framework.
Today, the question is increasingly being asked what, to-
gether with the development dimension that responds
to the development needs of the child, can be central in
415
parenting. These include affection and attention, safety
and trust, respect and recognition, communication and
consultation, tolerance and equality, openness and
cooperation, space and opportunities, time and inte-
grity, authenticity and individuality, rights and responsi-
bility, proximity and support, load-bearing and support
base, self-activity and context involvement. Perhaps a
multidimensional model in which several of these quali-
ties come together will offer the most optimal opportu-
nities for development and guidance. As a parent, you
can think about how to do this by making your own con-
tribution in dealing with your child.
In parenting, adults often looked also at who can func-
tion as a model. In society we encounter people whose
actions have been signed by one or more specific quali-
ties. It is about actions that are characterized by a great
knowledge and wisdom, or by a great constructiveness,
by involvement, or by a beauty, or justice, or by a synthe-
sis power, or by changing frontiers and progress, or by
allowing something to grow without violence. As a pa-
rent, it may be interesting to think about what makes
this action so valuable and how to incorporate and inte-
grate this into your child's development guidance.
In research is often searched for where upbringing can
in essence turn around, or can also turn around. Recent
concepts such as co-regulation, agency, supportive up-
bringing, connected parenting and schema pedagogy
416
came to the forefront. How to integrate them into your
own parenting.
In thinking about upbringing, thought can also be given
to how to equip your child to integrate optimally into so-
ciety. But here too, an important evolution is noti-
ceable. Where this used to be the most frequently asked
question, there is a shift to the question : how society
can better respond to the individual and his inte-
grity. This creates more space for the individual and his
individuality, and reduces or diminishes the pressure to
conform and fit into society, sometimes at the expense
of himself and his well-being. From society there is more
attention and space for diversity. As an individual you
sometimes come more to your right because of your per-
sonality, than because of your uniformity. To function
closer to yourself can sometimes valorise more than an
impersonal way of being and doing.
Think about your upbringing and bringing up
By your concrete and more general thinking about up-
bringing, you can better situate yourself as a parent and
for your parenting. This way you can better position
yourself for a number of parenting aspects. See where
you are somewhere, going from the absence of this as-
pect to the optimal presence of this aspect in your
dealings. This way you can better develop a vision about
parenting, better formulate your objectives, and better
attune your approach and interaction. This way you can
417
see where you can pay attention to and work at. You can
find out how this can be better tuned.
So, among other things, where do I stand with my up-
bringing, in which direction can I continue and in which
way. Where do I stand with the educational environ-
ment for my child, where else can it go and how. Where
do I deal with my education, what are his points of atten-
tion in which direction and how do I deal with this speci-
fically.
In this way, you can always gain quality and qualities. You
can experience more possibilities than those that you ha-
bitually used.
Today a lot of information about upbringing is avai-
lable. As a parent you often do not know what to fol-
low. It may be a good idea to think for yourself about
what you get presented and whether you can learn from
it and what you can use from it.
Thinking about parenting together
As a parent you have each formed your own idea of what
to bring up is and how you can pick it up. These ideas can
be very similar, they can also be very different. Most of
all there will be a certain correspondence. The question
then is how great this correspondence is and whether it
can not be made larger. You may come to the conclusion
418
that you can experience added value from your partner
just in the difference in your child's approach.
From everyone's own interpretation of what is upbrin-
ging, it will depend on whether you will experience your
partner's reaction as educational or rather of a different
nature. Even if at such a moment the reaction of your
partner is meant by himself or herself as a parent. So
can criticizing your child have a parental purpose for you,
while your partner only experiences it as venting off
steam from you, only taking care of yourself, but not hel-
ping your child. Because the child then only wants to de-
fend himself and is not open to insight and personal ad-
justment.
Parents often try to talk to each other and think together
to reach an agreement. At times of crisis, they then can
experience how strong this unit is and whether they do
not each approach it then their way which possibly drive
them apart. As a parent you can be very concerned
about your partner's lack of solidarity, or you feel disap-
pointed. This often adds to the difference, so that every-
one's style and approach are profiled even more
profoundly.
Only when you can face this difference and accept it,
there will be room for rapprochement and a real thinking
together. The joint approach to what goes together, the
separate where necessary and if it does not succeed
419
otherwise. For example, from a healthy individuality,
from a personal way of thinking about upbringing, a col-
lective upbringing process can be included, in which one
can come to a sharing in thinking and doing.
Research shows that children are particularly affected by
lack of clarity and instability. If what is together and se-
parate for the child is clear and not repeatedly thrown
together, it may be beneficial for the child to find adults
who interpret not only with words but also with their
actions where they stand for.
Educative way of thinking
Because parenting often does not allow ready-made so-
lutions, you will automatically invoke thinking and thin-
king together. This can help you find an answer and a re-
action with added value.
You can also view it in this way: that your actions always
go together and are supported by an associated, not al-
ways conscious thinking. By getting to know this implicit
way of thinking, you can deliberately and continuously
parallel your actions with an associated conscious and
optimally possible way of thinking.
This immediately provides an answer to the frequently
asked question: whether parents are no longer allowed
to do spontaneously in dealing with their child and fol-
low their intuition. Even if you assume that your actions
420
are not well thought out, this is based on personal thin-
king and knowing. Because you are little or not aware of
this thinking, this seems spontaneous. From the obser-
vation that you think anyway in terms of parenting, you
may be able to make it more aware, in order to get a
better view of its use value. In this way you can, if you
wish, adjust it by reflection or thinking back and use cog-
nitive guidance in your parenting by coaching and for-
ward thinking (meta).
To this end, you will increasingly feel the need as it be-
comes less smooth with the development and supervi-
sion of your child, as there are more tensions and more
conflicts that threaten to escalate. With your thinking
you will then try to follow what is happening, as is the
case with monitoring, and try to find out how you can
influence what happens.
For example, recent research by the University of New
York shows that parents have a better memory for pa-
renting-related information. When they think about pa-
renting they remember better, this could also be evolu-
tionary beneficial.
421
.
Parenting is for me ….
Parenting am I doing like
this …
… is for me an expression of
parenting
Parenting is for me ….
Parenting am I doing like
this …
… is for me an expression of
parenting
422
Parenting is for us ….
Parenting are we doing
like this …
… is for us an expression
of parenting
423
By thinking
These thwarts passes the rearing of every day. They
briefly reflect on the spontaneity of acting as a parent,
educator or teacher. They provide space for reflection
that can enrich, nuance or underpin spontaneous
action. To each to find what is useful and inspires.
Take a moment to consider every day parenting,
maybe it brings you new ideas.
Space to stop for a moment in your upbringing can
be to free yourself for new inspiration.
424
When what a child represents itself and proposes corres-
ponds to what parents have as representation and pro-
posal, there is less chance of tension. Stress arises as
soon as a child presents something other than his pa-
rents.
In parenting, quantity is sometimes confused with qua-
lity. In reality, quantity can sometimes stand in the way
and quality sometimes limits quantity.
In a time of restless searching for the perfect, also in pa-
renting, the restful finding of the imperfect must not be
forgotten.
A child often make adjustments to parents in their up-
bringing. This is because the individuality of the child re-
quires an individuality-based approach, also because the
development of the child requires a phase-based ap-
proach, further because the life situation of the child re-
quires a situation-based approach, and finally because
the life experiences of the child require a experience-ba-
sed approach.
As parents making choices for the child is becoming
more and more difficult, parents can opt for dialogue to
support their child in making their own choices.
425
Parenting is often confused with something else. Chec-
king with what it could be confused can make an end to
this.
Parenting can be described as binding work with respect
for individuality.
Parenting competence is constantly being developed im-
plicitly. Here, explicit attention can be devoted to add va-
lue.
Parenting processes involve a whole series of other pro-
cesses, such as care, guidance, support, influence, com-
munication, relationship, group, social, community and
choice processes. Knowing and optimizing these pro-
cesses can contribute to the parenting process.
As an educator you like clear lines in purposes, some-
times you run the risk of skipping intermediaries and
steps.
You can start educating with yourself, your ideas, prefe-
rences, feelings and wishes. Parenting can also start with
your child, his images, preferences, feelings and wishes.
It is becoming increasingly clear how neurological pro-
cesses influence behavior. Nothing less is true in the de-
velopment of your child and the upbringing that you of-
fer your child.
426
If brain cells do not communicate very much, thoughts
do not, and people do not communicate easily. When
brain cells communicate strongly, thoughts also do this,
and people communicate constantly.
Those who are more capable of implicit pattern learning,
that is knowing how to predict complex patterns, are un-
consciously more sensitive to culture and belief,
whereby a center creates patterns to bring order, this
according to neuroscience research from Georgetown
University. The implicit learning of patterns thus forms a
basis for the development of ordering beliefs, as was ob-
served. In children who unconsciously noticed patterns
in the environment, it was found that their sensitivity to
faith increased with age, even in a non-faithful environ-
ment. Children who were unable to do so were more li-
kely to have a faith-sensitive decline.
In interaction there is a danger of wanting to bring
something to something recognizable at his own level or
to reduce something to it, in order to avoid feeling him-
self less otherwise.
Learning from experience : recent research at the
University of München has shown that even single-
celled slime molds function on the basis of memory,
even though they do not have a brain. When finding
food, slime molds store information about where it
is found in the network of tubes that make them up.
427
is found in the network of tubes that make them up.
They produce dust at the location of food that wi-
dens their tubes in that area and increases the moti-
lity of the fungus. This is to reach food faster next
time and to move in that direction.
The resulting architecture is thus a reminder of the
past. This discovered simple form of intelligence
could be a prototype for more complex life forms
with a nervous system and brain, and their develop-
ment.
428
Activation cycle
The other does or does not respond to this.
When you talk or deal with someone, you make him or
her successive proposals for activation. This is what you
want to activate with him or her in order to perceive so-
mething and give meaning and then respond to it. The
other person can accept these activation proposals. The
other can not accept these activation proposals ei-
ther. He or she can then look in your activation proposals
for what he or she prefers to activate and want you to
formulate as an activation proposal. It is also possible
that the other person is little or not willing to listen and
chooses for an activation what he or she wants to for-
mulate you as an activation proposal in his actions and
You want the other to perceive something like that
and react accordingly.
The other does or does not respond to this.
429
expression towards you. You can then go into this acti-
vation proposal, or look for yourself in his proposal for
what to activate, or come up with your own activation
separately from his proposal.
You do not want your child to go to a friend that late. You
say it so that you are clear and you can expect that your
child will give up his plan. Your child, however, finds your
request unreasonable and urges you to come back to
your no and let him leave, after having realized how
unreasonable you are. However, you do not judge
yourself to be unreasonable at all, on the contrary. You
find your child ungrateful and unrealistic. Earlier in the
day he was already with his friend and leaving now
means impossible to be back in time at the agreed
time. You do not find it acceptable that he is still leaving
and you stay with your no.
Your activation proposal from no was considered unrea-
sonable by your child. His activation proposal of unrea-
sonableness of you was perceived by you as ungrateful
and unacceptable. What your child and you make of
what you do as proposal determines your reaction. He
protests from the unreasonableness he sees. You stay
with your no from his being unrealistic.
Each does his best to activate something that will pro-
vide a desired answer. On your first no, you wish to pro-
430
voke abandonment of his plan to his friend. With his sug-
gestion of unreasonableness, he wishes to appeal to
your reasonableness and move you to a yes-answer.
With your suggestion of ingratitude and unrealistic de-
sire to finally reach that he accepts your no-answer. Each
time you try to activate something that will allow the
other person to meet you. On closer inspection, you do
not try to bring each other directly into reaction, but you
try to generate something that will allow or bring about
that reaction.
In interaction and dialogue with someone you simulta-
neously offer a lot of activation proposals. Much of this
is known from communication research, although it is
formulated in a different way in a different context. In
this way we know that in addition to what you actually
say, you also say something about yourself, about the
other person, about your relationship with each other
and what you expect from each other. You also say
something about the context situation and about your
conceptual framework. In fact, all of this is formulated as
a proposal to the other party.
The listener can accept the concrete and implicit of the
other by introducing corresponding schemes. He can
also neither agree nor be happy with your proposals and
ignore one or more of them, possibly because it does not
suit him or is not advantageous to him. He or she is then
deaf, blind or insensitive to this. The listener often wants
431
to maintain or impose his interpretation and does not
take into account what you indicate or suggest. This
freedom of choice of the listener to listen to what and to
what to react on the basis of what is activated in him,
makes it very difficult for the speaker to express himself
so that the other person would listen and react as you
would wish by the corresponding activation of himself or
herself.
You express your disappointment to your child for
something that he has not yet done. You hope to wake
him up so as to do what is expected of him. At the same
time you show that not only what he has not done, disap-
pointed you, but that you have also been shocked by him
and he really disappoints you. Your child finds this very
unjustifiably what he hears. He activates in himself what
he has already done for efforts to meet you. He sees him-
self as very welcoming and in fact too friendly, especially
when he is presented with an attack of you. From his
activated 'there is abuse of my being too friendly', he
chooses not to respond to your insistence at all. He expe-
riences that he is doing too much and is under pres-
sure. Your activation proposal in which you imagine your
son to be inadequate is not experienced as such by your
son. Instead of accepting this proposal of being inade-
quate, he experiences misunderstood and misunderstan-
ding. What he activates in himself does not help at all to
carry out what you expect from him.
432
Sometimes you are surprised that what you ask does not
get an answer or consequence. While a little later what a
friend of your child asks is answered and executed enthu-
siastically. The other person apparently succeeds in acti-
vating something in your child that makes it res-
pond. This could be the context, or the ideas that are in-
cluded with the question. No compelling context, but a
friendly context. No dull ideas, but playful, for
example. This context and these ideas awaken your child
and make it willing to answer and respond to the ques-
tion. Your context and your ideas are not accepted as
proposal. The child puts them aside. Immediately the
necessary dynamics are lacking to activate willingness as
a schema of your child to respond to your question.
As a parent you often indicate something that is not pos-
sible. To your surprise you can then notice that your child
reacts to this by saying that you do it yourself. Your child
then tries to activate your embarrassment with the situ-
ation so that you would bind in. It does not accept your
proposal to change, it changes this into a proposal to
change yourself and by trying to activate your embar-
rassment it tries to reach its goal.
In general, as a parent, you can notice that what you say
to your child will have more effect as the way you deal
with it is with less resistance, feeling hurt, activating an-
ger and defense. But you rather approach it in such a
way that it activates willingness, recognition, satisfaction
433
and cooperation, if possible in a friendly context with ap-
pealing ideas.
This also applies to yourself. Sometimes your child makes
you a negative activation proposal. He or she does not
recognize your authority, finds you a parent like that, re-
fuses to do what you ask for. You can make yourself
pretty angry about this and activate 'force' in you. You
may also choose not to feel misunderstood, but to see its
remarks as a problem your child has with itself to activate
the appropriate schemes in itself to respond to you. You
can choose to keep activating your schema and turn to
your child with the question of what is going on that it
has activated so much negativity. You might find out that
your child has activated deprivation and therefore re-
fuses to answer your question. If you can make it clear to
your child that what you ask for also applies to the
others, it may be self-inducing that it reacts to it from its
de-activated sense of deprivation and activated sense of
equality.
In addition to activation proposals that you can do to so-
meone, you can also, as in the example, come up with
deactivation proposals. This way you hope that if some-
thing has gone wrong earlier, this can be put to an end
and there is room for a more favorable interaction. To
achieve this, some things must be released and de-acti-
vated in advance. As long as this remains activated or
434
becomes constant, no favorable interaction can be ex-
pected. This de-activation can be done through what
you propose. This de-activation can also be done by the
other person, in order to create space for something
more favorable to activate, or to activate himself. The
deactivation and activation can go together in other
words. Where it forms the basis for the other: de-acti-
vating what allows activation, or activating what allows
de-activation.
It may be an advantage to assess the activated thoughts,
feelings and needs in your child as a parent. It can also
be an advantage to discover for yourself what you say
and do activates in your child specific thoughts, feelings
and needs. It is these thoughts, feelings and needs that
the child uses in his reaction to you. It can also be an ad-
vantage to teach your child to assess activated thoughts,
feelings and needs in someone, for example with you. It
can also be an advantage to teach your child to discover
what goes on in what it says and how activates specific
thoughts, feelings and needs in someone. Thoughts, fee-
lings and needs that are used to the child in the reaction
to him or her.
Your child is really annoying at a time when you yourself
are already very tense. Because the child does not get a
reaction from you, because you are really in need of rest,
it is trying to get more attention. This annoys you so that
your child does not take into account you and your state
435
of mind, that you send your child away. The child does
not understand what happened to it at all. It had no idea
at all of your already overloaded feelings. It also did not
understand that by its claiming of you, you activated your
rejection.
To help your child with this, you can give your child an
insight into what is already activated with you, you can
also make clear to your child what it activates in you by
what.
This way, if necessary, you can tell your child on time that
you are very tense and tired. This way you can also make
it clear to your child that claiming makes you easily irri-
table. It can then be important to explain to your child
how it can appeal to you without making you even more
tense. 'Ask it later again, then I can take more time for
it. Do you want to do this for me? "
In addition to teaching your child what is activated by so-
meone in what way, you can teach the child to become
acquainted with what is activated by itself in thoughts,
feelings and needs by what others say and do in the en-
vironment and by what of itself it is activating something.
Your child is easily agitated. It is not always clear to him
that this is related to the feeling of being criticized at that
time. By learning to discover the child that his quarrel
turns up when it experiences criticism, you can teach the
436
child how to avoid criticism. By helping your child by say-
ing something in such a way and doing something to
others that it does not give rise to criticism, the feeling of
being criticized and feeling attacked can be avoi-
ded. Because of this, excitement and quarreling can be
prevented.
It may be interesting to consider that a behavior, an ex-
pression or a reaction is not alone, but embedded in a
cognitive whole or cognitive schema, as a thought, fee-
ling and dynamic whole.
Some easily let activate something in them on the basis
of what someone says or does to them. Others prefer to
give priority to choosing self what to activate in what so-
meone says or does to them. Still others try to combine
what activates others and what they activate themsel-
ves. The first respond easily to others and often have
their reaction determined by others, the first tone. The
second choose to act themselves and let their 'pro'
action be determined by themselves, the second
tone. Children can learn that when their reaction easily
causes problems, then how to respond less to what
others decide, but more to choose themselves how to
act and how to deal with a difficult situation. So that
their behavior can not be determined by what they want
to avoid, but by what they want to achieve.
437
Because your youngest child fears being skipped when it
is its turn, it easily tries to be noticed prematurely. This
arouses the resentment among the two other child-
ren. These threaten to repeatedly rule him out altoge-
ther. This makes your youngest child so excited that he
constantly disturbs the game. This way he tries to avoid
not coming to its turn. What he does not achieve,
however, is that he so still has a chance to get a
turn. Your child could also have believed more in itself
and could rely on the other children. It could have tried
to keep to the rules and agreements and to be of 'good-
will' by being a good playmate. If it reminds the other
children on time and does not allow itself to provoke dis-
ruption, it is probably more likely to come to his turn.
438
Activation cycle
What do I want to activate ?
What do I activate myself in me ?
What is activated in me ?
What do I say and do ?
What says and does the orther how ?
What do I activate with the other?
What activates the other
himsrlf?
What does the other want to acti-
vate in me ?
Activation cycle
439
Direct and indirect
approach in paren-
ting
The direct approach in parenting is focused on the con-
crete behavior of the child. A characteristic feature of
this approach is that your action as a parent is directly
focused on whether or not your child is acting and how.
There is no attention for the child as such, or for the be-
havioral environmental elements. The intervention is
usually limited, relevant, on the matter and im-
mediate. Focused on the behavior or the absence of it.
Focus your parenting directly on your child's behavior
or indirectly focus on what surrounds it?
Nicely, just sitting each at its site
for a while !
440
The direct interaction is indicated if clarity, certainty and
limitation are required at the moment, without negati-
vely affecting the child or environment.
Typical direct parenting is:
Clearly agree with the child so that it knows exactly what
is possible and what is not.
Apply rules consistently.
Talk to the child when drawing up rules of conduct.
Specify place and time for certain behavior.
Intervene where necessary.
Adding habits and rituals as self-evident reactions.
Direct parenting is especially useful as:
So clarity, security and limitation are needed here and
now.
So it is not possible to work on the child or is not obvious.
So the situation can not just be changed or adjusted to
the child.
The indirect approach in parenting is aimed at the per-
son and the experience of the child and his physical and
social environment.
A characteristic of this approach is that you want to cre-
ate the ideal external and internal conditions and growth
context that makes development possible. Attention is
given to everything that indirectly, in both space and
441
time, can exert a positive or negative influence on the
child in one way or another.
Important perspectives are:
to develop a positive and open relationship
which you, as a parent, present yourself as a
person who already realizes the human being
to a considerable degree and knows how to
get a good height of the child;
creating an affective good climate that pro-
motes 'personality growth' and
the use of living situations so that they offer
optimal opportunities for self-development
of the child.
Typical indirect parenting is:
Listening to what lives with the child.
Helping the child to express feelings.
Talk to the child in an open manner.
Creating an open climate with open communication.
Providing ordening and regularity.
Trying to take away tensions in the child.
Creating a living environment that promotes personal
growth.
Building a positive relationship with the child.
Stimulating social interaction with children.
A good way to deal with child.
Living together with child from which spontaneous de-
velopment can arise.
442
Offering identification options for child.
Expressing cheerfulness and humor.
Promote active openness to the world.
Helping to develop a life plan for the child.
Indirect parenting is especially useful:
As a basis that makes the development of the child pos-
sible.
If the child is very sensitive to the environment.
According to researcher at the University of California
Alison Gopnik, there are parents who previously act to-
wards a preconceived development goal for their child,
as a carpenter. They have a certain type of child for eye
that develops into an ideal adult. This is in contrast to
parents who create favorable conditions for their child
that enable their own growth and development, diffe-
rent from other children and themselves as parents,
such as a gardener. It seems desirable that the first ap-
proach that emerged from previous research could be
replaced by the second approach that is more in line
with recent research. According to her, parents should
not shape what is going on in their child's head. It is bet-
ter that they allow their brain to explore all the possibili-
ties that the world offers them.
The positioning of the direct and indirect approach
to each other can be done by placing the parental
action directly aimed at the child's actions against the in-
443
direct parenting that takes place around the child's act-
ions. This last action can relate to the concrete behavi-
oral situation or the broader context, or to the relations-
hip with the child, or to the conceptual framework for
parenting, also called the living and upbringing climate.
It goes without saying that both approaches can be used
additionally. That in addition to attention that you give
to certain behavior that you may or may not want for
your child, you can also pay attention to the situation,
relationship and climate in dealing with your child. Yet
you will find that you have to act more directly at certain
moments, while at other times a more indirect approach
is possible or desirable. In the direct approach, you strive
for an immediate result ; in the indirect approach, the
effect can be expected in the longer term.
The child is on the border between direct and indi-
rect. Strictly speaking, the direct approach does not fo-
cus on the child but directly on his behavior. Strictly
speaking, the indirect approach focuses on the circum-
stances for the behavior. As a parent, you can of course
turn to the child who shows a certain behavior in certain
circumstances and speak to it. This way you can state
that talking with the child and appealing to the child is
part of the indirect approach. The child is then expected
to adjust his behavior, or attention is given to the child
444
so that he can adjust his behavior. For example, the fati-
gue or the stress of the child are reduced so that the
child can better adjust himself.
Find out what is parenting directly and indirectly:
Rune, 5 years old, has a hard time. He constantly rubs
against his two-year-old brother Thomas.He has enough
of it. He wants to defend his territory in the back seat of
the car at any cost.
Mama Birgit tries to appease them with Nicely, sit quiet
each on its side for a while!'
'Thomas, you are the oldest', Daddy Bart tries, 'can you
be the bravest?'
"Bart, should we not stop and eat and drink a bit," Birgit
asks with some concern. 'We may be able to get away
from the road a little further and take time to picnic at
this beautiful weather and take a short walk', Bart tries
to give everyone courage.
"Rune and Thomas, I'll sit between you both, then I can
read to you from the comic that Thomas got this morning
for his birthday. Or if you like it, I also want to chat with
you. That has had not much of a chance lately', Mum
Birgit tries to meet them.
Bart, maybe it was not such a good idea to want to drive
all the way at once because we wanted to make a day
445
trip out of it. Maybe we should take an overnight stay
next time. It really does require a lot of each. Especially
now that we have noticed that everyone apparently
wants to go the same way and we are going much slower
with the car than we thought. ' "This seems a good idea
to me, Birgit. That way we can keep it pleasant and re-
laxing for everyone and we do not put too much pressure
on ourselves. '
Read more :
Gopnik, A. (2017). The parenting paradox: about the pa-
rent as gardener or carpenter. Amsterdam: Publisher
Nieuwezijds.
446
Keep distance
and go on
As a parent or child you experience occasionally that you
should do or say something, but that something in your
environment or something in yourself prevents you from
doing or saying this. You do or say nothing at all, or you
do or say something different than what you wanted.
The pressure from the outside was too big, or the pres-
sure from within yourself was too strong, so that you did
not go through. Somewhat externally or internally tried
to make something clear to you and sell something to
you and you listened and bought it. You left it to some-
thing external or internal and you gave them the
Sometimes thoughts, feelings, memories and percep-
tions of yourself or of your environment bother you.
How to keep a distance and continue anyway ?
447
lead. You did not choose how you would deal with some-
thing and what influence you would give some-
thing. There was no distance whatsoever, what the out-
side world wanted or did not want, or something you
wanted or did not want took over, so that you had no
more freedom and could not choose. You had sidelined
yourself.
The outside world may overtake you with certain
thoughts and certain feelings and they are so penetra-
ting that you can not ignore them. You take them over
as your thoughts and your feelings and you let them im-
mediately act and determine your reaction. The
thought, for example, that you can not do something
right and the feeling that you will fail. This easily under-
mines your self-confidence and your spontaneous fee-
ling of being successful and that it will be easy. The in-
tention was perhaps a clumsy attempt by the environ-
ment to let you make more effort. But it activated a
weakness thinking and weakness feeling in you.
Possibly you yourself as a parent or child have a ten-
dency, whether or not under the influence of the envi-
ronment, to develop certain thoughts and certain fee-
lings that are so penetrating that you can not ignore
them. You then experience these thoughts as true to
reality and experience the feelings as a reflection of a
real situation. The thought, for example, that others
don’t like you and the feeling to be not welcome. This
448
easily undermines your self-image and your self-
esteem. The intention of yourself was perhaps to protect
you from any disappointment. But it activated a weak-
ness thinking and weakness feeling in you.
Many of those thoughts and feelings that come to you
from your surroundings or from yourself, have to do with
previous experiences or possible fantasies and are sto-
red in the memory. In the memory of someone from
your surroundings or in your own memory. If a new si-
tuation in which a performance has to be delivered or
where you have to be accepted and get opportunities,
then these memories of real experiences or possible fan-
tasies easily reappear. They have to help you or warn
you. But in reality they usually stop you or hinder you, so
that it is possible that things go wrong.
These emotional and experience memories are stored in
schemes in memory, respectively emotional and cogni-
tive memory schemes. In a new situation they are easily
activated as accompanying. They allow you to deal with
the situation more easily by making available what you
have already experienced in such situations. They also
allow that new experiences and feelings in the current
situation are added to the memory schemes for later
use.
However, a risk is that they will disrupt the perception
and handling of the current situation. The situation is no
449
longer approached without prejudice and spontane-
ously, but it is emotionally and cognitively recognized
and reduced to what has already been experienced and
what is already known. If these previous feelings and
stored knowledge about the situation are pleasant and
favorable, this can only be helpful. However, if these
previous feelings and stored knowledge are unpleasant
and unfavorable, they hold a certain risk for your current
interaction.
In such situations the unpleasant and unfavorable me-
mories can better be omitted. However, this is easier
said than done. They emerge spontaneously to help or
warn. Help to take a threshold, to warn of a possible pit-
fall. In reality, however, trying to omit these unpleasant
memories as a parent or as a child, usually mean that you
are going to get away from the whole situation, but miss
out on a lot of opportunities.
In order to avoid this avoidance, you can choose not to
escape the emerging memories, but to keep them at a
distance, so that they will be less disruptive to your ac-
tions and reactions. The thoughts and feelings of your
environment or of yourself are still there and you recog-
nize them. However, you are no longer involved in
it. You may not find them correct or right. You just do
not take them over. You just do not give them the
lead. You do not let yourself be sidelined. You ensure,
however, that there is sufficient distance between those
450
thoughts and feelings on the one hand from activated
memory schemes and yourself and reality on the
other. You choose yourself how you want to deal with
it. For example, as if not correct, not right, not usable,
not applicable, not helpful, as disturbing, as if past, and
so on. You choose how much and what influence you al-
low.
It can always be a good idea to keep a healthy distance
with your thoughts and feelings. They give something up
to now, they indicate what you can expect. However,
they give no guarantee for here and now and for the
further course. Keeping in mind that things can be diffe-
rently and can be done differently, leave thoughts and
feelings for what they are, namely as information. This
prevents them from taking the lead or taking
over. Because of this distance you can continue despite
thoughts and feelings that you want to inform and warn.
At most you can continue to give them the function of
informing you, so that you can continue to be better ar-
med and with more effort or more alert.
It can also always be a good idea to keep a healthy dis-
tance from your emotional and experience memories
stored in your memory schemes. By experiencing them
less as fixed, but as complementary and changeable, you
give them their real and meaningful meaning. Informa-
tion from the past that you try to help for the future, but
certainly open to other future experiences to store in
451
your changing memory images for the further changing
future.
For example, as a parent or child you can experience fee-
lings of insecurity or disappointment without automati-
cally being insecure or reacting disappointedly. For
example, as a parent or child, you may experience
thoughts of possible failure or of possibly be rejected,
without responding as if you would fail or were rejected.
By keeping a distance from a representation of a situa-
tion, you can continue in the reality of the situa-
tion. Otherwise, there is a danger that the represen-
tation will arise between you and the reality of the situ-
ation, so that it prevents you from dealing with it. By gi-
ving the representation a less central place and putting
it more to the side at a certain distance, you can see and
decide for yourself what is relevant and what you can
use.
You do not keep away from the situation, which easily
happens to you with expressing thoughts, feelings and
memories. You then keep away from your thoughts, fee-
lings and memories, so that you can continue in the si-
tuation.
Keeping your distance prevents you from having to deny
or ignore thoughts, feelings and memories. It also pre-
vents you from having to change your thoughts, feelings
452
and memories, which usually does not work as well be-
cause they are the synthesis of your previous expe-
riences. Synthesis that can change step by step on the
basis of new and hopefully more positive and favorable
experiences, but can not suddenly turn around or can be
thought or felt in the opposite.
A healthy distance to thoughts, feelings and memories is
a distance that allows you to make your own choices and
to let you take the lead. The thoughts, feelings and me-
mories are yours, and not the other way that your
thoughts, feelings and memories possess you. You also
do not automatically coincide with your thoughts, fee-
lings and memories and you do not just identify yourself
with them and not just completely.
As a parent, or as a child, or together, you can try to gain
experience with distance. You can do this in new real si-
tuations. You can also do this by means of past remem-
bered situations. As a parent, you can stand in front of
your child as a model and keep going. For example, you
can show your child that being angry does not im-
mediately mean being angry without control and restric-
tion. This way your child can learn to feel irritation wit-
hout having to be irritating.
So far we have indicated why and how to keep a distance
from what you or someone else raises in you, especially
your thoughts, feelings and memories.
453
Keeping distance can also be used by keeping the situa-
tion itself at a sufficient distance, so that it prevents un-
wanted thoughts, feelings and memories in yourself or
your surroundings. By keeping a sufficient distance in a
situation and in relation to a situation, but also by looking
at and absorbing a situation from a sufficient distance,
you can try to achieve this. In this way you avoid giving
the guidance to the situation and being determined by
the situation.
This way you do not coincide with a potentially unfavo-
rable situation. That something failed, that others do not
accept you, does not automatically have to evoke fee-
lings, thoughts or memories in you. It is an actual reality
that you does not give the power to overwhelm yourself
and to determine what to feel and indirectly how to re-
act. That you did not succeed the first time, that you
were not allowed to participate immediately, you can
put it yourself at a sufficient distance, you become less
angry, you start thinking less that you can not do some-
thing or do not count, you start to conclude less that try-
ing again does not make sense and you can continue to
believe in it.
It can be experienced that often too much meaning is
given to thoughts, feelings, memories and the situa-
tion. This can be further enhanced by the sensitivity of
yourself to such a sense of meaning for yourself. Or
454
strengthened by the power of forced or self-generated
thoughts, feelings, memories and situational percep-
tion. This may be because they come to you with a lot of
external pressure, or because you yourself develop more
than just expressive thoughts, feelings, memories or per-
ceptions. Especially then it will be important to know to
keep distance, to be able to continue to be important.
What does the practice say?
As a parent or child I easily get involved with the thoughts
and feelings of others who make it difficult for me : yes or
no
As a parent or child I easily get involved with thoughts
and feelings of myself that make it difficult for me : yes or
no
I take spontaneously over the thoughts and feelings of
others as a parent or child : yes or no
I identify myself as a parent or child with my thoughts
and feelings : yes or no
I want to be more independent as a parent or child and
to keep away from the thoughts and feelings from the
environment : yes or no
I want to be more independent as a parent or child and
to keep away from self-developed thoughts and fee-
lings : yes or no
The thoughts and feelings provided by the environment
do not stop me (no longer) as a parent or child from con-
tinuing : yes or no
455
My thoughts and feelings developed by myself do not
stop me (no longer) as a parent or child from continu-
ing : yes or no
I experience that as a parent or child I give more than just
meaning to more than just expressive thoughts, feelings,
memories and observations from outside or from my-
self : yes or no
456
Capacity & burden of the family
Each of us has a certain capacity and each is confronted
with a certain burden in daily life. Likewise, a family has
a certain capacity and is faced with a certain burden.
Simply put, you could assume that the capacity of the fa-
mily is the sum of the capacities of the family mem-
bers. You could also assume that the load is the sum of
the loads of each individual.
It is not that simple. In addition to the individual carrying
capacity, the group can also provide a certain carrying
capacity. But just as individual capacity can be greatly re-
duced or even be absent for shorter or longer periods of
time, the capacity of the family group can be greatly re-
duced or even absent for shorter or longer periods of
time. The presence or absence of the individual carrying
capacity can also influence the presence or absence of
the joint carrying capacity. But conversely, the presence
Also the family has a certain carrying capacity and has
a certain load capacity. These fluctuate over time.
457
or absence of group support can influence the presence
or absence of individual capacity. In other words, family
members can derive part of their capacity from being
part of the family group. Conversely, the family group
can derive its capacity from the input of individual family
members. Belonging to this family makes you
strong. This family is strong because she can rely on
you. You gain strength from the capacity of the fa-
mily. The family acquires strength from your capa-
city. This way you can say that family members have a
greater capacity than if they were not members of the
family with capacity. You can also say that family mem-
bers have a lower level of ability when they are part of a
family with a greatly reduced or lost capacity than if they
were not a family member.
It is similar to what concerns the burden. In addition to
the individual load, the group can also ensure a certain
load. But just as the individual can ensure reduced or ab-
sent payload, the group can also try to reduce the
burden of work or reduce it. The presence or absence of
the individual load can also influence the presence or ab-
sence of the joint load. Conversely, the presence or ab-
sence of the group burden can affect the presence or ab-
sence of the individual load. In other words, family mem-
bers can be partially confronted with the burden that
comes from the family group. Conversely, the family
group can partly see its burden as a result of the indivi-
dual burden.
458
Summarized, this means that the group can make you
stronger or even weaker in terms of capacity. This de-
pends on whether or not the group has a certain capa-
city. And that the group can make you get more or less
burden. This depends on whether the group has more or
less load. Ideal for family members is a strong supporting
group that forms a buffer for to be overloaded. It is
usually for that reason that people like to be part of a
group. She provides strength and protection.
However, as soon as that group force and that group
protection are reduced and disappear, and group weak-
ness and group load take its place, it can be seen that the
family members are under severe pressure. It under-
mines your own power and increases your own load. If
you already have a small amount of power and you are
already being loaded to a large extent yourself, we
quickly see a shortage of own power with the increased
load.
You can feel this intuitively as a family member and you
are therefore willing to make a lot of effort to keep the
family group going and keeping the pressure and burden
of the family group as low as possible. A lot of individual
efforts are being made for group strength and the pro-
tection of the group. The more so because family mem-
bers may experience for themselves that they do not
have sufficient individual capacity and that they are con-
fronted with too great an individual burden. So that one
459
hopes to be sustained thanks to the capacity of the
group and its lower load. Sometimes little attention is
given to their own carrying capacity and bearing load and
they concentrate on the carrying capacity of the group
and its bearing load. It is no longer about itself but it is
about the group. This is what it then comes turning on
in your own way of thinking and doing.
The interaction between the mental, physical health and
psychological resilience of the individual family members
on the one hand, and the resilience of the family on the
other, is nevertheless crucial for the optimal functioning
of the family. It determines the well-being of the family.
This was very concretely demonstrated by a survey of
the Greek population in which the relationship between
the resilience of the family on the one hand and the well-
being of the parents and the resilience of the parents on
the other was studied.
Specifically, it was, for example, found that parents, who
reported higher levels of coping strategies in terms of fa-
mily resilience, were more likely to report higher levels
of well-being and psychological resilience as a parent.
However, no significant differences were found in family
resilience on the one hand and parental well-being and
resilience on the other hand between mothers and
fathers.
460
For the good functioning of the family it is important that
her capacity can be greater than her burden. This capa-
city is not stable but constantly evolving and possibly
changing. Similarly, the load is not stable but also in evo-
lution and often changing.
For the family, it can then be important to pay perma-
nent attention to maintaining its capacity and, if pos-
sible, increasing it. For the family, it can also be impor-
tant to pay permanent attention to keeping its burden
sufficiently low and, if possible, having it reduced. This
can create a certain reserve and a surplus that prevents
the family from losing their carrying capacity if the
burden is too high.
Spontaneously and permanently, a number of elements
and processes can be present that strengthen the car-
rying capacity. Spontaneously and permanently, a num-
ber of elements and processes can also be present that
reduce the carrying capacity. Some of these elements
and processes can not be influenced immediately. They
form the protective or risk factors and processes pre-
sent.
A number of other, however, can be influenced, which
can contribute to the carrying capacity. Getting these
elements and processes in the picture can contribute to
a greater capacity.
461
For example, it can be established that each family mem-
ber develops a number of contents that relate to each
other. These are display, ordering and relationship con-
tents that contribute to determining and contributing re-
lational interaction and communication to a certain ex-
tent. Among other things, they take the form of relatio-
nal and communicative schemes. These schemes sum-
marize each person's personal experience and
knowledge in relational and relation-communicative
fields (representations) as organized representations
(presentations) that outline what is and can be expected
of (and within) the family relationship (re-representa-
tion). They are mental plans at an abstract level that are
implicit and provide direction for relational and commu-
nicative action and serve as structures for interpreting
and summarizing knowledge and experience informa-
tion.
These cognitive relations and relationship schemes are
surrounded by a web of broader (cultural, context, situa-
tion) and person-related (individuality, state, self-image,
the others) schemes. Of importance here are the
schemes used about themselves, each other and the en-
vironment with a view to reaction and assignment in or-
der to be able to use the most optimal opportunities for
each and the relationship. Who, what or how am
I? Who, what or how is the other? Who, what or how
is the environment? And how can they respond to each
other? Because new experiences are constantly being
462
gained and new knowledge and insights are gained,
these schemes are subject to change.
Among other things, under the influence of this conti-
nuous cognitive activity, in addition to the real interac-
tion, these family relationships tend to be constantly
changing, unstable and non-linearly evolving. That is why
so much mental energy is often invested in understan-
ding one's own relationship with the other family mem-
bers and their evolution, in an effort to get a more stra-
tegic grip on it.
To this end, family members use relational trajectories
such as cognitive schemas with regard to the relational
history, the relational situation and the relational fu-
ture. Especially the future-oriented trajectory is impor-
tant because one's personal actions and the assessment
of the other's actions partly tends to be based on the ex-
pected future relationship, in addition to the current re-
lationship situation. Just as these trajectory schemes in-
fluence action and discussion, the concrete behavioral
and conversational experiences also influence the trajec-
tory schemes.
Because these relational mental schemas exist for each
family member separately and are seldom fully aligned,
relationships are often in motion. The tensions present
sometimes lead to strategic and tactical relational talking
463
and acting, in which interaction and discussions are pro-
vided in order to achieve certain joint relations and com-
munication perspectives in reality or on a mental level.
Thus, in the partner relationship of the parents and in
the parent-child relationship, phases in the course of
their development can be recognized. Phases that once
again contribute to a greater joint capacity. Then again
phases in which the carrying capacity loses strength.
For example, in a relationship one wants, as often at the
beginning, to seek and experience an intense rela-
tionship with a lot of tenderness, a we-feeling, which at
times becomes (too) oppressive and requires a lot of
itself.
On the basis of this experience one goes or chooses ea-
sily towards himself, an ego-orientation. Putting oneself
in the foreground, which implies pressure on the other
to change, to meet one's own wishes and ideals and to
become as one imagines or wishes the other.
Tempering experiences, in turn, bring the perspective of
coexisting with one another in the foreground. From in-
creased insight, preferably with as little pressure as pos-
sible from the relationship and from the other. But ra-
ther, as has become clear, leaving room for the rela-
tionship as feasible and as desired and with room for
464
each as one wants and each wants to be. Not as deter-
mined by the other person, but with being accepted by
and with the help of that other person and the relations-
hip.
In order to be able to result in a co-existing (mutual) re-
lationship with one another, in which one comes to
share with the other from the gained autonomy and the
acquired integrity. With an enriching and strengthening
of each other and the relationship based on affective in-
volvement, shared intimacy, appreciation, solidarity and
participation. With a finding of each other, with tender
attention and care for what is at issue, but also for
oneself and the other and for the relationship.
In this way the relationship always acquires a different
perspective, balancing between us and me and a mixture
of both, in order to continue to realize a viable and satis-
fying situation that is decisive for the available capacity
as a family group.
In this developmental course of the parent-child rela-
tionship and the partner relationship of the parents, a
different schema can always be the central focus : the
we-feeling, the self-centeredness, the mutual co-exis-
tence. Or, if necessary, a schema can be made more cen-
tral: the we-feeling, the together-with-each other (stan-
ding). Sometimes the same schematic contents are ac-
tivated simultaneously on the two sides, sometimes
465
not. Especially if this is not the case, this can influence
the carrying capacity to a lesser or more pronounced de-
gree in an unfavorable direction. Sometimes it turns out
to be one or two-sided around avoiding certain schema
contents, such as the we-feeling or the I-feeling.
Schemes that are attractively or 'repulsively' activated
can provide an increase in the load-bearing capacity that
is appropriate for the bearing load. They can also reduce
or undermine the capacity. Often is responded to an ac-
tivated scheme that is less appropriate. Since schemes
contain, in addition to an actual element, also a feeling
and value element, this feeling and value element easily
holds someone in this scheme. Their use may be more
emotional and judiciously satisfactory for someone. So-
metimes the schema also makes that the feelings and va-
lue judgments contained in it make someone react to the
others. As a result, there is still little eye for reality and it
is difficult to get away from it because of the emotional
and the expressed opinion. The factual element and re-
ality are still little discussed. One is held in the schema,
as it were, and holds the other in the confrontation. This
while the activation and use of another schema might
offer a better understanding and way out.
For example, family members can accuse each other of
shortcomings in one or more areas. The feelings and va-
lue judgments that hang around here can make the at-
466
tacked family members feel misunderstood for their ef-
forts and just find that the other person himself does not
want to notice this. It then turns out to be a lot about a
mutual shortcoming. This can easily lead to appropria-
tion on both sides of the right to defend itself and to no
longer commit itself to such an ungrateful person. And
this just at a time when each is very vulnerable and the
joint capacity deserves some support.
At such a moment, looking together at the problems that
each encounter and the effort that everyone has already
made to overcome, can make the perspective of the
other more interesting and so one can mitigate his ex-
pectations towards each other. A completely different
scheme is then activated. A scheme that can contribute
to the collective capacity. Each feels acknowledged in
his difficulties. This can reduce the distance to each
other, as a result of which the carrying capacity can in-
crease, or at least space can arise.
For example, in households with a disturbed balance
between carrying capacity and bearing load, it often
turns around or is about not being able to talk to each
other anymore, let alone influence each other. Either it
revolves around a constant confrontation, or it revolves
around avoiding as much as possible and avoiding each
other. The schemes confrontation and pressure are then
activated, or the schemes distance and ignore. By activa-
ting and switching on other schemes such as space and
467
openness, communication may be kicked off and re-in-
fluenced.
For example, in a family with a disturbed balance bet-
ween carrying capacity and bearing capacity the
pleasant and positive moments can be little or no longer
present. Everything revolves around unpleasant and ne-
gative moments. The attempt to preserve the remaining
favorable moments or to search again, if necessary with
the help of the outside world, can make it turn around
something favorable. This may offer the strength to
tackle the difficulties and tensions seen in its real pers-
pective and to bring them to a solution. What in fact
would then have to contribute to building capacity,
would otherwise increase the load. So that the share of
carrying capacity then easily reaches the share of the
load. The family is then no longer a strong force, but it is
a heavy burden.
The living situation in which the family ended up can thus
activate certain schemes. But the family members can
also choose together from the existing living situation
with the problems that arise there, which cause the bur-
den of carrying, to set themselves as a family objectives
to deal with this difficult life situation. This set of com-
mon goals in relation to dealing with the existing difficul-
ties can make one find each other easier, and so the ca-
pacity to bear can increase. These joint objectives can
then activate joint schemes that can help the assignment
468
for which one has placed themselves to a successful con-
clusion. The joint objectives then create a new or more
appropriate context that enables and appeals to a diffe-
rent approach. In this context, see the theme brochure
' How contextual are you?'
Similarly, family members can come to realize how im-
portant the group support is for each. This is possible
from the observation that this threatens to be lost or is
virtually absent. From there they can then choose to go
back to each other and to find out how by activating
which individual and joint schemes the objective of a
joint capacity again give opportunities.
The context of the family - to provide support for sharing
the burden - can be the guiding factor for self-imposed
objectives. In this connection, see the theme 'Sustaina-
ble interplay' of this encyclopedia.
Formulate for yourself what the family capacity or sup-
port can strengthen?
For each given answer, indicate:
What does the concept mean for you now:
what content could this be:
what is your behavioral response to this:
which way could this be:
where and when is this activated:
what could this be:
469
to whom is it activated:
what could this be:
how often is it activated:
what could this be:
which objective is discussed here:
what could this be:
Would you like some suggestions to strengthen family
capacity ?
Gaining :
attention to health
attention to sufficient rest
attention to relaxation
attention to leisure
attention to processing
attention for letting go
attention to positive experiences
attention to themselves
attention to self-knowledge
attention to self-esteem
attention to self-confidence
attention to skills
attention for interests
attention to problem handling
attention to coping mechanisms
attention to knowledge & experience
attention to time management
attention to contact
470
attention to proximity
attention for involvement
attention to protection
attention for support
attention to expression
attention to planning
attention to dosage
attention to mental preparation
attention to stress signals
attention for ....
Formulate for yourself what the family burden
can reduce?
For each given answer, indicate:
what does the concept mean for you now:
what content could this be:
what is your behavioral response to this:
which way could this be:
where and when is this activated:
what could this be:
to whom is it activated:
what could this be:
how often is it activated:
what could this be:
which objective is discussed here:
what could this be:
471
Would you like some suggestions on how to reduce the
load?
limiting tasks and assignments
limits from which no control
limiting changes
limiting what isn't clear
limiting uncertainties
limiting expectations
limiting requirements
limiting conditions
limiting obligations
limiting the pressure exerted
limiting time pressure
limiting accumulation
limiting say yes
limiting stress sources
limiting obstacles
mitigate difficulties
restricting confrontation
mitigate risks
restricting resistances
restricting hold
restricting enlargements
mitigate negative representations
restricting stereotypical thinking
restricting (self) criticism
restricting hypersensitivity
restricting overanxiety
472
limiting overreaction
limiting of ...
473
Drug use
child
Relationship with your child
As a parent you don't want to have to deal with it. How-
ever, you may suspect that your child is using drugs at
some time. Or you will hear from the school or through
the CLB, the center for pupil guidance. They appeal to
you to inform you and get your cooperation.
Ideally, you want to prevent your child from contact with
drugs and take preventive action. You can try to do this
by offering a favorable home, giving your child sufficient
attention and support, following your child with whom
he or she interacts and where they are staying. Maybe
you choose to let his friends come to your home, so that
It is not easy today as a parent to prevent your child
from having contact with drugs. What can you do
preventively and how can you respond? How to talk
to your child, activate his own forces and offer sup-
port with regard to drug use?
474
you have a clear view of your child and you don't have to
check something. You can also do something together at
intervals, this strengthens the mutual bond and that is
how you build up credit. Regularly talking to your child
as openly as possible can also make you have a good idea
of what it is doing. You can read more about this in the
theme section Connected parentingof this encyclope-
dia.
It is important to build a relationship of trust with your
child so that you know that your child would not just ac-
cept a proposal to use drugs. Knowing your child well can
make you know that not only adults must protect it from
drugs. Your child can act on its own or from what it thinks
as a sufficient brake that ensures that it does not go be-
yond its own limits.
Own attitude towards drugs
As a parent you usually have a number of negative rep-
resentations of drugs and drug use. It leads to addiction.
Your child is on the wrong track. It jeopardizes its future.
It ends up in a wrong circle of friends, a circle of often
older drug users. You lose contact with and control over
your child. It is sent from school. It comes into contact
with the police and the youth judiciary. Your child is in
danger. There is no way back. It causes damage to his
health, also mental damage. The child is in financial
need. It goes from bad to worse.
475
You will often want to convey this to your child: going
beyond certain limits also means ending up in a closed,
isolated world and thus sidelining themselves or being
sidelined. That it only seems that drugs offer something,
but that you actually lose. That you blow up bridges and
you risk your future. Even though these are your fears
and this is your opinion, overwhelming your child with
this usually provokes resistance and distance because
your child lives in the here and now and only perceives
immediate consequences. Many of these fears are un-
necessary because most young people get no further
than getting acquainted with drugs during experimental
and occasional use.
Some people don't think drugs are a problem. You may
be thinking for yourself, as an adult or in some situations.
However, it often seems like a defense of your child and
the situation in which it ended up. You want to show the
outside world that there is no problem with your child
and that everything is okay. However, this means that
you offer insufficient help and support to the outside
world. Something that can seem as if you are indifferent
to the situation.
If there is a problem, you may find that your child uses a
different logic, as if it is on a different wavelength. It does
not seem approachable and is not open to reason. As if
something or others determine and dominate his behav-
ior. You are no longer in the front row. On the contrary,
476
the child tries to avoid you. A personal conversation is no
longer possible. You have the feeling that you are losing
your child.
Short and long term
If there is a perceived or identified problem, you will
want to act primarily in the short term. Preferably as
early as possible, preferably at the first contact. Your ac-
tions are primarily problem-oriented, curative and ques-
tion-oriented. The latter involves finding out what your
child needs and what is underlying when a problem is
present with your child, such as helping to get a grip on
its behavior and itself, gaining more confidence, helping
to put a stop to its unfavorable situation, more support
and the necessary structure.
In addition, it is best to remember not to forget a long-
term perspective. You can then act in a solution-ori-
ented, preventive and vision-oriented manner to pre-
vent beginning or relapse. In this way, before your child
comes into contact with drugs, you can talk about it so
that it can develop an attitude towards use. This is nec-
essary because just about every child will come into con-
tact with drugs and there is before more room for your
input and model.
477
Signals and signs
In the first phase, as a parent, it will be important to gain
insight into what is happening during use. You can ask
your child about it without immediately condemning or
accusing it, and you can inquire the environment. You
can also pay attention to certain signals and signs that
are noticeable from certain changes, such as somewhat
peculiar and aloof behavior, indifference, absence,
changed feelings, emotions, thinking and attitude. Or
you can look at what is striking, such as certain equilib-
rium disorders, exaggerated talking or silence, unrest,
giggling, coordination problems, neglect of tasks and
oneself, or possibly your child who appears rather con-
fused. If necessary, you can magnify these symptoms for
yourself to better notice them.
You can also pay attention to possible symptoms in social
behavior, such as unexpected or changing group for-
mation and separate groups that arise. You can also pay
attention to symptoms in communicative behavior, such
as secret language, rumors, drug knowledge and vocab-
ulary and stories. Your child may initially want to deny or
minimize use. Then indicate that you already know and
there is a problem for you.
478
Underlying trigger
In conversation you can search for clarification for the
underlying trigger. Is it out of curiosity or boredom, or is
your child looking for a kick or pleasure experience, does
it form part of its search for its own identity, does it want
to belong somewhere to or not be excluded, or does it
want to drown out a bad feeling. In other words, is it
looking for a surplus, or is it a loss. In the first case it is
about a search for pleasure and its repetition, in the sec-
ond case it is about removing pain and bad feeling and
not experiencing the appearance. Hereby you can try to
find out which phase of drug use your child is in: is it ex-
perimental (curiosity, belonging), regular (recurring,
when the occasion arises), critic (with consequences,
making a choice), addiction (absorbing, need for money),
despair (impasse, everything went through). You can
take into account that most young people are in the first
phase and their use is incidental and that only a small
number are in the last phase.
Thinking and acting together
Based on your expressed concern and involvement, you
and your child can think about who can do what and
how. It is important to help your child discover what to
want and to be able to change in which way. Make it
clear that behavior only has a chance to stop after you
have decided to change and have chosen to stop it. You
479
can talk to your child in such a way that it can make an
assessment of his situation and find the strength within
itself to conduct his further reaction. With this you can
see what the child wants in principle and what the reality
is now. For example, not wanting drugs for themselves
instead of participating with others, finding their own
way instead of risk-taking behavior, feeling good instead
of looking for kicks, and so on. You can take into account
that your child will be more inclined to respond posi-
tively if you can come to specific actions together to
change the current situation. You can opt to talk about
this in a non-moralizing, but process-oriented and result-
oriented manner (from, for example, refusing to talk is
not allowed, to refusing to cooperate makes me uncer-
tain and worried; from, for example, ignoring is wrong,
to ignoring one person can hurt him a lot and can make
himself feel ignored, ...). It will be hereby important that
you always remain a point of contact and resource for
when something goes wrong, such as a overdose.
Your child will often be able to be communicatively influ-
enced. It will want to take into account or respond to
what is expressed and what is therefore audible, or there
will be a response from what you show and is therefore
visible. The child may have been in a bubble and will feel
placed in reality by your intervention. Sometimes only
what can be felt through your behavior or through aids,
such as increased supervision and control, or through
480
others will count. However, you can best start communi-
cating and if this fails, you can switch to behavioral re-
sponses. This generally applies that the less invasive and
the more personal input from the child are preferred.
For example, it is often sufficient to give the necessary
signals of what you do not want and what you do want
instead or about what was agreed, so you do not give a
free pass and free play. You do not let happen use wit-
hout reaction, but you try to be as fast as possible with
your signals.
Social pressure
It is possible that during conversation it appears that
your child is under social pressure to use and that it does
not know how to protect or defend itself. This often hap-
pens due to uncertainty or fear of rejection. You can
then clarify to your child how to say no and express less
uncertainty and fear. Together you can go through what
valid and useful no-answers to an invitation to drug use
could be for him or her. Such as, I am over it, no appetite
for it, allergic to it, I prefer rather ..., no interest in it, no
desire to mess up one's health or condition, not being
used, no confidence in, unreliable substance, all tried but
did me nothing, to find for anything else but not for that,
choose myself what I want, decide for myself what I
don't want, have decided for myself not to participate in
this, don't want the feeling that taking drugs take it over
from me, know cool things to spend my money on, don't
481
need a kick to get a kick, I can do without and you ?,
wants to take it easy for a while, don't want trouble,
don't think everyone here wants too, I'm just 'kicking
off', ask someone else, I prefer other 'stuff', you can have
mine, you can take my place, friends let everyone choose
themselves. The more confident and less fear of rejec-
tion is shown, the more powerful it can work out with
less chance of adverse side effects. You can support this
as a parent by helping your child to develop a positive
sense of self and sufficient self-confidence.
You can also try to influence group pressure. To this end,
you can monitor whether your peers are not adversely
affecting each other in an unfavorable way, possibly with
pressure, threat, dominance, dependence, uniformity,
defenselessness, social media, selective sources of infor-
mation, deprivation of support, demands for loyalty, sac-
rifice and secrecy.
Own share of approach and share of others
As a parent you can first pick it up yourself, if possible
together with the school or youth organization. In the
event of repetition or regularity, you can appeal to pro-
fessional services and, in the case of continuity and ab-
sorption, refer to specialized centers. You can obtain in-
formation anonymously from the telephone information
service, the DrugLijn.
482
At the same time, in contacts with the school or the pupil
guidance center, you can ask to raise the awareness of
pupils by informing them, pointing out serious risks and
risks to safety, health, development and mortgaging the
future for themselves and fellow pupils. You can ask to
indicate possible consequences for pupils and missed
opportunities. Learn to assess risks together with pupils
and view the downside of something. Requesting atten-
tion for their own choice, their own assignment, their
own responsibility, their own possibility and their own
limits. For individual problems, you can ask a teacher to
discuss with the pupil how he or she can deal with the
problem, how the teacher thinks he or she can deal with
the problem from what you expect or hope as a parent,
and how the pupil, the teacher and the group can handle
the problem together.
Change takes time
As a parent you cannot expect that the problem behav-
ior will immediately be omitted and the problem will be
solved immediately. You can determine what is still un-
resolved (you would now, you were not there, you did
this, ...), and indicate the direction where you want to go
(I would like, we expect that, you would, we agreed). ..),
indicate the work and effort required for this (we are not
there yet, try to expand what is successful, ...) and indi-
483
cate your own willingness and commitment (I will sup-
port you in this, you can always come and talk, I don't
want to let you go ...).
It is best to take into account that change always re-
quires time, phases and steps in someone's thinking and
feeling, in someone's behavior and reaction, in some-
one's environment and with others, sometimes change
can start in one part at some moment, sometimes in the
other. This time, phases and steps are even more de-
manded if change is desired on both sides. In addition to
time, it also requires that account be taken of changes in
space, opportunities, possibilities and resources in one's
thinking and feeling, in one's behavior and reaction, in
one's environment and with others. This is even more
necessary if change is desired on both sides. In addition
to time and space, you can take into account that change
requires stimulation, encouragement and reinforcement
on a mental, behavioral and social-real level. In this way
you can specifically take into account that mentally
changes require attention, awareness, sensibilisation, in-
terest, willingness to take action and care.
Avoid relapse
To avoid a recurrence, you can help the child learn about
the processes that encourage and sustain drug use, so
that the child can use this insight and these processes to
prevent recurrence. Which steps lead to this behavior in
484
order to use the opportunities to be able to intervene in
each of these steps in order to prevent the behavior. In
this way, the child can get to know more specifically the
mental steps that lead to this behavior, in order to be
able to intervene by changing it, to prevent the behavior.
A specific search can be made for change in perception,
in attention, in remembering, in desire, in thinking, in
feeling, in proposals and in experience.
You will often try to find out together what needs drug
use will meet and whether this cannot be achieved in any
other way. Specifically, it may have to do with tension
reduction, positive self-feeling, self-confirmation, be-
longing. The question may then be asked whether this
can also be achieved independently of drugs through
sport, relaxation, self-care, other friends, social engage-
ment, creativity, 'naturalness'. If the behavior of the child
is a reaction to a situation or to people, you can see how
you can react in a different way. For example, problems
can be recognized as needs, such as the need to learn
how to reduce or how to deal with emotions, tension,
loss, setback and rejection.
What also can help is teaching your child how to deal
with environmental limits, such as prohibitions, rules, re-
strictions, norms, and with limits from itself, such as its
own expectations, agreements, ideals and values. Indi-
cating that limits are usually there to prevent problems.
485
Own input and strengths of child
It will be important to address his own strengths in the
child and of his friends, such as own strength, own goals,
self-confidence, self-esteem, preference ego, group sup-
port, group engagement, group confidence, group value
sense, preference group. Before the first contact, it will
be important to help the child develop a personal atti-
tude towards drugs, risks and being friends. You can
read more about this in the theme section Limiters: Who
or what stops me? From this encyclopedia.
Finally, you can teach your child to devote more space to
itself. This can be achieved by appealing to its own free-
dom, own preferences, its own space, its own privacy, its
own feelings, its own opinion and its own territory. For
example, making something up for itself, not taking
things along, not answering, wanting to be left alone, my
life and other people's freedom, everyone does what he
or she want, personal preference, space, privacy, feel-
ings, opinion and territory. It can help, to realize that not
all young people use drugs and never started and that
what they say is not always what they do.
In this way you can teach your child to make well-in-
formed and well-considered choices for the future or to
clarify and substantiate implicit choices. In this way the
child learns to take responsibility for himself and others.
Thus, for example, saying no can also mean safety for
486
other young people with whom you interact, who so do
not have to feel obliged against their own preference.
Extra power
Do not reduce your child to a problem of use, not your-
self to guardian and your relationship not to a battle
scene. Your child, yourself and your mutual relationship
mean much more than that. Your child, yourself and your
relationship have many other facets with a more positive
and connecting value. If it goes difficult, you can take a
look at the interpretation that you came up to for your
child, yourself and your relationship. If there is a reduc-
tion and restriction, then you can look together what ad-
dition and expansion you can offer for each other and
how you can to do this with what result.
If you are unable to keep your child away from drugs, you
can indicate what limits there are for you as a parent and
you can encourage your child to determine its own lim-
its. This to limit its use to what is acceptable to you and
responsible and safe without risk and without danger of
addiction for him or herself.
How do you currently (re)act with regard to drug use?
How could you (re)act with regard to drug use?
487
Read more :
Your child and drugs. Drugs, parents and parenting
ttps://www.drugsinfo.nl/ublic/je-kind-en-drugs
My child and drugs. The most frequently asked ques-
tions - brochure
https://www.druglijn.be/assets/faq_mijn_kind_en_drugs
Self-help booklet for parents of drug using children
https://www.druglijn.be/assets/vad17_zogt_screen
488
From pressure
to attraction
How attractive are they?
Whether you wish it or not, whether you like it or not,
whether you are aware of it or not, your presence, your
appearance, your expression, your actions will always
have an influence on others. Who, or what, or how you
are and what you show, let hear and feel and how, will
awaken something in the other, address something, sti-
mulate something. What you activate can be what you
want, search for or prefer, or not.
In order to achieve the right impression, the right in-
fluence and the right response in a more focused man-
ner, it may be useful to become aware and discover what
you activate in the other, what thoughts, feelings, expe-
riences, desires and expectations you evoke, which side
you reach. This way you can come out more clearly with
What alternatives are there for pressure?
489
what you want to achieve in order to prevent misunder-
standings. This way you can also by changing something,
for example, when you go out to someone, try to achieve
something more preferable from the other person and
try to appeal to his attractive sides.
an example :
you want to be helped with something.
The uncertainty you are currently experiencing is clear
from your doings. This way, oncoming and caring re-
flexes can be released from the other. Your visible
helplessness awakens attention, understanding and in-
volvement with the other. He may want to meet you and
your needs, if he does not feel like he is being used or ma-
nipulated.
another example :
you would like to start a conversation.
Your looking at the other person, the attention you give,
your speaking to the other person, can make the other
person easily respond to this.
one last example:
you feel something for someone
upon getting acquainted, you notice that you are mainly
addressed by how someone thinks and views the world.
That this is what you love.
490
You always speak and attract something, by being attrac-
tive to what you need and feel and by openly coming out
of this. Without making tactical or well thought-out use
or abuse of it, you can get ahead. This applies not only
on a physical level, but also on an affective and relational
level. Much of this is learned to you, or given in your
upbringing, but you can always set your own accents.
That attraction can often be increased by making you
more accessible. Whether you are accessible and whe-
ther the other person wants access will be determined
to a great extent by the distance you create between
reality and its presentation. It will be a matter of ensu-
ring that the reality that you propose is similar or very
similar to the reality that exists or that you exhibit. And
also ensure that the reality that is there or that you show
is very similar to the reality that you represent. The grea-
ter this distance now or later, the smaller the accessibi-
lity on both sides.
an example :
what you say and what you do
However attractive it may be to reflect something else or
to do something other than agreed, this will ultimately
have a negative effect on a relationship and the unders-
tanding, because they can activate feelings of being ex-
cluded, used or abused, and can lead to distrust. The
danger lies mainly in losing credit to the other, provoking
a defensive attitude and creating distance.
491
This fact can also clearly occur in conversation : say that
you listen, but show and feel no interest; say yes, but let
it feel as not doing so; say no, but can not hide that you
will go into it anyway; etc. In the end, the other person
learns to pay special attention to what you do and leave
to notice and that he has not to take into account what
you say.
Also your own image of yourself and which scheme
about yourself you activate in (conversation) interaction
with others, can make to find someone with a suitable
image and can activate others with connecting schemes
about themselves.
some examples :
Corresponding to have an image of itself of easy failure,
it can attract others who have experienced a similar ex-
perience.
If you, in contact with others, easily activate the scheme
not to defend yourself, this may attract the attention of
others who wish to take advantage of this and use a
schema of use.
In order to get to where you want in a conversation or
during an interaction and to avoid that the other obliges
you to do something that you yourself do not agree with,
it may be useful to pay attention to which schemes you
might inadvertently address in the other person. If you
492
end up in an embarrassing or threatening situation in
contact with an other person, you can try to activate
other schemes in the other person that make him slow
down and bind in.
an example :
if you are very excited, this can also cause anxiety in the
other person.
If you want to de-energize the schema of excitement and
activate the relaxation schema, you may find it helpful to
activate the schema of being calm.
another example :
if you are experienced by the other as an agressor or thre-
atening, can this activate the schema defense or coun-
terattack in him or her.
If you want to undo this, you can set yourself up as a vic-
tim or helpless for the other person, then the schema
spare him or her and help someone can be activated. By,
for example, letting the you-tone fall into conversation
that easily evokes self-defense and closedness from the
other person, it can replaced with the I-tone which evoke
understanding and openness of the other person.
another example :
no other choice
By saying in a calm, convincing manner that the other
person will do something like this and not otherwise, and
not allow anything else from you to expect, point out and
493
that you really insist that this is so and you will not devi-
ate from it, this may cause the other person to leave the
schema resistance or leave their own planned schema,
because it is perceived as meaningless or unusable and
the scheme following and cooperation will be activated,
even if reluctantly.
How to generate attention and care for yourself ?
In communication and interaction you can have the luck
that others know how to respond to you. They unders-
tand you well and can share your opinions and mea-
nings. They show interest in you and feel a lot for
you. They are spontaneously inclined, or willing to take
care of you on demand. Each of us hopefully has enough
contacts that will make you feel good and make you
grow, or at least create the conditions for this. Yet the
reality, for a long time or a this moment, can be different
and can be very conflictually charged.
To change this, one usually raises an increased appeal to
that environment. It is thought that it must be dealt with
vigorously from the feeling of being misunderstood and
neglected and consequently having the right or the obli-
gation to claim its rights. This situation in which one
threatens to feel victim easily arouses a lot of feelings of
tension in oneself that one does not always dare to im-
mediately express from fear of not being able to count
on the other person. In the long run, if such situations
take too often and too long, they can lead to a general
494
feeling of weakness in which people themselves think
they no longer have the right to attention and care, in
view of not being worthwhile for others. If one has yet
the courage to recognize his feelings of tension, then
they can get the content of anger or excitement about
the other person. Or also uncertainty or sadness for
itself. One will then easily feel that the other person is
failing to meet you. This can lead to reproaches and ac-
cusations that the other person thinks too much or only
to himself, does not listen to you and has nothing left for
you. If this has no result, it is easy to make demands and
commit the other to spend more time, attention and
care to you.
Such an accusatory and compelling attitude can make
the other person feel very uncomfortable with this. He
or she is very unfree, does not seem to comply, clearly
falls short, is obliged to do something that he or she does
not want or does not like. He or she can also easily feel
misunderstood and neglected and possibly the vic-
tim. This leads to the other trying to win distance, shut-
ting himself down, the spontaneity that disappears, the
interest that is left out and only if he can not escape he
will do the most necessary. The result is that people start
to feel even more neglected. Own needs and desires
that one had no longer come up for, not spontaneously,
but also not forced. One manages no longer to bridge
the gap between what lives and what one needs and the
environment that would like to respond to this.
495
Only when one discovers that one pushes the other away
from him by accusing, compelling, responsibleing, being
overwhelmed by feelings of tension and shutting himself
down, may one try to find a way out by omitting things
here or to change. By leaving its offensive and obligatory
approach and offering the security and freedom to come
closer. By experiencing yourself to be responsible, by al-
lowing the other person to reach you. By becoming quiet
and opening yourself, the other person may be led, even
if only out of curiosity, to know who you are and what
lives with you. In this way you can inform the other per-
son about your feelings and show what you need and
what your desires are. This way you open yourself and
give access to the other person. The other person who
can continue to feel good and feel free and can get op-
portunities and interest to pay attention to you and take
care of you. This way you can also respond better to
yourself because it does not threaten to feel the victim
and you can find out exactly what you are sensitive to
and what you need. As a result, your need is reduced and
you become calmer and gain more self-confidence and
allow the other person to meet what you need less and
less because the other person wants to respond to this
before it becomes an emergency. This way you can also
show the other person what you are looking for by what
he does for you and how happy and grateful you
are. This allows you to touch and touch each other.
496
Neither the other person nor yourself have to feel un-
comfortable, unsafe or closed, alone and at a distance,
without trust in each other and without appreciation for
each other. You can thus try to create an atmosphere
and interaction in which you feel mutually easy and safe,
and feel connected, together and near, with trust in each
other, so that you can open yourself to each other. So
that you can respond to each other's expressed feelings
and your needs to the appreciation of each other. But
even if the other person does not want to join immedia-
tely, you can take this attitude from your side, so that
you can generate another communication and contact
with others and yourself. For example, the attention and
care that you generated for yourself may also generate
another attention and care of the other person for him-
self. For example, sometimes two hurt or neglected be-
ings appear to come out with a great need for recogni-
tion and appreciation from each other. Something that
makes you no longer feel attacked or excluded and so
that you like or are more prepared for the feelings and
needs of the other person you recognize in yourself. So
you find each other in an open embrace, where you pre-
viously drifted away from each other and walked away
from each other in a closed self.
How being infectious?
Some people in our environment can be busy with so-
mething in such a way or can communicate something in
such a way that they work infectiously. They know how
497
to execute something, or to talk about something, that
they arouse our attention, interest and motivation and
we are addressed and ignited to possibly do something
similar or to interpret, or to inform us about this and be
interested.Their attention, their interest and their moti-
vation and enthusiasm work infectiously on us, so that
we do not remain unmoved.Through their model and
their association and expression they know how to capti-
vate us and hold us, to orientate us and to stimulate us
in the direction they stand for. Especially feelings, moti-
vations and fantasies can they transfer to others. Their
own unrest, aversion and frightening presentation can
alert others and stop them from doing something. Their
own excitement, euphoria and paradisiacal presentation
can awaken others and encourage others to do
something similar.
Especially in situations where it is unclear how to tackle
something or how to react, others and what is going on
in them will be of influence to you. The other and his in-
ner compassion may be used as a guiding and model for
his own reaction and his own compassion. In dealing
with others, it will be important that each with a positive
and balanced representation can come to each so that
each one can respond equally well. Pointing out to
young people that they not only respond to others, but
that they also model others, can be helpful in experien-
cing themselves as less dependent on others and at the
same time feeling more involved and responsible for
498
others. Responsible in view of the unexpectedly unanti-
cipated influence they have on others.
Research shows that the chance of imitation depends
partly on the visible success, on the appearance of the
model and the possible identification with it, on what
lives with the possible mimic and what it expects from
imitation, from the opportunities and the chance for this
behavior, how acceptable the possible mimic sees imita-
tion for himself and for his environment.
an example :
I volunteered to help with a project. This gives me a num-
ber of new experiences and a number of new contacts. It
broadens my horizon and I like to tell my friends about
it.
I notice their curiosity and their somewhat teasing jea-
lousy and indicate how they themselves could also parti-
cipate as volunteers. One of them wants to come along
the next time and take a look if it is indeed so interesting.
another example :
you often hear: everyone is like that, thinks and does so
Respond to this with the question: 'Is everyone like
that? Does everyone think so? Does everyone do that? "
This easily elicits the answer: 'no, everyone is not like
that, do not think so, do not do that.'
499
Then the curiosity arises about who is not and who
is. This allows the uniform assessment of situations and
experiences to be broken through. It is no longer self-
evident. You are no longer the only one who is different,
thinks and does different. Concretizing these others also
offers you the chance to find out and find others who are
relevant and sufficiently close to you who you could fol-
low without any loss of face: my sister or brother, my
boyfriend or girlfriend, ...
Young people often experience it as very difficult to say
something that does not immediately arouse the ap-
proval or enthusiasm of other young people. Especially
being the first or taking the initiative for something or a
change seems a difficult job. From mutual uncertainty
no one dares to stick out his head: the one not to come
up with something, the other not to agree to this. Every-
one waits for and looks at the other and tries to play sa-
fely by staying with the old, not taking initiative, hiding
and being indecisive. The preference for the tough or
evasive to find hold and safety, then get all the opportu-
nities. Young people can, if they can not or dare not say
something not to be faint and docile, express it by tacitly
showing it in their mimicry and appearance. They can
also simply do something or have them done without
words. The first time this will be surprising, the second
time weird, the third time already expected and the
fourth time it seems ordinary. By not having to speak
out, a safety on loss of sight can be built in, also for the
500
others who follow this model in silence. In this way so-
mething can be brought about that would otherwise en-
counter resistance due to the verbal group reaction.
an example :
if I am tired or when it is time, I would like to leave.
To have to say that you want to go ahead and have to
give an explanation that is acceptable to young people,
seems an unattractive job, that, in own eyes, will cause a
lot of loose of sympathy.
Just getting up, taking your coat and stuff and getting
away will of course attract the attention of others, who
might ask for an explanation of what you are going to
do. Confirming, not justifying what you do - such as 'I am
gone' or 'I am going away" - can allow you to express
what you want. Others may also be happy with your ini-
tiative and follow your example without many
words. This way you do not create the habit of having to
express, explain or justify everything you want to do. In
this way you can maintain your freedom in your actions
and you are not caught in a follow-up obligation. A few
times speechless doing what you want with appropriate
convinced and carefree mimicry, can make that at the
least sign of you to step out the others take this as factual
and not changeable and prefer to go along whit it or re-
lease you because it is now like that.
501
How do you load someone with energy?
Each of us has a number of latent possibilities and skills
that can be expressed in behavior, if the necessary
energy is available for this. Each person can provide the
necessary energy and dynamics from his experience,
thinking, proposals, feelings and desires. Others can do
that for him or her. Making someone warm and energe-
tic can be done in a very different way. It can be done in
an open manner, in accordance with what the other per-
son wants. It can be done in a little or not visible way for
what the other person may not want.
Each knows people who so discourage you and ask so
much energy that every desire, courage and power is
lacking to do anything. On the other hand, there are
people who encourage you and charge you so with
energy that sense, courage and strength are made avai-
lable or made available to you so that you consider your-
self capable of doing so. They provide such a situation,
climate, relation and relationship that a lot of energy is
charged and also becomes available in yourself. This cre-
ates a kind of synergy that takes you further than you
would only achieve alone. Forces and initiative are not
extinguished or weakened, but stimulated and streng-
thened, and interconnected.
The positive tension that this creates, means that you
perform better mentally, but also that greater self-con-
502
fidence and more social resilience is available. A nega-
tive tension that reduces or blocks your mental possibi-
lities and restricts or undermines your self-confidence
and social resilience is avoided. The called optimal ten-
sion awakens the best forces and the strongest energy in
you, carried by an environment of well-being, safety, se-
curity and appreciation. In this way you also know how
to open yourself for the other person and to come to a
real cooperation. Not bothered by resistance and defen-
siveness, but activated by mobility and construc-
tiveness. The other puts the light on green for you and
then confirms you. You have the feeling that you are
busy with positive things and that you are growing accor-
dingly.
A danger arises when this happens in a way away from
reality and you thus come to a misguided act, no longer
critically tested by the other person. Others who do not
just follow you, often form a source that tests what you
want to undertake or undertake. They want to warn you
or protect you from carelessness and irrealism. They
then provide a buffer that have to protect you. This buf-
fer can, however, have a paralyzing effect, that every
energy is lost, rather than that energy is made available
for tested objectives.
Another danger arises when you allow yourself from a
small sense of self-esteem to follow an other person who
only strives for self-interest. The critical assessment by
503
yourself then falls away and the risk then exists to act
unthinkingly from an inadequate assessment of reality
and the other.
Ideally, a combination of discharging non-okay objecti-
ves and charging okay objectived will be possible. This,
partly through the actions of the other person and by
yourself on the basis of its meaning and tested value.
an example of extinction and charging:
someone likes to be pleasant and make fun in a group
The other person thinks this is faint and childish and
makes little effort to pay attention to what someone says
to be funny, and because of critical remarks, the fun
ends. Especially the person-oriented remarks extinguish
every effort to make fun.
or
The other person likes this and looks up at the liveliness
of those who started and makes an effort to let themsel-
ves be stimulated by the funny atmosphere. The critical
remarks stimulate those who started to intensify their ef-
forts, new elements are added and enthusiasm is respon-
ded to so much atmosphere. The person-oriented valua-
tion in particular is a confirmation and an immediate en-
couragement to continue.
504
Just keys:
What do I activate in the other?
What is the interaction that I activate with the other per-
son?
By what do I activate this in the other?
Which way of dealing with the other person would I pre-
fer?
What should I activate in the other for this?
By what can I activate this with the other person?
505
The child
under pressure
Every child experiences pressure. This pressure can be
greater or lesser. This pressure can occur more or
less. This pressure can last longer or be shorter in dura-
tion. This pressure can come from outside, such as high
expectations among parents, little understanding, little
support. This pressure can also come from within, such
as high expectations for themselves, unsatisfactory de-
sires, uncertainty, low self-esteem.
Children react to each other in their own way. Some
can handle this well. Or have learned this. Other chil-
dren may be less comfortable with this. Some children
continue to function as before. Other children quickly
become dysfunctional. Some children remain in charge
Every child experiences pressure. Not only parents
experience pressure.
Pressure is a signal that requires attention from pa-
rent and child.
506
of the experienced pressure. With other children, the
pressure takes over.
Meaningful people in the environment of the child can
decrease the pressure. Children often rely on their en-
vironment in order not to increase the pressure. Some
children can express their experienced feelings of ten-
sion and come up with it themselves. Other children do
not know or have not learned to express their fee-
lings. Sometimes there is no room for experiencing and
recognizing feelings. Not even to express them. Child-
ren then gradually show or feel indirectly which feeling
of tension they have.
Neither for the child nor for the environment is it always
immediately clear what lies behind the body's expressi-
ons and signals and behind the behavior of the child.
Children and adults learning to look at these sentient ex-
pressions can give an entrance to the child's emotional
world.
In the past, due to the living conditions and child-rearing
practices, little attention has been paid to the feelings of
a child. The living conditions demanded not too great
sensibility, the functioning in and for the group was pa-
ramount, with one's own feelings being given less space
from group expectations.In parenting attention to fee-
lings was often linked to making the child hypersensitive
507
and vulnerable. The living conditions, the group and the
upbringing required a resilience with little room for per-
sonal feelings.
Today there is more room for feelings. Feelings are re-
garded as sensors for the child: how the child feels about
something, whether the child wants to go through it or
what it chooses. Feelings also form sensors for adults
about how the child is going: how the child feels about
something, whether the child wants to go through it or
what it chooses.
In parenting, much attention is currently being paid to
feelings and how to deal with them. They form an es-
sential part in the experience of the child and in the fur-
ther orientation. They also form an essential part in
what to offer the child and continue to offer.
By giving space and attention to feelings, it can often be
avoided that they grow into emotions. The child can
then be offered the necessary support so that it can,
wants and dares to deal with a difficult situation.
By giving space and attention to feelings in order to re-
cognize and articulate them for themselves and the en-
vironment, it can prevented to only make them visible
and tangible to the environment and so often escape to
the child.
508
By giving space and attention to feelings, they can be un-
derstood and made easier and more controlled. It can
allow the child to function closer to himself.
However, it can regularly be established that a child is
under pressure, without being able to recognize the fee-
lings of tension and to talk about this with his surroun-
dings.
These feelings of tension can then be noticed in body ex-
pression or possible body complaints. Often, however,
they are reflected in the child's behavior. More specifi-
cally in the performance and behavior of the child. No-
ticing these underlying tensions, however, requires spe-
cial attention.
The failing performance behavior and disturbing beha-
vior are easily interpreted as a shortcoming or unwilling-
ness of the child and much less as an impotence to deal
with the situation with its capabilities.
Tensions arise when the carrying capacity of the child
(what it can handle or think it can handle, what it can be
or expects to be) hardly can handle the burden of carry-
ing (what the child has to perform or thinks to have to
perform, what the child must be or thinks to be able
to). If the carrying capacity is too weak in relation to the
load, then overtension occurs with the child. The child
can not comply with what it has to do, or must be, or
509
intends to do, or have to do, from what it can, or is, or
thinks to be, or must be.
This capacity or this feeling of carrying capacity and the
carrying load or the feeling of carrying load are someti-
mes drowned out by adults by taking it over from the
child too quickly, too strongly and too repeatedly or by
intervening for the child. Adults with their much
greater carrying capacity, or the feeling of it. Adults
who name something like a smaller load, or give it the
feeling.
"I do not think that's difficult at all. See, I have already
arranged it for you. "
"Don't you dare. I'll ask in your place. "
"You don't have to get excited about that. See how I do
it. "
As a parent you mean well, but you often achieve the
opposite effect: a weakened autonomy, or feeling of it
and a weakened performance, or feeling of being unable
to cope.
Through these tangling and overprotective interven-
tions, the child's trust is undermined. In addition, it has
the effect of preventing the child to confirm its ability
and of being able to self-confirm the child itself. What
further undermines the self-esteem of the child. And so
the stress for the child can still increase.
510
The child can respond to the current stress situation and
symptoms in four ways. These stress reactions are de-
termined on the one hand by the situation and the pos-
sibilities in it and on the other hand by the child and his
previous experiences or objectives.
From the observed behavior, the underlying feelings
(anger, excitement, fear or dejected) can immediately
be deduced which reflect the ratio between the available
carrying capacity and the bearing load, reflect on what
or who is or is not counted by the child and what the
child want.
In this way, it can be derived from what the child needs
to make his stress behavior and feelings disap-
pear. What can be done to the carrying capacity of the
child, what can be done to the load and what can be
done to support from the outside.
For example, anger can seek to strengthen the child's
own capabilities, how to make the given situation less
difficult and how to offer help so that the child feels sup-
ported and empowered.
In this way you as a parent can try to reduce the pressure
on the child and, if possible, make it disappear.
511
Not only what the child stands for, but also what the
child gets or has to deal with can bring tension and pres-
sure for the child. These stresses can also create fee-
lings and reactions of tension. They then depend on the
distance that is experienced between what the child
wanted or imagined and the perceived reality that does
not correspond with this. They fit into the child's pro-
cessing process and must help the child to reconcile with
reality, also for the future or to adapt the reality for the
future, possibly with the help of adults, so that it fits bet-
ter in what one wanted or imagined. For the time being,
for example, my feelings of fear still say something to
keep away and not to go too fast.
This way the pressure of what is gone can be taken away
for the child and it can be armed against pressure that
could arise in the future.
512
Expressing anger :
'too little help, too difficult'
Irritable
Attacking
Unfriendly
Hostile
Non-cooperative
'I count on something or someone'
'More direct approach and want to
change something'
Expressing being dejected:
'no strength, no chance'
Helpless
Lifeless
Sad
Quiet
Passive
'I do not count on anything or any-
one'
'prefer to stop and quit'
Expressing fear:
'too little strength, too much
Uncertain
Anxious
Restrained
Worry
Withdrawing
'I do not count on myself'
'prefer to take some distance and
leave'
Expressing excitement:
'all hands on deck, very addressed'
Restless
Nervous
Overactive
Talkative
Impulsive
'I count on myself'
'prefer to do something, do not know
what'
513
External
and internal pressure
EXTERNAL PRESSURE
Children and young people are often confronted with ex-
ternal pressure in their life situation. External pressure
from people in their environment, or external pressure
from a situation with which confronted. This external
pressure can be very different in size and inten-
sity. Sometimes there are few sources of pressure,
sometimes a lot. Sometimes the pressure of a source is
small, sometimes very pronounced. Especially the sum
and the duration or repetition of external pressure can
be very important for a child or young person and can be
very oppressive. The environment and the cir-
cumstances with their pressure then come very close to
A child adds internal pressure to external pressure.
How to avoid the pressure from becoming too high?
514
the child. There is little escape or distance from it. If an
attempt is made to do this, extra pressure from the en-
vironment will easily occur to rectify this situation.
In concrete terms, external pressure can arise from ex-
pectations or demands on the child or the young per-
son. Expectations or demands to do something, or not,
or not to do so. Expectations or demands of the adults
from the environment, but also of peers and groups of
which to be part. Not just what or how, or what or how
not, can pressure. Also when, to whom, why or to what
the child or the younger has to do something or not do
something can create pressure. If the expectations or re-
quirements are not uniform, extra pressure can arise
due to the opposition present. So if one adult expects
something different from the other, or if adults expect
something different from peers. Or if the inner world of
the child's or the young person’s family expects some-
thing slightly different than the outside world in society.
External pressure can also arise from the reality and the
conditions in it. The reality and circumstances can be un-
favorable and cause problems or extra tasks. For
example, the reality is complex, or is totally new, unk-
nown or different, or involves crossing large distances,
within a very short time. Or, for example, reality is
unstable, is or works against.
515
The external pressure is responsible for the bearing load
with which the child or the young person is confron-
ted. A lot will then depend on the capacity of the child or
the young person to deal with that load.
If the carrying capacity of the child is sufficient, there is
little risk that the child would suffer from external pres-
sure. However, if the capacity is insufficient, then the
risk is high that the child will get into trouble.
If the carrying capacity is unstable, it can often be esta-
blished that the child creates internal pressure in addi-
tion to the external pressure it experiences. The way it
handles that external pressure creates internal pressure.
INTERNAL PRESSURE
The internal pressure can have to do with feelings that
are evoked in the situation. The child is afraid to be una-
ble to answer the expectations or demands of the envi-
ronment, for example. The child is very excited about
the available means and time to do something. The in-
ternal pressure can also be related to thoughts that arise
in the situation. The idea of being confronted with some-
thing unfamiliar, or the idea of standing alone. Internal
pressure is often also created by the idea that the child
or the young person forms of the situation. The idea of
failure, the representation of the reaction of the envi-
ronment, the representation of a repetition of what hap-
pened before or went wrong. Bad memories are linked
516
to the performance. Also, additional pressure easily
arises due to one's own expectations, demands or de-
sires. What do you want from yourself and what do you
not want from yourself? What do you need or
need too? What do you miss or lose when you don't
succeed ? When do you meet your own expectations?
This internal pressure of the child or the younger person
can be minimal. However, it can also escalate and be
more maximum. This escalation can be a constant, or ra-
ther an exception. This maximum can be within reaso-
nable limits, or can also be extreme.
For example, some children and young people easily ex-
perience an overpressure. This is because, in addition to
the external pressure that has been met, it also adds a
dose of internal pressure that, on the one hand, provides
additional load, but also undermines the available load
capacity. These children or young people feel insecure,
they think they can not handle something, they imagine
that they are too weak or too inexperienced, they re-
member similar incidents, they expect excessive things
from themselves.
517
DECREASE OF PRESSURE
In order to decrease the pressure, simultaneous work
can be done on reducing the external pressure and the
internal pressure.
External pressure can be reduced for your child by miti-
gating your expectations or demands as an adult. For
example, by providing more time or expecting things
step by step. External pressure can also be reduced by
making the reality and the circumstances more favorable
or more accommodating for your child.
Internal pressure can be reduced as an adult for a child
or a young person by adjusting what the child or the
young person perceives, feels, thinks, remembers, pre-
sents and wants. Also by adjusting what the child or
young person in general perceives, feels, thinks, remem-
bers, presents and wants. To adjust it so that it becomes
more favorable, supportive and helpful and less unfavo-
rable, undermining and disturbing.
Concretely, this can by making the internal pressure less
central, less in strength and effect, less close and not
automatically, not entirely and just to follow and not just
letting your experience and reaction be determined by
it. So that the child or the young person does not simply
settle down in a situation and undergoes everything, or
does not just counterattack and offer resistance, or does
518
not just get away from it and just wants to forget every-
thing and leave it behind. Such reactions mean that the
child or the young person is guided by what creates in-
ternal pressure.
Especially creating less self pressure for yourself as a
child or young person can be helpful. This is possible
through tempering the mental processes of perception,
feeling, thinking, remembering, proposing, longing, ex-
pecting. By tempering the results of these mental pro-
cesses in the form of perceptions, feelings, thoughts,
memories, ideas, desires, expectations. By providing
more space and time for themselves in relation to what
to experience, giving less centrality and more distance
for what to experience, and leaving more freedom and
choice for themselves.
Due to the more limited intensity of processes, results
and following, less internal pressure is created for the
here and now, the situation and circumstances, but also
for the whole and the synthesis, what and how some-
thing or someone is.
This lower internal activation can reduce the internal
pressure considerably, so that internal attention can also
be paid to the external pressure. For example, the child
or the young person can show for themselves which
change it would like to experience in external pressure,
519
so that it would have to deal less with additional internal
pressure.
For example, the child or the young person who is taught
in his thinking about a situation or event, not to involve
everything on himself, not to assume the worst, not to
have the responsibility unchangeably, outside his in-
fluence in the environment, and not to perceive and
name the situation in a distorted way.
EXTREME FORM PRESSURE
Especially the exaggerating and extreme manner of
one's own mental processes, its contents and its use and
influence, create overpressure, so that sometimes the
reaction of the child or the younger is also magnified and
extremely. With the risk that the resulting pressure,
sometimes goes together with exaggerated resistance
and resistance reactions. The child or the younger per-
son does not believe in himself, he does not feel unders-
tood and feels overburdened, sees something as impos-
sible to do and wants to give up without further ado, or
gets stuck in a persistent attempt to do something for
which it determines for itself that it is never yet com-
pletely perfect.
The external and internal pressure then is responsable
for this overload, resulting in over-demanding of itself,
often linked to an exaggerated commitment of itself. It
520
will then be important not to end up in this pressure-in-
creasing spiral. The dosing of existing and generated
pressure is crucial here.
This is often a difficult task for adults towards the child
or the youngster. After all, they are inclined when some-
thing is not easy, to put pressure on. This implies the risk
that the child also creates more pressure inter-
nally. Pressure that, however, is not always favorable,
helpful and supportive, so that additional problems are
likely to arise. By paying attention as an adult to which
internal pressure the exerted external pressure creates
and taking into account its effect, its unfavorable effect
may be avoided.
Too often, however, it can be established as an adult that
a crisis situation arises due to external and internal pres-
sures. A crisis that ensures that what follows is often dif-
ficult and problematic, and that also has less strength for
the bearing capacity for the future. As a result, the child
or the young person may expect a great deal from the
adult and will possibly only be able to contribute a mini-
mal.
For example, the child or the young person says that
something is not possible and it will never be pos-
sible. That it is not at all capable of learning such a thing
and will continue to make mistakes that make it fail com-
pletely. The child or the young person indicates to hate
521
what to do and not to have any sense at all. The child or
the youngster refuses to start or starts tense but does
not know how to get ahead because it is never good
enough. The child is already very preoccupied with the
consequences and what it will experience if it fail. Also
what it will think about itself in general.
Especially this extreme requires attention. Pay attention
to how this can be mitigated. Also pay attention to it as
an outsider not entirely to take over, but to help the child
or the youngster to gain strength and autonomy. By ac-
tually choosing a middle way earlier, external and inter-
nal pressure can be removed and the crisis can be over-
come. By giving preference to a cautious, positive and
supportive approach, you can take into account the avai-
lable sensitivity and there is less chance of overreac-
tion. You are also a model for a more moderate rela-
tionship with a situation and with itself. Moderate asso-
ciation that sometimes lacks in the child or young person
to himself, which sometimes wants something in an ex-
treme way, but is sometimes even an extreme self-des-
troying self when they do not know how to live up to
it. By not linking everything together extremely, things
can be reduced to their true proportion, which in itself
can also contribute to a decrease in pressure.
DRAWING PRESENT PRESSURE
Indicate which external pressure is present and indicate
to what extent:
522
Indicate which internal pressure is present and indicate
to which extent:
Indicate the way in which the available external pressure
will decrease and indicate to what extent:
Indicate in which way the available internal pressures de-
crease and indicate to what extent:
523
Dealing with pres-
sure from your child
To clarify: Resistance or pressure?
As a parent, I can deal with something I want, but which
my child does not deal with. Then as a parent I can have
to deal with resistance or counter pressure of my child. If
you want to read more about how your child reacts to
pressure that you exert, you can go to the theme section
'Preventing resistance' of this encyclopedia.
As a parent, I can also deal with something my child
wants, but I do not want to go into it as a parent. Then I
have to deal with pressure from my child as a parent. In
this theme section 'Dealing with pressure from your
A child easily exerts pressure for what it wants or
does not want.
How to deal with this as a parent?
SWEET
MOM!
BAD
MOM!
524
child' you can learn more about how you can respond to
pressure that your child exerts.
As a child, you often and easily get involved with
something for which you need the help or permission
from your environment to do something or obtain
something. This environment is not always willing to go
into this. As a child, you may then have a tendency to in-
crease the pressure to still achieve what you intended. If
it is not admitted by the environment and it offers resis-
tance or counter pressure, then you can give up as a
child. You can also continue as a child and try to increase
the pressure to still obtain what you want. As a parent,
you can increase the counter pressure on this. The child
may or may not give up, with possible escalation as a re-
sult.
525
The child seeks ways to get his way and overcome your
resistance or counter pressure. It can do this in a
pleasant way for you. For example, to be praised or be
very helpful as a child to get his way. It can also do it in a
way that is unpleasant to you. For example, by a tan-
trum, by nagging and wining. In the first case, the child
tries to activate your goodwill and cooperation. In the
second case it tries to deactivate your resistance and
firmness. In the first case, the child tries to teach you not
to stay on your point by rewarding you for deviating from
it. In the second case, the child tries to stop you from
staying at your point by 'punishing' you for not deviating
from it.
526
As a parent, you feel intuitively not just to give like that
what your child wants, but at the same time you feel the
immediate benefits of admitting. Your child remains
sweet, or will be it again. In the long run, however, there
is a risk that the child will again and again be sweet and
not sweet to get his way and confronts you with an un-
pleasant situation if you do not comply. For example, a
child may exhibit behavior that shows signs of stal-
king. The child harasses you unsolicited, it penetrates
with his presence in an unpleasant way until it gets its
way. It runs for your feet, attracts your attention in some
way, keeps you busy, for example, by its inertia, until you
commit and admit.
Just at a glance : Pressure can be activated and resis-
tance or back pressure can be activated. Pressure can
activate resistance or vice versa can resistance activate
pressure. Pressure will not always activate resistance,
which is often the intention of your child to be deacti-
vated by applying pressure. Not always will resistance
activate pressure, that is because your intention as a pa-
rent is to be deactivated by resisting pressure. So in sum-
mary, it will be important for you as a parent to exert a
resistance such that it deactivates the pressure of the
child, or even does not even activate it. Parents know, for
example, that a child can whine all the time when, for
example, Dad walks through the toy department of the
supermarket, while the child does not give a kick when
Mama walks through that same ward. Or vice versa, or
527
with grandma, or grandpa, or the babysit. Pressure is
then not activated or immediately deactivated at the first
reaction of the adult. Perhaps something else is also ac-
tivated, for example, the adult's leadership. And some-
thing else is deactivated, the needs, for example, of the
child. It is therefore important what is active at a certain
moment, or in a certain situation and what is not. What
is active exerts influence. What is not active has no in-
fluence.
Pressure as communication
Especially the toddler is not yet able to make clear what
it wants or does not want. It can not yet or not so well
use words to say what it wants or not. It then expresses
itself with its voice, with its face and posture, especially
with its behavior, what it wants or not. This can take the
form of weeping, a pouting mouth, running away, to a
tantrum. The child turns into a shelf, stomps with his
feet, throws something or throws himself on the floor. It
offers physical resistance to being not followed. The
child then lets feel what it wants or does not want, or
shows it with his mimicry, attitude and gestures. The
better the language controls, the more it lets you hear
what it wants or not. The temper tantrums then de-
crease in number, but can then turn into whining.
As a parent, you can then pay attention to the fact that
a child will easily say or ask something first, show some-
thing afterwards if the hearing does not work, and finally
528
make you feel when something does not work. What it
comes down to, depends on the signal language that the
child uses to someone. This language is the language
that the other person responds to. Some children expe-
rience that, for example, saying something to a parent
has no effect, the parent does not respond. Only when
the child begins to shout, follows 'Not shouting baby!' as
a reaction. In this way, the child discovers and learns
which signals - to make something heard, see or feel - to
use to get reaction. Many children then easily skip to say
or show something and choose resolutely for the beha-
vioral language, for example walking away. Here follows
'Staying at the table I had said!' This way a child learns
a certain signal language from the parent by whether or
not he or she responds to certain signals. You can read
more about this in the theme section 'Signal lan-
guage' of this encyclopedia.
The best thing you can do as a parent is when the child
lets you hear or notice what it wants or does not, is res-
pond to this. Not so much or always with following, but
with letting you hear or notice that you have taken care
of what your child wants or not, followed by your
answer. "I hear you want an ice cream, but the answer is
no." The shorter the answer the better often. In the
answer you activate your leadership. With no, you ex-
press that you are in charge and that you do not give per-
mission. If your child nevertheless makes an attempt to
get his way by continuing to nag, you can repeat that you
529
clearly heard or noticed what your child wanted, and al-
ready clearly gave an answer. So it is clear to your child
that it was listened to and it is clear that you stay with
your answer once given. Whining can then no longer be
a signal to get his way, but to be listened to and get a
certain answer once.
If you can not avoid to give your child his way, make sure
that this happens at a moment when the child stops (for
a moment) from whining, drama or his tantrum. This
way the link is made between being calm and something
positive. Do not say 'if you stop ..., you get or may ...' In
this way you will really learn your child how to use pres-
sure as a means to obtain something. It can then
DON’T SHOUT !!!
DONT CRY !!!
530
become a habit to use this signal language for every-
thing, so that it can reward you for admitting. His signal
language is then nagging with possibly stopping as soon
as you react.
You can teach your child that the best signal language is
simply asking or saying something. That you want to lis-
ten to that and that the chances are then the greatest
that you answer yes. That whine, drama and tantrums
make you not listen and by definition the answer then
will be no.
With your no answer you can briefly explain why it is not
allowed to 'do not eat before eating, because then your
appetite passes over.' You then indicate the circum-
stances why or when something is not possible. For the
child, however, this may be the opportunity to change
the circumstances and thus try to obtain a yes. "I'm not
hungry at all to just eat. I only had breakfast one hour
ago. " For example, as a parent you often have to look
for a meaningful or useful argumentation. You can then
make it clear to your child that your explanation was an
clarification, but no legitimation at all for what you
wanted. If not, you run the risk of ending up in an endless
argumentation, which usually ends in much displeasure,
on one or both sides.
531
Just at a glance : With pressure, the child wants to make
clear and convince you of what it wants. Because pres-
sure is an unpleasant means of depriving you of freedom,
you can make it clear to your child that only making
something clear without pressure has the chance to con-
vince you. The argumentation you give your child can at
most be an explanation of the choice you make and in
which you can give explanations as an clarification. So
that your answer can be better understood and accepted
more easily.
Pressure, a signal for you
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal to
teach your child to get more effect without pressure, as
indicated above. It is possible that you generally instruct
your child too little and explain too little how you want
something. This way you can indicate in time exactly
what you want and what you do not. 'Do not walk' but
'step.' "Don't you come with me?" but 'Come with us,
we are gone.' Not in a questioning form, but preferably
in an affirmative form. In this way, you can also state in
concrete terms how something is possible and what is
not. By making it concrete, it becomes more feasible or
acceptable and you can prevent pressure. 'Not now' but
'after the meal'. Say not 'clean up' but 'put the puzzle in
the box'.
532
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that you allow yourself to be rewarded for admitting, or
being punished or ignored for not giving in. As long as I
stay up late, I will be extra attentive and quiet. As soon
as I have to go to sleep, I pretend I can not or can not
walk, or I use extra pressure, or choose to be difficult and
slow. By staying on your point as soon as it is sleep time
you can prevent influence attempts, they have no effect
whatsoever. As a parent, you simply do not have room
NO
YES
BE NICE
DON’T BE NAUGHTY
DON’T BE CHILDISH
MUST CLEAN UP
EAT EVERYTHING
DO NOT COME OUT
OF THE BED
TINE IS AT THE
TURN
PUT THE PUZZLE IN
THE BOX
533
for it. You can read more about this in the theme sec-
tion 'Who rewards, punishes, ignores ?' of this ency-
clopedia.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this may be a signal of
thinking of yourself, because you almost not or never ad-
mit, that you are not a good parent or not the parent you
want to be. You think that you deny your child too much,
or you think that you are being pushed into an unsympa-
thetic or negative role that you do not want to enter at
all. By thinking differently about yourself and looking at
yourself differently, you can feel more easily supported
for not giving in. For example, I offer more clarity, safety
and predictability as a parent. I can do better now and
SWEET
MOM!
BAD
MOM!
534
then be unsympathetic, to remain so positive and sym-
pathetic, than to continue to sympathize but to feel and
want to show less and less sympathy. Sometimes you
first have to convince yourself of doing something before
you can reach your child.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that your child has certain needs that you may pass
by. Your child needs more friends to play with. Your child
wants nutritious food, but now and then something de-
licious. Your child wants to eat until his hunger is satis-
fied, but don't want to stay at the table until his plate is
completely finished. Your child needs occasional atten-
tion, without having to force it. Your child wants to be
nice, but then this must be easily achievable and possibly
successful.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, it can be a signal that
your child has to enforce everything, otherwise you will
not get moving or take action, you will not cross the
bridge. Let your child give you the choice, then you do
not react, only if you are left with no choice from your
child, you will take action.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, it can be a signal that
you are very busy in the inhibiting atmosphere. You of-
ten say what you do not want from the child. As a parent
you can then try to become active in the stimulating at-
mosphere. You repeatedly say what you want. For
535
example, not what are you not doing when you do that,
but what are you doing when you do that. You then be-
fore, for example, easily blamed your child for being op-
pressive. But you can also admire your child for his
perseverance and commitment. 'I know you can do it, go
shopping without complaining. Can you show this to
your mom? If you succeed, you get something tasty af-
terwards.’ Or you can imagine something that your
child would like to go into. 'Can you dress up, then you
can play next door.'
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that you are passing your child. You do not appeal to
your child for his understanding and cooperation for so-
mething. The child can not convince himself or persuade
- milk
- butter
- bread
- salad
536
himself to do something and then clashes not only with
your no, but also against himself, because it has not per-
suaded himself to abandon something.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that your child has little control over himself. It does not
understand a number of negative answers from its envi-
ronment, or not correctly. It is overwhelmed with fee-
lings that temporarily take over from him. These can also
be fears. It can not handle enough with unexpected si-
tuations. It has insufficient self-confidence and confi-
dence in its environment and tests it out.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be related to
the nature of your child. The one child is easier and
smoother to deal with than another child. The one child
adapts to a new situation more easily, the other child
more difficult, yet another child needs more time. Here
it can help to think back just how you were as a child.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that you are confronting your child with unexpected
things and situations. It assumed that it got something,
and now it turns out differently. Normally it does not
have to eat his plate, suddenly this has to be done. It is
not clear when it has to go to bed, and suddenly it has to
go to bed now. Something was activated in the child, and
must now suddenly be deactivated. Or something was
not activated at all, and suddenly it has to be done. That
537
something is changing can not always be prevented, it is
important to prepare the child in time for this change.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal to
expect too much from your child. You expect too quickly
that it will eat completely independently, dress, clean or
clean up. Your child will then show that it is not able to
do this on its own and is whining for your help, or that
you would do it in his place. You may notice that your
child is no longer open to your expectation at all. It closes
his eyes or starts to scream, so that you are no longer
intelligible. It is at such a moment more important to pay
attention to how the child feels, than to whether or not
the child is able to respond to your expectation.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, then it may already
have given other signals in advance to want something
or not. The child wants to leave the table at a party. It
already showed that sitting at the table really took a long
time. Now it throws itself on the floor, really time for the
long promised and expected playground. The child has
been sitting on the lap for a long time. His nagging is
really the signal for what its restlessness was about, na-
mely to be tired.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal for
something else. The child is tired, is getting sick, is
hungry, is confused because of the new environment,
538
the environment is too busy, there are too many
unknown people, it is bored, and more.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, it can express his po-
werlessness. Something does not work, no matter how
hard it tried. By throwing the toy on the floor, it makes
clear that it can never succeed.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that the situation is too oppressive. Always having to
share everything with your younger brother at the game
can become too much for your child, so it starts yelling
and hitting. Putting your child out of the situation for a
moment, can make that what triggered the pressure is
removed.
If your child has a lot of pressure, this can be a signal to
talk to your child about it. About the fact that the child
sometimes has difficulty with something. That you can
also have difficulties with this as a parent. How can it be
otherwise ? What your child could try and what you
could do ? You can also come back to an event after-
wards. What feelings you noticed in your child, what fee-
lings were also brought to you ? What did you struggle
with as a child and yourself as a parent ? Like, for
example, the classic incident in the supermarket where
your child took something and you admitted to avoid a
public scene. You can then return to this in the car after-
wards. You can indicate what it took and to give it
539
back. Indicate how you would like this in the future and
how your child can contribute to this. This way you can
indicate at a receptive moment exactly what it could not
do. As clearly indicate not to bang with its head. Or that
hitting can not at all.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that a child has a lot to lose. You do not like your child
anymore, even if you do not mean this. Your child suffers
a lot of loss of face towards peers, for example, when
you make your child a comment in the presence of them.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal to
meet a lot of pressure as a child. Without you noticing
it, the child imitates the pressure that you exert
yourself. Sometimes you only rest shouting, but your
child can easily imitate this. By saying something quietly,
you may also be able to calm your child. Sometimes you
fear wrongly not having to say it anymore. Each child ex-
periences the need for guidance from others. The child
does not want to challenge this leadership at all. It is
only that the child experiences leadership, without expe-
riencing yourself the necessity of constantly being pro-
ven. As a parent you can start from strength, rather than
to seize the strength to get something. In this way you
can do something from your strength to your child, ra-
ther than with strength. Research shows that children
who show a lot of compulsory behavior have parents
who make frequent use of proven strength. Parents then
540
experience that you can only move your child to some-
thing if you force it to do so.
If your child uses a lot of pressure, this can be a signal
that it needs understanding and support to be reconciled
with no. By believing yourself that your child can let go
or come over something, you can try to distract it for a
moment, or just hold it, or cuddle it. Sometimes,
however, the child wants to be left alone for a while and
you can help to take a step back and let it be for a while
to express its anger or disappointment, without being
disrespectful about your child and its reaction.
Just at a glance : Pressure is not a desirable signal be-
cause it is uncomfortable for you and it makes you go
against it. Also because it offers your child few opportu-
nities not only towards you as a parent, but even more
towards the outside world and later. Yet you and your
child can learn a lot from it. The message as content and
core is often telling much and meaningful, the packaging
and form can be avoided and prevented.
Actually applied
What pressure tool(s) does your child use easily?
How do you easily respond to this?
Do you see a connection between the pressure of your
child and your reaction?
What do you think you can do to prevent the pressure of
your child?
541
For a favorable
dynamic
1. Favorable and unfavorable dynamics
As a parent you sometimes experience problems with
the behavior of your child. As a parent you want to bring
about change in this behavior. The efforts you do as a
parent for this, often prove to be without result. You did
your best, however. You may find your child ungrateful,
or unwilling, or it is just so. You do not understand what
prevents your child from doing as you wish. You will find
yourself clear. Sometimes you think you have to insist
more. However, and sometimes even more, you notice
that your child is persevering.
An unfavorable dynamic can really get in the way of
your child.
A favorable dynamic can help your child on his way.
542
In this case it can be good to look at the dynamics in your
child's behavior. However, this dynamic is not always vi-
sible. Sometimes even not easily understood, even if
you ask questions about this dynamic. Your child can not
always help you. You can always try it. Just ask why your
child fails to take into account what you say or expect.
Imagine that your child's unresponsiveness may have to
do with its fear that if it would try to do what you ex-
pected it reacted wrongly and that you would be even
more disappointed in your child and also show it expres-
sively. Doing nothing seems the safest choice. That it just
so can not do anything wrong. But that's how you stay
without a reaction. You can see in this outlined situation
that the fear is negative dynamic that prevent the child
from responding to your question or demand. You can
also see in this behavior that the search for safety is the
positive dynamic that encourages your child to not res-
pond.
As long as the two dynamics - fear and safety - play with
the child, the child will do little or nothing to change its
reaction from nothing. If you want to persuade the child
to follow you, it may be useful to give him or her a dyna-
mic to do this. Just think for yourself what might help:
543
How to translate change-oriented?
What dynamics would you feel your child can bring to
other behavior? Imagine yourself instead of your child:
you are afraid and you are looking for safety.
Being afraid is a feeling, look for a different feeling that
can affect his or her behavior more favorably:
Searching for safety is a need, find a different need which
can affect your child's behavior more favorably :
Did you find a suitable dynamic ? Try it out from the
idea that you would be the child.
You may feel self-assurance or a feeling of self-confi-
dence that you know how to respond to what your pa-
rents expect from you and that if it did go wrong you
would have enough resilience from your self-confidence
to be able to handle this. This was the feeling.
As need you might find proximity to your surroundings
and not have just to play safely by keeping a distance and
shielding yourself by crawling into your shell. If searching
from your vicinity would still go wrong, you could easily
get to a conversation and let hear what you meant and
what you still try to take into account for what you were
asked.
Try it out. Looking from the child's point of view:
Your parents ask you something. You have a dose of self-
assurance and you have sufficient self-confidence. You
want to be close to your parents. You are not afraid to
544
respond and you know that your parents are there for
you. They can count on you as you can count on them.
You are certain that if you do not answer their question
they will not reject you, you do not have to be afraid of
that. You are sure that you are a valuable person. They
let you feel this, even if they do not agree that you do
not accept their request. They continue to focus on their
expectation and not on your person. They do not threa-
ten you and prefer not to seize escalation and a more
powerful and more personal attack. They try to measure
good dynamics. How they can get you. Not with pro-
mises of all kinds. But to speak to you and to believe in
your strength to meet their demand. They try to avoid
getting stuck in a negative dynamic that ultimately leads
to resistance and isolation.
A visual illustration of trying to understand underlying
motivations for behavior as helpful for children with au-
tism.
2. Dynamic targets
Immediately two dynamic points of application are pos-
sible :
1. These of taking away or reducing the unfavorable dy-
namics :
An uneasy dynamic blocks the desired behavior and does
not allow the child to make this behavior. This is because
there is a dynamic for the opposite behavior or for no
behavior at all.
545
In the actions of the parents this unfavorable dynamic
can be given. Often you think as a parent to reinforce
your own performance if you have no or a reverse res-
ponse from your child. Without noticing, this entails the
risk of giving even more unfavorable dynamics. The
child's resistance may become even greater. Or the child
pulls himself back even more to limit the damage.
2. These of imparting or increasing the favorable dyna-
mics :
A favorable dynamic stimulates the desired behavior and
allows the child to set the desired behavior. It provides a
dynamic for this behavior and makes the behavior come
into being.
In other words, it is important to change your perfor-
mance so that the unfavorable dynamics stay away and
there is room for a more favorable dynamic and there-
fore a different behavior that fits your wishes more.
How to translate into concrete action and guidance-
oriented ?
Some cases:
Your child weeps through at a stretch because something
has broken down. The dynamic of his weeping is in the
experienced loss. If something broken could be undone
immediately, the crying would stop immediately. Think of
a child who lost something and found it back sud-
denly. As a parent, however, you do not wish to undo
546
every loss. You want to instill your child's dynamics for a
more caring and cautious approach, then the loss would
not occur. You also think it is good that your child learns
how to deal with loss and the reality that always involves
a certain loss. You want to instill your child's dynamics
for a more careful handling and for a more resilient be-
havior.
Your child is very excited because it feels to have been
treated unjust. It was not allowed anymore to partici-
pate in playing with other children. As long as your child
is left with this feeling of unjust, it will be difficult to calm
down. When it can be explained to the child that it has
already been so often in turn and now other children also
want to get a chance, the child can experience justice to-
wards him. This can calm the child and bring it back to
itself. As soon as the child can feel that he has been
treated fairly justly, it can be established that the child is
calming down. It is then clear to the child that it is later
again at its turn.
Your child is very listless. It does not believe it can do any-
thing. This disbelief in its own possibilities prevents the
child from trying something out and, if possible, gaining
positive experience. Attempts can then be made to teach
the child that it can only know whether it can or can not
do something by trying it and by giving it a chance. And
it is at least not itself responsible for its failure. For its
547
part, it has done everything possible. If it fails, it is not
due to its dynamics or lack of it.
3. Internal and external dynamics
In addition to influencing the internal dynamics, you can
also work on external dynamics. In this way, apart from
the removal of unfavorable internal dynamics and the
addition of an internal favorable dynamic, you can also
try to remove a potentially unfavorable external dynamic
and thus add a favorable external dynamic.
Let's see how this works out :
Thus, for example, a child can not only be frightened by
bad thoughts (there is no one around to help me), but
you can also frighten the child by evoking all sorts of na-
sty ideas through the stories that you tell your child, pos-
sibly from your own fear and insecurity. You can help
your child instead to invoke safe feelings in itself by de-
veloping trustworthy thoughts (there is always someone
around to whom I can fall back and whom I can find or
look for) and you can help your child by contributing to
a safe and trusted environment, supported by a relaxed
feeling and interaction with you as a parent.
In a discussion with your child, it is easily inclined to res-
pond with force, and you can easily be inclined to resist
this. The discussion then escalates easily and your child
then turns out to refuse what you want. You can then
548
notice an unfavorable internal dynamic with your child
and an unfavorable external dynamic from you to your
child. If you can remove this dynamism 'with strength'
from both sides and replace it with a dynamic 'from
strength', then your child may be moved to a rapproche-
ment. Your child can then, from his strength, have the
courage to stay calm and reasonable and consider how
far it can meet you. It can then easily meet your faith and
confidence in a favorable way out of your power. This
can make your child feel less easily attacked and meet
your optimism and feel approached to meet you a cer-
tain end.
A child can sometimes easily and quickly get angry at
other children from its immediate environment due to
difficult circumstances. As an adult you can be very busy
and angry about your child because it is so little tole-
rant. Other children may be tempted to leave the short-
tempered child aside. This can increase the child's anger
as well as the anger of you as an adult. The risk then
exists that the unfavorable internal and external dyna-
mics make it very difficult for the child and gradually iso-
late it further, because it ended up in a negative spiral. It
is then possible to talk to the child and to make it clear
to appeal self its calm and friendly side in itself and how
to do this. The child can then be explained to find so
easier the way back to its playing friends. By looking fur-
ther than the temporary problems with the child from
549
your side as an adult, the child can feel better under-
stood and supported and it is easier for it to open up to
its environment to be part of it again.
550
Eating problems
of children
If it goes smoothly
The first year of life the child has a great nutritional
need. The child grows quickly and increases greatly in
weight and height. Best in the first months of life you can
lay a foundation for a safe feeling around nutrition. You
can not only pay attention to food schemas, but also to
the needs of the child.
From 6 months on, liquids will no longer suffice. That is
why you can start with solid food between 4 and 6
months. This takes getting used for the child, as getting
used to solid food, to new tastes, to being fed with a
spoon, to the drinking cup. In general, feeding is easier
from 6 months. Especially if the child is hungry, you can
register that it is less picky.
The feeding of your child does not always go
smoothly.
Where can you think about and how to react as a pa-
rent?
551
From one year on the child can eat together with lunch.
The eating behavior is influenced during that period by
the taste that is beginning to develop, creating a taste
preference. Also wanting to eat more independently has
an influence on his eating behavior, such as what it does
eat and how much.
From the second year of life, the growth rate decreases
sharply. This results in a decrease in the appetite of the
child. This therefore does not have to cause anxiety
among parents.
In the toddler phase, the basis is generally laid for nutri-
tional and eating habits. The child is very dependent on
what their parents offer and what they do. The child is
greatly influenced by their eating and eating habits.
It goes not always smoothly
There is not always a problem-free development and
food problems can occur. For example, your child may
eat too little or too much, do not eat what you are aiming
for and is picky, especially eating what is not healthy or
nutritious, and have a penchant for sweets and snacks in
between, can not or do not want to sit at the table. Ea-
ting too slowly is often accompanied by a lot of whining,
doing something contrary, and playing with food, such as
overturning his cup or eating food with his hands.
552
You can especially look at the child and try to find out
what its eating behavior is a sign of. For example, the
underlying reason for eating problems may be that your
child is not hungry, or is very tense: it is too busy, anxi-
ous, insecure about something, has a frightened expec-
tation, experiences the pressure created around ea-
ting. Your child may be ill or show the first signs of pain
or discomfort : teeth are coming through, intestinal
cramps, a cold, it is just tired. Possibly your child also
looks for attention or wants to say something with his
eating behavior. Also drastic changes such as a new en-
vironment and other people can temporarily disrupt the
appetite of the child. Before you think of anything else,
it is good to exclude a possible physical cause. This way
you can also bring the food time forward if you notice
that your child shows signs of fatigue during the meal.
To overcome these eating problems, it is best to avoid a
power struggle or fight with your child. It is better not to
force, this may elude dislike and resistance, it may also
be counter-productive. So you better not express
threats, such as no dessert or extra if your plate is not
empty. You may prefer to let ask for more than to offer
too much. This way you avoid an unhealthy relationship
with food.
Better you can use spontaneity, self-evidence, encoura-
gement, stimulation, prizes for every step. In this way
you prevent awakening negativity or weakness. Better
553
also avoid subassertive reactions as whining and con-
stantly talking about it, without believing that it
helps. Sometimes you notice that your child does eat
well with someone else. This may be because your ap-
proach easily generates resistance, it provokes a certain
eating behavior pattern. Or your approach allows resis-
tance. If necessary, you can gain inspiration from whoe-
ver succeeds.
Atuning to your child
Better you can see the eating assignment in relation to
the child and his needs: such as choosing smaller quan-
tities, and avoiding breakers.
Instead of a few large meals, you can opt for multiple
small meals spread over the day. For example, three
meals a day is a habit rather than a necessity. A child can
quickly feel satiated or the feeling of satiety can be ab-
sent as a result of not paying attention to smell and
taste. The child may have been confronted with this pre-
maturely and has not learned to pay attention to smell,
taste and satiety.
With small meals you can not provide more than 2 to 3
hours between two feeding moments, this can be obtai-
ned by snacks, without having to eat outside these
meals. Not the amount per meal is important, you can
better monitor the amount per day. So you can keep
554
track of whether your child receives the necessary nu-
trients. If your child looks good, grows sufficiently and is
lively, it will in principle receive sufficient nutrition.
The question can be asked what is good or sufficient
food. This depends on the nutritional needs of your
child's body and his eating needs. Is it, for example, in
growth or very active? The nutritional need can vary ac-
cording to the growth periods, but also from day to
day. As a parent, it is important not to extinguish the sig-
nals of your child's needs, including hunger and thirst, for
example by ignoring them. After all, the hunger and fee-
ling of satiety determine the eating behavior of your
child.
Make food into something familiar
Fixed and regular eating times are preferred. Eating ti-
mes that you indicate at time so that your child can tune
in on time. It is preferable to provide sufficient food time
in a suitable environment. Best you can try to have the
meals in a relaxed and pleasant atmosphere. If it can as
a jointly situation. By eating with you, you are also a mo-
del as a parent. Here you can pay attention to your reac-
tion for what you do not like and the meaning of this for
your child. Leaving the food entirely to your child will
usually not work, but you can take your child into ac-
count. Also exaggerated eating games can be better
avoided, at most occasionally, such as a spoon for this or
that, etcetera.
555
Sufficiently varied meals are preferable. This way your
child can learn to eat everything without having to eat
all. Learning can be done in steps and in combination, a
bite of something to taste, so it can get used to the
taste. If necessary, you can prepare the food diffe-
rently. Or you can search for healthy alternatives for
what your child does not like.
If necessary, you can clear the table so everyone has
eaten even though the child has little taken inside. Clea-
ring without comment, neither negative nor positive. So
you avoid a downward spiral. Do not pay any attention
to your child. After a certain amount of time, make sure
to remove the plate without any conditions, if the child
does not eat.
What can actually help
You can give your child attention if it eats properly. You
can also actively involve your child, such as boarding its
own plate, or preparing its own sandwich.
Toddlers who want to eat independently can you give a
practice option. This way the child will quickly spill and
fail less. You can emphasize what goes well. Rather than
focusing on his inertia or what goes wrong. A child often
has a hard time talking to it contiously and remembering
what is and what is not.
556
Do not give your child too often and too many snacks, if
little appetite. Do not offer a substitute for not eating:
cookies, sweets, drinks. If possible give a healthy snack
as an alternative : fruit, fruit juice, cheese. Cookies and
sweets at the most immediately after the meal. No
snacks just before the meal.
Avoidance of one-sided diet, in which the child only eats
what it really likes, and the child takes the lead in eating,
instead of the child being guided. Better you can let your
child choose between two equivalent foods. For
example, it can be noted that skimmed products slow
down appetite less.
Small snacks and good chewing can help so that satiety
can occur in time. A healthy drink also helps to feel satia-
ted. This especially for children who have a tendency to
eat too much.
You can make a distinction for yourself between caring
attention and problematic attention. This way you can
invite your child and, if necessary, stimulate it wi-
thout forcing, controling or obliging it. You can pay at-
tention to your statements, such as starving, becoming
ill, disappointing if not eating. You can avoid to culpabi-
lize your child and making it anxious. You can also avoid
showing your concern too clearly. It is best to assume
that your child wants to eat, and not to question eating.
557
Do not too quickly activate one of the following interpre-
tation schemes : again, always, every time, only you,
constantly, can it be different, lasting. Or to activate such
a pattern beforehand.
If there is no clear reason for not eating, focus not too
much attention on not eating. Better let that problem
pass. Still, follow whether the child eats enough and, in
particular, drinks enough.
In case of problems you can try to visualize your influ-
ence on your child's eating behavior. When do you inter-
vene, such as with stress, anxiety, no reaction, unwanted
reaction. What do you think about eating behavior and
desired eating behavior, such as how much food, pace of
eating, independency of eating, eating everything. How
do you try to influence eating behavior, such as removing
tension, excitement, fear, or just the opposite. And what
can you do or could you change so desirably in this.
It is not always a good idea to compare your child's ea-
ting behavior with the eating habits of other children.
Very special can be the situation of premature babies,
seriously ill newborns and children with severe birth de-
fects. Their early eating experiences can be linked to un-
pleasant situations such as intensive medical care. Parti-
558
cular attention should be paid to food refusal or resis-
tance as a result of all unpleasant experiences in the
mouth area, and the possible lack of hunger.
Every child is just different: the growth rate is different,
the learning experiences are different, the history is dif-
ferent, the situation is different. In addition to what is
generally desirable, you can pay special attention to the
needs of your child and adjust your feeding behavior ac-
cordingly. This way the eating behavior of your child and
your feeding behavior for your child are better aligned.
Your ideas about nutrition ... and the reality of your child
Find out which of your ideas about nutrition do not match
the reality of your child:
Find out what you can do about these ideas to bring them
more in line with your child:
Consider what to do to your child's eating habits to bring
it more in line with your ideas about nutrition:
559
Referential
guidance
A brief overview of the referential thinking and working
model and some concrete practical illustrations of refe-
rential assistance and guidance
The theory
Care workers and training workers have the tendency to
ask someone with a disturbed relationship with his or
her environment questions such as these: why did it hap-
pen that you feel or do so? Or why do you feel or
do so? Or what does that person feel or do? Or what do
Something that is going to turn around something
gets attention,
so that something more favorable can happen:
what about?
560
you feel and do? Behind these questions are different
explanatory and assistance models. By what, refers to
behaviorism and psychoanalysis. Why, refers to psycho-
analysis and client-oriented assistance. For what, refers
to system thinking. Finally, what for, refers to the con-
textual thinking model.
However, one question has remained : what is your fee-
ling and doing about ? Where the first question had to
do with the situation by which, the second with the
needs why, the third with the influence to which, the
fourth with the right for which, has the remaining ques-
tion to do with to what you came and hold on to your
way. Name it where around or whereto around. Where
it revolves around to where.
Behavior often has something very personal and is some-
times difficult to influence directly and immediately, as if
someone is following an invisible line somewhere, as if
from an arrow or a direction indicator. Earlier outside in-
fluences, such as encouragement and discouragement,
may explain the nature of the behavior, but not so much
the endpoint. On the other hand, needs, influence and
right can determine the start and ending points, but less
the way. If both the way and direction are to be mapped
out, then it seems necessary to pay attention to both the
road and the final goal to which.
561
The referential model described here offers room for
this. This model indicates what we refer to in our beha-
vior, both in terms of both object and road, so that it
does not come across randomly, but rather inwardly. In
English they talk of 'revolve around', which in the scien-
tific literature stands for as having something or some-
one as the most central or most important interest or
subject; or also having something as a very important
part or goal; or also being connected with or related to
something.
The model can be situated in the extension of the con-
textual model, in the sense that where the contextual
model focuses primarily on values and norms, doing jus-
tice, in this model there is attention for ideas and convic-
tions at a more abstract level, as more comes to the fore
in a social constructionist or cognitive constructivist mo-
del. In view of the fact that ideas are content-free, in the
sense of being able to have any content, the content can
relate to something very abstract-ideal, but of course
also to something very concrete-real. This offers this
model the opportunity to pay attention to the various
existing models and to integrate these into its own wor-
king model. The term reference refers here fully to being
able to refer to reality very pragmatically, but also to
convictions very principled, and of course to everything
that can be interpreted, such as needs, interests and
rights.
562
The links to the cultural, the cognitive and the virtual are
immediately indicated. Where cultural something is pre-
sent collectively, the cognitive presents something per-
sonal, while the virtual presents something potential.
Three elements to which a lot of attention goes in the
referential model, for the orienting, guiding and limiting
share they have in someone's behavior and in someone's
interaction. Like, for example, making something availa-
ble so that it can be realized and it can be sorted out how
to reach it. Concepts such as 'in the sign of' or 'in func-
tion of' approach this somewhat. For example, for Jan
Rosier of the University of Louvain, the family is a school
for togetherness, solidarity, friendship and justice, which
is at risk of being lost.
As a central concept that interconnects one and another,
the cognitive scheme is used. A cognitive scheme sum-
marizes a person's personal knowledge and experience
in a given domain as an organized presentation. This re-
presentation relates to what of this domain, to the how
of it and to the where, when, to whom, why or for what
purpose. The cognitive scheme is divided into three
parts : the filling of the concept or what that applies to
someone, the behavioral filling or how that applies to so-
meone and the contextual filling or the where, when, to
whom, why or what that applies to someone.
563
This is in line with the recent notion 'situated cognition'
(situated cognition) of Lave and Wegner in which lear-
ning is also linked to an activity and situation or context
and not separate from it. This immediately means that
this activity and situation promote learning. In this way
all knowledge is also 'know-how' and situated know-
ledge, which interation and context - social and cultural
- are part of it.
A person's schema filling takes place in imitation of mea-
ningful others, himself and/or an objective. This creates
a very individual psychological filling with its own mea-
ning and design, which personally colors a person's be-
havior. Someone immediately becomes an active parti-
cipant in the construction and possible reconstruction of
his own reality and indirectly of the social reality. And
secondly, in the orientation, direction and limitation of
own and group behavior.
Schemes can be very limited or very comprehensive. To
relate to rather impersonal things, but also to one's own
life. Behaviorally they have an orienting, guiding and li-
miting function.
The engagement or activation of schemes is usually
bound on the one hand with objectives, on the other
hand with situations and persons. The interplay bet-
ween the situation, the person and the objective can be
564
displayed in a schema, so that the behavior is given con-
tent and form. The activating elements can be very spe-
cific, or more general.
By working on one's schemes or by working on the use
of schemes, one can try to get the disturbed relationship
of someone with his environment smooth. In the wor-
king model there is therefore a lot of attention for exis-
ting processes of schema set-up and use. The wakened
activation, the self-selected activation, the triggered ac-
tivation and the external and internal extinguishing de-
activation are dealed with.
But also a whole series of other underlying processes are
described that can be referred to in behavior and inter-
action and can be worked on. As referring to solutions,
to processes, to knowing-how, to influence, to what so-
meone wants, to the future, to the strong side, to the
confident part, to the positive side, to personal life, to
origin, to emotionality, to wordings, to stories, to synthe-
ses, to second order, to connections, to embedding, to
speaking, to what is useful rather than to problems, to
symptoms, to defenselessness, to powerlessness, to
what someone wants to avoid, to past or present, to
weak side, to uncertain part, to negative side, to imper-
sonal life, to cause, to rationality, to self-evidence, to
facts, to basic experience, to first-order experience, to
differences, to exclusion, to rejection, to what corres-
ponds.
565
What has been described above at individual level also
applies at group level. Here too, processes of schema
building and deployment and subsequent underlying re-
ferential processes are employed. Moreover, a certain
exchange between individual and group-based referen-
tial processes is perceptible.
It can be established that deviating from what serves as
a reference or is setted in, can feel uncomfortable and
inferior and can evoke resistance. Schemes thus repre-
sent reality, recognition, belonging, efficacy, justice, cor-
rectness and safety. Preference is easily given to what
does not deviate from that reality, which is not unknown,
which does not isolate or involve risks, which does not
seem ineffective, which does not feel unjust and which
is not perceived as incorrect. Thus, their own schemes
are preferred and appreciated, such as how to think,
feel, want and react, especially because they were there
before and are therefore more familiar. This easily of-
fers a preference in terms of environment, for example,
own culture, in terms of people, for example, own
friends, in terms of goals, for example, own ideals and
traditions. This offers an easy feeling and a sense of ad-
ded value and easily evokes following. This way schemes
can be very helpful if healthy, because they are easily fol-
lowed up both in observation and in execution. But for
the same reasons they can also be very inhibitory for ob-
serving and acting if problematic. Fixed way and content
of perception, fixed manner and content of acting. This
566
way someone's perception and reaction can seem very
irrational. The situation or the goal requires a completely
different perception and reaction, but it does not
work. One keeps sticking to his activated schema that
can not suddenly change at once. For example, this be-
havior is considered to be unrealistic, inefficient, un-
weighted, unprofitable, unusable or disrupted. Even if
someone sees this himself, he can not simply leave his
perception and reaction behind him and distance him-
self from it.
If interaction deviates from the used schemes, this easily
evokes emotions, that only can be released altogether so
that the referential can evolve - which demands effort -
or - as is usually expected - returns to the referential :
the deviant of the reality, of the known, of accepting and
belonging, of what is working, of what is just, of what is
right, must first be put in order. Brought to reality, to the
known, to the accepted and the belonging, to the active,
to the just and to what is right. So that inhibitions and
resistances can be overcome and the other can be rea-
ched and approached in a different way.
In addition to what individually or possibly jointly serves
as reference point(s) and in addition to what the refe-
rence shares and ratios are, there is plenty of attention
for what counts as a negative or positive reference pool,
and attention is given to where, in interaction, perso-
nally or jointly, the reference core will be placed.
567
Schemas are sometimes called 'sensitive strings' or 'pit-
falls'. This is true if they relate in an unfavorable way to
someone himself or herself (for example, inferiority, vul-
nerability, failure, high demands or excessive criticism)
or if they relate in an unfavorable way to his or her rela-
tionship or interaction with others in his or her environ-
ment (for example, dependency, submission, seeking re-
cognition, self-sacrifice or appropriating rights). They
then give fixed patterns that easily pop up in someone
and often work unfavorably for him or her and for his or
her environment. Because someone gets stuck easily,
schemes are also called 'magnets'. Magnets that easily
confirm or attract certain 'evidences' and hold off or re-
pel what does not fit. As : 'I am constantly confronted
with problems that I quickly notice, while I do not see
what works.' Especially in a therapeutic framework,
terms such as 'sensitive string', 'pitfall' or 'magnet' are
used.
The referential model allows what is linked and refers to
each other in its coherence and visualization, to place in
its proper context and to help on the way from a new
perspective. This way connections can be made visible
and what makes reference to something else made
aware. This way the larger picture can be mapped. As a
result, possible obstacles can be detected and forces re-
leased. This way difficulties can be given a place and pro-
blems solved. Like, for example, how negative expe-
riences can stand in the way, or how someone remains
568
excessively stuck to unusable beliefs, or how certain
emotions and desires stand between someone and his
environment, or how someone threatens to fall victim to
unrealistic plans or unattainable dreams, and more.
Where reference is made would ultimately be the refe-
rent. The referent stands for the reality that is referred
to in language. In view of the fact that reality can not be
understood in itself and reality always presents itself as
the reality for us, reference is in fact made to the named
reality, also philosophically called the world. These as-
signments can be found in cognitive schemes, a kind of
representation or progressively constructed 'theory' of
reality. Cognitive schemes then refer to reality by pres-
enting them to us.
According to Wikipedia, in semantics (linguistics) with re-
ferent is meant an entity, event or property in the - usu-
ally linguistic - reality where reference is made to lingual
elements (words, phrases or whole sentences). Thus, ac-
cording to a first semantic movement, we use the refe-
rential language theories, language to describe some-
thing in reality. According to a second movement, the re-
presentational language theories, we make a connection
between language and mental representations. Bringing
together these two streams means a double reference:
one, language that refers to representations of reality
and two, representations that refer to reality.
569
Where this thinking and working model can appear ra-
ther abstract and little practical, it was specifically imple-
mented in a social-emotional skill development training
package for adults and young people. The training
package was included in the practical guide 'Eye for your-
self and the other!' This practical guide elaborates the
referential model in terms of content and method very
detailed in a hundred themes, with many illustrations
and examples. The intention was to provide a well-deve-
loped methodology from a completely new para-
digm. Paradigm that lies in the line of further and ex-
pected developments in the care services.
The referential working model is therefore a blueprint of
a richly varied and versatile work form that can be ap-
plied in various domains, ranging from education and
training, through guidance, programming and organi-
zation, to assistance and therapy. It can be used in both
problematic and non-problematic situations as a set of
insights and methods that are integrated in a coherent
context.
570
Practice
Illustrations of referential assistance and guidance
Working on problems can be done in different ways. Pro-
blems can be tackled on the surface as soon as they
become visible. Problems can also be tackled in depth
before they become visible. Attention can then be focu-
sed on the underlying processes that give rise to the ex-
perienced problems. In the past, people have always
looked for various ways to tackle something, a problem
or an assigment. One approached with this methodo-
logy, someone else with another.
Here a referential model is proposed in which the diffe-
rent solution methods take place. Referential refers to
what is referred to when approaching something.
A practical example:
Many people who seek help have a hard time coming
into their own in their contact and dealings with others
without losing the other. It seems to them a dual
choice. Either to stand up for themselves and then get
isolated because they repel others. Either self-effacing
and letting go and thus win the sympathy and others for
themselves. The cognitive schemes that they use here
do not offer them many opportunities.
In this way, being kind will be filled in and answered in a
negative way.
being nice is: (NEGATIVE WAY)
571
.. allow everything .. (refer to situation)
.. self-effacing .. (refer to yourself)
.. give all attention to the other .. (refer to
another)
.. always stay nice .. (refer to relation)
.. not respond to perceived injustice (refer to
context)
.. neglect your beliefs .. (refer to
frame)
or is kind to them: (POSITIVE WAY)
.. allow what you feel good about .. (refer to
situation)
.. also let yourself come into its own .. (refer to
yourself)
.. to divide attention between yourself and the other ..
(refer to other)
.. being nice if it can, set limits if necessary ..
(refer to relation)
.. let come into its own with which to make..
(refer to context)
.. where you stand for you know to integrate in your
dealings ..(refer to frame)
Depending on whether you refer to the concrete situa-
tion on the surface, or deeper to yourself, the other per-
son, your relation, the environmental context or your
conception framework, you will be nice in another way,
for example.
572
This reference can be done in a negative way, by taking
the element you refer to as it is and by paying little or no
attention and care to it. In fact by ignoring or neglecting
what you refer to in some way and not to refer to what
you want in exchange.
Do you neglect a situation of abuse, let you use yourself,
are you afraid to turn your relationship upside down, do
you want to forget your own past, do you not want to
take into account what you find important, then you of-
ten come out badly. This can sometimes be experienced
too late. It is then rather as something to avoid (away
from).
However, this reference can also be done in a positive
way : by paying attention and care to the various ele-
ments. In your love, you pay attention to the concrete
situation by getting it in order. In other words, you can
do this on the surface, but also more deeply as fol-
lows. In being dear you pay attention to yourself not to
allow yourself to be used, let alone abused. In your love,
you give your attention to the other by involving the
other person in finding a solution. In being nice you give
attention to your relationship, it is precisely because of
this that you want to pick something up, talk it out and
arrange it. In being nice you give your attention to your
context, which is customary for everyone you do not
want to let go or exclude. In being nice you give atten-
tion to your framework, what is essential for you, you
573
want to express and realise as good as possible. This is
then what you want to achieve (on the way to).
Your attention, care and well-being for the other often
has to do with meeting the (attachment) needs of the
other person. Let me show your attention and care to me
and to bring about well-being for me. As you approach
me, you meet my (attachment) needs, so that I can feel
connected to you, in my own way - possibly back to my
childhood. Rather than facts and arguments in interac-
tion, this involves recognizing and dealing with existing
basic feelings and underlying (attachment) needs. Emo-
tion-oriented therapy points in that direction.
Depending on what you say and do in the end, you can
deduce what is prioritized for you and what does not
matter or does not have to come into its own. Are you
rather pragmatic or are you principle, for example.
In all, six types of rewards can be distinguished, that each
in their own way are responsible for the development of
schemes. They each have their own source that lies at
the root or origin of appreciative rewards. These six
types of remuneration are : actual remuneration, inter-
nal remuneration, external remuneration, relational re-
muneration, contextual remuneration and cultural re-
muneration. They are each assigned by another source:
the factual by reality, the internal by oneself, the exter-
574
nal by others, the relational by the relation, the contex-
tual by the context and the cultural by the thought fra-
mework. Here, the reality may be a source of appreci-
ation to oneself, or is there agreement with something
valued in itself, or is there agreement with something va-
lued by others or the relationship, or is there agreement
with something valued in the context or in the thought
framework. The rewards are always supported by the
released hormone dopamine in the brain. The onpare
rewards (factual, external and contextual) refer to some-
thing more momentous and varying. The pare rewards
(internal, relational and cultural) refer to something
more permanent and stable. These rewards together
with the liberated dopamine ensure that the contents of
the schemes are strengthened. This may concern con-
tent already present, supplemented content, or new
content. In this case there is successively recognition,
supplementation after recognition and apprecia-
tion. Particularly in the case of recognition, the combi-
nation of understanding and expectation can then be
very reinforcing.
From a development perspective:
The filling and limitation of your own thinking and doing
- what is, for example, being nice, what is it not, how is
being nice, how is it not - and what you give attention
and what counts for you, you can watch from a develop-
ment perspective. From a certain research angle (Kohl-
berg) it then comes to the fore that in the age group of
575
four to ten years only attention is given to and an ac-
count is taken of the reality - in which there is something
at stake - and with possible consequences and reactions
in it. Being nice for the disadvantage that it saves. Sub-
sequently, attention is given to and taking into account
one's own needs and what someone himself meets. Be
nice to the benefit that it delivers. In the age of ten to
thirteen years, there would first be attention to and con-
sideration of the other person, his attitude and reaction
to you. Be nice to please the other person. Then it would
be to pay attention to and take into account group ex-
pectations and agreements in order not to disrupt the
existing relation or relationship. Being nice because we
expect and hope this from each other. From adoles-
cence onwards, when filling in and defining his thinking
and doing, the adolescent would focus on and take into
account the broad context. Being nice because it be-
longs to and is valued in society and you want to take this
into account. And this could evolve in bringing the self
into the forefront of and weighing up a self-made, more
universal frame of reference. You can not live without
love and you do not really come to life, until you have
discovered that.
This could mean that in someone's saying and doing suc-
cessive elements come forward and are central to suc-
cessively causing someone to do what does not cause
problems in reality, doing what gives satisfaction, does
what is accepted by others, does what corresponds with
576
rules and attitudes, does what someone himself agrees
with the broad environment and finally does what some-
one thinks is okay. A question will then be answered (or
not taken into account) in order to avoid problems in re-
ality, if something is received in exchange, to please the
other, to comply with the rules, to respond to the social
reality, to respond to your own reality. So in succession
for something in reality, the social reality and the perso-
nal reality.
Especially the successive motivations of a person's
judgment and actions are central to this development
concept. Where initially between four and ten years so-
meone's judgment and reaction are motivated by no col-
lision with reality, they are subsequently motivated by
meeting their own needs. From ten years to thirteen
years of age, a person's judgment and reaction is moti-
vated by no collision with others, then by no collision
with rules and organization in the group. From adoles-
cence, the motivation for judgment and action can be
found in wanting to meet the broad context in order to
eventually lead to a motivation based on their own
frame of reference. It is of course important to state in
this view that this is what is usually found in research in
various countries. These findings may be closely related
to existing parenting patterns, which means that diffe-
rent parenting patterns might yield different re-
sults. What can cause a lot of thinking, given that the re-
577
search shows that few reach the post-conventional ado-
lescent level (from and for or because of themselves and
the others) and most of them get stuck in pre- (from or
for the sake of themselves) and conventionally (from or
for the sake of the other) level.
A model presentation:
In relational situations, especially when they are conflic-
ting or problematic, one can see that one is more or less
inclined to refer to certain of these mentioned ele-
ments. This then yields four possible interaction and
communication patterns within a three-axis representa-
tion model:
the horizontal axis of the assertiveness: with attention
and care for issues & attention and care for themselves
the vertical axis of the cooperative with attention and
care for the other & attention and care for the rela-
tionship
the depth axis of solidarity and universality with atten-
tion and care for the context & attention and care for the
(reference) framework
578
. If mutual attention is only paid to assertiveness, there
is often a quarrel and a furious reaction is easily expres-
sed.
. If only attention is given to cooperation, one easily fol-
lows or accomodate to one another and his expectations
and doesnt want to fail, which leads to an adaptive res-
ponse.
. If no attention is given to self-defense or good team-
work, then one decides to disagree, no longer being able
The following simplified presentation can be found in every-
day language:
In daily practice you notice that some people mainly follow
their head (ratio - what is learned), others their heart (fee-
ling - what is felt), or still others their intuition (sensing -
what they want). Your intuition as close to yourself as what
to want, your heart as close to your relationships as what
to feel, and your head as close to your context as what is
learned and thought.
Some only follow their desires and fantasies, others only
their feelings, others just what is learned and thought.
A mix of the three elements, in which each of the three is
taken into account simultaneously, may offer added value
here. If, for example, you only follow your head as what you
were taught, this may conflict with your intuition as you
choose. For example, always be accommodating as held up
by others, while you yourself absolutely do not want some-
thing.
579
or willing to discuss or pick up something, which leads to
a mutually avoiding reaction.
. By both caring for yourself and what is at stake and the
other person and your relation can through a exploration
of problems and possible solutions and a consultation
and negotiation be reached a cooperative action. Which
ultimately means the most chances in time. Certainly if
traditions and customs are also taken into account and
with what each finds worthy and valuable. This way you
can refer to multiple elements.
This care for yourself and the other can be demonstrated
by interest and involvement. Best can be given each
other mutual guarantee in advance that each of the ele-
ments and thus each will be sufficiently met. On the way,
we can search and strive to let the elements and thus
each come to its fullest right. In this way, the threat can
be removed for each and trust can be built up.
In some situations where confidence isn’t there and
there is a mutual sense of powerlessness, it is possible to
first choose to restore trust from the need for each other
which can experienced by the underlying feelings of po-
werlessness. From this relationship rehabilitation with
recognition by the other person, can be found willing-
ness within each to work on problems that are often ac-
companied by stress. In the attachment-based family
therapy, there is plenty of attention for this.
580
Central to this is working on trust using the recognition
of mutual emotions that refer to mutual relationship
needs. This relationship and recognition can then form a
basis for working on problems through the development
of appropriate competencies.
With all this, you can establish that attention and care
you spend on the situation also immediately focus on
content and care for yourself. But also vice versa, if you
pay attention and care to yourself, this also implies that
you pay attention and care to the situation.
The same applies to attention and care that you spend
on the other person, this also means that you pay atten-
tion and care to your relationship. And, conversely, the
attention and care you devote to your relationship, also
immediately entails attention and care for the other per-
son.
Finally, the same applies to attention and care that you
spend on your context, which also means attention and
care for your whole of the mind. And conversely, the at-
tention and care you spend on your whole of thoughts,
also includes attention and care for the context.
For example, by paying attention to three elements, for
example situation, relationship and context, you would
immediately pay attention to the six distinct elements
581
(situation, yourself, the other, your relationship, the con-
text and your whole of the mind). Nice bonus !
However, this does not always go smoothly. This can
create tensions if context does not coincide with culture,
or if relationship does not coincide with others, or even
if it does not coincide with what is topical. In the first
case there is culture versus context, in the second case
group versus individual, and in the third case individual
versus topicality. Failure to coincide then easily creates
tensions.
An example of culture versus context is possibly a hou-
sing unit with multiple cultures; or a culture spread over
several housing units.
An example of group versus individual may be a rela-
tionship that is not met as a partner or as a parent or
child; or attachment needs of partner or child that are
not met within the partner or parent-child relationship.
An example of individual versus reality may then have to
do with self-neglecting on a matter; or matter, or a point
of attention that is not being fulfilled, to the benefit of
itself.
By offering space for each other and allowing and provi-
ding variation, both can be more easily integrated.
582
Some, however, prefer to give preference or priority to
the context, or to the other or to the actual reality, res-
pectively. Others prefer the culture, or the relationship
or the individual self. The search for a combination and,
if possible, an agreement between each of them offers
the most possibilities and benefits.
You can asked yourself if in all of this, you let yourself be
guided by:
. what you perceive what is how as fact or fiction
. what you recognize what can be how done as okay or
not okay
. what you feel what to be how together or individually
. what you want what how happens as working or not
working
. what you imagine what is how allowed as right or
wrong
. what you think what you how find as right or wrong
Both in what you want to achieve (which something is)
and in the way (how something is) you can refer to one
or more of the mentioned elements. These reference
points can then be used as landmarks that indicate the
direction or as ending points as what to achieve. It is
about the extent to which how to make something
true. This level will easily determine the intensity and
flexibility with which to achieve something.
583
An example of parenting support :
When parents get stuck in their upbringing, it usually has
to do with something around which the parent-child re-
lationship has come to turn to a great extent. Something
that constantly repeats itself. Or something that does
not want to succeed. A difficulty occurs again and
again. You can not leave it behind. Even if you want as
a parent or a child, you can not manage it, no matter how
much you are trying.
You can then check if what it turns around or is about is
something you want. Or just something that you absolu-
tely do not want. You can check whether it is something
that is within your reach. Something with and for which
you can do something. If this is not the case, you can find
out how you can get it within your reach. So that you can
achieve what you want through the effort you make.
Imagine that your child is constantly making a fool of you
and doing completely different things behind your back,
then you may have opted for control. You can then no-
tice that no matter how much control you exercise, your
child will always try to keep everything in front of it. On
what it does outside your knowledge you do not have
any vision at all, let be control.
Where it then possible comes to turn around more and
more is silence and control. What is sure is that it doesn’t
lead to anything. You could then choose to let it revolve
584
around something else in your mutual interaction. Sa-
fety, for example, so that your child dares to talk about
what it experienced and is planning to do. In this way you
get more insight into the actions of your child and you
come closer to your child. This gives you more chances
to adjust in time and you gain more influence through
the growing trust.
You could also notice that your child easily divides you as
parents. The child seeks to be right with one of you and
constantly plays you out against each other. You could
then notice that it is always a coalition struggle of you as
parents to the coalition with your child. You could then
agree to let it run around a coalition between the pa-
rents. Parents who do not compete but follow each
other as much as possible and support each other, or
who together consult and agree on a joint answer and a
follow-up response.
As a parent, you can easily be dealing with your child who
does not want something new. It continues to do what it
always did and refuses to get stubbornly acquainted with
something new, let alone attempt to try and explore the
new. Instead of letting your reaction revolve around the
refusal of your child, you can choose to let it revolve
around your stimulation of your child. So you can find
out how you can stimulate your child and what you can
do, rather than being stuck in what your child did not
want and failed to do.
585
By always looking at which schema or which schema con-
tent does not work, you can choose a different schema
or schema content around which it can turn better, so
that more opportunities arise and the jamming can be
prevented.
An example of vulnerability :
Neither as a parent nor as a child, you like to be hurt in
contact with each other and therefore you try to avoid
this. However, as a parent and child you can become
very focused on this, which puts everything in the pers-
pective of possible hurting and being hurt and how to
avoid this and protect each other. This way you can pay
attention to possible hurting if you don't want to hurt
(for example, delaying as a parent or child to react until
it hurts hard). On the other hand, you can watch for pos-
sible hurt if you don't want to be hurt (for example,
fleeing everything and putting off as parent and child un-
til you are confronted with reality). This way you can also
pay attention to possible hurting if you don't want to be
hurt (for example, where you as a parent or child go on
the attack as a defense). Finally, you can pay attention to
possible hurt if you don't want to hurt (for example, by
living in a fantasy and thus limit yourself, or let yourself
be used). Fear of hurting or being hurt often plays an im-
portant role from an underlying current need for accep-
tance, confirmation and appreciation by others, but also
by oneself. Possibly from a low self-assurance and a low
self-confidence, in other words a pronounced feeling of
586
vulnerability. It is also possible that a hypersensitivity is
at the basis, which makes everything feels stronger.
About hurting there may be a fear of the reaction and
the consequences for the relationship with each other,
such as feeling misunderstood or rejected, or not being
experienced anymore as sweet. In this way it comes to
silence, accept, follow and admit, until it can no longer.
Information, advice, limitation or correction are easily
taken as personal, causing yourself and each other to
hold back because of a potentially hurtful experience.
Everyone is afraid to show his own vulnerability. That is
why it is easy to build a wall around oneself and to keep
a distance and there is little openness. Also, each own
feelings are sometimes kept at a distance to protect
themselves.
All this can be understood referentially as an insufficient
or unfavorable attention and care for oneself and for
each other in the upbringing situation. After all, favo-
rable attention and care for oneself and each other re-
quire communication and an approach to unspoken pro-
blems, needs, preferences and relationship with each
other, preferably as early as possible. It is precisely a
greater positive or favorable involvement in oneself and
each other that makes something not easily come across
as hurtful, because it was not intended that way, did not
come across that way and each can handle more. Open-
ness is then not confused with vulnerability, but as an
587
opportunity for understanding, support and confirma-
tion. Thinking, acting, and being in terms other than hur-
ting and being hurt can create space for something else,
such as involvement, closeness, support, and affirma-
tion. So it comes in education to revolve around
something else than possibly hurting and how to avoid
it. You touch each other like being touched and not as
hurting each other and you also allow each other to do
this. The way in which this is done, will be a determining
factor in this regard.
An example of hostility :
As a child, for one reason or another, you may find
yourself in a hostile environment characterized by dis-
trust, distance, lack of affection and involvement, an en-
vironment full of criticism, blame and accusation. As a
child you sense this and you easily react to it intuitively,
in order to still get attention and to force its own place.
The child then seems easily out of control. In fact, the
child is looking for acceptance, trust, love and warmth,
that shows affection and commitment. This will require
a friendly environment that no longer revolves around
hostility. An animosity that may also stem from a pre-
vious past of his own.
An example of mental (life) force :
By activating knowledge schemes about each other in in-
teraction, you bring each other to life. It is the child that
brings parenthood to life. No parent without a child.
588
Conversely, as a parent you also bring your child to life.
Without a parent, no child. By simultaneously activating
knowledge schemes about the interaction event while
interacting, the event comes to life. A story, a history and
possibly a future is created. Seeing each other with the
story of accepting and loving each other. Or avoid each
other with the story not to like and not loving each other.
Saying something (interaction) that triggers a lot in each
(story). Or say something (interaction) that leaves
everyone cold (no story). Without interaction there is no
story. Without a story there is no interaction. In this way,
knowledge schemes bring both an interaction event and
the actors to life.
An example of influenceability:
As a young person you can hardly be influenced from the
outside or inside. You seem stiff and inflexible. It seems
as if the youngster is attached to something internally or
externally and is sent through it. The environment does
not get access to him or her and has little or no control
over him or her. This is particularly evident when the
young person grows up in a difficult upbringing situation.
There can then be in you inner schemas more or less
fixed patterns present that guide you. They originate
from previous experiences in yourself or in your environ-
ment. This creates personal and social schemes that
become active in certain situations at certain times.
589
For example, for young people in a difficult situation, in-
dividual schemes such as 'I am worth little or nothing', 'I
am afraid' or 'I am constantly on the run'. These young
people are often looking for better life experiences that
they hope to find in other life situations. In these situati-
ons, the following social schemes may be developed:
'here I am someone', 'they reassure me and make things
recognizable to me', 'I can go to them and they make me
big and give me a sense of self-esteem '.
However unhealthy these situations may be, they help
you get away from your old schemes of weakness as a
youngster and exchange them for new schemes of
strength, even if you have to pay the (high) price of an
unhealthy situation. A situation that may involve use or
even abuse, from within your own vulnerability. For
example, you are more susceptible to drugs, dealing,
prostitution, loverboys, radicalization, and so on. Some-
times you also only know the illusion that new schemes
apply to you and the reality is usually different. Because
schemas are situation-based, the activation in one un-
healthy situation can not simply be transferred to ano-
ther healthy situation. This requires the acquisition of
new experiences in this new situation.
An example of limitation:
As a parent you want easily go against something you do
not want. However, much can stop you : yourself, who
does not want to come across as a limiter; your child,
590
where you do not want to go against and you want to
continue to regard as sweet; your relationship with your
child, who you does not want to endanger and who you
wants to keep relaxed. On this manner it is difficult.
You may be able to distinguish between attention and
care for your child as a person and attention and care for
your parent-child relationship. Your limitation has the
same goal of being able to keep loving your child and
finds its origins in your love for the child. You want to pay
attention and care to your child and his development.
You go against something, just because you care about
and love your child. You can also express this in your
reaction to your child : 'because you are important, be-
cause I love you, because I care about you, because you
matter'.
By responding in a timely manner, you also hope to se-
cure your relationship and not to endanger it. Just be-
cause we get along so well and can continue to do so, I
respond in time. As a parent, I also know that as a child
you also want to do a lot to maintain a pleasant rela-
tionship. So it can be that reacting against something
immediately turns out to be an opportunity to confirm
your affection towards your child and your bond with
each other. You might also get better, because at the
same time you can also pay attention and care to
yourself and to what you find important. In this way you
ultimately meet what you want, yourself, your child and
591
your relationship, this within a context of upbringing and
your whole of thoughts.
An example of border crossing, interactively real and in
expression virtually:
The model allows to specify when (criminal) boundaries
are exceeded in expressions and opinions, such as via so-
cial media, and effectively in real interaction. The 'demo-
nizing' present then can be situated at different levels:
real, personal, interactive, relational, contextual and cul-
tural. Respectively this manifests itself by threatening
(on a real level), insulting (on a personal level), inciting
(on an interactive level), discriminating (at relational le-
vel), humbling (on a contextual collective level) and con-
demning (on a cultural level). The targeted persons ex-
perience this as having to deal with threats, insults, inci-
tement, discrimination, humiliation and/or condemna-
tion. Immediately the contours are shown of what can
how instead be done in interaction with each other.
Finally:
The referential working model is a richly varied and ver-
satile work form that can be used in various domains,
ranging from education and training, through guidance,
programming and organization, to assistance and the-
rapy. It can be used in both problematic and non-proble-
matic situations. It offers a whole of insights and me-
thods integrated into a coherent whole.
592
The application
A selection of tools from the referential thinking and wor-
king model for you in concrete practice are shown.
Point out what appeals to you and what you find useful
in your situation :
593
referential model
concepts as :
where around
what
how
where, when,
to whom
. cognitive and memory scheme
. cognitive, virtual and cultural
. product information and process infor-
mation
. comprehension and behavioral filling
. basic and synthesis experience
. first and second order
. refer to seeing, feeling, thinking, doing
. refer to yourself and others
. deal with yourself and with others
. embeded and excluded
. openness and closedness
. bigger and smaller frame
. start and trace
. objective and subjective
. objectives and instrumentality
. parts and sides
. connections and deformations
. association and dissociation
. differences and commonalities
. small differences and big differences
. add and accelerate
. process thinking and progress
594
(P)referential parenting and guidance from a to z 12-
part scientific encyclopedia. - Hove (Antw.- Belgium),
2023.
ISBN 978-90-802113-7- 7 info@opvoeding.be
Keywords : development, parenting, guidance, child,
parents
Number of pages: 6000
Publ. : psychcom-research vzw, Hove
Chief editor: Jo Franck
Illustrations: i.a. BigStockPhoto.com
PART 1 ENCYCLOPEDIA: from A to El
(c) copyright 2023 (info@knows.ac)
All rights reserved. From this publication only something can
be reproduced, stored in an automated database, or made
public, in any form or by any means, electronically, mechani-
cally, by means of photocopies, recordings, or in any manner
whatsoever, after prior written permission from the author.
595
Jo Franck
Psychologist
Honorary Lecturer Social-Agogic Work Artesis Plantijn-
hogeschool Antwerpen (Belgium)
Editorial Council member Sozio Flemish-Dutch Maga-
zine for Social and Pedagogic Professions
Editor-in-chief E-Magazine Development & Guidance on
www.opvoeding.be
Author CD-ROM Preventing bullying can be learned!
Edition Youth & Peace
Author of 'How do I tell you? For your own communica-
tion culture ',' Eye for yourself and the other! ' on socio-
emotional skills development, 'Problem approach in
school context ' and 'Referential schema thinking and
practice for educational practice'
Coaching Social-Emotional guidance, problems like bul-
lying, parenting support, parental guidance
Jury member of the annually awarded 'The-bullying-
that-can-not-prize!' in Flanders
596
This encyclopedia aims to provide a
broader and more systematic innova-
tive framework for housing recent
scientific insights and research findings
on parenting and guidance.
Scientifically-based pedagogical pro-
cesses, mechanisms and contexts are
described and arranged in alphabetical
order. There is room for what is, but
also for what is preferable in parenting
and guidance. Especially the how of
what is and of what is preferable is dis-
cussed.
Jo Franck studied psychology, crimino-
logy and family and sexological scien-
ces and is for many years internatio-
nally active in social-pedagogic gui-
dance, training and editorial work.
ISBN 978-90-802113-7- 7